by Noa Amouyal
Rep. Ilhan Omar co-sponsored the original resolution, but ultimately votes against it.
Rep. Rashida Tlaib, Ilhan Omar, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Ayanna Pressley, during a news conference at the Capitol in Washington, July 15, 2019 | Photo: AP/J. Scott Applewhite |
The Israeli-Palestinian conflict continues to divide political opinion in the United States, as evidenced by the most recent resolution to come before the House. In an attempt to resolve the conflict through a negotiated two-state solution, the US House of Representatives on Friday passed the resolution in a 226 to 188 vote.
The four Democrats who opposed the resolution were Reps. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.), Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) and Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.) – freshmen Congresswomen euphemistically known as "The Squad."
Tlaib also criticized the bill, speaking out against it from the floor of the House adorned with a black and white keffiyeh wrapped around her shoulders. Invoking the language of the Civil Rights Movement in the US, opining that "separate but equal didn’t work in our country," in an egregious attempt to equate the two situations. She also argued that the resolution did not account for steps that Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has allegedly taken to ensure the demise of the two-state solution.
Ultimately, the bill was introduced as a rebuke to the Trump administration’s overtures to Israel’s right-wing, the House resolution supported a two-state solution, "recording opposition to any peace plan put forward by the Trump administration that doesn’t expressly call for an independent Palestinian state living side-by-side with a Jewish state of Israel," according to The Hill.
The sands are shifting with regard to the opinion in the legislature regarding the Israel-Palestine conundrum. Solid bipartisan support is becoming a thing of the past – especially when a figure as unpopular and divisive as 45 – is president. The bill was brought after a raft of Trump administration measures that the Democrats have criticized for endangering the so-called two-state solution; including moving the embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, Israel’s capital since 1949; recognizing Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights and punitive cuts of US aid to the Palestinians.
In addition, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo announced that there would be a shift in US policy vis-à-vis Israeli settlements in the Biblical heartland of Judea and Samaria. They would no longer be considered illegal under international law, a rebuttal of one of the Obama administration’s last pieces of business – to not veto UN Security Council Resolution 2334, which claimed their illegality.
For some commentators, the Squad’s decision to vote against the resolution was yet more evidence of their animus toward the world’s only Jewish state. This sentiment was echoed by House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Eliot Engel (D-NY) opening remarks from the floor. He decried the idea of a one-state solution, arguing that "Israel's right to exist as a state that is both Jewish and democratic is incompatible with a one-state solution, period," The Hill reported.
Similarly, international lawyer and political analyst Arsen Ostrovksy tweeted that none of them is interested in a two-state solution at all, rather the destruction of the state of Israel.
Source: https://www.israelhayom.com/2019/12/08/squad-opposes-houses-2-state-resolution-on-israeli-palestinian-conflict/
Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter
No comments:
Post a Comment