Fox
News contributor Joe Concha questions whether President Biden profited
off his son's 'shady' business dealings and criticizes Biden for failing
to commit to a Super Bowl interview.
Hunter Biden’s legal team has been at the center of
news coverage this month after it appeared to confirm the authenticity
of his laptop in a letter (only to try to backtrack 24 hours later). It
was a curious and gratuitous move for Biden and his counsel Abbe Lowell
as they called for criminal investigations into his critics, suggested
lawsuits against media, and even argued that the tax-exempt status of
some groups be rescinded by the IRS.
Now,
however, the team is moving in a far more precarious direction. They
seem to be adopting the strategy of Steve Bannon that resulted in his
conviction for contempt of Congress. Lowell categorically refused to
turn over material to Congress this week, leaving his client open to a
subpoena and possible prosecution. The move may have thrilled hardcore
Democrats, but it is the Republicans who should be most ecstatic with
Hunter's initial position.
Lowell has declared the oversight
investigation in the Biden family's alleged influence peddling as
illegitimate and has refused to turn over records related to its
investigation. In a letter to House Oversight Committee Chair James
Comer (R-KY), Lowell declared "Peddling your own inaccurate and baseless
conclusions under the guise of a real investigation, turns the
Committee into ‘Wonderland’ and you into the Queen of Hearts shouting,
‘sentence first, verdict afterwords.’"
The move comes after news
reports of a Democratic team forming around Hunter to attack potential
witnesses and adopt a scorched earth approach in litigation. Even in
personal matters, Hunter appears to be dispensing with his prior
cultivation of a tragic and besieged figure. Recently, Hunter moved to
block one of his daughters from using his surname.
HOUSE REPUBLICANS PRESS HUNTER BIDEN, JAMES BIDEN FOR BUSINESS DEAL DOCUMENTS
In
this latest matter, Lowell appears to be channeling the same strategy
of Steve Bannon who was ultimately charged with contempt and convicted.
At the time, I said that Bannon was asking for a contempt charge and
Biden appears to be replicating this same ill-considered strategy.
Lowell
would have been far smarter to turn over some material to the Committee
in good faith while seeking to negotiate on the scope of the inquiry. A
categorical refusal gives the Committee ample basis to issue a
subpoena. Lowell is simply wrong that there is "no legislative purpose"
in seeking information on possible influence peddling by the Biden
family that could involve the President himself. Such corruption
scandals have been part of congressional inquiries from the XYZ Affair
to the Teapot Dome scandal to the investigation of Trump family business
interests.
Lowell
left open the door to Comer convincing him of some "legitimate
legislative purpose" in meetings, but the letter went too far in its
categorical rejection of the initial demand. Comer is likely to balk at
having to convince Hunter Biden
of the "legitimacy" of his investigation. A court would likely support
the Committee's right to such evidence for financial and communication
records. While the Committee will not necessarily get everything, it is
likely to prevail on threshold issue of the right to such evidence.
In
the Bannon case, the Democrats spared little time in seeking a contempt
order. Just one week after Bannon missed a date to appear, they voted
out the contempt sanction of Committee, and it was quickly approved by
the House as a whole. It was contempt of Congress, as I said at the
time. However, Republicans opposed the sanction on the same grounds now being used by Lowell and some Democratic members.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE OPINION NEWSLETTER
Lowell
could tack back on his letter, as he did his earlier letter on the
laptop. However, he may have little time to do so. He just led the
foundation for the Oversight Committee to move quickly toward a subpoena
and ultimately a contempt sanction, if he maintains this position.
Lowell actually expedited the process for the House, shortening the
calendar for possible contempt proceedings. If this matter were to go to
the courts (either as a criminal contempt matter or an enforcement
matter, or both), there is now plenty of time for the Committee to
prevail in securing much of this material.
That would place
Attorney General Merrick Garland in a tough position. After years of the
Justice Department largely ignoring contempt sanctions, Garland moved
aggressively to prosecute Trump figures like Bannon. The failure to do
so with Hunter Biden would fuel concerns over political bias at the
Department.
The bill has come due on the alleged Biden influence peddling
operation. While Democrats and pundits have insisted that there is no
actual crime raised in such corruption, it is clearly a matter for
Congress to investigate. Otherwise, the Democrats will be in a position
of arguing that neither the courts nor Congress can pursue allegations
of corruption and foreign influence surrounding the President and his
family.
That is a fight that the Republicans should relish, and Hunter Biden just made it a lot easier.
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM JONATHAN TURLEY
No comments:
Post a Comment