by Greg Piper
CIA management overruled analysts' conclusions in favor of lab leak, retaliated when they protested "middle-of-the-night, anonymous rewrite" of their work, Gabbard's task force member says. CIA blasts Rand Paul for "bad faith" hearing.
Dr. Anthony Fauci didn't have to force himself into intelligence community discussions about the origin of SARS-CoV-2, whose emergence may have been facilitated by funding he provided a Chinese lab, according to a CIA whistleblower.
The IC "happily pursued" the then-director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, consulting with Fauci's "conflicted list of curated subject-matter experts" to settle on a natural-origin explanation for COVID-19, senior operations officer James Erdman told the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee on Wednesday.
This was despite analysts within IC agencies, many of them on "joint duty assignment" from the CIA, circulating papers early in COVID that "all the conditions were present for a lab leak," said Erdman, an Army Ranger and foreign service officer before joining the CIA in 2013.
It was Erdman's second appearance before the committee but the first in public, having testified before its members in a classified setting. Chairman Rand Paul, R-Ky., said that transcript is still undergoing classified review.
Last month, Erdman finished his joint duty assignment with the Office of the Director of National Intelligence Director's Initiatives Group, established by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard a year ago to restore trust and accountability to the IC.
CIA management overruled its own analysts' conclusions in favor of a lab leak and retaliated when they protested the "middle-of-the-night, anonymous rewrite" of their work, changing their assessment to a "non-call judgment," Erdman testified.
The agency "refused to comply with lawful oversight" as the DIG reviewed the IC's work on COVID origins and "illegally monitored" its personnel and contact with whistleblowers, even firing a contractor a day after the whistleblower met with DIG, he also said.
Fauci's hand-picked experts, which included Kristian Andersen, ran around the IC Community telling them there was no possibility of a lab accident.
— Paul D. Thacker (@thackerpd) May 13, 2026
Here's the report State Department's INR produced after a briefing from Fauci scientists. https://t.co/KIQ4US5oPp https://t.co/qYeK2F8JRi pic.twitter.com/z1xevDIGPP
The CIA also seized 40 boxes of files undergoing ODNI declassification, related to the Kennedy assassination and CIA mind-control project MK-Ultra, when DIG ceased its work, according to Erdman. The CIA's Freedom of Information Act page on MK-Ultra disappeared between Aug. 9 and Aug. 21 last year, archives show, yet still appears in Google search results.
Florida GOP Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, who chairs the Task Force on Declassification of Federal Secrets, scheduled a hearing on MK-Ultra for May 13 but announced its postponement the day before, citing "legitimate" hesitance to testify by three of four witnesses. She warned the CIA on Wednesday afternoon she'd be following up on Erdman's disclosure.
The CIA blasted Paul's committee for "bad faith" in a statement to Fox News as the hearing got underway, for "subpoenaing an Agency officer for testimony today without notifying CIA" after already getting his closed-door testimony.
"The witness testifying today is not appearing as a whistleblower in pursuit of the truth" but under Paul's subpoena, public affairs director Liz Lyons emphasized. "This proceeding amounts to nothing more than dishonest political theater masquerading as a congressional hearing," when the CIA assessed a year ago that COVID more likely leaked from a lab.
Erdman testified that there are 2,000 documents JUST IN THE FIRST TRANCHE of documents that ODNI is seeking to release, in accordance with the law that passed unanimously in 2023 to declassify documents related to covid origins https://t.co/PdcPbKVXUB
— Charles Rixey, MA MBA (c) (@CharlesRixey) May 13, 2026
Erdman confirmed to the Senate's Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations Chair Ron Johnson, R-Wis., that the CIA hadn't cleared his testimony and that he doesn't have a "game plan" for dealing with possible retaliation.
While it's a good sign that the CIA gave him a desk since his recent return from Gabbard's task force, Erdman said, he asked Johnson to "hold off" before publicizing more detailed allegations he gave Congress, as Johnson waved the sheet from the dais.
Paul and Johnson, with Erdman's support, called for a new congressional committee to review IC abuses as a sequel to the 1975-1976 Church Committee.
The CIA doesn't give Johnson "squat" in response to his subpoenas, the senator said, also pleading with the mainstream media to belatedly report his subcommittee's findings about the Biden administration's intentional burying of COVID vaccine injuries as early as March 2021, as alleged by a Food and Drug Administration whistleblower.
Committee Democrats also showed no interest in the hearing, with their complete absence noted by a "shocked" Johnson and Sen. Bernie Moreno, R-Ohio.
Erdman said he wished Democrats had shown up, because the parties must cooperate to "pull the purse strings when agencies are behaving poorly," as when the Justice Department refuses to prosecute bad actors. Moreno had just relayed that his constituents complained about the absence of "perp walks" for officials who allegedly covered up COVID origins.
We just completed the very successful COVID-Coverup Whistleblower hearing. I am very grateful for the whistleblower who came forward to tell the truth to the American people.
— Senator Rand Paul (@SenRandPaul) May 13, 2026
I wrapped up my remarks with a direct response to the CIA: https://t.co/ULywkxvxPj pic.twitter.com/VmLEjMunGP
'Cross-pollination' in the system makes gain-of-function research more dangerous
CIA science analysts "repeatedly concluded" a lab leak was most likely but the IC "buried, softened or withheld" that conclusion from Congress, Paul said in his opening statement summarizing Erdman's planned testimony.
Instead, a "small circle" of scientists, federal research grantees and IC advisers, including ODNI's Biological Sciences Expert Group, moved among agencies and briefings to coordinate the natural-origin narrative while falsely portraying their findings as the result of independent research, Paul said.
He noted BSEG advisers included University of North Carolina virologist Ralph Baric, who collaborated with Chinese virologist Shi Zhengli to conduct the gain-of-function research that may have unleashed COVID. Both also collaborated with Peter Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance, which Fauci used to pass through funding to Zhengli's Wuhan Institute of Virology.
UNC notified faculty Tuesday that Baric was retiring in June, two weeks after former Senate pharmaceutical corruption investigator Paul Thacker reported the feds had removed Baric from his National Institutes of Health grants and that UNC had put Baric on leave while refusing to cooperate with NIH officials to learn more about Baric's coronavirus research.
Like crazy coincidences? Dr. Ralph Baric is the UNC scientist most credibly to blame for creating SARS-CoV-2, outsourcing to Wuhan. The announcement of his retirement today comes from Dr. Nancy Messonnier, now at UNC who was at the CDC in 2020 when on Feb 24 she briefed the press… pic.twitter.com/loZnN5AI76
— Jeffrey A Tucker (@jeffreytucker) May 12, 2026
Fauci's role in the "coverup" was intentional, influencing the analytical process and findings through "injection points" to push his experts into the "orbit" of the IC, Erdman said.
The first, Feb. 3, 2020, was two days after Fauci's controversial phone call with virologists who initially thought COVID looked too bespoke to have emerged naturally but would soon write the natural-origin paper Proximal Origin. Paul called them "part of the same machine designed to reach the same conclusion," saying one received big grants after changing his mind.
The second, June 4, 2021, kicked off a 90-day study led by the National Intelligence Council. One of the officers questioned why they didn't have "a separate set" of experts since Fauci came from the world of public health, Erdman said.
No one directly came out and noted Fauci's conflict of interest for having approved funding for the Wuhan Institute of Virology, a possible source for the virus, according to Erdman. "It was more subtle than that" as reflected by emails his task force reviewed.
Fauci did "significantly influence" the change in analysis, with documentation showing the CIA leaning toward a lab leak on Aug. 12, 2021 but changing its mind five days later, Erdman said. "We have no idea why that changed" because the CIA won't provide documentation.
The IC's fear of the American public learning that their taxpayer dollars may have played a role in COVID's emergence was "part of the calculus" for the suppression of lab-leak, Erdman said, again emphasizing the subtlety of the thinking.
"There's sort of a zeitgeist that runs underneath the analysis," according to Erdman, saying a whistleblower justified not going public because "nobody wanted the lab-leak conclusion" and too many are "willing to make excuses for China." The motivation was not to spite Trump but "reluctance" to provide information that could be "geopolitically destabilizing."
The task force found a "much larger meta-problem sitting on top of COVID," the "cross-pollination" within the ecosystem, Erdman said.
The National Academy of Sciences, for example, helps devise policy on weapons of mass destruction and is also full of Chinese researchers. "If we're not careful, we're going to have Chinese researchers helping us draft U.S. WMD policy," he said.
The federal government's inability to "differentiate between public health and biodefense," and the "oversight-resistant ecosystem of life-science actors," makes gain-of-function research increasingly dangerous both at home and abroad, he said.
Changes after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks "muddled boundaries" between scientists, the military and the IC, according to Erdman. The system is "deliberately opaque and excessively redundant," with an infrastructure seemingly intended to worsen bureaucratic bloat.
"There was no oversight monitoring how this web of relationships influenced research, policy and public health in any holistic way" for more than 20 years, he said.
Greg Piper
Source: https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/coronavirus/fauci-infected-intelligence-community-covid-origin-probe-it-was
No comments:
Post a Comment