by Shlomo Cesana, Erez Linn and Israel Hayom Staff
Legislation would make excluding Israeli products a criminal offense for public bodies, student unions • Boycotting Israeli goods "is potentially damaging to the U.K.'s relationship with Israel and risked fueling anti-Semitism," says minister.
| 
                                            Wine produced in Judea and 
Samaria on display at a supermarket in Jerusalem [Archive]              
                                  
                                                 
|Photo credit: AP | 
New British government directives are aiming 
to prevent public bodies, universities and student unions from 
boycotting Israeli products, The Independent reported Sunday. According 
to The Sunday Times, the move "follows mounting concern among Jewish 
leaders about anti-Semitism."
British media quoted Cabinet Office Minister 
Matthew Hancock, who is scheduled to visit Israel later this week, as 
saying such boycotts are divisive, potentially damaging to the U.K.'s 
relationship with Israel, and risk fueling anti-Semitism. 
The new bill, already described as a 
"controversial crackdown," seeks to prevent any public body from 
imposing a boycott on a World Trade Organization member, which Israel 
has been since 1995. The regulation will essentially outlaw boycotting 
Israeli products -- a threat often made against goods produced in Judea 
and Samaria -- and allow the British government to take legal action 
against organizations that impose such boycotts.
Under the plan, all publicly funded 
institutions would be barred from excluding goods produced by their idea
 of "unethical companies," such as companies involved in arms trading, 
fossil fuels, tobacco products, or companies based in Judea and Samaria.
Any public bodies that continue to pursue boycotts would face severe penalties, The Independent reported.
Critics of the initiative said it constituted a "gross attack on democratic freedoms."
Hancock said the current situation, which 
gives public bodies autonomy to make ethical purchasing decisions, was 
"undermining" Britain’s national security. 
"We need to challenge and prevent these 
divisive town-hall boycotts," Hancock told the International Business 
Times. "The new guidance on procurement, combined with changes we are 
making to how pension pots can be invested, will help prevent damaging 
and counter-productive local foreign policies undermining our national 
security. ... We will take steps to stop such outdated policies being 
pursued through procurement and pension policies. We will safeguard the 
security of families at home and prevent such playground politics 
undermining our international security." 
MP Eric Pickles, head of Conservative Friends 
of Israel in Britain, said, "This move is very welcome. The attempt by 
the irresponsible Left to demonize Israel is bad for British business, 
bad for the local taxpayer, and deeply damaging to community relations. 
It encourages anti-Semitism and strives to make a municipal foreign 
policy contrary to the interests of the U.K."
Hugh Lanning, head of the U.K.-based Palestine 
Solidarity Campaign, condemned the move as "a gross attack on our 
democratic freedoms and the independence of public bodies from 
government interference."
      Shlomo Cesana, Erez Linn and Israel Hayom Staff
Source: http://www.israelhayom.com/site/newsletter_article.php?id=31771
Copyright - Original materials copyright (c) by the authors.
 
1 comment:
No mention of "Judea and Samaria" labeling----is it included in the new measure? Where does the UK stand?
Post a Comment