by Judicial Watch
Judicial Watch is the national leader in enforcing the NVRA.
(Washington, DC) Judicial
Watch announced today that it filed a lawsuit against Pennsylvania and
three of its counties for failing to make reasonable efforts to remove
ineligible voters from their rolls as required by the federal National
Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA). According to Judicial Watch’s
analysis of voter registration data,
these counties removed almost no names under NVRA procedures for
identifying and updating the registrations of those who have moved (Judicial Watch v. Pennsylvania, et al (No.
1:02-at-06000)). The lawsuit also points out that the Commonwealth has
over 800,000 “inactive” registrations on its voter rolls. One
Pennsylvania county almost immediately removed 69,000 inactive names
earlier this year in response to a Judicial Watch letter.
In
its complaint, Judicial Watch points out that the State’s abnormally
low number of removals under NVRA procedures designed to identify voters
who have changed residence indicates that it is not removing inactive
registrations as the law requires. According to data the State certified
to the Election Assistance Commission (EAC), in the most recent
two-year reporting period:
- Bucks County, with about 457,000 registrations, removed a total of eight names under the relevant NVRA procedures;
- Chester County, with about 357,000 registrations, removed five names under those procedures; and
- Delaware County, with about 403,000 registrations, removed four names under those procedures.
Judicial
Watch also argues that an abnormally high percentage of registrations
compared to the population over 18 years of age is an indicator “that
the jurisdiction is not taking steps required by law to cancel the
registrations of ineligible registrants.” It alleges that “[t]he
registration rates for Bucks, Chester, and Delaware Counties are high in
comparison to other counties in Pennsylvania, and high in comparison to
other counties throughout the U.S.” As of April 2020, Pennsylvania’s
own data shows it has over 800,000 inactive registrations.
Other Pennsylvania counties have acted to avoid being sued by Judicial Watch. On January 14, 2020, CBS Pittsburgh reported
that because of the threat of a lawsuit from Judicial Watch, Allegheny
County removed 69,000 inactive voters. David Voye, Elections Manager for
the county told CBS, “I would concede that we are behind on culling our
rolls,” and that this had “been put on the backburner.”
“Dirty
voting rolls can mean dirty elections – that’s one reason why we’re
going to court to force Pennsylvania to follow federal law to clean up
its voting rolls,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.
“Pennsylvania has to take the simple steps necessary to clean from its
rolls the names of voters, which number over 800,000, who probably have
moved away or died.”
Judicial Watch is the national leader in enforcing the NVRA.
Recently, a federal court ordered
the State of Maryland to produce complete voter registration records
for Montgomery County that include the registered voters’ dates of
birth. The judge found that Judicial Watch made “reasonable
justifications for requiring birth date information, including using
birth dates to find duplicate registrations and searching for voters who
remain on the rolls despite ‘improbable’ age.”
Judicial Watch recently filed a lawsuit against
North Carolina to force the state to clean its voter rolls that
included over one million inactive voters. In December 2019, Judicial
Watch provided notice to
19 large counties in five states that it intended to sue unless they
took steps to comply with the NVRA by removing ineligible registrations
from their rolls. In addition to North Carolina and Pennsylvania, Judicial Watch sent letters to counties inCalifornia, Virginia, and Colorado.
In 2018, the Supreme Court upheld a voter-roll cleanup program that resulted from a Judicial Watch settlement of a federal lawsuit with Ohio. California settled an
NVRA lawsuit with Judicial Watch and last year began the process of
removing up to 1.6 million inactive names from Los Angeles County’s
voter rolls. Kentucky also
began a cleanup of hundreds of thousands of old registrations last year
after it entered into a consent decree to end another Judicial Watch
lawsuit.
Despite
successful litigation by Judicial Watch to bring counties and states
into compliance with the NVRA, voter registration lists across the
country remain significantly out of date. Judicial Watch’s 2019 study
found 378 counties nationwide that had more voter registrations than
citizens old enough to vote, i.e., counties where registration
rates exceed 100%. These 378 counties combined had about 2.5 million
registrations over the 100%-registered mark. This is a drop of about one
million from Judicial Watch’s previous analysis of voter registration data in 2017.
Judicial
Watch Attorney Robert Popper is the director of Judicial Watch’s
Election Integrity initiative. Judicial Watch is being assisted by H.
Christopher Coates of the Law Office of H. Christopher Coates, and by
Jonathan S. Goldstein of Goldstein Law Partners, LLC in Hatfield,
Pennsylvania.
Judicial Watch
Source: https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-releases/jw-sues-pa-voting/
Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter
No comments:
Post a Comment