Monday, February 10, 2025

Palestinian Authority halts 'pay-for-slay' policy in West Bank - Jerusalem Post Staff

 

by Jerusalem Post Staff

The PA is reportedly worried that upcoming US fines of about $200-300 million will lead to a financial crisis.

 

Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas addresses the Turkish parliament during an extraordinary session on August 15, 2024 in Ankara, Turkey. (photo credit: Serdar Ozsoy/Getty Images)
Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas addresses the Turkish parliament during an extraordinary session on August 15, 2024 in Ankara, Turkey.
(photo credit: Serdar Ozsoy/Getty Images)

Palestinian Authority (PA) Chairman Mahmoud Abbas issued an order to cancel laws and regulations related to paying financial allocations to the families of Palestinians linked with terrorist activity, known as "pay for slay," on Monday, according to Palestinian Authority state media WAFA.

Additionally, the computerized cash assistance program, along with its database and financial allocations, will be transferred from the Ministry of Social Development to the Palestinian National Institution for Economic Empowerment, WAFA stated.

The amendments will allow all families previously benefiting from the former laws, regulations, and legislations to be subject to the same eligibility criteria as other families enrolled in social protection and welfare programs, according to WAFA.

The Palestinian Institution for Economic Empowerment will now assume full authority over all social protection and welfare programs in Palestine. It will be responsible for providing assistance to all Palestinian families in need, without discrimination, WAFA added.

The Palestinian Institution for Economic Empowerment will work to mobilize funds, grants, and allocations for various segments of the Palestinian population, particularly given the significant increase in families requiring social care, support, and empowerment following the war in Gaza and the West Bank, WAFA added.

Palestinian women walk past a money changer in the West Bank city of Ramallah February 16, 2010. REUTERS/Mohamad Torokman/File Photo (credit: REUTERS/MOHAMAD TOROKMAN)Enlrage image
Palestinian women walk past a money changer in the West Bank city of Ramallah February 16, 2010. REUTERS/Mohamad Torokman/File Photo (credit: REUTERS/MOHAMAD TOROKMAN)

WAFA stated that "the goal is to strengthen Palestinian resilience, similar to social welfare systems adopted by other countries with strong and institutionalized social protection mechanisms."

"This decision aligns with efforts to enhance the status of the State of Palestine, strengthen its legal position within the United Nations and other international institutions, and secure further international recognition and full UN membership," WAFA added.

"It also aims to safeguard national interests, address the growing humanitarian needs in Gaza—especially for children who have lost caregivers and displaced families—and restore international aid programs that were suspended in recent years," according to WAFA.

"The decree seeks to support economic recovery and reconstruction programs, alleviate financial blockades, and put an end to Israel’s illegal deductions from Palestinian taxpayer funds, which have amounted to billions of shekels." WAFA concluded.

Knesset legislation

According to current Knesset legislation, Israel can deduct amounts paid to prisoners from the tax money transferred to the PA. In 2024, Israel increased the amount deducted to NIS 21 million. N12 claimed that the PA asked the US to stop Israel from doing so.

PA sources added that the release of about half of the 480 prisoners sentenced to life imprisonment in Israel, as part of the ongoing hostage-prisoner exchange, "creates an opportunity" to implement this reform.

Fines on the Palestinian Authority

This comes amid news that, on February, US courts will impose heavy fines - of about $200-300 million - on the Palestinian Authority – following lawsuits filed by families of terror victims. The PA is reportedly worried that this will lead to a financial crisis.

The Palestinian Authority arranged payment for families of dead Hamas terrorists amounting to a combined total of around $2.8 million, following the October 7 attacks, according to a report by the Palestinian Media Watch (PMW), a nongovernmental organization and media watchdog group.

However, according to a recent study conducted by the Jerusalem Center for Security and Foreign Affairs, in 2024, the scope of the PA’s pay-for-slay payments to terrorists decreased by 30-40%.

 
Jerusalem Post Staff

Source: https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-841475

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Sunday, February 9, 2025

'The Palestinian People Does Not Exist' - Nils A. Haug

 

by Nils A. Haug

"Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct 'Palestinian people' to oppose Zionism." — Senior PLO official Zuheir Mohsen, interviewed by James Dorsey, Trouw, March 31, 1977.

 

  • "The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct 'Palestinian people' to oppose Zionism." — Senior PLO official Zuheir Mohsen, interviewed by James Dorsey, Trouw, March 31, 1977.

  • Jordan... actually was in possession of Jerusalem, if illegally, between 1948 and the 1967 Six-Day War. Jordan nevertheless, the first day of the war, insisted on joining the other Arab countries in attacking Israel, even though General Moshe Dayan had warned Jordan's King Hussein at the time to stay out of it....

  • The Al-Aqsa Mosque would therefore have been constructed six years after Muhamad's death: c. 570- June 8, 632 CE.

"The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct 'Palestinian people' to oppose Zionism." — Senior PLO official Zuheir Mohsen, interviewed by James Dorsey, Trouw, March 31, 1977. Pictured: Mohsen in 1975. (Photo by AFP via Getty Images)

While Islamism can be understood as an extremist political and ideological facet of Islam, Palestinianism comprises a narrow ideological expression of such Islamism. In particular, Palestinianism can be regarded as a subset of the broader jihadist Islamist agenda; one of its "action-arms" so to speak.

On the world stage and promoted by the legacy media, the Palestinian issue is relentlessly and often callously exploited by ruthless jihadist Islamists and their sympathizers, despite the immense suffering of many innocent civilians from both parties to the conflict. It is the gross misuse of the Palestinian people's predicament for tactical purposes that has led to the fabricated ideology of Palestinianism. Admittedly, the Islamist propaganda "machine" has been partially successful in persuading the West as to the justice, however fabricated, of the Palestinian cause.

Islamist land claims pertaining to Palestine (by which they infer all of Eretz Yisrael - the land of Israel) are, unfortunately, based on false allegations of illegitimate colonialist actions by the Jewish people of the area. The Jews have, it is claimed, usurped the rights of Muslim Palestinians to their historical land. These allegations, however, are merely a façade for covering the true motives of jihadist Islamists who control the public narrative.

The less-than-elevating background to the "Palestinian movement" was exposed by leading Harvard Law School Professor Alan M. Dershowitz in his June 2024 article on the notion of Palestinianism. He explained that the dispute over land has escalated in recent times from "a resolvable conflict over land to an irresolvable conflict over religion." The true nature of the conflict is thus one of religion.

The late senior PLO official Zuheir Mohsen even openly admitted in the Dutch daily Trouw in 1977 that the Palestinian cause is actually, well, fake:

"The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct "Palestinian people" to oppose Zionism. Yes, the existence of a separate Palestinian identity exists only for tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa, while as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan."
— Zuheir Mohsen to James Dorsey, "Wij zijn alleen Palestijn om politieke reden", Trouw, March 31, 1977.

Palestinianism has nevertheless accelerated on the world stage through an intersection of Western ideologies based on the neo-Marxist premise that if someone succeeds, it can only have happened because they have oppressed someone else. A situation of win-win capitalism -- with unions protecting workers, and profit-sharing plans and investments that share the opportunity so that if an enterprise is successful, all the investors win (and if it is not, they all share the risk and lose) -- does not occur to them. For the Marxists, there must always be an oppressor and an oppressed.

Recent ideologies have related, for instance, to critical race and sex-gender constructs; allegations of settler-colonialist conflicts -- one in particular referred to as Zionism, whereby the purportedly rightful landowners (Muslims) are displaced by Jews, even though Jews have also lived on the land continuously for nearly 4,000 years. Human rights violations are supposedly committed only by Israel, whether in war or peace.

Some leaders of Western nations are complicit, whether by commission or omission, in encouraging or tolerating Palestinianism, notwithstanding countless violent crimes committed in the name of the "Palestinian cause" by jihadists and their supporters. Nations that blame only Israel include Ireland, Norway, Spain, France, Netherlands, Germany, USA, Canada and UK.

Eli Wiesel, during his Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech, reminded the world that, "We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented."

Most Western leaders fail to counter jihadist attacks, jihadist sexual grooming and mass rape of children, violence against women, stabbings, vehicular ramming and other sociopathic behavior. They apparently want every vote.

The true motive of Islamists -- in exploiting the Palestinian issue -- might well be to take control and ownership of the holy city of Jerusalem and the rest of the land to which, since the Ottoman Empire, they appear to believe they are entitled. Jordan, however, actually was in possession of much of Jerusalem, if illegally, between 1948 and the 1967 Six-Day War. Jordan nevertheless, the first day of the war, insisted on joining the other Arab countries in attacking Israel, even though General Moshe Dayan had warned Jordan's King Hussein at the time to stay out of it;

"Moshe Dayan, as Israel's Defense Minister, did attempt to keep Jordan out of the Six-Day War in 1967. On the eve of the conflict, Dayan cautioned army commanders in Jerusalem to avoid provoking Jordanian forces. Additionally, on the morning of June 5, 1967, as Israel launched its preemptive strike against Egypt, Prime Minister Levi Eshkol sent a message to Jordan's King Hussein, stating that if Jordan made no hostile move, neither would Israel. Despite these efforts, Jordan ultimately joined the war on June 5, 1967, after receiving false reports of Egyptian success against Israel. This decision led to intense fighting between Israeli and Jordanian forces, particularly in Jerusalem and the West Bank."

All other declared reasons apart from conquering Israel are simply a mask to distract from the real strategy for capturing all of Jerusalem and all of the land that now constitutes Israel. In this effort, they are happily aided by willing, often ignorant, Jew-hating sympathizers in the West, and jihadists in various Islamic states.

For this reason, a two-state solution has been continually rejected by Islamists since even before the days of PLO Chairman Yasser Arafat, despite the 1993-95 Oslo Accords promoting the sharing of Israel's land. Islamists want all of it, not just portions. Israel and the Jewish people of the world can never allow that, nor should they.

The root of Israel's current conflict with Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis, and Iran therefore seems to focus first on Jerusalem – as does Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan. Jerusalem is the religious center of Israel and the heart of claims by the world's three great monotheistic faiths: Judaism, Christianity and Islam -- despite Islam, among the three, having only the slightest legitimate entitlement to the city:

The primary Islamic claim to Jerusalem, as noted by journalist Roy Hirsch and Dr. Tanveer Zamani, founder of the People's Party of Pakistan, is based on:

"The Quranic chapter Ibrahim 14:37 recounts that God instructed Abraham to leave Hagar and Ishmael in the barren valley of Mecca, while Isaac stayed in Canaan. This deliberate landmark separation not only highlights the distinct identities of these religious civilizations but also provides insights into resolving contemporary disputes over land claims.

"The Islamic connection to Jerusalem is linked to Prophet Muhammad's brief, one-time stop at the farthest Temple Mount during his nocturnal journey to Heaven in 620 CE, as mentioned in Quran, Al-Isra -17:1.

["Glory to (Allah) Who did take His servant for a Journey by night from the Sacred Mosque to the farthest Mosque, whose precincts We did bless,- in order that We might show him some of Our Signs: for He is the One Who heareth and seeth (all things)." Al-Isra -17:1]

"This passage describes a fleeting visit that should not be misused as a lasting religious claim. The stop at the Temple Mount was an initial stage of Prophet Muhammad's nocturnal journey to Heaven, involving the witnessing of heavenly signs on Earth before his ascension. These Holy sites, associated with earlier prophets such as Abraham, and Isaac, lineage; Jacob, Moses, David, Solomon, and Zakariya, served as a prelude to his ultimate ascent to Heaven. The Al-Aqsa Mosque, established by Caliph Umar in 638 CE, was not even present during the Prophet's time."

The Al-Aqsa Mosque would therefore have been constructed six years after Muhamad's death: c. 570 - June 8, 632 CE

The two holiest sites for Muslims, and exclusive to them, do not include either the Al-Aqsa Mosque or Jerusalem, but are the Sacred Mosque in Mecca (in the direction of which Muslims pray daily) and the Mosque of the Prophet in Medina – neither of which is anywhere near Jerusalem. Hence, declarations by Islamists claiming Jerusalem are not founded on history, reality nor legitimacy, notwithstanding the Palestinian Authority in 2000, "passing a law declaring Jerusalem to be their capital."

In the result, the propagated basis for the invasions of Israel during times of intifada and particularly on October 7, 2023, ostensibly to prevent a Jewish take-over of the Al-Aqsa mosque, are simply false -- part of Palestinianism propaganda claims first proposed as a pretext by Hitler's ally, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Amin al Husseini.

The October 7 jihadist operation, named "Al-Aqsa flood" supposedly to "liberate" that part of Jerusalem's Temple Mount where the mosque is located, was therefore founded on a gross deception. The jihadist utilization of Palestinianism was, however, successful in gathering a mass of terrorists in a common cause to execute the Islamist agenda of conquering Israel, "liberating" Jerusalem, and killing all occupants. Hence the slogan, "from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free." Again, the jihadist strategy was doomed to failure -- as are all attempts to annihilate Israel and its people.

In 2010, Eli Wiesel explained the exclusive sacred nature of Jerusalem to Jews:

"For me, the Jew that I am, Jerusalem is above politics. It is mentioned more than six hundred times in Scripture -- and not a single time in the Koran. Its presence in Jewish history is overwhelming. There is no more moving prayer in Jewish history than the one expressing our yearning to return to Jerusalem. To many theologians, it is Jewish history, to many poets, a source of inspiration. It belongs to the Jewish people and is much more than a city, it is what binds one Jew to another in a way that remains hard to explain. When a Jew visits Jerusalem for the first time, it is not the first time; it is a homecoming."

Historically, Jerusalem indisputably belongs to the Jewish people. Ever since King David declared Jerusalem to be the capital of the nation, some 3,000 years ago, the Jews have occupied and controlled the city -- apart from only two occasions in history: once during the period of Roman rule and the other in more contemporary times when Jordan refused access to the Jews before the 1967 Six-Day War.

The enduring importance of Jerusalem is not only its historical connotations but the belief, by Jews, Christians and Muslims alike, that the city and its surrounds is to be the redemptive center of world events leading up to the culmination of human history (see here and here).

As regards Islam's attitude to Jerusalem:

"Islamic eschatology, as described in various Hadith and teachings, features Jerusalem in relation to the events of the end times. The emergence of the Mahdi, a significant figure in Islamic eschatology, is believed to occur in Jerusalem. Additionally, Islamic belief holds that Dajjal, a false messiah, will make an appearance, further emphasizing Jerusalem's place in eschatological narratives."

Religious Islamists, undoubtedly aware of these beliefs, would like to control Jerusalem, in addition to Mecca and Medina, for their own purposes. Their intent, however, can never become a reality. As Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu forcefully declared in his July 2024 address to the America's joint Congress,

"For nearly 4,000 years, the land of Israel has been the homeland of the Jewish people. It's always been our home; it will always be our home."

Israel, with its capital of Jerusalem, is the ancestral land of the Jewish people; they have nowhere else to call their own.


Nils A. Haug
is an author and columnist. A Lawyer by profession, he is member of the International Bar Association, the National Association of Scholars, a faculty member at Intercollegiate Studies Institute, the Academy of Philosophy and Letters. Dr. Haug holds a Ph.D. in Apologetical Theology and is author of 'Politics, Law, and Disorder in the Garden of Eden – the Quest for Identity'; and 'Enemies of the Innocent – Life, Truth, and Meaning in a Dark Age.' His work has been published by First Things Journal, The American Mind, Quadrant, Minding the Campus, Gatestone Institute, National Association of Scholars, Jewish Journal, James Wilson Institute (Anchoring Truths), Document Danmark, and others.

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21374/the-palestinian-people-does-not-exist

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Hezbollah's absence from new Lebanese gov't is rare opportunity for West - expert - Peled Arbeli

 

by Peled Arbeli

“What America and the West must push for is a resolution to dismantle Hezbollah’s armed capabilities," Baram noted.

 

An illustrative image of a Hezbollah flag in the backdrop of an individual holding a weapon.  (photo credit: SHUTTERSTOCK)
An illustrative image of a Hezbollah flag in the backdrop of an individual holding a weapon.
(photo credit: SHUTTERSTOCK)

Hezbollah's complete absence from the new government formed in Lebanon offers a rare opportunity for the West to push for the dismantling of the terror group's military capabilities, prof. Amatzia Baram, an expert in strategy and the Middle East from the University of Haifa said on Sunday. 

On Saturday, Lebanon’s presidential office announced the formation of a new 24-member government led by Prime Minister-designate Nawaf Salam. 

“For the first time since 2008, there are no Hezbollah representatives in the government,” Baram said.

While the new cabinet includes five representatives from the Amal Movement, led by Berri, he noted that Amal, despite being a longtime Hezbollah ally, has also been its rival in the past. “They are allies but also rivals.”

Baram explained that the government’s composition marks a significant shift in Lebanon’s political landscape. “If the new Lebanese government consists of 24 ministers, with five of them being Shia - even if they are loyal to Hezbollah - this still represents a major shift. Under agreements signed in 2008, any party holding a third of the cabinet seats has the power to veto all decisions,” he said. 

 Lebanese Prime Minister Nawaf Salam speaks to the press following the formation of the new government at the presidential palace in Baabda, Lebanon. February 8, 2025.  (credit: REUTERS/EMILIE MADI)Enlrage image
Lebanese Prime Minister Nawaf Salam speaks to the press following the formation of the new government at the presidential palace in Baabda, Lebanon. February 8, 2025. (credit: REUTERS/EMILIE MADI)

In the past, Hezbollah and Amal together controlled more than a third of the government, enabling them to block any attempt to curb their influence. “The government wanted to act against Hezbollah, particularly concerning its armed capabilities, but it was unable to because Hezbollah would simply veto any such decision.”

Now, Baram suggests that Hezbollah’s position is more vulnerable than ever. “There’s also a chance that Hezbollah’s Christian and Druze allies in the new government will abandon them, and then they won’t even have a blocking third in the government. If that happens, the government could demand that Hezbollah disarm its heavy weaponry.”

A rare opportunity for the US

Baram emphasized that this change presents a rare opportunity for the United States and its allies. “What America and the West must push for is a resolution to dismantle Hezbollah’s armed capabilities. This could mark the culmination of a process that Israel initiated with the heavy blow it dealt to Hezbollah.”

Beyond Hezbollah’s military presence, the new government could also challenge its broader control over key sectors in Lebanon. “The influence extends beyond weapons - there is now a possibility to dismantle all the institutions Hezbollah has built as a ‘state within a state.’ This includes banks, control over Beirut’s airport and port, and its independent telecommunications network, which has operated without oversight. These are things that, for the first time since 2008, the government may now be able to address."


Peled Arbeli

Source: https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/article-841301

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Netanyahu: Gaza return to be conditioned on deradicalization - Joshua Marks

 

by Joshua Marks

The Israeli PM called President Trump's plan to temporarily resettle Gazans while the coastal enclave is rebuilt as "the first fresh idea in years."

 

U.S. President Donald Trump and Israeli prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House in Washington D.C., Feb. 4, 2025. Photo by Liri Agami/Flash90.
U.S. President Donald Trump and Israeli prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House in Washington D.C., Feb. 4, 2025. Photo by Liri Agami/Flash90.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Saturday night that returning Gazans must “disavow terrorism” as part of U.S. President Trump’s temporary resettlement plan for the war-torn coastal enclave.

“All President Trump is saying is that I’m going to open the gate and give them an option to relocate temporarily while we rebuild the place physically and while we also rebuild it in terms of deradicalization,” Netanyahu said during an interview with “Life, Liberty & Levin” host Mark Levin that aired on Fox News at the end of his week-long trip to Washington, D.C.

“You want to come back? You have to disavow terrorism. But you can come back,” he continued.

Netanyahu welcomed Trump’s Gaza proposal as “the first fresh idea in years,” calling it “a novel and correct approach” that should not be dismissed outright.

Speaking to reporters alongside Netanyahu at the White House on Tuesday, Trump proposed that the U.S. take control of Gaza, resettle its Palestinian population elsewhere and transform the enclave, which he described as a “demolition site right now,” into a developed hub.

During the interview with Levin, Netanyahu criticized past cycles of Israeli military action, withdrawal and renewed Hamas attacks, saying, “we smack them, they rebuild, we smack them again, and nothing changes.”

Trump’s plan, according to Netanyahu, offers a different approach, including finishing off Hamas permanently to ensure Israeli security, temporarily relocating Gaza’s civilian population to allow for reconstruction, rebuilding Gaza’s infrastructure and deradicalizing its population, and securing financial support from Arab and Gulf nations instead of from U.S. taxpayers.

The Israeli premier also clarified that Trump never proposed using American troops or taxpayer funds in Gaza. Even before the war, he noted, some Gazans wanted to leave but were prevented from doing so due to Egyptian border restrictions.

Arab countries, the Palestinians, including Hamas and other terror factions, and other countries around the world have rejected the president’s proposal to move Gazans out of the Strip.

Netanyahu calls Trump “Israel’s greatest ally”

The Israeli leader praised Trump during the interview as “the greatest friend that Israel has ever had in the White House.”

He credited Trump with significantly strengthening the U.S.-Israel alliance, highlighting his leadership both for America and globally.

Netanyahu summarized Trump’s second term in the White House so far as “a great beginning and a restart, a recalibration of our great alliance.”

He thanked Trump for swiftly unblocking weapons shipments to Israel as it fights a multi-front war, and also lauded Trump’s stance against antisemitism and rejection of the International Criminal Court (ICC), which he accused of unfairly targeting Israel and the United States.

Saudi normalization and a Palestinian state

The Israeli leader dismissed the idea of creating a Palestinian state, asserting that “Gaza under Hamas was essentially a Palestinian state, and it became a terror base to destroy Israel.” He argued that both Hamas and the Palestinian Authority seek Israel’s destruction—Hamas through terror, and the P.A. through legal and diplomatic warfare.

He reiterated that Israel will not accept a security situation where it is just “nine miles wide” and vulnerable to attack. In the wake of the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas-led massacre, the debate over a Palestinian state is over, he added. Instead, he sees long-term peace through a strong regional alliance, including further cooperation with Saudi Arabia and other Arab nations.


Joshua Marks

Source: https://www.jns.org/netanyahu-gaza-return-to-be-conditioned-on-deradicalization/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Anti-Hezbollah Christians join new Lebanese government - JNS

 

by JNS

The Lebanese Forces Party is a major counterbalance to the Shi'ite terrorist group.

 

The Lebanese Parliament Building in Beirut. Source: Wikimedia Commons
The Lebanese Parliament Building in Beirut. Source: Wikimedia Commons

The Christian-based Lebanese Forces Party, which has not been part of a Cabinet in the Land of the Cedars in more than five years, has entered the country’s newly announced government, constituting a major counterbalance to Hezbollah.

The party picked four ministers—including Foreign Affairs Minister Youssef Raji and Energy Minister Joseph Saddi—in the government of Lebanon’s new prime minister, Nawaf Salam. On Saturday he announced that he had formed the country’s first full-fledged government since 2022.

This development, which benefits internal forces hostile to Lebanon’s Shi’ite terrorists, follows years of political instability in the multiethnic and war-torn country. The Shi’ite terrorist group Hezbollah had exercised de facto control of Southern Lebanon for years, before it agreed to vacate the area in November.

Hezbollah and its close ally Amal, another Shi’ite movement, have five Cabinet ministers in Salam’s government, the same as in the previous non-caretaker government under former prime minister Najib Mikati, which collapsed in 2021.

The Amal-Hezbollah coalition also holds the key portfolio of finance, held by Hezbollah politician Yassin Jaber, and four other comparatively minor portfolios: Health, Labor, Environment and Administrative Development.

Under the current political constellation, Hezbollah and its allies are prevented from wielding a “blocking third” in the government, where a two-thirds vote is needed to pass some key decisions.

In a speech on Saturday, Salam vowed to implement the ceasefire agreement that in November ended the most recent war between Israel and Hezbollah and to make sure that Israel “withdraws from Lebanese territory until the last inch.” He also pledged to ensure reconstruction in areas that suffered destruction during the war.

Hezbollah was severely weakened during the war, which it entered on Oct. 8, 2023, in solidarity with Hamas. Israel killed Hezbollah’s top command as well as thousands of its terrorists. Hezbollah accepted a ceasefire, whose terms it had previously rejected, under which it would pull back north of the Litani River.

The government’s formation followed an intervention by the United States.

Morgan Ortagus, deputy United States special envoy for Middle East peace, said in a speech in Beirut on Friday that Washington had “set clear red lines from the United States” that Hezbollah would not be “a part of the government,” the Associated Press reported. The comments drew backlash from many in Lebanon who saw them as meddling in the country’s internal affairs.

The U.S. embassy in Beirut welcomed the Cabinet announcement, saying it hoped it would rebuild state institutions and implement needed reforms.


JNS

Source: https://www.jns.org/anti-hezbollah-christians-join-new-lebanese-government/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Air traffic controllers say FAA hiring practices, ‘immunity program,’ led to DC plane crash - Natalia Mittelstadt

 

by Natalia Mittelstadt

Air traffic controllers say an FAA “immunity program” fails to hold people accountable for their mistakes, even with deadly consequences.

 

Current and former air traffic controllers warn that the Federal Aviation Administration’s hiring practices and “immunity program” have led to problems, such as those that may have resulted in the recent midair collison near Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport.

The FAA’s focus on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) hiring practices has resulted in the employment of less qualified air traffic controllers (ATCs) and a staffing shortage, former ATC's say. This, in addition to an “immunity program” that fails to hold ATCs accountable for their mistakes, are likely contributing factors American Airlines plane collided with a military helicopter on Jan. 29 that resulted in both aircraft plunging into the Potomac River near the Washington, D.C.-area airport. All  67 people aboard died.

The FAA and the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) are investigating the incident.

Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, said Thursday that the helicopter’s advanced tracking system was turned off at the time of the crash. As for the FAA, an ATC tried unsuccessfully to contact the helicopter less than 30 seconds before the collision, according to audio from air traffic control.

Warned about dangers

The FAA was warned in a 2023 report that air traffic controllers were increasingly making last minute flight adjustments to deal with traffic and shortages of controllers in a trend that raised safety concerns. The safety expert report that warned America’s air traffic control system is suffering from quality-control issues and staffing shortages that put safety at risk.

The November 2023 report also warned that personnel shortages among air traffic controllers were forcing people to work longer hours and make sudden, last-minute changes to flight plans that increased risks.

Regulators acknowledged that in 2023 there were 19 serious near-misses at U.S. airports that could’ve been catastrophic, one of the largest totals in many years.

Some former ATCs have pointed to the FAA’s change in hiring practices under the Obama administration as partly to blame for the current state of air traffic control, which led to a class action lawsuit that is ongoing.

"Biographical survey" vs "Cognitive and skills-based testing"

In December 2013, thousands of students who had participated in the FAA’s Collegiate Training Initiative (CTI) – a program specifically designed to prepare individuals to become Air Traffic Control Specialists – were informed that their previous scores on a cognitive and skills-based test, the AT-SAT, would be discounted. Instead, the students would have to pass a biographical survey before retaking the cognitive portion of the test.

What the program graduates did not know is that only 14% of them would pass this new biographical questionnaire, despite half of them having previously passed the skills-based test and met all of the FAA pre-qualifications to be referred on the next step to becoming Air Traffic Control Specialists.

Eventually, one of the CTI graduates, whose career was derailed by the biographical questionnaire, sued the FAA for discrimination in a class action lawsuit.

Michael Pearson, who was a FAA air traffic control specialist for over 26 years, is a lawyer in the lawsuit against the FAA regarding alleged racial discrimination in the agency’s hiring practices. Pearson told Just the News on Tuesday that ATC didn’t follow proper procedure, which led to the crash. He said there was a conflict alert on the radar, giving the ATC “27 seconds to do something.”

“When a [conflict alert] goes off, you take immediate action,” he said.

While the media largely appears to holding the crew of the Army helicopter to blame for the crash, Pearson believes that the ATC is primarily at fault. Pearson says that the controller "didn't tell the jet that the helicopter was in sight,” despite being “required to, and didn’t give safety advisories” when the conflict alert went off. Also, the “helicopter route was horrible,” and “the controller didn't apply the rules properly.” 

Regarding the FAA’s hiring practices, Pearson said that the FAA “stopped hiring” in order “to figure out how to eliminate the CTI program” because the agency leadership believed there were “too many white people.” While the CTI program wasn’t eliminated, the FAA stopped using it to hire people, he also said. 

There were 36 schools with the CTI program, before the FAA stopped hiring CTI graduates. From about 2010 through 2014, there was “no hiring done,” resulting in the FAA being “down thousands of people” as controllers retired, Pearson said.

He thinks the hiring freeze may have contributed to controllers’ fatigue, attrition and low staffing – resulting in the crash in at the Reagan airport. 

Another issue is the Air Traffic Safety Action Program (ATSAP), which the National Air Traffic Controllers Association says “helps resolve safety issues that otherwise might not have been identified or resolved.” 

No consequences

With ATSAP, “employees are promised that no punitive or disciplinary actions will be taken as a result of reporting errors that could impact safety, provided those errors are not the result of gross negligence or illegal activity,” according to the association.

Pearson calls ATSAP  an “immunity program" that results in the FAA having “no way to decertify controllers who can’t be retrained.” Like the change in ATC hiring practices, ATSAP also began around 2010.

John Gilding, who is a former controller, supervisor, and professor for Arizona State University’s CTI program, told Just the News on Thursday that the FAA is “resurrecting” its use of the CTI program to hire controllers.

Before ditching the program, the FAA would hire CTI graduates, military controllers then people “off-the-street” – who had no experience in ATC and only graduated high school – in that order of prioritization, Gilding said.

After hiring them, they go to the FAA Academy in Oklahoma City. And if they graduate, they are then dispersed “throughout the country to various facilities, then they go on to on-the-job training,” he said.

The controller hiring pipeline can’t just be “reloaded,” Gilding said, as “a lot of schools shut down” their CTI programs because they couldn't afford to keep them. “When students found out the program was dead, they stopped enrolling,” he said.

It might take five to eight years “to get the CTI program back up to full strength,” but “will the FAA do another rug pull in seven to eight years?” he asked.

Gilding added that controllers are working six days a week, 10 hours a day, leading to burnout, "mistakes and serious errors.”

“In our career field, if you run people into peak exhaustion, someone's gonna die,” he said. 

Regarding the D.C. crash, Gilding said that he and Pearson reviewed the publicly available information and found that “there was a stunning amount of air traffic error there,” and that he “stopped counting at six or seven mistakes the controller made.”

“ATSAP might be the problem,” Gilding said regarding the reason for the mistakes that led to the crash.

In response to a request for comment on Friday, the FAA sent Just the News its FAQ page on the crash and a link to its hiring practices.

The FAA told Just the News in a statement: "Growing the nation’s air traffic controller workforce is a top priority for the FAA. We continue to hire and onboard new controllers. Their work is critical to meeting our safety mission. The FAA hired 1,811 air traffic controllers in Fiscal Year 2024."

A controller who asked to not be identified by name told Just the News on Friday that during a controller’s on-the-job training, supervisors can have different standards for when someone is “ready to be certified.”

While the overall standard for certification is that a controller “moves planes without breaking any rules,” they could still take actions that supervisors with higher standards believe are not acceptable, meaning a controller needs more practice, the controller said.

"Get out of Jail" card

The controller also addressed ATSAP, saying that controllers use “self-reporting … as immunity from punitive action from the FAA,” even if it’s “just retraining.”

“The problem is that a lot of controllers, after ATSAP rolled out, saw it as a get-out-of-jail-free card,” he said.

Before ATSAP, there was a three-strike rule, the controller said, where if a controller had “three errors in two years, then they could be terminated by the FAA.” This forced “accountability on the controller’s part,” the controller said.

While ATSAP “allowed us to speak out on safety issues in the system” when there wasn’t really “a good avenue for that before,” the FAA “went too far,” the controller said.

A controller could make a mistake “three to four times before the FAA could give you retraining,” which is called “skill enhancement training,” the controller said. However, “to me, if someone” makes a mistake “three to four times, they have a much bigger problem,” and “waiting to that point” is too long,” the controller also said.

Some controllers are “taking the job not as seriously as they should because there's no threat to them,” the controller said.

The “real threat is collision,” which isn’t typical, “so people have complacency” because there are “so many systems put in place,” the controller said, adding, "Hopefully, the crash is “a wakeup call for people."

Group, not individual performance

The controller also said another “big issue” is that there has been a shift “away from individual performance to group performance management.” Thus, management does “not go after one controller,” but rather, the whole facility, even if it’s an individual’s issue.

"I think most controllers are dedicated and do a great job, but as in any profession, there are some lower performers that are not being addressed, and their mistakes are grouped into the facility as a whole," the controller explained.

Following the D.C. crash, President Donald Trump called out the efforts during the Obama and Biden administrations to prioritize DEI in the FAA hiring practices, including for important air traffic control specialist roles, and issued an executive order requiring a review of government hiring in the industry. 

 


Natalia Mittelstadt

Source: https://justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/air-traffic-controllers-warn-faa-hiring-practices-immunity-program-led

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Trump, Musk, and the Deep State: The Battle Over Transparency Begins - Roger Kimball

 

by Roger Kimball

Trump and Musk are unraveling the deep state’s secrets at record speed, and the left is panicking—wielding emergency orders, judicial overreach, and legal theatrics to stop the exposure.

 

 

Here we go again. At the beginning of his first term as president, Donald Trump issued an executive order temporarily banning travel from several countries—Yemen, for example, Sudan, Libya, and four others—that had been identified as major exporters of terrorism.  The left went nuts, excoriating Trump for his “racist” “Muslim travel ban.”

It wasn’t a “Muslim travel ban,” but try telling that to Seattle District Court judge James Robart. He sniffed the air, sensed the pleasing hysteria and press coverage, and issued a cursory restraining order against Trump’s executive order. The humorous part of Robart’s order came towards the end.  As I wrote at the time, Robart insisted that the “declaratory and injunctive relief” outlined in his order be applied immediately and on a “nationwide basis” (my emphasis).

Seattle has spoken, Comrades! Judge Robarts finds (where? how?) that his court has jurisdiction over … well, over just about everything: the president and the head of the Department of Homeland Security, for starters, but also “the United States of America (collectively).”

So all across the fruited plain, “Federal Defendants and all their respective officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and persons acting in concert or participation with them are hereby ENJOINED and RESTRAINED” from enforcing the President’s executive order.

This may be the best place to pause and point out that Donald Trump, acting as the president of the United States, was perfectly within his rights to issue an executive order to suspend travel from particular countries.

And so it is now with Trump’s deputies in the Department of Government Efficiency.  Tasked with the Herculean labor of unscrambling the byzantine Rube Goldberg device that is the 21st-century administrative state for furthering corruption, illegal payments, and partisan influence at home and abroad, DOGE commander Elon Musk and his laptop-and-algorithm-toting lieutenants have been patiently uncovering the pyramid of waste, fraud, and abuse that is the foundation of the United States government in its twenty-first-century incarnation.

In a remarkable piece called “Override: Inside The Revolution Rewiring American Power,” a blogger known as EKO showed how it worked. Four young coders arrive at the Treasury Department in the wee hours of January 21.  Within hours they have succeeded in tracing long-hidden payment directions.

No committees. No approvals. No red tape. Just four coders with unprecedented access and algorithms ready to run.

“The beautiful thing about payment systems,” noted a transition official watching their screens, “is that they don’t lie. You can spin policy all day long, but money leaves a trail.”

That trail led to staggering discoveries. Programs marked as independent revealed coordinated funding streams. Grants labeled as humanitarian aid showed curious detours through complex networks. Black budgets once shrouded in secrecy began to unravel under algorithmic scrutiny.

The difference between Trump’s first term and his second (acknowledged) term can be explained in two words: velocity and preparedness.  In 2017, Trump’s initiatives were hampered, blindsided, litigated, and smothered in red tape.  This time the Leviathan’s usual expedients are impotent. “Their traditional defenses—slow-walking decisions, leaking damaging stories, stonewalling requests—proved useless against an opponent moving faster than their systems could react. By the time they drafted their first memo objecting to this breach, three more systems had already been mapped.” And here’s the point:

“Pull this thread,” a senior official warned, watching patterns emerge across DOGE’s screens, “and the whole sweater unravels.”

He wasn’t wrong. But he misunderstood something crucial: That was exactly the point.

The left gets it. And their heads are exploding.  So far, their biggest gun was the creaky cannon Judge Robart wheeled out: the emergency injunction with immediate “nationwide effect.”

The New York Times, a house organ for anti-Trump hysteria, has a long hand-wringing column about the latest wheeze. Paul A. Engelmayer, a U.S. District Judge appointed by Barrack Obama, just issued an “emergency order” to restrict Elon Musk’s and DOGE’s access to the Treasury Department’s payment and data system.  He also insisted that anyone who had access to those systems after January 20 “destroy any and all copies of material downloaded from the Treasury Department’s records and systems.” Fun part: even Scott Bessent, the Secretary of the Treasury, is prohibited from looking into the corrupt structures of his own department.

Engelmayer’s order came in response to a lawsuit filed on Friday by Letitia James, Attorney General of New York and professional scourge of all things Trump, along with 18 other Democratic state attorneys general. What was the charge?  The stated predicate was that by authorizing the investigation, Trump had failed in his Constitutional duty to “faithfully execute the laws enacted by Congress.” The real predicate was that Musk’s beavers were uncovering the inner mechanism of the deep state and the resulting truths were unbearable.

“Humankind,” said T. S. Eliot, in “Burnt Norton,” “cannot bear very much reality.” Similarly, Bureaucrats cannot bear very much transparency.  Like vampires, the sunlight is fatal to them.

How will Trump respond?  We do not know yet.  I hope it will be at least partly as Andrew Jackson is said to have responded in his contretemps with Chief Justice John Marshall.  In 1834, the Supreme Court determined that the Cherokee Indians owned Northern Georgia. Nevertheless, Andrew Jackson evicted the Indians, reputedly observing that Marshall “has made his decision; now let him enforce it.”

Lincoln responded in a similar fashion to Chief Justice Roger Taney in 1861. In April of that year, Lincoln suspended the writ of habeas corpus between Washington, D.C., and Philadelphia. This allowed military commanders to imprison suspected saboteurs without indictment. Taney said (in “Ex Parte Merryman”) that Lincoln did not have the authority to do this. Lincoln basically ignored him, invoking the novel doctrine of “nonacquiesence.”

As usual, Lincoln demonstrated his deep understanding of the issues involved. “Are all the laws but one to go unexecuted,” he asked Taney, “and the Government itself go to pieces lest that one be violated? Even in such a case, would not the official oath be broken if the Government should be overthrown when it was believed that disregarding the single law would tend to preserve it?”

In my view, Trump’s actions to expose the partisan corruption of the administrative state are in response to an existential threat is as grave, if less bloody, than the Civil War. The permanent bureaucracy that rules us has for decades been erecting and fortifying a nearly impenetrable edifice from which to preserve its privileges and power, stifle criticism, and export its globalist agenda.  Donald Trump was elected to deconstruct that edifice. Elon Musk is one of his most potent aides in accomplishing that task.  Of course, the left is hysterical.  Their gravy train is being derailed before their eyes. The people who elected Trump are delighted.

I suspect that the squeals and tantrums of the ruling party and its minions will amount to no more than theater. I further suspect that Trump will resort not only to “nonacquiesence” but also to non-payment.  In 2022, New York received $383 billion in federal spending. There are many ways in which Trump could stanch the flow of federal dollars to obstreperous states. I think he should consider them all. I am also happy to see some official pushback.  Rep. Darrell Issa, for example, just announced that he is “immediately introducing legislation next week to stop these rogue judges and allow Trump and DOGE to tell you where government is spending your money.” Good for him.

One final suggestion. If left-wing regime-party judges can issue emergency restraining orders with “immediate nationwide effect,” why couldn’t a politically mature district judge in, say, Alabama do the same, overturning the order issued by his left-wing colleague on an “immediate, nationwide basis?”  I offer the idea free and for nothing.


Roger Kimball

Source: https://amgreatness.com/2025/02/09/trump-musk-and-the-deep-state-the-battle-over-transparency-begins/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Elon Musk outlines 'super obvious' changes DOGE and Treasury have agreed to make - Anders Hagstrom

 

by Anders Hagstrom

A federal judge blocked Musk's DOGE from accessing Treasury Department systems


 

Billionaire Elon Musk outlined a list of "super obvious" changes that his Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) plans to make at the U.S. Treasury Department this weekend.

Musk says officials at the treasury are working to make the government's books more simple to audit, as well as more accountability for where funds are going. The changes also require treasury employees to more frequently update the congressional "do not pay" list, which highlights fraudsters and illegal fronts.

"Nobody in Treasury management cared enough before. I do want to credit the working level people in Treasury who have wanted to do this for many years, but have been stopped by prior management," Musk said.

"Everything at Treasury was geared towards complain[t] minimization. People [who] receive money don’t complain, but people who don’t receive money (especially fraudsters) complain very loudly, so the fraud was allowed to continue," he added.

USAID HAS 'DEMONSTRATED PATTERN OF OBSTRUCTIONISM,' CLAIMS TOP DOGE REPUBLICAN IN LETTER TO RUBIO

"The above super obvious and necessary changes are being implemented by existing, long-time career government employees, not anyone from DOGE," Musk added.

"It is ridiculous that these changes didn’t exist already! Yesterday, I was told that there are currently over $100B/year of entitlements payments to individuals with no SSN or even a temporary ID number," he continued. "If accurate, this is extremely suspicious. When I asked if anyone at Treasury had a rough guess for what percentage of that number is unequivocal and obvious fraud, the consensus in the room was about half, so $50B/year or $1B/week!! This is utterly insane and must be addressed immediately."

ELON MUSK'S DOGE MAKES ANOTHER HIRING PUSH

Musk at Trump inauguration

Billionaire Elon Musk's DOGE is targeting the Treasury Department. (Kenny Holston-Pool/Getty Images)

Musk's tirade toward the treasury department comes just after a federal judge blocked DOGE's ability to access treasury department systems. The Tesla CEO condemned the ruling as "insane" this weekend.

'VIPER'S NEST': USAID ACCUSED OF CORRUPTION, MISMANAGEMENT LONG BEFORE TRUMP ADMIN TOOK AIM

The Friday lawsuit, which was filed by 19 Democratic attorneys general, claimed Musk’s team violated the law by being given "full access" to the Treasury’s payment systems. The systems include information about Americans’ Social Security, Medicare and veterans’ benefits, tax refund information and more.

The lawsuit was filed in New York by the office of New York Attorney General Letitia James, who wrote that President Donald Trump "does not have the power to give away Americans’ private information to anyone he chooses, and he cannot cut federal payments approved by Congress."

US-POLITICS-TRUMP-DEPARTURE

A federal judge intervened to block DOGE from accessing treasury department systems. (ROBERTO SCHMIDT/AFP via Getty Images)

U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has expressed support for Musk and DOGE in the past, recently saying that the U.S. "doesn't have a revenue problem, we have a spending problem."

"At the Treasury, our payment system is not being touched," Bessent said in a "Kudlow" interview on Wednesday. "We process 1.3 billion payments a year. There is a study being done — can we have more accountability, more accuracy, more traceability that the money is going where it is?"

 

Anders Hagstrom is a reporter with Fox News Digital covering national politics and major breaking news events. Send tips to Anders.Hagstrom@Fox.com, or on Twitter: @Hagstrom_Anders.

Source: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/elon-musk-outlines-super-obvious-changes-doge-treasury-have-agreed-make

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

All the tax cuts likely to be included in Trump and GOP's forthcoming reconciliation bill - Nicholas Ballasy

 

by Nicholas Ballasy

There appears to be broad consensus among House and Senate Republicans on the tax cuts to include in a reconciliation bill but they're still debating spending cuts to offset the cost.

President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans are negotiating a tax package that a budget watchdog group estimated could cost anywhere from $5 trillion to $11.2 trillion over the next decade.

A series of tax policy changes that Trump supports appear to have broad support among Republicans in Congress. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget has released a study that projects the cost of each item over a 10-year period. The possible tax changes are expected to be included in a budget reconciliation package, which allows the GOP to bypass the filibuster in the Senate, where they lack a 60-vote threshold. It is unclear at this time if the tax provisions will be passed in one large reconciliation bill or as part of a two-bill approach.

According to the CRFB, extending the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, Trump's 2017 tax reform package, would cost between $3.9 trillion and $4.8 trillion.

By the numbers

Under the CRFB study, expanding the State and Local Tax deduction (SALT) would cost from $200 billion to $1.2 trillion. 

  • Eliminating taxes on tips, which Trump campaigned heavily on enacting, would result in a $100 billion to $550 billion reduction in federal tax revenue, according to the study;
  • Exempting overtime pay from federal taxes would cost $250 billion up to $3.0 trillion;
  • Exempting Social Security benefits from federal taxes would cost between $550 billion and $1.5 trillion;
  • Lowering taxes for U.S. production of certain goods would cost between $100 billion and $200 billion;
  • Reducing tax benefits for stadium owners and ending the carried interest loophole would save about $100 billion, according to the group.

Without significant spending cuts, the CRFB projected that the tax cuts would result in the national debt totaling from 132 to 149% of GDP by 2035, “compared to nearly 100 percent today and 118 percent under current law.”

Overall, the CRFB has estimated that all of the tax cuts currently on the table, if enacted, could result in a 1.3 to 3.0% Gross Domestic Product (GDP) reduction over 10 years. 

House and Senate Republicans are still debating what spending cuts to include to offset the costs of the tax cuts in the full reconciliation package. House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., had proposed about $700 billion in spending cuts but members of the conservative House Freedom Caucus are advocating for more.

Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, leader of the new Department of Government Efficiency, has been working on finding waste and fraud at the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and going as far as trying to close the agency as a way to cut spending but it is unclear how much of a savings that would yield. Final closure of USAID would not be finalized without some sort of action from Congress. 

Trump said at a news conference at the White House on Friday that Musk and DOGE are going to find ways that the U.S. government can save money at the U.S. Department of Education as well as the Defense Department. 

“Pentagon, Education, just about everything. We’re going to go through everything,” Trump said at a joint press conference at the White House with Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba.

Trump described the situation at USAID as "very unfortunate" and said most of the employees there have been dismissed.

“It was so bad, with what we just went through — with this horrible situation we just went through, and I guess 97% of the people have been dismissed,” Trump said.

“It was very, very unfortunate. You’re not going to find anything like that, but you’re going to find a lot. And I’ve instructed him to go check out Education, to check out the Pentagon, which is the military. And you know, sadly, you’ll find some things that are pretty bad,” he added.

The House GOP is considering wrapping border security funding provisions into the same reconciliation bill with the tax changes and spending cuts. Each component of that bill will be subject to approval by Elizabeth MacDonough, the Senate parliamentarian.

In the meantime, Senate Budget Committee Chair Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., has introduced a $342 billion budget resolution framework without any tax changes, which he said could be included in a second larger reconciliation bill later in the year.

“I have tremendous respect for Speaker Johnson, Chairman Smith and my House Republican colleagues,” Graham wrote on X Friday afternoon. “I hope the House will move forward soon, but we cannot allow this moment to pass, and we cannot let President Trump’s America First Agenda stall.”


Nicholas Ballasy

Source: https://justthenews.com/government/white-house/all-tax-cuts-likely-be-included-trump-and-gops-large-reconciliation-bill

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Trump prefers deal with Iran to ‘blowing it to smithereens’ - JNS Staff

 

by JNS Staff

"They don’t want to die. Nobody wants to die," said the U.S. president.

 

U.S. President Donald Trump signs an executive order in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, D.C., Jan. 20, 2025. Photo by Jim Watson/POOL/AFP via Getty Images.
U.S. President Donald Trump signs an executive order in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, D.C., Jan. 20, 2025. Photo by Jim Watson/POOL/AFP via Getty Images.

U.S. President Donald Trump reiterated in an interview with The New York Post on Saturday that he would prefer to solve the Iran nuclear issue diplomatically, without resorting to military action.

“I would like a deal done with Iran on non-nuclear. I would prefer that to bombing the hell out of it,” he said. “They don’t want to die. Nobody wants to die,” he added.

“I hope they decide that they’re not going to do what they’re currently thinking of doing. And I think they’ll really be happy,” he said.

On Feb. 4, Trump made similar comments on his social media portal Truth Social, saying that wants Iran to “peacefully grow and prosper.”

“Reports that the United States, working in conjunction with Israel, is going to blow Iran into smithereens, ARE GREATLY EXAGGERATED,” he posted.

“I want Iran to be a great and successful country, but one that cannot have a nuclear weapon,” he added.

“I would much prefer a Verified Nuclear Peace Agreement, which will let Iran peacefully grow and prosper,” he wrote. “We should start working on it immediately, and have a big Middle East Celebration when it is signed and completed.”

 Trump signed an executive order on Feb. 4 to reimpose “maximum pressure” sanctions on the Islamic Republic.

The president said at the time that he was “torn” regarding the order. “It’s very tough on Iran,” Trump said. “Hopefully, we are not going to have to use it very much … I’m unhappy to do it,” he added.

Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said during a meeting with Iranian air force members on Friday that “negotiating with such a government should not be done.”

“If they threaten us, we will threaten them. If they act on those threats, we will do the same. If they undermine our nation’s security, we will undoubtedly respond in kind,” he said. 

Trump was warned during his 2024 presidential campaign about an assassination plot by Iranian officials, apparently seeking revenge for America’s targeted killing of Iranian Gen. Qassem Soleimani in January 2020.

As early as 2022, Khamenei promoted an animated video featuring a drone strike on Trump and former U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, The New York Post reported.

On Feb. 3, Trump publicly warned Iran it would be “obliterated” if it assassinated him.


JNS Staff

Source: https://www.jns.org/trump-prefers-deal-with-iran-to-blowing-it-to-smithereens/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter