Saturday, May 2, 2020

Another bombshell about Flynn — and it may reach up to Obama and Biden - Andrea Widburg


by Andrea Widburg


The latest document drop reveals that the FBI knew before interviewing Flynn that he’d done nothing wrong but it went after him anyway.



"Show me the man and I'll show you the crime." —Lavrentiy Beria (head of Stalin's secret police)

Under America's criminal law system, an investigation cannot begin unless there's a crime. After that, one seeks the probable criminals. These alleged criminals, in turn, are given myriad due process protections so the government, which is judge, jury, and executioner, does not violate their inherent civil rights. Under Stalin's totalitarian system, the state targeted people for destruction, invented crimes against them, and then led them through a sham investigative and prosecutorial process that led to an inevitable conviction.

Newly released documents establish that beginning in the waning days of Obama's presidency, high-level FBI officials inflicted Soviet-style "justice" on General Mike Flynn. It's also possible that both Obama and Biden were part of this plot.

The newest batch of documents reveals that, by January 4, 2017, the FBI had ruled Mike Flynn out as a possible suspect in its investigation into whether Trump or his associates had colluded with the Russians. The agent reviewing the evidence against Mike Flynn wrote a memorandum explaining that there was no "derogatory" evidence against Flynn either in house or through an outside agency.
The investigating team concluded, therefore, that Flynn was no longer a viable candidate as part of the larger [Russia investigation] umbrella case. A review of logical [redacted] databases did not yield any information on which to predicate further investigative efforts.
[snip]
The FBI is closing this investigation.
If the FBI knew as of January 4 that Flynn was innocent, why then did agents sneak into the White House and interview Flynn with an eye to getting "him to lie, so we can prosecute him or get him fired"?

That was Peter Strzok's doing. Immediately after receiving notice that the FBI intended to close the file, Strzok texted, "Hey if you haven't closed RAZOR [Flynn], don't do so yet."

(You can review all of the documents here.)

Strzok's conduct is interesting, but it still raises the question of why he wanted it open. Sundance, at the Conservative Treehouse, looked at the chronology and thinks this peculiar conduct might have involved Obama and Biden trying to wipe out Trump's presidency from the get-go.

On January 4, case agents wanted to close the file on Flynn because he was innocent, but Strzok still wanted the file kept open. That same afternoon, Strzok noted that the "7th floor [was] involved," which meant that Comey had inserted himself into the Flynn affair.

On January 5, Obama, Biden, Susan Rice, Sally Yates (who'd been focusing on Flynn), and Comey met in the White House. Two weeks later, Rice emailed herself to say of that meeting that Obama stressed that everything should be "by the book." Her email looked like "cover your a--" retrofitting, as did Obama's statement (assuming he made it).

On January 6, Comey went to Trump Tower to tell Trump about the Steele dossier, thereby giving the Deep Staters a justification for getting the Steele dossier to the media. On that same day, Steele deleted all his files relating to the dossier.

At this point, everyone involved knew or should have known that Flynn was an innocent man. By the end of the month, though, the FBI was entrapping Flynn, the DOJ was hell-bent on prosecuting Flynn, and Obama and Biden, who knew that Flynn was innocent, said and did nothing while that Soviet-style kangaroo process proceeded. All had the same plan: destroy Flynn, whose policies they disliked, and undo the results of the November 2016 election.

Kimberly Strassel sums up nicely what happened to Flynn:
2) The new docs show FBI had already cleared Flynn of ludicrous claims that he was agent of Russian power; it moved to close that investigation on Jan 4 2017. But then DOJ cooked up the absurd Logan Act claim, the notion Flynn had violated an obscure 1799 law.
— Kimberley Strassel (@KimStrassel) April 30, 2020
4) The real goal was trap him into saying something at odds with transcript, to "get him to lie." And the evidence of that strategy is everywhere. We have Comey bragging that they went around WH legal counsel, so Flynn would have no representation.
— Kimberley Strassel (@KimStrassel) April 30, 2020
6) We have McCabe docs showing he discouraged him from getting lawyer. FBI decided to get rid of standard admonition altogether. Also did not tell Flynn he was being interviewed in an "investigatory" context, suggesting this was a chat between gov officials.
— Kimberley Strassel (@KimStrassel) April 30, 2020
7) As for liberal commentators/legal scholars saying all this is "routine," well, let's sure as hell hope not. The FBI exists to investigate cries--not create them.
— Kimberley Strassel (@KimStrassel) April 30, 2020
Money is not enough to compensate Gen. Flynn for what the Deep State did to him. When these conspirators, who stomped on his civil rights and attempted to overthrow an elected government finally land in prison, Flynn needs a day pass so he can go visit them every day and spit in their faces.

Andrea Widburg

Source: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/05/another_bombshell_about_flynn__and_it_may_reach_up_to_obama_and_biden.html

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter



No comments:

Post a Comment