by Rick Moran
Sad, maddening, at a loss for words - the gamut of emotions that one experiences upon hearing the news that Syria will still be added to the Human Rights Council at the UN boggles the mind.
What's worse? The dripping hypocrisy or the total obliviousness of the SecGen?
And despite calling for an independent investigation into the crackdown, which has left hundreds dead, U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon apparently won't do much about blocking Syria's path to the human rights group.
"That's not really for the secretary general to suggest to a member state," said Martin Nesirky, a spokesman for the secretary-general, when asked if the U.N. chief would ask Syria to drop out of the running for the post. When asked if Ban had brought up the point during his telephone conversation April 9 with Assad, Nesirsky told Fox News, "that's not really something the secretary general would raise specifically, because it's for other member states to decide on the membership of the Human Rights Council."
Ammar Abdulhamid, a Syrian human rights activist based in Washington, called on the secretary-general "to have a greater sense of decency and courage, and to realize that his position gives him a certain moral authority and puts him exactly in the position to tell the Assads that their candidacy at this stage is unwelcome." Abdulhamid was forced to flee Syria in 2005 following criticism of the Assad regime, and still finds himself under attack by the regime. His website was recently hacked and now posts the latest videos and news on his blog (http://syrianrevolutiondigest.blogspot.com).
A State Department spokesman last week said the U.S. would oppose Syria's bid to the Human Rights Council, calling it "inappropriate and hypocritical." But it would seem Syria is virtually guaranteed a seat, having been selected as one of four candidates for the Asian bloc.
President Bush refused to have anything to do with the Council after the anti-Israel majority put on a dog and pony show of hate, bigotry, and anti-Semitism in Durban, South Africa.
But with his policy of engagement and his "Let's not be beastly to the thugs of the world" attitude, President Obama hopped on board the Council train despite members whose record on Human Rights might better be read at the World Court.
Now we're stuck; either we meekly accept this outrageous insult to human decency and common sense, or we walk away and have nothing to do with this irrational, hypocritical body.
Which path do you think our president will choose?Pass me the Pepto. I think I'm going to be sick.
Copyright - Original materials copyright (c) by the authors.