Wednesday, November 11, 2020

Victor Davis Hanson Video: Why are Trump Supporters Disillusioned? - Frontpagemag.com

 

​ by Frontpagemag.com

The anomalies no one can explain.

 

 

In this new video, historian scholar Victor Davis Hanson is interviewed by former Deputy Prime Minister of Australia, John Anderson, to  explain why Donald Trump's supporters are disillusioned and skeptical of the US election results so far. Hanson also addresses “anomalies no one can explain”. Don’t miss it! 

And make sure to watch Barry Nussbaum, the founder of American Truth Project, discuss Confronting the Dems' Election Steal, where he unveils What the battle plan has to be: 

 

Frontpagemag.com  

Source: https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2020/11/victor-davis-hanson-why-are-trump-supporters-frontpagemagcom/ 

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

The real story behind AG Barr authorizing investigations of vote fraud blows away the MSM narrative - Thomas Lifson

 

​ by Thomas Lifson

Barr's order is hugely significant, for it removes the obstacle that has prevented serious investigations of vote fraud up to now.

Even some of my most respected conservative correspondents have been taken in by pessimism over Attorney General William Barr's authorization of investigation of vote fraud.  The media cabal seeking to oust President Trump focused on the abrupt purported "resignation" (he is keeping his federal paycheck and transferring to a different post) of Richard Pilger, director of the DOJ Criminal Division's Election Crimes Branch.  The narrative Pilger offers, all but universally adopted by the media, is that Barr is violating established norms and acting out of (corrupt) political motives.

Pilger's email called Barr's edict "an important new policy abrogating the 40-year-old Non-Interference policy of ballot fraud investigations in the period prior to elections becoming certified and uncontested."

"Having familiarized myself with the new policy and its ramifications ... I must regretfully resign from my role as Director of the Election Crimes Branch," Pilger wrote in his message, first reported by The New York Times. "I have enjoyed very much working with you for over a decade to aggressively and diligently enforce federal criminal election law, policy, and practice without partisan fear or favor."

That was enough to spark demands for Barr's impeachment.

But there is a lot more going on here, and despite the frustrated worries of some of my conservative friends and colleagues that nothing will come of this, Barr's order is hugely significant, for it removes the obstacle that has prevented serious investigations of vote fraud up to now.

To explain, I turn to Mark Wauck, an email correspondent and contributor who has written important articles here, often building on his wealth of experience as a retired FBI special agent.  His blog Meaning in History is a daily read for me.  Yesterday, he explained the real significance of Barr's move, and with his permission I quote extensively.

Can you imagine watching a baseball game without knowing the rules? That's what watching the criminal justice process can be like for outsiders — and even for many insiders, because often times knowledge of the rules is compartmentalized. That's the case with yesterday's news that AG Bill Barr issued a memo specifically authorizing local US Attorneys and their prosecutors to undertake investigations of election fraud. (snip)

Mark draws on the work of Shipwreckedcrew (SWC), the DOJ veteran who writes anonymously at RedState, drawing on this post in particular (boldface and colored type in original):

The point is that there's more to see here than just another career DoJ drama queen flouncing off the election fraud stage. Barr took his action because he became aware that investigations of election fraud were being blocked from within DoJ HQ.

As SWC details, the drama queen, one Richard Pilger, has been in charge of the Election Crimes Branch at DoJ HQ for quite a few years. During the Obama years he wrote up a manual of procedures for the handling of allegations of election law violations. That manual specified that the local US Attorneys (USAs) — including their Assistants (AUSAs) and FBI agents — could take no action with regard to allegations of election law violations without DoJ HQ — meaning, without Pilger's — approval.

There's an important distinction here, one that might seem minor but which helps to see events of the last week more clearly — those events leading up to Barr's action. 

First of all, that provision in the manual didn't prevent the FBI or local USA offices from receiving allegations of election crime violations.

Now, you'll recall that shortly after the election, Barr had his DAG specifically state that FBI agents could enter election centers armed. That was a clear sign that the FBI was receiving complaints of election law violations and was responding to them by going to election centers — presumably because the complaints were coming from workers at those centers. They were being blocked from entering because they were armed, and their complaints about this obstruction got to Barr very quickly.

So, why were the agents armed, and why didn't they just ditch their sidearms somewhere and get on with the investigation? Because FBI agents are required to be armed when conducting official business unless authorized otherwise — they can't exempt themselves from the requirement. There has to be a reason for an agent to go unarmed, and it has to be authorized from higher up. There's no need to go into the reasons for this policy — it has to do with investigative authorities — but I can tell you that it caused years of trouble with the airlines, and even with individual pilots who thought they were the law on 'their' plane.

Clearly, then, local election officials were probably refusing entry to FBI agents, perhaps with the assistance of armed local police or security. This was presenting a roadblock for the agents, who were obviously not about to engage in a shoot out in those circumstances! Thus, Barr's intervention. 

As SWC notes:

Contrary to popular belief, the FBI has not been sitting on its hands all week while evidence of suspicious activity has been developing in multiple locations across the country.

So, Barr at that point knew that the FBI was doing its job. But then it turned out that that wasn't the only roadblock for investigators. It's entirely possible that Barr may not initially have been aware that Pilger was blocking any substantive action on the allegations that the FBI (and probably USAs) was/were receiving. When Barr learned of this, he took action. As SWC explains:

What happened today, and what prompted Pilger to "quit" was that AG Barr said to US Attorneys – "If you have substantial allegations of election fraud in your district, you have authority to investigate that."  Basically, Barr cut Pilger and Election Crimes Branch out of the picture as "gatekeepers" to starting investigations in places like Philadelphia, Milwaukee, Detroit, and Atlanta.

It's a bit like federalism in action within DoJ, with authority being devolved to the local judicial district level. But you and I would never have known what was behind Barr's action without insider knowledge of Election Branch procedures. So, with one stroke of the pen Barr has broken up the logjam that obstructionists at DoJ (protected by civil service laws) had constructed.

To understand why this has liberal knickers in such a knot, it's necessary to understand the effect of Barr's action. FBI agents — the investigators — can do quite a bit of investigating without grand jury involvement. Many cases can be essentially completed using techniques such as interviews and physical surveillance, consensual searches, and so forth. It all depends on the nature of the crime involved. In the case of election fraud, it's safe to say that, beyond volunteered information, no evidence of substance can be gathered without use of a grand jury subpoena, no matter what election workers may have told the FBI. What Barr has done with his action is to facilitate grand jury involvement in these investigations.

Again, SWC explains:

But, missing from much of the coverage of what Barr did today is the most significant point — what his statement did was authorize the use of federal grand juries to gather evidence.

That is, Barr authorized local federal prosecutors to make that decision to open election fraud investigations, bypassing DoJ HQ.

FBI agents will often conduct interviews and gather evidence without the benefit of grand jury assistance.  But federal prosecutors don't go forward with new cases without opening up a grand jury matter.

THIS is what the left-wing pundit class is so alarmed about over AG Barr's announcement.

As always, the famously aggressive Barr made sure of his ground — after all, he's surrounded by a host of enemies at DoJ and has to be careful not to hand them any ammunition. But then he took measured, but far reaching, action that was appropriate to the issue at hand. And he did so promptly. Keep that in mind with regard to other matters, as well. 

We don't know what evidence will be uncovered with grand jury subpoenas in hand, but with these tools available, the fraud that is self-evident when poll-watchers are excluded, when the counting of votes mysteriously is shut down at 2 A.M. in Democrat strongholds of Philadelphia, Detroit, and Milwaukee and Trump majorities promptly disappear in their key states, the odds look pretty good for President Trump.

Photo credit: Shane T. McCoy, US Marshals Service, Attribution 2.0 Generic (CC BY 2.0) license.

 

Thomas Lifson  

Source: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/11/the_real_story_behind_ag_barr_authorizing_investigations_of_vote_fraud_blows_away_the_msm_narrative.html 

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

A Biden Presidency and the American Gulag - Robert Spencer

 

​ by Robert Spencer

Out of the question? Of course, except for all the leftists who are calling for it.

 


Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-Kolyma) tweeted Friday: “Is anyone archiving these Trump sycophants for when they try to downplay or deny their complicity in the future? I foresee decent probability of many deleted Tweets, writings, photos in the future.” Michael Simon, a former Obama administration staffer, tweeted in response (and later deleted the tweet): “Yes, we are. Every administration staffer, campaign staffer, bundler, lawyer who represented them – everyone.” He linked to “The Trump Accountability Project,” a website that proclaims ominously: “Remember what they did.” Remember it, apparently, in order to hound these people out of public life and into poverty or worse. Is the age of American gulags about to dawn?

Emily Abrams, a Pete Buttigieg campaign worker, tweeted (and then made her account private): “We’re launching the Trump Accountability Project to make sure anyone who took a paycheck to help Trump undermine America is held responsible for what they did.” The Trump Accountability Project website proclaims its intention to destroy Trump supporters:

             We must never forget those who furthered the Trump agenda.

             We should welcome in our fellow Americans with whom we differ politically.

But those who took a paycheck from the Trump Administration should not profit from their efforts to tear our democracy apart. The world should never forget those who, when faced with a decision, chose to put their money, their time, and their reputations behind separating children from their families, encouraging racism and anti-Semitism, and negligently causing the unnecessary loss of life and economic devastation from our country's failed response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Aside from the tissue of falsehoods this presents about the Trump administration, this statement raises the obvious question about what “the world” should do after it recalls all these things about Trump supporters. The answer is not hard to imagine: they should be shunned by everyone: denied employment, denied housing, denied a bank account, denied everything. Camps will have to be constructed to house them, unless Emily Abrams, Michael Simon and AOC want the streets to be filled with millions of starving Trump supporters.

Remember also that on October 17, Bill Clinton’s Labor Secretary Robert B. “Third” Reich tweeted: “When this nightmare is over, we need a Truth and Reconciliation Commission. It would erase Trump’s lies, comfort those who have been harmed by his hatefulness, and name every official, politician, executive, and media mogul whose greed and cowardice enabled this catastrophe.”

A Truth and Reconciliation Commission to shame and vilify Trump’s supporters! And what will this Commission decide to do with them, Mr. Reich? Reeducation camps? Worse? Reich may be a doctrinaire authoritarian fanatic, but there has been no chorus of condemnation from Democrat leaders for his ugly little threat, either.

Ultimately, Reich, Abrams, Simon, Ocasio-Cortez and their ilk will not be satisfied with anything short of the deaths of those whom they have targeted. You think that’s an exaggeration? Consider the fact that last year, fascist “journalist” Andrew Kaczynski of CNN tried to get the acting director of the Interior Department’s Bureau of Land Management, William Perry Pendley, fired not just for denying the Left’s “climate change” mythology, but also for opposing jihad violence and illegal immigration. The guy is in the Bureau of Land Management. What does that have to do with jihad violence and illegal immigration, much less “global warming”? Nothing. But that doesn’t matter. Kaczynski showed here that the cancel culture wants its targets nothing less than dead: if Pendley had sought a position as a grocery clerk, Kaczynski would have shown up to get him fired, because he departs from the Left’s orthodoxy.

Nor is Kacyzynski alone. A few years ago I was invited to address an education conference in California that had nothing whatsoever to do with Islam; the hate-filled fascist “Islamophobia” propagandist and future real estate agent Nathan Lean got the cowardly Catholic bishop Jaime Soto, under whose auspices the conference was being held, to cancel my appearance. (I spoke at the conference as scheduled, in a venue outside the bishop’s purview.) And also a few years ago, the Washington Post discovered that the Qur’an-burning pastor Terry Jones was driving for Uber; they duly got him fired. I don’t approve of book-burning, but it is not illegal in the United States, and the idea that a man must be hounded forever and prevented from making a living for views that dissent from the Left’s reveals what Leftists really are.

So it has been clear for years that if you dissent from Leftist orthodoxy, you must be destroyed. Not just “debunked” or “discredited” in your field, but also prevented from doing everything else, so that the only option you have is to die. Will Biden open the gulags? Or will he leave that to Kamala Harris? Or perhaps for a future President Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, elected in 2024 or 2028, now that stolen elections have become the norm in this unhappy nation?

* * *

Photo credit: NRKbeta 

 

Robert Spencer is the director of Jihad Watch and a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. He is author of 21 books, including the New York Times bestsellers The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades) and The Truth About Muhammad. His latest book is Rating America’s Presidents: An America-First Look at Who Is Best, Who Is Overrated, and Who Was An Absolute Disaster. Follow him on Twitter here. Like him on Facebook here.

Source: https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2020/11/biden-presidency-and-american-gulag-robert-spencer/ 

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

The Three Things To Do Next - Katie Hopkins

 

​ by Katie Hopkins

We have work to do.

 


“When I am not crying, I feel frozen and numb.”

The text above, like so many others I have received from the great Americans I was fortunate to campaign alongside this summer in America, threatens to break my heart all over again.

And I understand it. I can feel it — viscerally. As a respectful outsider to your great country, I use "we" when I think of you and me, because I feel it just as keenly too.

We feel disbelief at what just happened and near paralysis at the thought of it. It is as if someone changed the speed setting on life and forced everything into slow motion, where you get to watch a horrible moment of impact play out in excruciating detail, wincing hard for the moment of impact that hasn’t truly made itself felt just yet.

And there IS a lot of tough stuff to swallow:

1) World leaders like Boris Johnson congratulating Joe Biden, scrambling to be the first to deposit an odious message on Twitter: "looking forward to working together on our shared priorities of climate change, trade and security." In truth, Biden’s policies (were he to be formally elected as President) would actually be a version of AOC’s Green New Deal and a disaster for America and the UK.

2) The media and their relentless push for Biden, pumping a win they have no right to declare, and reveling in the perceived humiliation of Trump.

The self-aggrandizer-in-chief from CNN, Don Lemon with his $4 million annual salary, believes he has had it toughest of all: "I don’t dare speak for my colleagues, but I can’t tell you how difficult its been as a journalist to cover this dark part of our history. Let’s hope the attacks on journalists, journalism and EVERYONE ends."

Then again, he owns poodles…Has it really been that difficult for you, Little Don, you poor little tortured puppet, sitting in your comfy studio with your make-up artist and production team?

3) And then there’s the Biden-Harris supporters themselves (although admittedly many of these appear to be people who died a decade ago). I watch them celebrating the alleged Biden win and realized they aren’t actually celebrating a Biden win at all — but a perceived Trump loss.

For them, Trump losing is much more meaningful than a Biden win. And that tells you a lot about Democrat supporters and the media who are backing them. It is never about the hard work of building something great, but rather the temporary thrill of destroying something already in play.

Regardless of all this tough stuff we are being force-fed, there is a way for us to take back control and to feel a whole lot better:

[1] We can reject the narrative.

The media does NOT call an election. Fraud is NOT acceptable and until the courts have ruled on any outstanding matters, Biden is NOT the President. It does not matter how many world leaders want to congratulate him, or how many times you hear "President-Elect Biden" repeated in the press.

We have to reject the narrative we are being force-fed. Look what happens to people inside the media when they try to speak for themselves or articulate the alleged fraud. Yet again, Judge Jeanine was sacrificed by Fox News when she tried to speak her truths. I wish the boys on the team had the moral courage to stand by her side.

[2] We can remember our truths.

They are powerful and authentic. Our truths are built on four years of supporting the President, of working hard at grass roots to build momentum and support, and understanding the difference he has made to the lives of ordinary Americans. Our faith is strong because of time invested in attending his rallies or helping with his re-election. And the truths of the Republican Party are strong too.

Right now, the Republican Party is doing better with Hispanics and blacks that at any other time in its history. And this success has been demonstrated in the House and Senate. Republican incumbents held their Senate seats, creating a Republican majority of 53 to 47 pre-runoffs.

Republicans flipped eight House seats, six by female candidates. At least 13 GOP women are headed to the House. And these newly-elected women are fierce conservatives who echo Trump on a range of issues, including building a wall, defending gun rights, and scrapping the Affordable Care Act.

Our truths matter.

[3] We stand strong.

Now is the time to hold the line behind President Trump.

We have observed the silence of those keeping their heads below the parapet, and heard from the treacherous list of cretins who could not wait to stick the boot in and display their RINO credentials for the world to see; like Mitt Romney calling Trump a 900-lb. gorilla. Better to be a 900-lb. gorilla than a snake.

None of us wants to be like Mitt Romney. In fact, I’d argue Mitt Romney doesn’t even want to be Mitt Romney as a failed Presidential candidate and someone that voted to impeach the President of his own party. How on earth can he call himself a Republican?

We do not concede. We put our heads up and follow the leaders pushing us forward like Gaetz, Marjorie Taylor-Greene, and young influencers like Scott Pressler and Brandon Straka who are national treasures (or at least should be) and have been relentless in their efforts to support the President. 

Millions more Americans voted for Trump in 2020 than in 2016. He remains the most important and powerful man in the Republican Party, and arguably the Party is stronger than at any time before.

My message back to your texts is that you don’t have to sit and watch this car crash, election steal play out in slow-mo any more. You have work to do.

You resist the narrative. You know your truths. And you stand strong.

 

Katie Hopkins  

Source: https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2020/11/three-things-do-next-katie-hopkins/ 

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Lawyers, investigators uncovering fraud and corruption in key 2020 election states - Phill Kline

 

​ by Phill Kline

The details are gradually coming into focus.

Big Tech and the mainstream media are the only ones who have called the election for Joe Biden.  Fortunately, neither of those institutions decides who will serve as our president.  Only the American people, guided by the rule of law, can do that.

Ensuring that the 2020 presidential election is resolved lawfully and consistently with the Constitution is imperative.  But time is short, and the forces seeking to prevent scrutiny of the results are powerful.

The coronavirus pandemic gave biased actors an opening to exploit chaos, fear, and uncertainty to manipulate the electoral process in a lawless manner designed to benefit the left.  What we are seeing now is the result of those efforts.

The world's strongest democracy deserves an open and fair election for all American voters.  Not to allow the rule of law to be followed and prevail disenfranchises every American voter.  The president is not picked by Big Tech or big media companies.  Rather, the Constitution and federal and state laws designed to allow Americans to fairly cast their ballot and observe the counting of those ballots protect the voice of each and every American, regardless of ideology.

These laws were not followed.  Windows were boarded up to prevent observation.  People were kicked out of counting rooms.  Americans were denied their right to witness what went on in the counting rooms.  This lawlessness — and yes, I mean lawlessness, in that there was a willful defiance of the law — has called hundreds of thousands of ballots into question.

Mr. Trump does not win a second term unless the Electoral College awards him a majority when it convenes in mid-December.  Likewise, Mr. Biden cannot become president-elect until that same time.  This is our law.  This is our Constitution.  Every American should allow the law and Constitution to work toward the transparent and fair election we deserve.

As director of the Amistad Project run by the non-partisan Thomas More Society, I have a large and growing team of lawyers and investigators working in key states — such as Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota, and Georgia — to identify and expose the corruption and fraud that we believe is responsible for the appearance of a Biden victory in this election.  The details are gradually coming into focus, but the left's broader strategy has been apparent for months, and we've been fighting it every step of the way.

It started with last-minute changes to election procedures, many of which violate state election laws, that were explicitly designed to make it easier for voters to cast ballots by mail and open the door for fraud.  Billionaires such as Mark Zuckerberg were then able to step in and funnel hundreds of millions of dollars through left-wing nonprofits to ensure that voters in left-leaning jurisdictions would disproportionately benefit from the new rules while also paying the salaries of those receiving and counting votes.

Ballot drop boxes, for instance, were made plentiful in left-leaning urban areas such as Philadelphia, but they were few and far between in the more sparsely populated counties where Donald Trump tends to draw his strongest support. 

Leftist governors delivered another blow to conservative voters at the eleventh hour, using COVID as an excuse to make in-person voting more difficult on Election Day by closing polling locations.

Giving liberal voters unequal access to the ballot box was only the most visible part of the strategy.  The second phase began once the votes had been cast.  Based primarily on coronavirus concerns, election officials refused to give Republican observers meaningful access to the counting rooms where results were being tabulated, even going so far as to lock the doors and cover the windows in some locations.

In the absence of meaningful oversight, left-leaning poll workers set about "curing" ballots that had been rejected by voting machines for irregularities.  That means interpreting the intentions of a voter when that person was not present, filling out a new ballot on his behalf, and discarding the original.  That's obviously a monumental exercise of discretion, which is why state laws require observers from both parties to be present when ballots are "cured."

In most places, laws were followed and transparency was maintained.  Unfortunately, that was not the case in some of the jurisdictions that may well determine the outcome of this extremely close election.  Disparate treatment of voters based on who they are, where they live, or which candidates they support is a violation of numerous federal laws, as well as the U.S. Constitution.

Big Tech and the mainstream media are declaring the election over based on the unofficial results of a deeply flawed process.  There is still time to restore certainty and transparency to this election, but we must act quickly and decisively. 

The world's strongest democracy has the strength to make sure that this presidential election is fair and transparent.  Right now, it is not.

 

Phill Kline is a former Kansas attorney general.  He currently serves as pulpit pastor of Amherst Baptist Church, a law school professor, and director of the Amistad Project of the Thomas More Society.  Previously, he served as president of the Midwest Association of Attorneys General, was on the Executive Committee of the National Association of Attorneys General, and was co-chairperson of the Violent Sexual Predator Apprehension Task Force.  He was a Kansas House member for eight years where he chaired the Appropriations Committee and the Taxation Committee and authored victim's rights laws and welfare reform.

Source: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/11/lawyers_investigators_uncovering_fraud_and_corruption_in_key_2020_election_states.html 

 Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

IRGC Unveils 'Missile Machine Gun' Capable Of Rapidly Firing Long-Range Ballistic Missiles - MEMRI

 

​ by MEMRI

Our Enemies Will Be Unable To Move Or Breathe

The following is a complimentary offering from the MEMRI Iran Threat Monitor Project (ITMP). For more information, write to memri@memri.org with "ITMP Subscription" in the subject line.

On November 4, 2020, Channel 1 (Iran) aired a report about the unveiling of a "missile machine gun" system capable of rapidly and accurately firing long-range ballistic missiles. The reporter explained that the system uses carriages to rapidly launch the missiles, and he said that all of Iran's underground missile cities will be equipped with this technology. IRGC Commander-in-Chief General Hossein Salami, who made an address at the unveiling, said that Iran must prove its technical, tactical, operational, and strategic "control" over the enemy.

Click here to view this clip on MEMRI TV

MTV8428.JPG

MTV84281.jpg

Narrator: "These are the first images of the IRGC's missile machine gun. This newest innovation from the IRGC's Aerospace Force [is] a smart system capable of rapid or timed fire of ballistic missiles. More than anything, this is evidence of the liveliness and the dynamic nature of the Islamic Revolution. The smart missile machine gun system was unveiled today in the presence of the IRGC's Commander-in-Chief and the Aerospace Force Commander. It can rapidly launch long-range ballistic missiles in quick succession at specific targets.

MTV84282.jpg

MTV84283.jpg

[...]

"This is just one of Iran's dozens of missile cities that contain the launch silos, the warehouses, the carriages, and the containers that store the missiles upright and ready to be launched. This demonstrates their new and incredible destructive capacity to those who want to harm Iran and its people."

Hossein Salami: "Your fingers must always be on the triggers. You see that sometimes the enemy beats the drums of threats. We must restrain it. 

MTV84288.jpg

"We must prove our psychological superiority, and our technical, tactical, operational, and strategic control over the enemy. When the missiles are flying, the enemy shudders [in fear]. Today, this capability guarantees that our regime will continue to live and to deter [its enemies]."

MTV84285a.JPG

MTV84285.jpg

Narrator: "The carriages that bear those long-range ballistic missiles enable rapid launch. This is an innovation, and there is nothing like it in the world. From here on out, all of the missile cities throughout Islamic Iran are equipped with this missile machine gun. This means that if the enemies of this country [decide] to [make] a mistake, they would have no opportunity to move or breathe. This would be thanks to the IGRC's rapid launching of ballistic missiles."

MTV84286.JPG

MTV84287.JPG

View The Clip

 

MEMRI  

Source: https://www.memri.org/tv/irgc-unveils-missile-machine-gun-rapid-fire-long-range-ballistic-missiles 

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Why the Muslim Brotherhood Came Out of Its Hole - Khaled Abu Toameh

 

​ by Khaled Abu Toameh

The Islamists are desperate to return to power in Egypt, which is why they are prepared to even court the American "Satan" to reach this goal. These are the same Islamists who have been condemning Arabs who have any contact with Americans.

  • The labeled terrorist organization [Muslim Brotherhood] said, with a straight face, that it "wishes Mr. Biden, the American people, and the peoples of the whole world to continue to live in dignity under the principles of freedom, justice, democracy and respect for human rights."

  • "There are several reports confirming the Muslim Brotherhood's support for Biden so that the organization would be able to avoid restrictions on political Islam movements.... Now, they are hoping that the US will remove them from the list of terrorist organizations." — Israa Ahmed Fuad, Egyptian political analyst and author, Youm7.com, November 7, 2020.

  • The Muslim Brotherhood "are partners of Democratic administrations in ruining the region and supporting extremism." — Amin Al-Alawi, Moroccan researcher, 24saa.ma, November 8, 2020.

  • No US administration can afford to dismiss the warning bells sounded by Arabs in the wake of the Muslim Brotherhood's attempt to present itself as a peaceful group that seeks to bring freedom and democracy to the Arab world.

  • The Islamists are desperate to return to power in Egypt, which is why they are prepared to even court the American "Satan" to reach this goal. These are the same Islamists who have been condemning Arabs who have any contact with Americans. At this time of possible administrative change in America, the Arabs who do not support the Muslim Brotherhood -- particularly those living in Egypt and the Gulf states -- fervently hope that their alarm about Islamists will be heard loud and clear by Biden and his group.

The message Arabs are sending to the new US administration is: Do not repeat the mistakes of former President Barack Obama, whose administration sided with then Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi, a Muslim Brotherhood member. Pictured: Then US Secretary of State John Kerry (left) meets with Morsi in Cairo on March 3, 2013. (Photo by Khaled Desouki/AFP via Getty Images)

Will a new US administration possibly under Joe Biden help revive the Muslim Brotherhood, which is considered a terrorist organization by Egypt, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Bahrain and Syria? Why is the Muslim Brotherhood rejoicing over the "victory" of Biden?

Some Arabs say they are worried when they see the Muslim Brotherhood celebrating the results of the US presidential election. These Arabs fear that the Muslim Brotherhood, backed by Qatar and Turkey, is preparing to make a comeback under a potential Biden administration.

The message Arabs are sending to the new US administration is: Do not repeat the mistakes of former President Barack Obama, whose administration sided with then Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi, a Muslim Brotherhood member. The Arabs also want to remind a potentially new US administration that the Islamists and their supporters are inveterate liars who care only about their own interests.

"Muslim Brotherhood activists and media outlets have seemed very enthusiastic about the Democratic candidate Joe Biden's progress in US election results," according to the London-based The Arab Weekly newspaper.

"Analysts attributed this enthusiasm to their [Muslim Brotherhood's] wish for an encore of their experience in the era of former President Barack Obama, during which they played a remarkable role riding the wave of the 'Arab Spring' uprisings...

"Pro-Muslim Brotherhood activists and media professionals in Egypt, Tunisia, Yemen and the Gulf states did not hide their prayers for a Biden victory...

"From the outset, the Muslim Brothers did not hide their bias towards Biden. They presented him as a supporter of Islam and Muslims, highlighting the fact that he cites the Prophet's [Mohammed] hadiths..."

Last week, the Muslim Brotherhood published a statement on its official website in which it wrote that it "appreciates the American electoral process, which resulted in Mr. Joe Biden winning the position of the new President of the United States, a victory that proves that the American people are still able to impose their will."

The labeled terrorist organization said, with a straight face, that it "wishes Mr. Biden, the American people, and the peoples of the whole world to continue to live in dignity under the principles of freedom, justice, democracy and respect for human rights."

The Muslim Brotherhood called on Biden "to review the policies of support for [Arab] dictatorships, and the crimes and violations committed by tyrannical regimes around the world."

The statement surprised few Arabs, many of whom scoffed at the Muslim Brotherhood's talk about "freedom, justice, democracy and respect for human rights." Saudi writer Tariq Al-Homayed remarked:

"As expected, the Muslim Brotherhood organization came out of its hole and issued a statement congratulating Joe Biden and asking him to act against those they call dictatorships... We say expected, because the Muslim Brotherhood, who used to condemn their critics as agents of the West and Zionists, have revealed their face, and they are urging America to intervene against our countries now under the pretext of democracy."

Al-Homayed wondered whether the dictatorships the Muslim Brotherhood are talking about include Iran, Turkey and Qatar. "Are the dictatorships those who want to protect the Arab countries from the evil of the Muslim Brotherhood, their lies, and their terror?," he asked.

Al-Homayed pointed out that the Muslim Brotherhood had mourned Qassem Soleimani, the commander of Iran's Quds Force, "who fought Iraqis, Syrians, and Lebanese, and was the architect of devastation in the region."

Soleimani was assassinated in a targeted US drone strike on January 3, 2020, in Baghdad. He was personally sanctioned by the United Nations and the European Union and was designated as a terrorist by the US in 2005.

Egyptian political analyst and writer Israa Ahmed Fuad, reacting to the Muslim Brotherhood statement, said that the terrorist organization "seeks in various ways to exploit any international circumstance in order to recycle itself and come to the fore after its sabotage project in the region failed with the collapse of their regime in Egypt in 2013" - a reference to the downfall of the regime of President Mohammed Morsi.

"There are several reports confirming the Muslim Brotherhood's support for Biden so that the organization would be able to avoid restrictions on political Islam movements," Fuad added. "The Obama era was an ideal period for them. Now, they are hoping that the US will remove them from the list of terrorist organizations."

Moroccan researcher Amin Al-Alawi said that the Muslim Brotherhood's "celebration of Biden reflects a nostalgia for the era of revolutions and the Democrats' support for the Arab Spring." The Muslim Brotherhood, he charged, "are partners of Democratic administrations in ruining the region and supporting extremism. The Muslim Brotherhood believes that Biden will bring them back to power [in Egypt], especially after [President Donald] trump's four-year presence has aborted their ambitions."

Khaled Salah, editor-in-chief of the Egyptian newspaper Al-Youm Al-Sabi', mocked the Muslim Brotherhood's greetings to Biden. Salah said that the Muslim Brotherhood is hoping that Biden will pressure Egypt to release senior members of the terrorist organization from prison. "The ignorant group [Muslim Brotherhood] is dancing with joy at Biden's victory, as if they are preparing to return to power on orders from the White House," he commented.

Nabil Na'im, a former member of the Egyptian Islamic Jihad Organization, said he too believes that the Muslim Brotherhood is seeking "to open a new page" with the new US administration. By congratulating Biden, Na'im argued, the Muslim Brotherhood is expecting the Democratic Party to adopt it, defend its existence and pave the way for its return to the political arena.

No US administration can afford to dismiss the warning bells sounded by Arabs in the wake of the Muslim Brotherhood's attempt to present itself as a peaceful group that seeks to bring freedom and democracy to the Arab world.

The Islamists are desperate to return to power in Egypt, which is why they are prepared to even court the American "Satan" to reach this goal. These are the same Islamists who have been condemning Arabs who have any contact with Americans. At this time of possible administrative change in America, the Arabs who do not support the Muslim Brotherhood -- particularly those living in Egypt and the Gulf states -- fervently hope that their alarm about Islamists will be heard loud and clear by Biden and his group.

  • Follow Khaled Abu Toameh on Twitter

 

Khaled Abu Toameh, an award-winning journalist based in Jerusalem, is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at Gatestone Institute.

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/16753/muslim-brotherhood-came-out 

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

How Collapsing Checks and Balances Destroyed the Election in Pennsylvania - Frank Ryan

​ by Frank Ryan

As a member of the Pennsylvania House of Representatives, I have seen firsthand the overwhelming tilting of the scales of justice in the 2020 elections in my own state.

The presidential election of 2020 will go down as a pivotal test of whether or not our great Constitutional Republic experiment in liberty will survive.

There are a few states that will serve as the front line in this critical battle for survival.  Be it Pennsylvania, Michigan, Georgia, North Carolina, Wisconsin, Nevada, or Arizona, the impact on our grand experiment will be profound. 

As a member of the Pennsylvania House of Representatives recently re-elected to a third term in a landslide, I have seen firsthand the overwhelming tilting of the scales of justice in the 2020 elections in my own state.  I am in the midst of this battle for survival.

The undue influence by the Executive Branch and the Judicial Branch of government has been profound in Pennsylvania, virtually guaranteeing the debacle that has occurred in the 2020 election in the Keystone State.

With the election results in for most states, the overturning of the tentative election results in Pennsylvania and two other states such as Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, or Wisconsin, which have seen similar allegations of inconsistencies, fraud, and irregularities, would alter the electoral results and thereby re-elect Donald J. Trump to a second term.

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has been so biased in its actions relative to this election that it appears as if some of the justices on the Court colluded with the DNC and the governor to influence the election.  

In September 2020, the PA Supreme Court changed Act 77 of 2019 by allowing votes to arrive three days after Election Day and to permit drop boxes, both of which had been specifically precluded by Act 77

Even NPR wrote in its article that "the Pennsylvania Supreme Court handed down several voting-related decisions Thursday that are likely to help Democrats this fall.  The court extended the deadline for accepting mail ballots, will allow voters to submit their ballots through drop boxes, and removed the Green Party's candidate for president from the ballot."

These decisions were exacerbated when the Court ruled just prior to the election that signatures on mail-in ballots could not be verified as a basis for disqualifying a vote.

The conduct of one justice was so outrageous that I filed articles of impeachment, H.R. 1044, against him for his alleged conduct.

Notwithstanding the judicial interference, the Executive Branch, particularly the Department of State, has been so horribly inept in its actions that election inconsistencies were rampant throughout Pennsylvania in the 2020 election.

For instance, in Philadelphia, the Trump campaign went to court to allow election-observers close up observation of vote-counting but this legal victory happened on November 5, two days after the election and after much counting had already been done.

Additionally, the counties were given such conflicting guidance from the Department of State relative to the election that the uniformity of the election processing of ballots would be impossible to enforce.

In the case of Barnette v. Montgomery County Board of Elections (2:20-cv-05477), one county actually has been accused of attempting to cure defective votes cast despite a court decision to the contrary.  It turns out that similar guidance went out to multiple counties, particularly in more urban areas.

Due to the rampant concerns of irregularities and inconsistencies, H.R. 1032 was introduced prior to the election.  It was since tabled but is not being pursued with the governor to ensure that the past election results fairly and accurately reflect the desires of the citizens of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in this most recent presidential election.

The resolution states:

RESOLVED, That the House of Representatives establish the Select Committee on Election Integrity to investigate, review and make recommendations concerning the regulation and conduct of the 2020 general election; and be it further RESOLVED, That the select committee be authorized and empowered to investigate, review and make findings and recommendations regarding the regulation and conduct of the 2020 general election, including all of the following:

(1)  Actions taken, instructions provided and information distributed by the Department of State and the Secretary of the Commonwealth concerning the 2020 general election.

(2)  Actions taken, instructions provided and information distributed by the county boards of elections.

(3)  Best practices of other states concerning the regulation and conduct of the 2020 general election.

(4)  Legislative, regulatory or other changes to improve the conduct of the 2020 general election or subsequent elections.

Election fairness is important in reality and in perception.  Our liberties and our system of government demand accountability, transparency, and honesty in how we select our leaders.

The election of 2020 is our most important test of our fragile system of liberty, justice, and basic freedoms that I have sworn to support, defend, and uphold.

 

Col. Frank Ryan, CPA, USMCR (ret.) served in Iraq and briefly in Afghanistan and specializes in corporate restructuring and lectures on ethics for the state CPA societies.  He has served on numerous boards of publicly traded and non-profit organizations.  He can be reached at FRYAN1951@aol.com and on Twitter at @fryan1951.

Source: https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/11/how_collapsing_checks_and_balances_destroyed_the_election_in_pennsylvania.html 

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Fox News's betrayal — there's a question hanging in the air - Patricia McCarthy

 

​ by Patricia McCarthy

What were they thinking?

Now that millions of Fox News's loyal viewers have awakened to the network's betrayal, what are we to think about those hosts we have let into our homes all these years?  We've long thought these anchors we relied upon for actual news were on the same political page as their viewers — reverence for the Constitution, law enforcement, our military, freedom, belief in American greatness, etc.

While it was clear some were not all-in Trump fans, Fox viewers assumed they shared their values.  So have they been faking all these years?  Have they gone home and made fun of Fox-watchers and voted Democrat?  Or have they now been ordered by Rupert Murdoch's son to move left, to mimic CNN and MSNBC? 

Chris Wallace revealed himself to be a partisan leftist, an anti-Trump guy, years ago, so Fox News Sunday was no longer a must-watch program.  He really exposed his bias in that first presidential debate; that was the final blow for conservatives re: Wallace.

Wallace is as committed a leftist as little George Stephanopoulos of ABC and the moonbats on CNN and MSNBC.

But that Bret Baier, Martha MacCallum, Arthel Neville, Sandra Smith, Chris Stirewalt, et al. are suddenly all anti-Trumpers to the point of supporting a rigged election is a shock.  Were they pretending then, or are they pretending now?  Either way, millions of us are no longer tuning in to Fox News. 

The network has stabbed its loyal viewers in the back, and the viewers are not taking it lying down.  They are switching over to Newsmax and OAN or just leaving their televisions off.  Thankfully, there are hundreds, if not thousands, of other sources for actual news.  Zuckerberg, Dorsey, and their fellow tyrants of social media are not the only games in town.  They are Soviet-style censors of any thoughts or words with which they disagree.  This is how they control the dissemination and suppression of information. 

If the millions of Americans who cast their votes for Biden had known about his decades of corruption re: China, Ukraine, and numerous other nations, all information suppressed by Google, Facebook, and Twitter, would they have reconsidered their votes?  Most likely.  If they hate President Trump so much they would knowingly vote for a lifelong self-serving, get-rich-quick corrupt pol, then they may reap what they have sown if Biden is inaugurated.  He will undo all the tremendous accomplishments of the Trump administration.

And given their tone of the last week, Fox News will be on board, not at all different from CNN and the rest of the fake news media.  Unless someone develops a new network based on the preservation of America as founded, cable news will be dead to all but the hard left.  Those of us who have for years made it our go-to news channel will have left, feeling tricked, cheated. 

So what is the answer to that question hanging in the air?  Have Fox News hosts been pretending to be conservative and pro-American all these years and mocking us when they are out and about?  Or have they been coerced into defending an obviously rigged election by the newer powers that be at Fox?  Neil Cavuto on Tuesday cut away from Kayleigh McEnany's press conference because she was detailing the then known facts of voter fraud that we were not going to be allowed to hear.  Much more is known now.

Cavuto, like Wallace, Smith, Stirewalt, and the rest of them, should hang his head in shame, for long pretending to be what they are not: honest, objective journalists.  It now seems that they are not at all different from Rachel Maddow or Lawrence O'Donnell.  They all want to be invited to the elitist D.C. parties with the cool people.  The media and D.C. swamp have worn them down, and they have now been rendered as irrelevant as Joe Biden, a Democrat place-holder, a non-entity — no more, no less. 

Like the rest of the MSM, Fox has melded with a thoroughly compromised media establishment to do Biden's handlers' bidding.  Who are his handlers?  A long list of anti-American operatives, many of them funded by George Soros and the panoply of corrupt organizations he funds and directs in his quest to destroy the U.S., along with a host of far-left radicals who share Soros's anti-democratic vision for the world.

Fox News had a good run until it caved to the left.  The network's embrace of yet another coup attempt has destroyed it in the eyes of the millions of viewers its operators took for granted.

"The saddest thing about betrayal is that it never comes from your enemies."

Image credit: Rae Whitlock via Wikimedia CommonsCC BY-SA 2.0.

 

Patricia McCarthy  

Source: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/11/fox_news_betrayal__theres_a_question_hanging_in_the_air.html 

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Tuesday, November 10, 2020

The tide is already turning for President Trump - Ed Timperlake

 

​ by Ed Timperlake

When the feds knock on the door of Democrat operatives engaged in election fraud, many will fold.

Attorney General Barr just mobilized the Department of Justice to engage as appropriate to investigate election fraud throughout America. He is on very solid legal grounds.  ​It is a very simple means of addressing the greatest attempted political theft in American history and I would rather be us, Trump Nation, than them, the Democrat party's illegal operatives.

This is because President Trump and his team laid the legal ground work for identifying and prosecuting such criminal behavior in 2017:

Federal Prosecution of Election Offensives

Eight Edition 2017

“Our constitutional system of representative government only works when the worth of honest ballots is not diluted by invalid ballots procured by corruption.

The actual fact that AG late last night triggered the use of the DOJ legal handbook bodes very ill for those who are involved in electoral cheating.

For them, when the men and women in suits arrive on their doorstep to politely inquire "can you explain this," with “this” being one of many the many felonies listed above, the campaign operative is likely to immediately have a life-altering moment. As often is said: you can go easy or you can go hard, but make no mistake, you are going to address your behavior. And as the joke goes, never steal anything small and the Democrat team certainly took that to heart.

At the moment of an investigation asking a low-level operative 'what role did you play' in this grand theft election, the massive conspiracy will begin to crumble. After all what young campaign worker wants to go to jail for Joe Biden? So far, it looks like Biden will have trouble even keeping his own son out of entanglement with potential legal felony charges.

Notice I said men and women in suits. This is because of my very direct personal experience working officially with very honorable FBI Special Agents. I'm not talking about the deep state operatives at the top. I have much faith in the dedicated honor and respect for the rule of law enforced by Special Agents of the FBI in the field.  Adding to that phalanx of the FBI in the field, there is also the absolutely no-nonsense U.S. Marshals Service. And, as the evidence may present itself, there's also our world class diligent Secret Service agents.

The majesty and mission dedication that all Americans expect of our federal protectors is well placed. Please do not let the horrific aberration of people like Jim Comey, and those like him in D.C. paint in your minds FBI field agents as deep state swamp creatures.

Federal prosecutors also have very solid legal guidelines because the Supreme Court has already established precedent for nationwide election fraud cases. 

See “Anderson v United States, 417 U.S 211, 227 (1974) cited in the Department of Justice criminal file cited above.

Now for the very big and scary surprise for election-stealing criminals: there is a new federal team on the field of battle at the Department of Homeland Security. Note this:

ELECTION INFRASTRUCTURE SECURITY

Fair and free elections are a hallmark of American democracy. The American people’s confidence in the value of their vote is principally reliant on their confidence in the security and resilience of the infrastructure that makes the Nation’s elections possible. Accordingly, an electoral process that is both secure and resilient is a vital national interest and one of CISA’s highest priorities.

CISA is committed to working collaboratively with those on the front lines of elections—state and local governments, election officials, federal partners, and vendors—to manage risks to the Nation’s election infrastructure. CISA will remain transparent and agile in its vigorous efforts to secure America’s election infrastructure from new and evolving threats


The practical result of these teams fighting in the 2020 election campaign can already be seen.

As interviews are conducted in the field and hard evidence accumulated with federal prosecutors building cases and the need for a “Rocket Docket” directly to the Supreme Court, I suspect the conspiracy will crumble as the minions and mid-level political miscreants scurry for legal safe haven. It is simple: As the DHS team chases illegal computer voting “trons,” many of those in criminal legal trouble may see an opportunity to get out of jail free by singing to the feds.

Essentially, “the computer ate my homework” defense, with the press calling it a “computer glitch,” will collapse, and then significant votes may swing back to the correct column.

Sadly, if it takes walking a few conspirators to identify and correct many machine-directed mis-votes, so be it.

President Trump will eventually win. Just look at this early headline at a very local level in the key battleground state of Michigan.

Fixed computer glitch turns losing Republican into a winner in Oakland County

A computer error led election officials in Oakland County to hand an upset victory Wednesday to a Democrat, only to switch the win back to an incumbent Republican a day later.

Soon many “computer errors," I suspect, will be corrected.

However, those election-thief conspirators that took the analog route by corrupting hard-copy ballots, by either throwing away Trump votes and/or adding illegal Biden votes, well, they can become cooperating witnesses. Or else too bad for them because I hope they enjoy their stay at a “Club Fed” and living with a lifelong felony conviction in the thereafter.

Ed Timperlake is a former congressional staffer, a former Marine, and the author of several books on the Washington swamp.

Image credit: Official seal, via Pixabay public domain

 

Ed Timperlake  

Source: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/11/the_tide_is_already_turning_for_president_trump.html 

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter