by Boaz Bismuth
The
only thing left was to iron out the differences on the language of the
deal -- that is what the sources kept feeding us, the flocks of
journalists who had descended on Geneva for the farcical nuclear talks.
The Iranians insisted that any interim deal must recognize their right
to enrich uranium, even if the level of purity would be capped at 5%.
The most the
West was willing to offer was to silently acknowledge this right by
mentioning Article IV of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty; although
there are so many problematic aspects in Iran's nuclear program, the
world chose to focus on the language of the agreement.
The past four
days could serve as a teachable moment, on four different dimensions.
First, the sanctions may have worked, but they apparently fell short
because Iran has yet to buckle. This is the only reason why Iran was not
willing to fully accept the West's demands.
Second, Iran's
civilian nuclear program is not really designed to serve civilian
purposes. Otherwise the Iranians would have not been so stringent in
their demands. Why did Iran want to enrich uranium, or build a
plutonium-producing heavy water reactor in Arak or limit the scope of
inspections? There is only one explanation for that -- they want a
nuclear bomb.
Third, the
smiling Iranian delegation was not authorized to talk about ending the
nuclear program. Its mission was limited to getting sanction relief,
nothing more.
Fourth,
ratcheting up the pressure on Iran would have forced Iran to accept the
West's demands and fully dismantle its nuclear program. That would have
been the only course of action that could have effected such a change.
Fifth, the world
subscribes to hypocrisy when it comes to Israel. (That is hardly a new
phenomenon.) It was business as usual on Wednesdays; the Western
negotiators continued smiling at their Iranian counterparts, just hours
after Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei talked about Israel
being wiped off the map. (How? Through the use of the Iranian nuclear
program? He did not specify.) The Western negotiators should have
scorned the Iranians, faulting them for what their leader had said. But
they stayed silent.
Sixth, the
difficulties encountered on the way to the agreement show that the
contours from two weeks ago were more than bad, they were terrible. Just
imagine what would have happened if France had not slammed the brakes
during the first round of talks? After meeting with Iranian Foreign
Minister Javad Zarif and European foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton
on Saturday, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry left for the Geneva city
center to buy chocolate for his wife. It is a pity he didn't buy Iran a
clock that would show the approaching deadline for the talks.
Boaz Bismuth
Source: http://www.israelhayom.com/site/newsletter_opinion.php?id=6431
Copyright - Original materials copyright (c) by the authors.
No comments:
Post a Comment