by Gregg Roman
J Street has come to be vilified by former friends and distanced from the Left in Israel.
Slightly edited for clarification.
J Street proved to be a woefully inadequate ally in the Obama administration's efforts to strong-arm Israel. 
 | 
  
At the end of 2017, the far-left Jewish advocacy group J Street will celebrate its 10th anniversary. At its inception, J Street promised
 to be the first political movement "to explicitly promote American 
leadership to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict." However, the 
organization's pursuit of this goal was an abject and damning failure.
Circumstances couldn't have been more amenable toward J Street's lofty goal. Within 14 months of J Street's inception, Barack Obama swept to power in elections that also left both houses of Congress controlled by Democrats.
As
 president, Obama's approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict was 
groundbreaking in many ways, deviating from the positions and tone of 
his predecessors, both Republican and Democrat. J Street backed this 
shift with political cover, campaign donations, and organizational 
unanimity, providing a convenient panacea to American Jewish community 
outrage over Obama's maneuvers.
The
 fledgling J Street found itself at the top table with veteran Jewish 
and pro-Israel organizations at the White House, with almost 
unprecedented access during Obama's two terms.
J Street touted itself as a vital part of the Obama administration's Israeli-Palestinian policy. 
 | 
  
It
 wasn't merely a spectator: J Street saw itself as a vital part of the 
administration's strategy and policy on Israel and the peace process. It
 prided itself on the puppeteer role it played in defending the White 
House or pushing its policy platform.
"We were the blocking-back, clearing space for the quarterback to do what we wanted him to do," said
 J Street's president, Jeremy Ben-Ami, in 2011. He added, Obama "hasn't 
been able to push as aggressively as we would like," and J Street has 
"switched from being out front and clearing the way, to pushing him to 
do something more."
Something more turned out to be a lot less.
During
 the full eight years of the Obama administration, which set as one of 
its foreign policy goals a peaceful resolution to the Israel-Palestinian
 conflict, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Palestinian 
Authority President Mahmoud Abbas never sat in the same room for more 
than a few hours in total.
Israeli
 Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Palestinian Authority President 
Mahmoud Abbas sat in the same room for no more than a few hours during 
the entire Obama presidency. 
 | 
  
While
 Netanyahu constantly repeated that he was willing to meet with the 
Palestinian leader at any place at any time, with no preconditions, 
Abbas made a series of impossible preconditions that pushed meaningful 
negotiations further and further away. J Street ended up blaming Netanyahu for Abbas's intransigence.
Mutual
 distrust between the parties may not have been greater in a generation,
 and it could be argued that peace is as far away as it has been since 
the Oslo Peace Process began. J Street's continued criticism of the 
Israeli government created a pseudo-Zionist political shield on the 
Jewish community's left flank that the Obama administration used to 
blame Israel for actions largely caused by Palestinian obstinacy.
For eight years J Street supported Obama's destructive policies toward Israel like the unilateral settlement freeze, nuclear détente with Iran, and his allowance for international condemnation of Israeli communities in the West Bank.
As a group that prided
 itself on its ability to make its voice heard in the American 
administration's halls of power, J Street's inability to influence must 
take a very heavy responsibility for the remission of the peace process.
Moreover, in its unrelenting vision of itself as chartering new territory, it lost many ideological allies.
J Street President Jeremy Ben-Ami's efforts to conjure support for Obama's treatment of Israel fell flat even among Democrats. 
 | 
  
At
 the end of 2008, when Israel decided to defend itself against incessant
 rocket attacks from the terrorist organization Hamas in the Gaza Strip,
 J Street attacked Israel's defensive actions. Rabbi Eric Yoffie, president emeritus of the Union for Reform Judaism, called
 J Street's reaction to Israeli policy "morally deficient, profoundly 
out of touch with Jewish sentiment and also appallingly naïve."
In 2009, J Street initially tried to facilitate
 meetings between Richard Goldstone, lead author of a slanderous report 
on Israel's war on terror in Gaza, and members of Congress.
In
 2011, when it appeared to advocate for the U.S. not to veto a deeply 
problematic UN resolution condemning Israel, supporters like Democratic 
Congressman Gary Ackerman of New York cut ties with the organization.
J Street also placed itself out of mainstream pro-Israel circles when it invited
 prominent activists in the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) 
movement to its conferences and claimed that George Soros had not funded
 the organization until it became a matter of public record that he had 
in fact provided significant donations, especially during its formative years.
All of these hits have left the reputations of J Street and its combative president battered and bruised.
However, the latest election results have delivered the knock-out punch.
J Street has come to be vilified by former friends and distanced from the Left in Israel. 
 | 
  
If
 perhaps the only selling point J Street could offer its potential 
donors in recent years has been largely unfettered (if squandered and 
ineffective) access to the White House, this will now be completely 
removed from the equation by the victory of Donald Trump and continued Republican control of both houses of Congress.
J
 Street has now become an organization vilified by former friends, 
distanced from the Left in Israel, and distrusted by many more. It may 
reconstitute itself in some constellation or another, but its heyday has
 past.
Gregg Roman is director of the Middle East Forum, a research center headquartered in Philadelphia.
Source: http://www.meforum.org/6529/j-street-dead-end
Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter
Copyright - Original materials copyright (c) by the authors.
No comments:
Post a Comment