by Elliot Abrams
Having more money will embolden Iran's rulers and do nothing for its citizens, who detest the tyranny under which they live.
It was widely assumed that with the end of sanctions, Iran would "join the world" and become a less repressive state. To take just one example, the Iranian philosopher Ramin Jahanbegloo argued in Huffington Post that the nuclear deal created "the opportunity for Iranian civic actors to enable and empower Iran's civil society space" and "help the country to become more open, transparent and susceptible to international pressure on issues like the death penalty and the imprisonment of civic actors in Iran." Last summer, Reuters carried this story: "Iranian pro-democracy activists, lawyers and artists have thrown their weight behind last month's nuclear deal with world powers, hoping it will lead to a promised political opening that President Hassan Rouhani has so far failed to deliver."
Oh well. That was the last thing Iran's rulers had in mind, and they have acted quickly this week to crush such reformist efforts. Here's The Wall Street Journal account:
"Days after Iran secured relief from economic sanctions under a contentious nuclear deal, the country's powerful hard-liners are moving to sideline more moderate leaders who stand to gain from a historic opening with the West.
"Almost two-thirds of the 12,000 candidates who applied to run in next month's parliamentary elections were either disqualified by Iran's Guardian Council or withdrew."
Actually the picture is even worse: 99% of reformist candidates were rejected.
So the hopes that the nuclear agreement would lead to reform are vanishing very quickly. As is, and always was, logical: Reform was never the intention of the Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps, the Quds Force, the Basij thugs, or any of the groups and individuals that hold a monopoly on force and hold real political power in Iran. As we just saw in the seizure of American sailors in the Gulf, having more money will embolden Iran's rulers -- and do nothing for the vast majority of its citizens who detest the tyranny under which they live.
That's the real problem with the nuclear deal, and with the whole Obama approach to Iran since he became president. He has always sought an improved relationship with the Iranian regime, not with the Iranian people. When the people rose up in 2009, he was silent in the crucial early days -- because the uprising was inconvenient, threatening to spoil his diplomacy with the ayatollahs.
One cannot condemn Iranian reformers for seeing some hope in the nuclear deal. One can only feel sorry that the United States and others in the P5+1 made an arrangement with their oppressors that will likely lengthen the life of this criminal regime.
Elliot Abrams is a senior fellow for Middle East Studies at the Council on Foreign Relations. This piece is reprinted from Abrams' blog "Pressure Points."
Copyright - Original materials copyright (c) by the authors.