Sunday, January 24, 2021

Back to the Obama’s Failed Policies and Blinkered Personnel - Clarice Feldman

 

​ by Clarice Feldman

Biden sends the message that by executive fiat and personnel choices he plans to double down on policies that will undo Trump’s achievements and weaken our nation.

Donald J. Trump has been the most consequential President in my lifetime since Ronald Reagan. Issues & Insights counts some of the ways, listing the 10 most significant.

"He slashed individual and business taxes, he forged peace in the Middle East, He created Operation Warp Speed, which “may well end up saving hundreds of thousands of lives in coming years,” he deregulated our economy, saving “the average American household an average of $3,100 a year,” he got rid of Obama’s individual mandate,  he restored balance on the Supreme Court, he forced NATO to reform  and in so doing “likely saved the West’s main military alliance,” he encouraged U.S. energy independence so that we are “one of the only major countries whose CO2 emissions are plunging, with output now at the lowest levels since 1984,” he reformed immigration and built more than 450 miles of wall “to control entrance to our nation," he withdrew from the Paris Climate Deal which commits only major industrial nations to shrink their economies.

An email to Glenn Reynolds measures President Trump’s achievements in yet another important way:

Trump showed that the annihilation of the American middle class was not the result of inevitable forces. Technological change and globalization are not weather or the movement of tectonic plates. The economy, and who gets what from whom, is embedded in political choices. Who pays the costs and who reaps the benefits are political choices. Who is crushed by the legal system and who benefits from it, and who is insulated from it, are also political choices. Trump will never be forgiven for showing normal people that their destruction, and the enrichment of other people, who despise everything that they love, believe in, and care about, is a policy decision. Trump showed other choices are possible.

Having seen once how it actually works, we can never unsee it.

That is Trump’s greatest achievement.

His successor was sworn in this week behind 12-foot fences topped with razor wire and in the presence of  over twenty thousand troops, a show of force and as well of the insecurity of his administration. It is unlikely he would have had a cheering crowd of thousands on hand in any event.

Biden shares with Obama his demonstrated disregard for the troops, some 200 of which have now tested positive for COVID, by requiring loyalty checks on them and forcing 5000 of them from the Capitol to camp out in an unheated parking garage with no internet reception, a single toilet, and only one electric outlet. (Trump has invited them to house at his hotel near the White House.) Three governors were so disgusted with Biden’s treatment of their troops they withdrew them: Ron De Santis (Florida), Greg Abbott (Texas), and Chris Sununu (New Hampshire).

Recognizing this had become a public-relations disaster, Jill Biden went to the garage to hand out chocolate-chip cookies for media photographers to capture. And as humiliating to the new commander-in-chief was his team’s lack of foresight. Biden fired the chief  White House usher on inauguration day and failed to name a successor, so after the swearing in, when the Bidens went to enter the White House, they arrived to a locked door and stood outside forlornly for 10 seconds with the cameras rolling. It’s the chief usher who opens the door, and there was none. Finally, a member of the staff who remained took it upon himself to admit them.

From the beginning, Biden sends the message that by executive fiat and personnel choices he plans to double down on policies that will undo Trump’s achievements and weaken our nation while further restricting American  liberties. Democrats found COVID so convenient a means to open the gates for election fraud and population control and now they plan to use this example as a governing principle, demonizing their opponents while mouthing  calls for “unity.”

If it’s true that personnel is policy, let’s have a look at some of his picks. Susan Rice, John Kerry, and Samantha Power are Obama retreads, but there are others just as statist and loony. His choice to head the Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division is Kristen Clarke author of this: “Melanin endows Blacks with greater mental, physical and spiritual abilities -- something which cannot be measured based on Eurocentric standards.” Anita Dunn as a”senior advisor,” a woman who regards Mao Tse-Tung, the worst mass murderer in history, as one of her “favorite political philosophers.” 

It’s not just the abhorrent beliefs and records of his selection that raises eyebrows. It’s the utter incompetence that shines through. Thus though the CDC ranked Wisconsin the 48th state in distribution of the COVID vaccine, the head of that state’s DHS, Andrea Palm, is Biden’s choice for deputy secretary of  HHS. The incompetent handling of the vaccine distribution there is described here. As assistant secretary for health in the HHS department he named Dr. Rachel Levine, thus filling a transgender slot. She was the health official in charge of Pennsylvania’s COVID response. State Senator Doug Mastriano called for her to resign after she adopted and failed to rescind orders to house COVID patients in nursing homes. “Let me state this clearly, this order by Secretary Levine is responsible for the deaths of approximately 2,500 of our citizens, and displays the gross incompetence of someone unfit for office. The bottom line is Secretary Levine has failed to protect our most vulnerable population.” State representative Ross Diamond joined Mastriano in calling for her resignation:  

...the high volume of nursing home deaths in Kirkland, Washington, at the start of the pandemic should have been a warning to Levine. 

"Instead of heeding that clear warning, Dr. Levine instituted Department of Health policies which halted routine inspections and issued guidance for nursing facilities to admit and readmit patients who tested positive for COVID-19," Diamond said in May. 

"For vulnerable Pennsylvanians residing in those facilities, it's like they were being forced to live within a ticking time bomb." 

It was a bad situation that Levine removed her mother from while others perished, he said.

(Of course, as Daniel Henninger observes, the craziness of the COVID vaccine distribution particularly in blue states, “is at a level of dangerous absurdity.”)

See more at michaelpramirez.com

Just as the centralized model of statecraft fails, the Biden administration wants to return to that model, a model that gets failing marks next to the streamlined one for inoculations in Florida, West Virginia, and Texas.

Henninger continues:

How refreshing it would be if someone on the left would blow the whistle on the dysfunctional complexity of government bigness and say the solution lies in the opposite direction, as was suggested in the early days of Bill Clinton’s presidency.

The pandemic again offers guidance: Private, parochial and charter schools returned quickly to teaching, while the too-big public systems stayed closed. Even as vaccine distribution faltered, the gig economy never stopped delivering stuff everywhere.

In fact, and optimistically, for all the problems in the vaccination “last mile,” the organizations administering the injections -- from hospitals to pharmacies inside supermarkets -- have been efficient, friendly and competent. But please note: This superb last-inch effort is not top-down -- the failed Andrew Cuomo model that is soon to be Joe Biden’s. It works because it is decentralized.

Government as currently configured can’t deliver. We await someone who will run for office on that reality before the next pandemic arrives.

Simply put, too many cooks in the government adding to and stirring the pot for their advantage produces a tardy, tasteless product.

Not only are the personnel choices distressing, but so were the firings. There was the general counsel of the NLRB, confirmed in that position for which there were 10 months remaining in his tenure. Worse yet, per Mollie Hemingway, was  placing the General Counsel of the National Security Agency’s General Counsel Michael J. Ellis on administrative leave.

Beyond personnel choices are his executive actions, most of which are politically unfeasible nonstarters or which will embroil the administration in lengthy litigation. Texas has already filed suit to require him to lift a 100-day deportation freeze; Pipeline unions are already furious at the halt to the Keystone Pipeline and companies which sunk so much into its construction may have a say in this about-face, as may the Canadian government. Moreover, there are, as the Foundation for Economic Ediucation notes, other serious consequences to this move. It may well increase CO2 emissions, cost 11,000 jobs and 1.6 billion in wages, and discourage future business investment.

So much of what the new administration believes is contrafactual. The continued claim that climate change is an effect of human activity and that there is “systemic racism” flies in the face of both real climate science and the fact that the fastest-growing demographic in the country is people of two or more races. The Dem-Media itself is forced to do back flips to paint the Trump followers as racists since he enjoyed such a high level of support among minorities. The Washington Post treats this absurdly, claiming minorities who support him suffer from something called “multiracial whiteness.” 

And women who supported Biden may have to rethink what they supported. One of his orders permits transgendered men who identify as women with obvious strength superiority to complete in women's sports and to share shelters designated for women, restroom, shower and locker facilities. Normals certainly find such rules objectionable and often dangerous

Some of these orders may run afoul of the same issues of administrative law which precluded President Trump from undoing Obama’s executive order on DACA. Others will engender suits claiming breaches of contractual obligations. Certainly we’ll see now that  the White House has changed hands whether tolerating district courts’ penchant to issue nationwide injunctions will remain unchanged by the Supreme Court. 

In sum, I think the administration is already overreaching, and in appeasing the far left will face an increasingly energized and angry citizenry. You can help by supporting organizations like Judicial Watch, Pacific Legal Foundation, and FIRE, organizations dedicated to preserving your constitutional rights.

 

Clarice Feldman  

Source: https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2021/01/back_to_the_obamas_failed_policies_and_blinkered_personnel_.html 

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

The latest news about Amazon hypocrisy ought to infuriate you - Andrea Widburg

 

​ by Andrea Widburg

When it comes to protecting its interests, the e-commerce giant is striking a decidedly un-Democratic note about unionization voting.

If there was one thing that contributed to Biden’s entering the White House, it was the mail-in voting that Democrats initiated by crying “COVID.” According to Democrats, voting in person in 2020 was tantamount to murdering citizens. Mail-in voting, though, is an invitation to old-fashioned ballot fraud. That’s why it’s maddening that Amazon is now insisting that a unionization vote in Alabama must be conducted through in-person, not mail-in ballots, to ensure “vote fidelity and timeliness of vote count.”

Jeff Bezos, Amazon’s founder and the richest man in the world, bought the Washington Post in 2013. Under his aegis, the paper went from being a left-leaning outlet to becoming the official paper of Washington’s Democrat party. As such, the Washington Post strongly advocated for mail-in voting during the 2020 election.

For example, in August 2020, Bezos’s Post insisted that President Trump’s concerns about the risk of fraud because of states that had switched entirely to mail-in voting were “without evidence,” as was his claim that “ballots would take too long to process.” The article then pointed to all the countries that rely on mail-in voting, whether exclusively or primarily.

The article ignored the fact that, as Harmeet Dhillon wrote in June 2020, mail-in voting (which is distinguishable from absentee ballots) is widely acknowledged to lead to fraud:

Democrats would flood the postal system with unused ballots and open the door for bad actors to manipulate the election. Nevada estimates that 90% of ballots mailed to inactive voters will be returned as undeliverable. From 2012 to 2018, there were 28 million ballots mailed but never returned.

[snip]

Expanding vote-by-mail systems takes an immense amount of equipment, time, staff and funding, yet House Democrats want to impose universal vote-by-mail mandates on every state this fall. 

[snip]

Widespread voting by mail also risks severely delayed election results. Processing mail ballots is time consuming, particularly in states that have low levels of voting by mail.

[snip]

Finally, mail voting is less secure than in-person voting. Voters, particularly in vulnerable populations such as the poor or the elderly, can be coerced to yield their ballots because there is no ballot secrecy. Voters’ ballots can be lost, delayed or thrown out by election officials without the voter knowing. Ballot harvesters can spread COVID-19 while also pressuring or manipulating voters.

Let me reiterate the official Bezos/Amazon viewpoint when it comes to mail-in voting for the most consequential national election since 1860: It’s all good, timing is not a problem, and no one needs to worry about fraud, especially in a time of COVID.

Things are a bit different, though, when it comes to Amazon’s own business – specifically, it’s Alabama warehouse. In that case, Amazon asserts that mail-in voting regarding unionization creates way more problems than Amazon should be forced to risk, especially in a time of COVID:

The company Thursday filed an appeal to a decision by the National Labor Relations Board, which is allowing a mail-in process due to Covid-19 risks instead of the in-person elections that are typical in such unionization votes.

[snip]

Amazon declined to comment on its appeal but has said it believes the best approach to an election would be conducting it in person, saying it “provided the NLRB with a safe, confidential and convenient proposal for associates to vote on-site, which is in the best interest of all parties—associate convenience, vote fidelity and timeliness of vote count.” (Emphasis added.)

To repeat: When it comes to America, Amazon is fine with a system that is entirely vulnerable to fraud, difficult to manage, and drastically delays vote counts. When it comes to a large leftist company trying to avoid unionization, lest it be forced to pay its employees a living wage, suddenly Amazon is excessively concerned about timeliness and fidelity and urges the same in-person voting that Trump and his supporters insisted was necessary for an honest election.

I don’t have anything pithy to say here. I’m so choked up on my own anger at this hypocrisy that I’m at a loss for words. Here’s one suggestion, though: If you can, don’t buy from Amazon. The only exceptions are if you need to buy from Amazon or, as Sarah Hoyt notes, you’re using Amazon to support conservative content providers. And while you’re boycotting your economic and political enemies, try not to buy anything from China either.

 

Andrea Widburg 

 Source: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2021/01/the_latest_news_about_amazon_hypocrisy_ought_to_infuriate_you.html 

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Israel to Biden: Stand with us at The Hague - Arutz Sheva Staff

 

​ by Arutz Sheva Staff

Israel to seek US aid in selecting replacement for outgoing ICJ Chief Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda, who aided PA efforts to prosecute Israelis.

Israel will ask the Biden administration to continue the US' cooperating in an effort to prevent the moves made against the Jewish State by the International Criminal Court in The Hague.

The Israel Hayom newspaper reported that the first move that Jerusalem will seek to work on jointly with the new administration is to coordinate the selection of the next chief prosecutor of the tribunal in the coming weeks.

The current prosecutor, Fatou Bensouda, has served for the past nine years and is expected to step down in the coming weeks. In recent years, she and the International Criminal Court have been the subject of very harsh sanctions by the Trump administration, following its decision to investigate alleged American and Israeli soldiers.

US President Joe Biden and his administration have not yet taken a position on how they will respond to the court's actions.

Unlike the previous chief prosecutors of the tribunal, who mainly investigated war crimes in third world countires, Bensouda maintained that all crimes against humanity should be investigated, even those allegedly committed by the superpowers. She examined charges attributed to British and American soldiers. In the case of Israel, she instructed the Palestinian Authority on how to be admitted to the tribunal, promoted PA complaints and rejected all the arguments that Israel submitted.

For an unknown reason, the judges of the Hague Tribunal have long refrained from publishing their decision on whether to authorize the opening of an investigation against Israelis accused of war crimes.

The court itself supports the move, but many major countries around the world have appealed to the court to avoid it, and this may be the reason for the delay.

Another possibility is that the tribunal has been waiting for a change of government in the US, and now that Trump is not in the picture the judges will not be afraid to advance moves against Israel and the US.

 

Arutz Sheva Staff  

Source: https://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/295463 

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Left-wing riots rattle US cities even after President Biden's inauguration - Michael Ruiz

 

​ by Michael Ruiz

Protesters have smashed windows at government buildings and even the original Starbucks

Joe Biden's First Week...and Impeachment

What we are learning about the direction of the Biden presidency.

Left-wing riots have rattled a handful of cities across the U.S. even after President Biden's inauguration – leading to vandalism of government buildings and at least 20 arrests.

In Seattle Wednesday, hours after the swearing-in ceremony, dozens of protesters marched demanding the abolition of Immigration and Customs Enforcement. At least three people were arrested, and broken windows were reported – including those at Starbucks' original Pike Place storefront.

On the same day, Portland saw an anti-Biden Antifa protest in which rioters carrying stun guns, pepper ball guns and fireworks scuffled with police and damaged an ICE building, police said. Photographs show marchers carrying signs with phrases including, "We don’t want Biden – we want revenge!" and "We are ungovernable."

The first Starbucks location was damaged during an anti-Biden protest in Seattle on Wednesday.

The first Starbucks location was damaged during an anti-Biden protest in Seattle on Wednesday. (Seattle Police Department)

WASHINGTON CITY'S MAYOR RUSHED TO SAFETY AFTER RIOTERS STORM CITY HALL

There was also damage to the state Democratic Party headquarters, although some people who attended the protest later condemned the violence. At least 15 people were arrested.

In Denver, protesters blasted both former President Donald Trump and Biden and allegedly burned an American flag. At least two people were arrested there.

Black Block, anarchists, and antifascist activists opposed to Joe Biden marched and demonstrated in Portland, Oregon on Inauguration Day, January 20 2021, resulting in a few broken windows and eight arrests. (Photo by John Rudoff/Sipa USA)

Black Block, anarchists, and antifascist activists opposed to Joe Biden marched and demonstrated in Portland, Oregon on Inauguration Day, January 20 2021, resulting in a few broken windows and eight arrests. (Photo by John Rudoff/Sipa USA) (Reuters)

"I remember the media and Democrats blaming all this Antifa violence on Donald Trump -- yet here we have Joe Biden in the White House and Antifa is still rampaging in the streets of Seattle and Portland and Denver," Sen. Tom Cotton told "Fox & Friends" Thursday morning.

PORTLAND RIOTING AGAINST BIDEN INAUGURATION LEADS TO CHARGES

And in the college town of Bellingham, Wash., Mayor Seth Fleetwood was rushed out of City Hall Friday morning after a mob of rioters stormed the building.

KIRO-TV reporter Deedee Sun tweeted video that appeared to show masked, black-clad protesters taking down the American flag outside and carry it away. She said they also "threw a hot drink" on a different reporter and stole a microphone.

Rioters entered City Hall – but no one was hurt, nothing was damaged and no one was arrested, according to the local Bellingham Herald newspaper.

Meanwhile, in Washington, D.C., where thousands of National Guard troops were deployed to ensure security on Inauguration Day, authorities said there were "no confrontations" with protesters.

Post Millennial editor-at-large Andy Ngo tweeted late Saturday that Antifa members in Portland planned to march again later in the evening from Elizabeth Caruthers Park.

 

Fox News’ Brie Stimson and Stephanie Pagones contributed to this report.

 

Michael Ruiz is a U.S. and World Reporter for Fox News.

Source: https://www.foxnews.com/us/left-wing-riots-cities-after-biden-inauguration 

 Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Amazon Demands In-Person Union Vote After Arguing Mail-In Ballots 'Raise Risk Of Fraud' - Tyler Durden

 

​ by Tyler Durden

Hat tip: Dr. Jean-charles Bensoussan 

Surprise! Mail-in ballots raise the risk of fraud - according to Amazon.

 


In a Thursday filing with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), the Seattle-based online retail giant formally requested that a group of Alabama warehouse trying to form a union be required to vote in person, rather than by mail, according to Bloomberg. The company also requested a postponement of the vote so the NLRB can reconsider its earlier ruling which gives workers the next two months to vote by mail.

A group of workers at Amazon’s Bessemer, Alabama, warehouse filed paperwork in November for an election to decide whether to be represented by the Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union, a rare step for workers at a company whose U.S. workforce isn’t unionized. The NLRB, which oversees union votes, earlier this month said the vote would be conducted by mail, citing standards set up during the pandemic to keep workers and staffers safe. -Bloomberg

Amazon objected to the NLRB's decision - saying they had 'unfairly dismissed the company's argument' that its facility is safer than the surrounding Jefferson County, which hit a 20% COVID-19 positive test rate earlier this month. The company argues that in-person voting would have "fully minimized any risk of transmission," and that the NLRB's decision on mail-in votes was "based on speculation and conjecture, and without ever balancing the purported risk of virus spread against the public policy that ‘strongly favors’ allowing employees to vote in person."

The world’s largest online retailer said that a mail election raised the risk of fraud and the coercion of workers. It also said the process would depress turnout, arguing that as many as 29% of its more than 5,800 employees eligible to vote wouldn’t do so or would return incorrectly completed ballots. -Bloomberg

 The solution, according to Amazon? Hold the election in a heated tent in the facility's parking lot in conjunction with software designed to ensure social distancing. The NLRB says conditions are too dangerous for in-person voting, and that acquiescing to Amazon's demands might give workers the impression that government employees conducting the vote might be receiving inappropriate benefits from the company.

"The most important factors in my decision are the safety of all election participants and the enfranchisement of all voters," wrote the NLRB's acting regional director in the Board's decision, adding "Both of these factors weigh in favor of a mail ballot election."

 

Tyler Durden 

 Source: https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/amazon-demands-person-union-vote-after-arguing-mail-ballots-raise-risk-fraud 

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Cancel Culture Intensifies - Michael Curtis

 

​ by Michael Curtis

Entire nations' history is getting destroyed as woke leftists topple monuments worldwide.

It may be too strong to say that a specter of uninterrupted disturbance of all social conditions is haunting the Western democracies, but two interrelated issues are cause for concern.  One is the apprehension that the West is erasing too readily historical landmarks or individuals that are regarded as inimical to certain modern sensibilities or is downplaying past achievements while other factors are considered more important.  The second is the emergence of a "counterculture" — not simply the lack of commitment to a common culture, but a modern form of ostracism removing or downgrading people, expressions, and ideas deemed offensive or problematic or not politically correct to particular groups or to social or professional circles.

Changes in culture in the U.S. may be illuminated or inferred from two recent events.  One is the dilemma of the football team, the Washington Redskins, once the Boston Braves, presently known as the Washington Football Team until an inoffensive name is found.  The other pertains to the symbolism of Winston Churchill.  In 2001, the bust of Churchill was loaned by Prime Minister Tony Blair to President George W. Bush, who put it in the Oval Office.  The bust was removed by President Obama in 2009 and was reinstated by President Trump in 2017.  On his first day in office, President Biden removed the bust from the Oval Office and replaced it with images of Martin Luther King, Jr.; Rosa Parks; Robert Kennedy; and Cesar Chávez.  Prime Minister Boris Johnson is not alone in seeing this new removal as a "snub to Britain."

A new development in Britain raises the issue of intellectual cultural amnesia or a lack of commitment to a historic culture.  It stems from the decision of the University of Leicester, which issued an extraordinary statement denying that it was dropping Geoffrey Chaucer from its English courses because Chaucer was "too white."  University plans had been revealed that he was being replaced by teaching modules on race, ethnicity, diversity, and sexuality.  Such courses, a decolonized curriculum, according to university officials, would match students' own interests and enthusiasms.  This means that programs will be offered in English literature from "Shakespeare to Bernadine Evaristo," the author who in 2019 is the first black woman to win the Booker Prize, the leading literary award in the English-speaking world.  However, cuts in the programs will be made affecting John Milton's Paradise Lost, poems of John Donne, and Sir Thomas Malory's Le Morte D'Arthur.

It may be admitted that readers of Chaucer are a minority cult, and that few are engaged in seeking adventure or glory in noble deeds as are the knights of Malory, but Chaucer is generally considered the father of English literature with his immortal work The Canterbury Tales.  He was the first person to be buried in Westminster Abbey in the area known as Poet's Corner.  The decision of Leicester University is not simply another example of "cancel culture," but also disregarding valuable information of early British history.

The CanterburTales, the 24 stories told 1387–1400, on the pilgrimage from Southwark to St. Thomas Becket's shrine in Canterbury, provides a portrait of English society at the time of the peasants' revolt in 1381 and turmoil in the Church, told by a diverse, wide-ranging group of people — the knight, the merchant, the pardoner, the Wife of Bath — and social classes, thrown together by accident.  Though on a "pilgrimage," the group is more concerned with material things than spiritual ones.  Leicester, in its obsequiousness to political correctness, will deprive its students of an ironic and critical presentation of English society and of the Church at that time.

One of those critical of the impact of political correctness is Prime Minister Boris Johnson.  We cannot, he said, now try to edit or censor our past: "We cannot pretend to have a different history."  However, in recent weeks, that history has been subject to different interpretation.

Another victim of modern anti-racism is Charles Dickens, who supported liberal causes, including the European revolutions of the 1840s, expressed sympathy for the working class, abhorred slavery, and supported the anti-slavery movement.  However, in private letters, Dickens expressed "racist" sentiments, such as referring to Indians as "low, treacherous, murderous, tigerous, villains."  In 2020, the Charles Dickens Museum in Broadstairs, Kent, was defaced by a former local councilor who scrawled the words "Dickens, Racist" on the wall and defaced a street sign of Dickens Road with black paint.

Many will be familiar with Oliver Cromwell, who led the parliamentary army that defeated Charles I and became Lord Protector of England, but who was also responsible for brutal military dictates that led to deaths of thousands, including 2,000 in Wexford, in his invasion of Ireland.  Statues to him have been built in a number of places, including one in Wythenshawe Park, Manchester.  In June 2020, that bronze granite plinth and pedestal monument was vandalized with the words "Cromwell, racist and cockroach," and the letters BLM were written on it.  Some have viewed this act as one of mindless graffiti, arguing that the pyramids were built by slave labor: shall we tear them down?

Two more examples come from Britain, one from the British capital.  The City of London is planning to remove statues of former Lord Mayor William Beckford and Sir John Cass because of their links to the slave trade.  Beckford was twice lord mayor in 1762 and 1769.  He was born in Jamaica and inherited 13 sugar plantations and 3,000 slaves.  He was usually considered a political reformer.  Cass was a merchant and in 1705 was a board member of the Royal African Company.  He was Tory M.P. for the City of London 1710–1715 and sheriff of London.  He funded a mixed school, the Cass Foundation school, that has become part of the City of London Polytechnic and now called the London Metropolitan University.  But the name of Cass has been removed from one of the units in the university.

After the BLM protests in the U.S. and elsewhere, the Exeter City Council set up a task force to review the complaints that had arisen over the bronze statue of General Redvers Buller, astride his favorite horse, erected in 1905 in the city center of Exeter.  Buller had been born in Crediton, about seven miles from Exeter.  He was a war hero who won the Victoria Cross during the Second Zulu War in 1879, where he carried three men to safety during a military defeat.  He became commander in chief of British forces during the early part of the Second Boer War and subsequently commanded the army in Natal until 1900, but he was an unsuccessful general.  He was defeated three times by the Boers with heavy losses.  After his "retirement," he was awarded the freedom of Exeter and given a jeweled sword.

The review by the City Council concluded that the statue should be removed, but about 7,500 people signed a petition that the statue be saved and that "historically illiterate people cannot erase our history."  The problem arose because in Buller's case, that history includes references to colonial campaigns on the plinth of the statue including the words "he saved Natal."  His fault was that he was linked to British imperialism.

On the general issue of correctness, some interesting remarks have come from an unlikely source: the brilliant British comedian Rowan Atkinson.  Without specifically mentioning cancel culture, he alluded to the "digital equivalent of a medieval mob roaming the streets looking for someone to burn."  Modern societies must be aware of the tendency to boycott supposedlyl questionable or controversial individuals or ideas.  The rules of the game may change, and with it changing standards.  It is wise to adhere to the approach that there is more than one set of publicly palatable ideas about history and about the present at this time.

Image: Derek Harper via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 2.0.

 

Michael Curtis  

Source: https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2021/01/cancel_culture_intensifies.html 

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Tehran's Presidential Show: A Game of Exclusions - Amir Taheri

 

​ by Amir Taheri

The aim, here, is exclusion rather than qualifications.

  • The aim, here, is exclusion rather than qualifications.

  • One fake university with an address in the island of Saba, in the Caribbean, has sold over 500 doctorates to Iranian officials for $25,000 apiece.

  • To complicate matters further, the conditions demand other qualifications that are hard if not impossible to measure.... For example, how do you prove "heartfelt belief in the necessity of religion" or "transparent hostility to the West" or "opposition to all seditions that have taken place against the Islamic Revolution"?

  • Things become more complicated when would-be candidates are asked to prove loyalty not only to the regime and all its policies but also to be committed to preserving all the existing institutions of the Islamic Republic. This means that those who dream of reforming let alone disbanding the High Council of Guardians of the Constitution or merging the Revolutionary Guard with the national army need not apply.

(Image source: iStock)

Perhaps to divert attention from here and now problems, such as the ravages caused by the Covid-19 pandemic, economic meltdown, hyperinflation and rampant corruption, Tehran's ruling elite have decided to give an early start to a presidential election expected to be held in June.

The main tune played by the official media is that the election this time is going to be the final showdown between the "reformist" and "principalist" factions that have provided an Islamist version of the Punch-and-Judy show as a sign of democracy in the Islamic Republic.

A sub-theme is also built around rumors that the "Supreme Guide" has decided to have a military president as his sidekick. So far at least two of Iran's estimated 1,000 or so active or retired brigadier-generals have already thrown their caps into the ring.

Finally, a third tune would have us believe that the "Supreme Guide" wants a change of generations at a time that almost all top positions in his Islamic gerontocracy are held by septuagenarians to nonagenarians.

However, judging by the strident new conditions set for those who wish to stand for presidency, it may be hard, if not impossible, to find a candidate that would meet the desiderata fixed by the "Supreme Guide". In fact, the rules, published last week, seem to be designed more to show who cannot stand than who could.

The aim, here, is exclusion rather than qualifications.

First exclusion, of course, concerns female Iranians, although they account for some 52 percent of the population. Next exclusion affects non-Muslim Iranians who account for two to four percent. Non-Shiite Muslims, accounting for 12 percent of the population, are also excluded. Even then, being male, Muslim and Shiite isn't enough to secure qualification. As a Shiite you have to be a Twelver Shiite to be considered. But that isn't all. Being male, Muslim, Shiite and Twelver you must also be an "oslui" (fundamentalist) which means that dozens of sects, such as akhbaris, sheikhis, Sufis etc; are excluded.

Thought that was all? Wrong.

Even being male, Muslim, Shiite, Twelver and "osuli" won't be enough to let you stand for the presidency of the Islamic Republic. You must also be "imam-mand", a neologism by mullahs to indicate the belief that Islam is incomplete without imams.

However, even being "imam-mand" won't do the trick.

You still need to be "wala'i", or someone who believes that "walayat al-faqih" (Custodianship of the Jurist) is the only legitimate form of government.

Oof! Is that all? Not by a long chalk.

Belief in "walayat al-faqih" isn't enough either. You must believe in its absolute version.

Finally, once you have fulfilled all the above conditions you must meet another one, absolute devotion to the "Supreme Guide" Grand Ayatollah Sayyed Ali Hosseini Khamenei, who has quietly asked to be referred to as Imam.

Apart from those basic conditions for candidacy, you must also be aged at least 30, which excludes over 50 percent of Iranians, and under 70. which excludes another 5 percent.

Needless to say, the estimated eight million Iranians in exile are also barred from candidacy.

The new conditions also stipulate the necessity of university-level degrees or equivalent in theological seminaries and military schools.

That, too, won't be as easy as it sounds.

A Majlis report in 2018 claimed that there were thousands of fake PhDs in the Islamic Republic, including many in the high echelons of government. Being suckers for titles, Iranians love to be called "doctor" or "engineer" when they cannot be called "sayyed", ayatollah or, at least, Hojat al-Islam. The height of glory, of course, is to bear several titles as was the case with Grand Ayatollah Sayyed Doktur Muhammad Beheshti, one of the early operatives of the Khomeinist power grab in 1979.

It is not surprising that almost all top commanders of the Revolutionary Guard also use the title "Doktur" on the strength of real or fake degrees from real or non-existent universities.

One fake university with an address in the island of Saba, in the Caribbean, has sold over 500 doctorates to Iranian officials for $25,000 apiece.

Theological qualifications are equally subject to doubt and speculation.

Traditional seminaries in Qom, Mashhad and Najaf do not recognize seminaries set up by the regime under mullahs on state payroll. In exchange, state-funded seminaries do not recognize certificates of jurisprudence (Ijtihad) issued by traditional seminaries.

Again, leaving aside women and non-Muslims, and non-Shiites, that condition would exclude 80 percent of those who might wish to apply.

To complicate matters further, the conditions demand other qualifications that are hard if not impossible to measure.

For example, how do you prove "heartfelt belief in the necessity of religion" or "transparent hostility to the West" or "opposition to all seditions that have taken place against the Islamic Revolution"?

Another hard-to-prove condition is "preferring the interests of the system to personal interests" while "a deep knowledge of domestic affairs, regional politics and international situation" may require at least an undergraduate course followed by examinations.

Things become more complicated when would-be candidates are asked to prove loyalty not only to the regime and all its policies but also to be committed to preserving all the existing institutions of the Islamic Republic. This means that those who dream of reforming let alone disbanding the High Council of Guardians of the Constitution or merging the Revolutionary Guard with the national army need not apply.

One condition, perhaps designed to exclude President Hassan Rouhani's so-called New York Boys, bars anyone with a dual nationality or permanent residence permits in foreign countries to stand.

But that is not all. Those with foreign-born or foreign-resident parents, offspring or any other close relatives are also barred.

In 2018 the Islamic Majlis, the ersatz parliament, claimed in a report that over 1,500 senior officials, including unnamed members of the Cabinet and provincial governors, had a dual nationality, mostly US or Canadian, or had children attending school in Western Europe or North America.

Last week, the Islamic Majlis gave the Council of Guardians the power to veto would-be candidate on the basis of their program as well.

Even if you fulfill all those conditions, your application may still be rejected by the Council of Guardians on grounds that are never explained. But approval by the council isn't the final hoop either. The "Supreme Guide" may veto your candidacy and, as you believe in his infallibility, you will not be able to challenge his decision.

One can think of only one candidate who might have all the qualifications and certainty of approval by the "Supreme Guide": Major-General Qassem Soleimani.

Problem is, he is no longer available.

This article was originally published by Asharq al-Awsat

 

Amir Taheri was the executive editor-in-chief of the daily Kayhan in Iran from 1972 to 1979. He has worked at or written for innumerable publications, published eleven books, and has been a columnist for Asharq Al-Awsat since 1987.

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/16984/iran-presidential-show 

 Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Voting outside the box - Gideon Allon

 

​ by Gideon Allon

Central Elections Committee Head Orly Adas has several tricks up her sleeve to ensure the coronavirus pandemic does not undermine the integrity of the March 23 elections.

Central Elections Committee Head Attorney Orly Adas has one thing on her mind these days: making sure the coronavirus pandemic does not undermine the integrity of the March 23 elections.

The vote in just over two months will see Israelis go to the polls for the fourth time in two years. This time, however, voting is exponentially more complex. The March 4, 2020 elections took place mere days before the global pandemic hit Israel with full force – at the time only 13 people had been infected with COVID-19 and some 4,500 were under quarantine – and the outbreak, currently in its third resurgence, means Adas and her colleagues on the committee have to think out of the box.

In a recent press briefing Adas, who joined the Central Election Committee in 1998, introduced a series of measures seeking to enable a safe election, including drive-through voting, increasing the number of polling stations by 30% to reduce crowds, placing two voting booths in every station to speed up the process; and designating workers to ensure adherence to health guidelines – especially social distancing – at all sites.

Central Elections Committee Head Orly Adas (Yitzhak Harari)

"I would be lying if I told you I don't have my reservations," she told Israel Hayom. "I'll be honest with you, my stomach is turning. This is a very complex election campaign. We have to oversee a regular election day, with 11 polling stations, while simultaneously overseeing several others.

"The situation requires us to set up massive systems from scratch, like polling stations designated for COVID-19 patients and people who are in quarantine, [polling] stations in nursing homes and in assisted living centers, and dealing with a 30% increase in the number of polling places."

Still, Adas is convinced that she and her team "can meet any mission with which we are tasked."

Q: There are concerns that the volume of voters in polling stations could cause a spike in morbidity.

"One of our biggest challenges is to make sure that two weeks after the elections we don't see that. We plan to take every precaution necessary to make sure that doesn't happen.

"We all want to get our lives back after the elections. If we go our part and the public does its part, there is no reason to see morbidity rise."

According to Adas, the Central Election Committee is sparing no effort to meet every possible scenario that could arise on election day to minimize the pandemic's effect on the voting process.

"We try to find a solution to every situation. For example, each polling place will have an attendant tasked with enforcing social distancing. Every station with a large hall will have two ballot boxes, to allow for faster entry and exit; voters will be required to disinfect their hands with alcogel; a screen will separate the members of the polling committee and voters; and of course, everyone – members of the polling stations and the voters will be required to wear face masks."

The committee, she added, "plans to devote a lot of time and effort to producing TV ads to inform the public of things [voter arrangements] in the run-up to the election, in which we will try to instill in the public a sense of safety, so they come and vote.

"We all long for a sense of political stability, and we believe that these elections will produce it," Adas said.

Q: Where will coronavirus patients and those in quarantine vote?

"They will have two options: voting in polling stationed set up in one of Clalit's 1,600 centers around the country, or using a voting drive-through."

Asad explained that Clalit – one of Israel's four major healthcare service providers – was selected so as to cut the costs of the operation, adding that by law, the Central Election Committee must set up one polling station for COVID patients and one for those in quarantine in every one of the 155 major localities in Israel.

The most novel idea of the coronavirus-era elections is, of course, the drive-through ballot.

Q: How will drive-through ballots work?

"This method seeks to minimize contact with people who are infected or are in quarantine. Procedure calls for them [voters] to arrive by car at a designated location, where a member of the committee will meet them. After they [voters] present their IDs, they will drive to a polling booth, where a covered tray with the ballot slips will be attached to the car's window. Voters will choose a ballot and cast their vote."

Q: Do you have an estimate as to how many people will vote in polling stations in HMOs and in drive-through ballots?

"At the moment, we don't know how many patients and quarantined people we'll have Election Day, because their number changes every day. However, it is likely that that number will decrease by the elections, due to the vaccination campaign. By our plan, 500 polls will serve those who are quarantined and 500 will serve patients, on top of the drive-through ballots."

Q: The elections are scheduled to take place on Tuesday, March 23. Will you be able to finish counting the votes by Friday, which is also the eve of Passover?

"That's one of the biggest challenges we face because we will only start receiving the ballots after the polls close at 10 p.m. We are considering extending the voting hours until midnight, but that also means the arrival of the ballots [at the Central Election Committee's headquarters in Jerusalem] will be delayed.

"This means we only have two days to count the votes," she explained. "On Wednesday and Thursday, 3,500 people in the Knesset will work around the clock, as we have to finish counting the votes on Friday."

Q: Is that a feasible task, to finish the count in two days?

"We will make it possible. Remember that the counting process will take place while maintaining distance between the teams and taking additional precautions. In addition, we must also hold an election integrity review. By law, we must deliver the final results of the elections within a week."

Central Election Committee workers counting votes during the September 2020 elections (KOKO)

Adas told Israel Hayom that in the internal discussions that took place on how to hold a general election in the midst of the coronavirus pandemic, the possibility of holding the vote across two – maybe even three or four – days rather than on one day was seriously considered as means of minimizing the risk to public health.

However, Election Day in Israel is a one-day sabbatical, designed to facilitate voter turnout. Stretching the process, she said, proved far too costly.

"When we explored implementing this option we realized that the cost of a four-day sabbatical would reach NIS 1.5 billion ($458 million). As many polling stations are in schools, the education system would have to halt operations accordingly, and it would also be impossible for us to recruit 70,000 workers for a four-day election process. For all these reasons, we decided to drop this idea."

Q: Many Israelis are wondering why in 2021 we still use ballot slips instead of more advanced methods, like online voting.

"First of all, the electoral system is enshrined in basic laws," Adas noted, referring to Basic Law: The Knesset, which outlines the process of elections in the Israeli parliament, "so changing the electoral system requires legislation."

"Over the years, we have explored various possibilities for computing different aspects of the electoral system and it presented various issues, such as cybersecurity. Look at what happened in the US," she said, touching in claims that foreign entities intervened in the 2016 presidential elections. "We realized that could affect the voting process in Israel.

"There is also the fundamental principle of. We can't guaranty voter confidentiality on the internet because a manager can stand behind his employees and tell them who to vote for.

"For us, employees of the Central Election Committee, online voting could have been much simpler than the current system, but the fact of the matter is that most European countries, including Britain, Italy, Germany, and Spain, use ballot slips as we do. Many states in the US that had computerized voting went back to using ballot slips because too many issues had arisen."

 

Gideon Allon  

Source: https://www.israelhayom.com/2021/01/24/voting-outside-the-box/ 

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Details of planned Ben Gurion Airport closure - Arutz Sheva Staff

 

​ by Arutz Sheva Staff

Proposal to halt flights to and from Israel, other than humanitarian cases, to be voted on by Israeli government.

Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu on Saturday night held discussions on the issue of whether to close Ben Gurion International Airport and will submit a proposal to the government on Sunday.

Netanyahu held meetings with the Health Minister, Transportation Minister, head of the National Security Council, the directors-general of the Health and Transportation ministries, the coronavirus czar, the head of the Health Services in the Health Ministry, the head of the Civil Aviation Authority, the Attorney General, and other senior officials.

Under the proposal, flights to and from Israel will be halted for two weeks in order to prevent additional mutations of the novel coronavirus from entering Israel.

During the discussions, it was agreed that, subject to government approval:

- Incoming and outgoing foreign and Israeli passenger flights will be halted;

- there will be a reduction in arrival permits to Ben Gurion International Airport, allowing only those in exceptional circumstances and requiring any exceptions to be approved by a committee headed by the Health and Transportation Ministry director generals;

- a separate outline will be formulated for humanitarian cases requiring special flights.

It was also agreed that, subject to government approval, the above decisions will apply to passenger flights for a period of 14 days, and will take effect immediately upon approval by the government.

Meanwhile, IDF intelligence has warned that allowing those who recovered from coronavirus or received the vaccination to skip quarantine upon arrival in Israel may lead to the spread of a vaccine-resistant mutation.

 

Arutz Sheva Staff  

Source: https://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/295451 

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Saturday, January 23, 2021

America’s Great Purge (and Israel) - Caroline Glick

 

​ by Caroline Glick

Democrats demonstrate that they have very short memory


President Joe Biden and the small crowd assembled on the Washington Mall for his inauguration Wednesday celebrated the event as “democracy’s day.” But in truth, the state of democracy in America today is nothing to celebrate.

The talking heads on TV, Democrats and a smattering of anti-Trump Republicans insist that the fault for all of America’s political woes lies with former president Donald Trump and the senators and congressmen who joined him in questioning the results of the election in several swing states. For refusing to set aside evidence of widespread election fraud, they stand accused of inciting an insurrection and so endangering the foundations of American democracy. Trump was impeached for his statements at the January 6 rally. And Democrat lawmakers are calling for Senators Ted Cruz and Josh Hawley to be expelled from the Senate for questioning the electoral college votes from states with widespread allegations of election fraud.

The accusers forget conveniently that Democrat leaders from Nancy Pelosi to Hillary Clinton have insisted since November 2016 that Trump’s electoral victory was “illegitimate” and the job of good Americans was to “resist” his “regime.”

They forget as well that Democrat lawmakers objected to the certification of the electoral college ballots in 2016. And when their objections failed to overturn the election results, a protest broke out in the visitors’ gallery of the Capitol. Several protesters were arrested.  

No one in the media or in the coastal elite ever accused Pelosi and Clinton of inciting an insurrection even as hundreds of thousands of protesters filled the streets demanding that Trump be overthrown.

Republicans still unafraid of being called domestic terrorists and insurrectionists insist that if the violent protesters in the Capitol on January 6 were insurrectionists, their “insurrection” was but a pale glimmer of the insurrection mounted in the streets of America’s cities throughout the spring and summer, with the enthusiastic support and financial backing of Democrat leaders and their corporate sponsors. 700 police officers were injured, dozens of citizens were killed, tens of thousands of businesses were destroyed and vandalized during the Antifa and BlackLivesMatter riots. Property damage and losses were assessed at $2 billion. Government buildings were besieged, burned to the ground and vandalized.

The truth is that both Democrats and Republicans are wrong. Politicians from all sides and at all levels of government have long questioned election results. And no matter how strident their rejection of the results may have been, their actions never undermined America’s democratic foundations.

Likewise, America has been the site of mass protests since before the Revolution. The right to protest is considered so sacred that it is protected in the First Amendment of the Constitution. There are laws governing where the line between protests and lawbreaking lies. And policing protests is as American as the protests themselves. Protests do not threaten American democracy.

The great danger to American democracy is not to be found in the streets. It is certainly not to be found in politicians debating how votes were counted and collected.

The grave danger to American democracy emanates from the unprecedented fusion between the Democrat Party and corporate America. Political philosopher Angelo Codevilla referred to this unity of forces as a ruling “oligarchy” that is replacing the American Republic.

The emerging “oligarchy” is currently enacting something that can rightly be dubbed, “The Great Purge.”

The Great Purge, an event without precedent in American history, isn’t about one side seizing the levers of power for itself. It is about one side denying the other side the right to even vie for power.

The purpose of The Great Purge is not to replace Trump loyalists with Biden loyalists in positions of power in government. Such replacement happens as a matter of course every time a new administration comes into office. The purpose of the Great Purge is to “cancel” the Republican Party and its voters as a legitimate political force and so transform the United States into something approaching a one-party system. To achieve this goal, the Democrats in government and their partners in the corporate and big tech media are using their power to repress, silence, ruin and criminalize tens of millions of private citizens for the “crime” of supporting Trump and the Republican Party.

The Big Tech giants’ coordinated cancellation of all of Trump’s social media accounts almost simultaneously was the opening gambit. It was rapidly followed by Congress’s light speed impeachment of Trump for his alleged role in fomenting the violent protest at the Capitol. Like the social media ban, the impeachment flew through with no debate, no due process, no evidence through the good offices of Democrat lawmakers and their Republican allies who wish to make an example out of Trump. There is every reason to believe that in the coming months and years, the members of the ruling class will continue to abuse their power to destroy Trump whether by bankrupting him or prosecuting him. They must continue to pursue him. For if he perseveres, then they will have failed.  

At some point in the near future, Trump will face a Senate trial. As he left the White House on Wednesday morning, Trump had yet to secure legal counsel for the trial. The reason he has no lawyers doesn’t owe to sudden shortage of good defense attorneys in Washington. It owes to fear of the purge. Qualified lawyers are afraid to represent him.

And they should be.

Cleta Mitchell has long been a fixture in Washington legal circles. A senior partner at Foley and Lardner law firm, Mitchell was a member of Trump’s legal team in his electoral challenges in Georgia. When word got out that she was representing him, Democrat operatives from the Lincoln Project began threatening her firm with a client walkout.

The day after the Lincoln Project began threatening the firm’s business, Mitchell announced her resignation. Within an hour of her announcement, all mention of Mitchell was scrubbed from the firm’s website. One of Washington’s top attorneys had been “cancelled.”

Weeks before, the Lincoln Project did the same thing to two other law firms whose partners were representing Trump’s legal challenges to the Pennsylvania election results. The attorneys saved themselves from immediate cancellation by immediately cancelling their representation of the President of the United States.

Since January 6, petitions of lawyers and law students demanding that Senators Cruz and Hawley be disbarred for lawfully challenging the electoral college votes of disputed states have garnered thousands of signatures. Harvard students are demanding the university withdraw the degrees of Trump advisors and political allies.

Regular Americans who participated in the protests – outside and inside the Capitol – are also being purged. Doctors, lawyers, state lawmakers, policemen and others whose only “crime” was being present have lost their jobs after being “outed.”

Therese Duke, a nurse’s assistant from Massachusetts was one of those “purged.” Duke participated in a protest on January 5 – the night before the Capitol siege — at Freedom Plaza in Washington. She was videoed as she wept, with blood flowing down her face after being punched by a policewoman. Duke’s daughter, a member of the “woke” revolution outed her mother in a leering post on Twitter. The next day, Duke was fired from her job at University of Massachusetts Memorial Health Care. She told a local newspaper that she doesn’t believe she will be able to get another job.

As bad as things are becoming in the private sector, the smoke signals being sent out from Washington are even more alarming. Since January 6, Democrat lawmakers have been preparing legislation that would apply counter-terror laws passed to fight foreign terror groups abroad to investigating and fighting Americans suspected of membership in “domestic terror groups.” Former military, law enforcement and intelligence leaders are pushing for such a move. General Stanley McChrystal, who commanded U.S. forces in Afghanistan spent the past year campaigning against Trump.

Last week McChrystal told Yahoo News, “I see a similar dynamic in the evolution of al Qaeda in Iraq, where a whole generation of angry Arab youth with very poor prospects followed a powerful leader who promised to take them back in time to a better place, and he led them to embrace an ideology that justified their violence. This is now happening in America.”

Former CIA director John Brennan then detailed who the enemy is. Aside from Trump and “lawmakers,” Brennan said the new enemy is comprised of “an unholy alliance of religious extremists, authoritarians, fascists, bigots, racists, nativists and even libertarians.”

Former FBI director James Comey made the goal of the purge explicit. “The Republican Party needs to be burned down or changed,” he told the Guardian.

He figures people would be happy to go along with that.

“Who would want to be part of an organization that at its core is built on lies and racism and know-nothingism? It’s just not a healthy political organization.”

Unfortunately for Israelis, this isn’t just America’s problem. Thanks to New Hope Party Chairman Gideon Sa’ar, Israel is now importing some of the instigators of the purge. Sa’ar has reportedly hired four founders of the Lincoln Project to run his campaign against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the Likud ahead of the March elections.

The Lincoln Project is run by former Republicans who have devoted the last four years of their lives to helping Democrats by demonizing Trump, Republicans and Republican voters. Their efforts met with negligible success in the 2020 elections. Trump increased his vote total by 11 million over 2016.

Trump didn’t lose because Republicans stopped supporting him. He lost because the Democrats massively increased their voter base. The Lincoln Project’s performance was so dismal that Cong. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez demanded that it give its outstanding funds – raised from Democrat donors – to Democrat organs that had actually won the election.

But since its election failure, the Lincoln Project as come into its own. When Ocasio Cortez said Democrats should make a database of Trump administration officials to prepare a blacklist, she was pilloried as a totalitarian. But when the “former Republicans,” from the Lincoln Project said they were compiling such a list, it went over without protest. And ever since, the Lincoln Project has led the way in blacklisting and cancelling everyone from Trump’s attorneys to hotels and vacation websites that served Trump supporters who came to Washington on January 6. It is now calling for the firing of everyone from a county election board chairwoman in Georgia to Republican House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy.

For four years, Israelis have gasped at the similarities between the Israeli left’s unrelenting efforts to destroy Prime Minister Netanyahu, in partnership with the media and the legal fraternity, and the efforts of their American counterparts to destroy Donald Trump.

Sa’ar decision to integrate the instigators of America’s great purge – a purge that is already endangering the democratic order of the most powerful democracy on earth – into Israel’s political bloodstream bodes ill for Israel’s future. And it most certainly tells us something alarming about the direction Sa’ar is interested in taking the country, if his campaign to become the next prime minister succeeds.  

Originally published in Israel Hayom.

 

Caroline Glick  

Source: http://carolineglick.com/americas-great-purge-and-israel/ 

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter