Saturday, July 12, 2025

Rioter opens fire on ICE agents at raid of cannabis farm - Nicholas Ballasy

 

by Nicholas Ballasy

The Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) says it is offering $50,000 for any information that leads to the arrest of the violent rioter.

 

Rioters attacked ICE agents and one opened fire during a raid at a California cannabis farm, the Department of Homeland Security  revealed on Friday.

"During the operation, more than 500 rioters attempted to disrupt operations. Four U.S. citizens are being criminally processed for assaulting or resisting officers. The rioters damaged vehicles and one violent agitator fired a gun at law enforcement officers," the agency said in a news release. 

The agency said the investigation into immigration and potential child labor violations at the cannabis farm is ongoing.

“At the California marijuana facilities, ICE and CBP law enforcement rescued at least 10 migrant children from what looks like exploitation, forced child labor, and potentially human trafficking or smuggling. Our law enforcement also arrested nearly 200 illegal aliens,” said Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin. 

“During the operation, a violent agitator fired a gun at our brave officers. While ICE and CBP officers are being assaulted by rioters and dodging bullets to save children, sanctuary politicians are demonizing ICE and CBP. We will prosecute to the fullest extent of the law anyone who assaults or doxes federal law enforcement,” she added. 


Nicholas Ballasy

Source: https://justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/rioter-opens-fire-ice-agents-raid-cannabis-farm

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

After 12 days of war, Iran finds itself more isolated than ever - Giorgia Valente

 

by Giorgia Valente

Tehran reels from new sanctions, diplomatic pressure, and internal unrest following conflict with Israel.

 

 A man installs a banner with a picture of late Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) Commander-in-Chief Major General Hossein Salami, following the Israeli strikes on Iran, in Tehran, June 14, 2025.
A man installs a banner with a picture of late Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) Commander-in-Chief Major General Hossein Salami, following the Israeli strikes on Iran, in Tehran, June 14, 2025.
(photo credit: MAJID ASGARIPOUR/WANA/REUTERS)

Twelve days of military confrontation between Israel and Iran have brought Iran’s internal fragilities into sharp focus. From a sweeping domestic crackdown to renewed international sanctions and mounting distrust between Tehran and global institutions, the Islamic Republic now finds itself navigating one of its most critical diplomatic crossroads since the US withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) in 2018.

For more stories from The Media Line go to themedialine.org

The war, which saw Israeli strikes on military and nuclear targets within Iran, revealed not only security vulnerabilities but also exposed the regime to a new wave of international scrutiny. In response, the Islamic Republic has doubled down on domestic repression, expelling large numbers of Afghan refugees, interrogating minority communities, and detaining dozens on allegations of espionage or collaboration with Israeli intelligence.

“The government, aware of its security deficiencies and how easily it was infiltrated, responded with repression,” Nima Baheli, an Iranian political analyst, told The Media Line. “One tactic was the mass expulsion of Afghan refugees, possibly 300,000 or more. These deportations intensified after the conflict, suggesting an effort to reassert internal control,” he added.

Interrogations extended even to members of the Jewish community. “They avoided targeting Iranian Jews directly this time, but many were questioned and socially isolated for hours before being released. It caused panic. The regime understood the risk of provoking international reactions if it crossed a red line,” Baheli noted.

Meanwhile, the international community, particularly the United States and European Union, has responded with sanctions aimed at curbing Iran’s nuclear development and punishing human rights violations. Yet the nature and scope of these sanctions differ sharply between Washington and Brussels, reflecting divergent geopolitical philosophies.

 Satellite image shows a close up view of destroyed buildings at Isfahan Nuclear Technology Center, after it was hit by US airstrikes, in Isfahan, Iran, June 22, 2025. (credit: MAXAR TECHNOLOGIES/HANDOUT VIA REUTERS)
Satellite image shows a close up view of destroyed buildings at Isfahan Nuclear Technology Center, after it was hit by US airstrikes, in Isfahan, Iran, June 22, 2025. (credit: MAXAR TECHNOLOGIES/HANDOUT VIA REUTERS)
From the US side, sanctions on Iran are among the most comprehensive in the world. These are divided into primary sanctions, which prohibit virtually all trade between US persons (including citizens, companies, and entities operating under US jurisdiction) and Iran, and secondary sanctions, which penalize non-US persons who engage with specific sectors of the Iranian economy.

“The US approach is about isolation,” Daniel Martin, partner and head of the sanctions team at HFW, a leading global law firm in the aerospace, commodities, construction, energy, insurance, and shipping sectors, told The Media Line.

“At present, US persons are essentially banned from trading with Iran, apart from limited exemptions such as food or humanitarian goods. But the more aggressive component now being emphasized is the secondary sanctions regime designed to deter global companies, even those outside the US, from doing business with Iran,” he added.

Martin noted that this approach is fundamentally different from those in Europe. “The European position is structured in the opposite way. European Union regulations allow trade with Iran unless there is a specific prohibition. That’s in contrast with the US primary sanctions, where everything is banned unless explicitly permitted,” he said.

Currently, EU and UK sanctions are more narrowly targeted. They focus on two main areas: Iran’s nuclear program and its record on human rights. Sanctions currently in place include asset freezes and travel bans on individuals and entities linked to Iran’s ballistic missile development, human rights abuses, and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. Additionally, restrictions exist on exports of equipment that could be used for internal repression or nuclear-related activities.

European commercial interest in engaging with Iran

Still, within these legal boundaries, trade with Iran has continued in sectors not explicitly targeted, particularly in energy.

“There’s no denying that Europe has had a commercial interest in engaging with Iran,” Martin said. “European companies have historically been active in Iran’s oil and gas markets, automotive sector, and aviation industries. After the JCPOA was signed in 2015, we saw trade missions from Germany, France, and Italy seeking contracts. Access to Iranian oil was seen as an opportunity to diversify energy supply and reduce dependency on other exporters,” he added.

However, Martin added, “Even though EU sanctions are less extensive than American ones, the reality is that trade hasn’t rebounded. Businesses fear that if they reengage, sanctions could be reimposed unpredictably, especially with the US shifting policies quickly. What businesses crave is certainty, and they haven’t had that,” he noted.

He elaborated further: “Whatever the legal position, commercial organizations need predictability. Reengaging with Iran requires significant legal and compliance investment. If there’s no assurance that sanctions relief will last, businesses won’t take the risk. That’s why even though EU sanctions are less extensive, trade hasn’t returned to pre-2018 levels,” he said.

Domestically, these economic constraints are being felt acutely by the Iranian population. Sanctions targeting the aviation and energy sectors have left both industries under-resourced. Aging equipment, reduced access to spare parts, and the inability to attract foreign investment are limiting Iran’s operational capacity. “Ultimately, it’s the ordinary citizen who suffers,” Martin said.

That suffering is compounded by fear. The short-lived truce between Israel and Iran, observers say, feels fragile to many Iranians.

“There’s real fear that the war will resume,” Baheli noted. “Netanyahu’s visit to the US and his track record of using conflict for political leverage, along with Iran’s awareness of its military shortcomings, have fueled this unease. People believe the truce is only temporary,” he added.

Amid the instability, Tehran has signaled renewed interest in regional diplomacy. A meeting is reportedly being prepared between Iranian and Saudi officials, aimed at stabilizing relations following years of hostility and proxy conflict. The move could be part of a broader recalibration in Iran’s foreign policy as it struggles to counter its isolation.

“Saudi Arabia wants stability. It cannot afford a war between Iran and Israel, nor a scenario where Iran is perpetually in crisis,” Baheli explained. “The Saudi development agenda depends on regional calm, and for that reason, they are invested in resolving tensions,” he added.

 

Giorgia Valente

Source: https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/iran-news/article-860730

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Thursday, July 10, 2025

Muslim Leaders Who Oppose Terrorism: The New Heroes - Khaled Abu Toameh

 

by Khaled Abu Toameh

Undoubtedly, there are some Muslims who are in favor of these kinds of visits and interfaith dialogue, but they either prefer to remain neutral or are afraid to voice their opinions in public.

 

  • "You [Israelis] represent the world of brotherhood, the world of humanity, the world of affection, the world of democracy, the world of freedom." — Hassen Chalghoumi, imam from France and head of the visiting delegation, at a meeting with Israeli President Isaac Herzog, July 7, 2025.

  • When Muslims say they support the Palestinian "resistance," they are actually voicing support for terrorism and Hamas's October 7 atrocities against Israelis and others.

  • Undoubtedly, there are some Muslims who are in favor of these kinds of visits and interfaith dialogue, but they either prefer to remain neutral or are afraid to voice their opinions in public. Muslims should applaud, not condemn, Muslim leaders who reach out to Israel and Jews and speak out against Islamist terror groups, for their own future: they can choose, instead of a life of fear a life of freedom, prosperity and opportunity.

A group of brave Islamic religious leaders from France, Belgium, The Netherlands, Italy and Britain who are visiting Israel this week are being condemned and ridiculed by many Muslims. The leaders are being accused of "treason" and promoting "normalization" with Israel. Pictured: The delegation tours the Yad Vashem Holocaust Memorial Museum in Jerusalem, Israel, on July 8, 2025. (Photo by Menahem Kahana/AFP via Getty Images)

A group of brave Islamic religious leaders from France, Belgium, The Netherlands, Italy and Britain who are visiting Israel this week are being condemned and ridiculed by many Muslims. The leaders are being accused of "treason" and promoting "normalization" with Israel.

The Muslim leaders did not come to Israel to stand against Muslims or the Palestinians. Rather, they came with a message of peace, coexistence and tolerance. They came to Israel out of a belief that interfaith dialogue between Muslims and non-Muslims is imperative. Interfaith dialogue, which promotes peace and harmony, is important because it allows people to learn about different religions and cultures, and to appreciate the similarities and differences between them.

These Islamic leaders are heroes because they chose to visit Israel at a time when many Muslims, especially those living in Europe, are waging a massive smear campaign against Israel because of its war against the Iran-backed Hamas Islamist terror group in the Gaza Strip. Muslims who care about their religion should stand up against Islamist terrorists who have hijacked their religion and are committing atrocities in the name of Islam.

The war began after Hamas and thousands of "ordinary" Palestinians invaded Israel on October 7, 2023, murdering 1,200 Israelis and foreign nationals and injuring thousands more. Another 251 Israelis and foreign nationals were kidnapped and dragged to the Gaza Strip, where 50 (20 of whom are believed to be alive) remain in captivity.

Hassen Chalghoumi, an imam from France and head of the delegation visiting Israel, said during a meeting with Israeli President Isaac Herzog:

"You [Israelis] represent the world of brotherhood, the world of humanity, their world of affection, the world of democracy, the world of freedom."

While the visit of the Muslim leaders to Israel shows that moderate Muslim leaders can play a positive and constructive role in promoting peace and harmony, it also serves as a reminder that a large number of Muslims continue to support extremism and violence and do not recognize Israel's right to exist.

Fadel Soliman, a Muslim Quran translator and author with more than half a million followers on X, commented:

"Today, the president of Israel met in the occupied city of Jerusalem with a delegation of misguided imams and the vilest of God's creation... Anyone who sees them would spit on them, for they are more despicable than prostitutes who sell their honor on street corners."

Lebanese businessman Rida Saad described the imams as "spies, sons of dogs, traitors and whores."

Social media influencer Dr. Abdelaziz Ragab, who lives in Italy, wrote on X:

"Bastards who sold their faith and betrayed their nation! They said: 'We came with a message of love, and you (Israel) represent the world of humanity!' What betrayal and degradation could be greater than this?"

Former Egyptian member of parliament Mohammed Emad Saber issued a statement denouncing the Muslim leaders' visit to Israel as "a clear violation of God's law and the consensus of the [Islamic] nation." He added:

"This was a blatant act of normalization, a horrific moral fall, a brazen challenge to the sentiments of the Islamic nation, and a clear stab in the back of the blessed [Hamas] resistance...

"The meeting of these individuals with the criminal Zionist president of a betrayal of Allah, His Messenger, and the believers, and a clear violation of the rulings of Islamic Sharia, which forbids allegiance to the enemies of Allah. Allah Almighty says: 'O believers! Take neither the Jews or Christians as guardians – they are guardians of each other. Whoever does so will be counted as one of them. Surely, Allah does not guide the wrongdoing people.' [Al-Maida 51]...

"[W]e declare that these individuals have lost their religious and moral legitimacy to perform the role of imams and preachers. Their prayers with the people are morally void. Muslims, especially in Europe, must boycott them, expose them, and refrain from praying behind them until they publicly repent to Allah and atone for their actions.
We call on Islamic institutions in Europe, Sharia councils, and advocacy groups to issue clear statements of condemnation, remove their names from lists of scholars and preachers, and refrain from hosting then on any media or religious platforms."

The Union of Scholars at Al-Azhar University in Egypt condemned the visit of the Muslim leaders to Israel as a "disgraceful normalization unrelated to Islam and human dignity." The union said the visit represents a "treacherous stab to the [Islamic] nation and an unforgettable disgrace, as well as a violation of the rules of Sharia and the blood of the martyrs. We strongly reject any form of normalization with the Zionist entity and express our full support for the Palestinian people and their honorable resistance."

When Muslims say they support the Palestinian "resistance," they are actually voicing support for terrorism and Hamas's October 7 atrocities against Israelis and others. Notably, Hamas murdered 23 Arab Muslims on October 7. So those who have come out against the visit of the Muslim leaders to Israel are also saying that they support the murder of innocent Muslim civilians living in Israel.

Sadly, it is hard to find Muslims who have positive things to say about the visit of these Muslim leaders to Israel. Undoubtedly, there are some Muslims who are in favor of these kinds of visits and interfaith dialogue, but they either prefer to remain neutral or are afraid to voice their opinions in public. Muslims should applaud, not condemn, Muslim leaders who reach out to Israel and Jews and speak out against Islamist terror groups, for their own future: they can choose, instead of a life of fear a life of freedom, prosperity and opportunity.


Khaled Abu Toameh is an award-winning journalist based in Jerusalem.

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21735/muslim-leaders-who-oppose-terrorism

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Comer dismisses Biden doctor's bid for pause in cover-up probe: 'Throwing out every excuse' - Elizabeth Elkind

 

by Elizabeth Elkind

The former WH physician's lawyers have asked for a pause while the DOJ investigation is ongoing



 

 

 

 

 

 


FIRST ON FOX: House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer, R-Ky., appears to be shooting down a request by a key player in the former Biden administration to suspend his probe into whether ex-President Joe Biden’s top allies "covered up" evidence of his mental and physical decline.

Former White House physician Dr. Kevin O’Connor’s attorneys released a statement after his appearance before House investigators on Wednesday, calling for Comer’s probe to pause while a parallel federal investigation was ongoing.

Comer told Fox News Digital it was "another tactic to avoid testifying about the cover-up of President Biden’s cognitive decline."

"Dr. O’Connor doesn’t want to give the American people the truth about President Biden’s cognitive decline, and his attorneys are throwing out every excuse to see what sticks. We requested his testimony over a year ago, but the Biden White House blocked him from appearing before the Oversight Committee," Comer said. "Now that we’ve compelled him to come forward and the White House waived executive privilege, Dr. O’Connor has resorted to pleading the Fifth Amendment to keep the truth hidden."

BIDEN AIDES PUSHED FOR EARLY DEBATE TO SHOW OFF BIDEN'S ‘STRENGTH’, EXPOSE TRUMP'S ‘WEAKNESS,' BOOK SAYS

Former President Joe Biden and House Oversight and Government Reform Chair James Comer

Left: Former President Joe Biden. Right: House Oversight and Accountability Committee Chair James Comer, R-Ky. (Paul Morigi/Getty Images for Care Can't Wait Action and AP Photo/Mariam Zuhaib)

Comer argued there was "longstanding precedent" for simultaneous probes between Congress and the Department of Justice (DOJ).

The Kentucky Republican subpoenaed O'Connor to appear before his committee, which is also investigating whether any Biden administration decisions were signed off via use of an autopen, and whether it was with the then-president's knowledge.

Biden allies have pushed back, arguing the president was the final sign-off on every decision.

But unlike a previous deposition with ex-Biden aide Neera Tanden, which lasted hours behind closed doors, O'Connor's sit-down lasted roughly 30 minutes before he and his lawyers left the room.

"No comments to press," one of his lawyers said in response to Fox News Digital's shouted question.

A video of the deposition shared by the House Oversight Committee shows O'Connor invoking the Fifth Amendment for all questions after his name.

WHITE HOUSE WAIVES EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGES FOR BIDEN DOCTOR KEVIN O'CONNOR IN COVER-UP PROBE

Biden and O'Connor walk along the side of the White House

House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., subpoenaed former President Joe Biden’s physician Kevin O'Connor to appear for a deposition as part of a probe into Biden's mental decline.  (Manuel Balce Ceneta/AP)

His lawyers insisted he did so out of concerns that House investigators would press him to violate patient-physician privilege. An Oversight Committee aide responded, "Doctor-patient objection would have meant he would have stayed and answered questions that didn’t implicate such privilege. Instead, he took the Fifth to all and any potential questions."

"This Committee has indicated to Dr. O'Connor and his attorneys that it does not intend to honor one of the most well-known privileges in our law - the physician patient privilege. Instead, the Committee has indicated that it will demand that Dr. O'Connor reveal, without any limitations, confidential information regarding his medical examinations, treatment, and care of President Biden," the attorney statement said.

"Revealing confidential patient information would violate the most fundamental ethical duty of a physician, could result in revocation of Dr. O'Connor's medical license, and would subject Dr. O'Connor to potential civil liability. Dr. O'Connor will not violate his oath of confidentiality to any of his patients, including President Biden."

Pointing out that a similar investigation was launched by the DOJ, they added, "We believe that the Committee should hold its investigation in abeyance until any criminal investigation has concluded."

Pleading the Fifth Amendment was not an admission of any guilt, the lawyers said.

Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Texas, who made a surprise appearance at the interview, similarly defended O'Connor while citing the DOJ probe.

"As someone who has served as a criminal defense attorney and actually been in courtrooms, it's kind of astounding to hear someone say, if you invoke the Fifth Amendment, that is only because you are guilty," Crockett said. 

"We have a constitutional right that anyone who may be under fire can invoke. And unfortunately, with this rogue DOJ, it has decided that it wants to run a contemporaneous investigation, criminal investigation, involving the doctor – I think he did what any good lawyer would advise him to do."

But Comer's Thursday statement to Fox News Digital signals he will press on with the probe.

O'Connor's lawyers pointed Fox News Digital to their prior statement when reached for comment on Comer's remarks.



Elizabeth Elkind is a politics reporter for Fox News Digital leading coverage of the House of Representatives. Previous digital bylines seen at Daily Mail and CBS News.

Source: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/comer-dismisses-biden-doctors-bid-pause-cover-up-probe-throwing-out-every-excuse

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

'A stalemate': Hamas objects to Israel's concessions on IDF troop deployment in Gaza - Amichai Stein, Jerusalem Post Staff

 

by Amichai Stein, Jerusalem Post Staff

Netanyahu met with families of the hostages in Washington Wednesday night, saying that tremendous efforts are being made to bring everyone back.

 

Flames rise in Gaza, as seen from the Israeli side of the Israel-Gaza border, July 9, 2025
Flames rise in Gaza, as seen from the Israeli side of the Israel-Gaza border, July 9, 2025
(photo credit: REUTERS/AMIR COHEN) 

Hamas has raised objections to Israel’s second ceasefire proposal, which was submitted to mediators and outlines the deployment of IDF forces in the Gaza Strip during the proposed 60-day ceasefire.

The updated offer, presented late on Wednesday, includes increased Israeli flexibility regarding the presence of the IDF during the ceasefire in the area stretching south from the Morag Corridor toward the Philadelphi Corridor, located along the Gaza-Egypt border.

One source described the situation to The Jerusalem Post as a “stalemate,” while another said, “We thought things would move faster due to American and Qatari pressure. At least a few more days of negotiations will be needed.”

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met with families of hostages on Wednesday and told them that, under the current circumstances, a comprehensive deal could not have been reached. “There was no such option,” Netanyahu said. In response to questions about who might be released under the deal, he told the families: “All of them are humanitarian cases. It will likely be Hamas that decides who will be released.”

 HAMAS TERRORISTS keep guard on the day Hamas handed over deceased hostages, in Khan Yunis, Feb. 20, 2025. (credit: REUTERS)
HAMAS TERRORISTS keep guard on the day Hamas handed over deceased hostages, in Khan Yunis, Feb. 20, 2025. (credit: REUTERS)

In a statement issued by the Prime Minister’s Office, Netanyahu said that at the beginning of the 60-day ceasefire, “we will enter negotiations for a permanent end to the war, meaning a permanent ceasefire.”

He clarified Israel’s conditions: Hamas must disarm, Gaza must be demilitarized, and Hamas can no longer maintain any governing or military capabilities. “If this can be achieved through negotiations, all the better. If not, we will achieve it through other means - by force, through the strength of our heroic army.”

A source familiar with the negotiations told the Post that Trump’s Special Envoy to the Middle East, Steve Witkoff, is planning to push for talks on ending the war from the very first day. “He’s planning for the talks to begin immediately and intends to travel to Qatar in person to start them,” the source said.

Hamas claimed on Wednesday that on its side, there were several sticking points, including the flow of aid, withdrawal of Israeli forces from the Gaza Strip, and "genuine guarantees' for a permanent ceasefire." Although it has agreed to release 10 hostages, the terror group described the talks as "tough" due to Israel's "intransigence."

The families of hostages give a clear message: 'Don’t leave anyone behind'

Families of hostages called for a complete deal that would see the return of all remaining 50 hostages in a rally at Washington DC on Monday. 

“We are here to remind President Trump and PM Netanyahu that there are 50 hostages to be released. We cannot accept a deal for a partial release”, says Ilan Dalal, father of Guy Gilboa-Dalal. 

He also added: “A partial deal would mean that some of the hostages will stay in the tunnels for more time, and this would be a death sentence. Please make a deal that will bring all the hostages home.”


Amichai Stein, Jerusalem Post Staff

Source: https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-860622

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Israel, ICC prosecutor have third fight over 'State of Palestine' war crimes probes - Yonah Jeremy Bob

 

by Yonah Jeremy Bob

Unlike prior rounds of debate on these issues which took a year or more, it appears that the ICC’s Pre-Trial Chamber will try to reach a decision within several months at most.

 

(L-R): International Criminal Court Prosecutor Karim Khan; Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
(L-R): International Criminal Court Prosecutor Karim Khan; Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
(photo credit: FLASH90, POOL) 

Israel and the International Criminal Court Prosecutor have been engaging in an almost weekly duel of legal briefs in their third round of fighting over whether a “State of Palestine” exists that can grant the ICC judges jurisdiction over war crimes probes against Israelis.

At stake is whether the ICC Prosecutor can move forward with its case and arrest warrants against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former defense minister Yoav Gallant after suffering a setback decision on April 24 from the ICC Appeals Chamber.

These arrest warrants have shaken Israel’s legitimacy worldwide and threaten additional stark, negative, diplomatic, economic, legal, and other consequences.

But on April 24, the ICC’s Appeals Chamber gave Israel a rare and pleasant surprise when it stalled the prosecution’s progress against Israelis by saying that its lower court needed to review Jerusalem’s objections to the ICC’s jurisdiction more carefully than it had before.

This is really the third battle over whether there is a “State of Palestine” that can give the ICC jurisdiction to go after Israelis, following two prior wins for the Palestinians on the issue at the lower court level in 2021 and November 2024.

 Illustrative picture of flag at pro-Palestinian demonstration that reads 'Free Palestine,' April 23, 2025. (credit: REUTERS/MICHELLE MCLOUGHLIN)
Illustrative picture of flag at pro-Palestinian demonstration that reads 'Free Palestine,' April 23, 2025. (credit: REUTERS/MICHELLE MCLOUGHLIN)
As of July 3, the ICC Pre-Trial Chamber (lower court) gave Israel an extension to file additional legal briefs by August 1 in this ongoing battle.

This came after the ICC Prosecutor filed legal briefs against Israel’s positions on June 18, June 27, and July 2, with the Palestinian Authority also filing multiple briefs during this period.

All of the briefs relate to Israel’s May 26 legal submission to push forward after its April 24 partial victory at the ICC Appeals Chamber, so as to try to get the case tossed completely as being beyond ICC jurisdiction.

This would be because there is no State of Palestine or because the Oslo Accords from the mid-1990s prevent the PA from granting jurisdiction to the ICC to go after Israelis, pending resolution of the peace process between Israel and the PA over their mutual future borders.

Some of the arguments Israel is hoping will win this time are that the PA has no set territory and no control over Gaza, especially after the current ongoing 21-month war, as well as arguments about the Oslo Accords holding back the ICC, which Jerusalem feels were summarily dismissed in the past without a serious analysis.

STILL, ISRAEL faces an uphill battle.

Israel tries to freeze arrest warrants against Gallant, Netanyahu

Jerusalem already tried on May 9 to use its win before the ICC’s Appeals Chamber to get that same court to freeze the arrest warrants which the ICC’s lower court had approved against Netanyahu and Gallant, but the Appeals Court rejected that request.

In the middle of all of this, over May 17-18, ICC Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan took an indefinite leave from his position due to unrelated allegations of sexual assault committed by him against an ICC employee.

In his absence, instead of the ICC’s Assembly of States Parties appointing a single acting chief prosecutor, it confusingly appointed both of his deputies to run the office.

These deputies, Mame Mandiaye Niang (Senegal) and Nazhat Shameem Khan (Fiji), have consistently divided their roles between criminal investigations and the later stages of prosecution.

When the ICC’s prosecution filed its brief to fight back against Israel on May 21, Shameem Khan signed the papers over Karim Khan’s printed signature.

She has continued to sign later briefs, signaling that she will run the case until his return.

In any event, her approval to continue the Netanyahu and Gallant arrest warrants seems to suggest that even Khan’s extended leave from his position (which could turn into him being fired) will not free Israel from the ICC’s ongoing scrutiny.

One question is whether the chief prosecutor’s deputies will file new charges against Israelis, or whether, given their lesser authority, they will stick to only maintaining the existing probe against Netanyahu and Gallant.

For example, The Wall Street Journal reported that right around when Khan decided to step aside, he was seriously considering going after Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich and National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir for their support of the settlement enterprise as well as their alleged support of Jewish extremist violence against innocent West Bank Palestinians, such as in Huwara and Jit.

Khan was considering going after Smotrich, Ben-Gvir for support of settlements

In May 2024, there were even reports that some ICC officials wanted Khan to pursue Smotrich and Ben-Gvir and the settlement enterprise first before he decided to target Netanyahu and Gallant in relation to the Israel-Hamas War.

The reasoning for targeting Smotrich and Ben-Gvir initially was that there was a greater global consensus against those officials and the settlement enterprise at that point. In contrast, many prominent countries came to the defense of Netanyahu and Gallant.

But because the deputies do not have the same standing as Khan, and given that the Trump administration’s sanctions are deeply harming the ICC’s operations, including around half a dozen staff members leaving to avoid sanctions, Shameem Khan may avoid adding new charges against Israelis at this moment.

Unlike prior rounds of debate on these issues, which took a year or more, it appears that the ICC’s Pre-Trial Chamber will try to reach a decision within several months, at most, and will not let the issue drag out as long.


Yonah Jeremy Bob

Source: https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/defense-news/article-860624

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Syria faces major challenges in efforts to integrate US-backed SDF into military - analysis - Seth J. Frantzman

 

by Seth J. Frantzman

The US under Trump aims for a stable, unified Syria, with Barrack tasked to achieve this, including bringing the SDF into Damascus.

 

 A person holds flags as people celebrate after the Kurdish-led and US-backed Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), which controls much of Syria's oil-rich northeast, has signed a deal agreeing to integrate into Syria's new state institutions, the Syrian presidency said on Monday, in Damascus, Syria Mar
A person holds flags as people celebrate after the Kurdish-led and US-backed Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), which controls much of Syria's oil-rich northeast, has signed a deal agreeing to integrate into Syria's new state institutions, the Syrian presidency said on Monday, in Damascus, Syria Mar
(photo credit: REUTERS/KHALIL ASHAWI)

 

US Ambassador to Turkey Tom Barrack, President Donald Trump’s special envoy for Syria, continues to try to help Damascus achieve its goals. He has played a key role in engaging with Syria after Trump met Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa.

There are many hurdles in Syria, however, and one of them is the question of integrating the US-backed Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) in eastern Syria with the new Syrian army.

There are hurdles because there are major ideological differences between many new Syrian army commanders, who fought alongside Sharaa as part of Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), and the SDF. The SDF is largely a Kurdish organization that has roots in the far Left, while HTS is largely an Arab group that is extremely conservative and Islamic.

Barrack met with Mazloum Abdi, the leader of the Kurdish-led and US-backed SDF and Sharaa on Wednesday. He told reporters there were still gaps that remain between Damascus and eastern Syria.

SYRIAN DEMOCRATIC FORCES and US troops are seen during a patrol near Turkish border in Hasakah, Syria, in November. (credit: RODI SAID / REUTERS)
SYRIAN DEMOCRATIC FORCES and US troops are seen during a patrol near Turkish border in Hasakah, Syria, in November. (credit: RODI SAID / REUTERS)
The key question appears to revolve around whether eastern Syria will receive some kind of autonomy within a federal Syrian state. How unified will the state be, and how top-down will it be ruled from Damascus?

Prior to the Syrian civil war, the Assad regime denied rights to Syrians and also excluded many Kurds in eastern Syria from having basic rights, including even citizenship for some of them.

After the regime began fighting its own people in 2011 and 2012, the Kurds were able to free themselves from this oppression via the People’s Protection Units (YPG). There are other Kurdish political parties in Syria, such as the KNC or ENKS, but the YPG mostly suppressed them in eastern Syria.

The situation has now changed. With the war over and ISIS defeated, Syria is supposed to be unifying under the new government.

The SDF has a lot to offer Damascus. It is a US-trained organization and has standard uniforms and arms. It is likely better trained than some of the Syrian government’s new divisions. This is a ready-made large security force that can aid Syria in stability.

Nevertheless, Damascus is wary of groups that want a federal structure. In essence, it doesn’t want the regions or ethnic groups being too independent. It has already clashed with Druze and Alawites.

Rudaw media in the autonomous Kurdistan Region of northern Iraq reported on the important meeting between Barrack, Sharaa, and Abdi. Unlike the high hopes in March, when Sharaa and Abdi first met, this meeting seems to have run into some troubles. The US military in Syria has supported the meetings.

“The Syrian government has reaffirmed its readiness for dialogue with the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) to bolster national unity, while firmly rejecting any moves toward division or federalization, reiterating its unwavering commitment to the principle of ‘one Syria, one army, one government,’” Rudaw reported. Damascus says it welcomes “any path that would enhance the unity and territorial integrity of Syria.”

Eastern Syria can't have too much autonomy

The new Syrian government, however, doesn’t want eastern Syria to have too much autonomy. This means it doesn’t want it to end up like the Kurdistan Regional Government of northern Iraq, which is very autonomous.

Barrack appears to agree with Damascus’s view. Damascus has been cautioning that “any delay... does not serve the national interest, but rather complicates the scene.”

Barrack’s comments after the meeting have raised eyebrows. On Thursday, he told Rudaw it appeared that the SDF had been “slow” in working with Damascus. In essence, this appears to blame the SDF for the current hurdles.

“I think SDF has been slow in accepting and negotiating and moving towards that, and my advice to them is to speed that,” Barrack told Rudaw. “There is only one road, and that road is to Damascus.”

This has led some online commentators to suggest that Barrack is too supportive of Damascus, or that his views are derived from him also being ambassador to Turkey. Ankara doesn’t want the SDF to become autonomous.

Some have also compared Barrack to the previous US envoy to Syria during Trump’s first term, James Jeffrey. Jeffrey was also seen as being supportive of Ankara’s views and critical of the SDF.

During the first Trump term, the US didn’t stop a Turkish invasion in 2019 that targeted the SDF, or another invasion in 2018 that targeted Afrin, a Kurdish region in northwest Syria. The SDF was portrayed as a temporary, tactical, and transactional relationship that was primarily working with US Central Command.

The US State Department appeared to distance Washington from the SDF. Things have now changed. The US has moved to end sanctions on HTS and also end sanctions on Damascus.

The Trump administration wants Syria to be stable and unified. Barrack is tasked with achieving this. Bringing the SDF into the fold in Damascus is part of the goal.


Seth J. Frantzman

Source: https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/article-860645

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Dutch imam fired after visiting Israel, meeting President Herzog - JNS Staff

 

by JNS Staff

Youssef Msibih was dismissed by the board of his mosque in Alkmaar after videos emerged of him singing Hatikvah in Arabic.

 

A group of Muslim religious leaders from Europe meet with Israeli President Isaac Herzog in Jerusalem, July 7, 2025. Credit: Amos Ben Gershom/GPO.
A group of Muslim religious leaders from Europe meet with Israeli President Isaac Herzog in Jerusalem, July 7, 2025. Credit: Amos Ben Gershom/GPO.

 

A mosque in the Dutch city of Alkmaar fired its imam after he visited Israel with other Muslim faith leaders from Europe, the institution’s board said on Tuesday.  

The Bilal Mosque in Alkmaar told the Islam Omroep, a Dutch-Muslim news site, that Imam Youssef Msibih was “immediately removed” from his position.

The dismissal comes just days after Msibih participated in a delegation of 15 imams and Muslim leaders from France, Italy, Holland, Belgium and the U.K. who paid a rare visit to Israel. 

During the trip, Msibih made headlines on social media for singing an Arabic-language rendition of the Israeli national anthem, Hatikvah.

The delegation met with Israeli President Isaac Herzog and visited sites connected to the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas onslaught on Israel, including Kibbutz Kfar Aza near the Gaza Strip. The trip was organized by the European Leadership Network, a pro-Israel policy group.

In his meeting with the delegation, Herzog praised their visit as a “sign of moral courage.” He thanked the group for “standing up against hatred” and expressed hope for peace, the release of Israeli hostages held in Gaza, and relief for civilians suffering in the war zone.

French Imam Hassen Chalghoumi, a prominent figure in interfaith dialogue, told Herzog: “The war after Oct. 7 is not between Israel and Hamas—it’s between two worlds: one of light and one of darkness. … You represent the world of humanity and democracy.”

While the visit was hailed by some as a courageous gesture of solidarity and bridge-building, it also sparked backlash. Chalghoumi said some of the visitors had received threats. 


JNS Staff

Source: https://www.jns.org/dutch-imam-fired-after-visiting-israel-meeting-president-herzog/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Another judge blocks Trump's birthright citizenship order - Ben Whedon

 

by Ben Whedon

The Supreme Court last month narrowed the scope of prior injunctions against the order, finding that lower courts likely lacked the authority to issue sweeping injunctions.

 

A federal judge on Thursday blocked President Donald Trump's executive order restricting birthright citizenship in the wake of the Supreme Court's ruling on nationwide injunctions.

U.S. District Judge Joseph Laplante granted class-action status to babies who would be affected by the order, in an apparent attempt to circumvent the high court's directives to limit injunctions to participating parties in the case.

The ACLU filed suit, arguing that those affected would suffer irreparable harm, NBC News reported.

The Supreme Court last month narrowed the scope of prior injunctions against the order, finding that lower courts likely lacked the authority to issue sweeping injunctions.

"The issuance of a universal injunction can be justified only as an exercise of equitable authority, yet Congress has granted federal courts no such power," wrote Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett. 

In a concurring opinion, however, Associate Justice Samuel Alito wrote that "today’s decision will have very little value if district courts award relief to broadly defined classes without following 'Rule 23’s procedural protections' for class certification." 


Ben Whedon

Source: https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/another-judge-blocks-trumps-birthright-citizenship-order

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Russiagate Secrets Unlocked: Spy court approves FBI effort to share new evidence with Congress - John Solomon and Jerry Dunleavy

 

by John Solomon and Jerry Dunleavy

FISA Court quietly rules DOJ and FBI can review FISA warrant intel to support Kash Patel effort to hand over more Crossfire Hurricane documents to House and Senate.

 

The nation's spy court has quietly approved a Justice Department request to review information tied to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrants that targeted former Trump campaign associate Carter Page as FBI Director Kash Patel seeks to hand over more Russiagate evidence to Congress.

At the behest of President Donald Trump, Patel already declassified a host of documents tied to the bureau's deeply flawed and politically-motivated Trump-Russia inquiry known as "Crossfire Hurricane" back in April.

The DOJ’s filings with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court show that the FBI is looking to hand over further information about the Crossfire Hurricane scandal following information requests from the GOP-led House and Senate Judiciary Committees.

Early last month, the DOJ told the FISA court that it needed to review a host of documents containing info tied to the FISA warrant against Carter Page, and on June 17 the secretive spy court signed off on this request.

The Justice Department filed its request with the FISA court on June 6, and the filing was made public on the FISA Court docket on Monday.

Kevin J. O'Connor, the chief of the oversight section for DOJ’s National Security Division, told the FISA Court early last month that “the government … seeks an order permitting the use or disclosure of information acquired from one or more of the four Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act applications targeting Carter W. Page.”

The U.S. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court describes itself as "a specialized federal court in Washington, D.C. that Congress created in 1978 when it enacted the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). The FISC’s primary role is to review executive branch (“government”) applications for authorization to employ various means of obtaining foreign intelligence, principally when they are conducted in the United States or otherwise directed at Americans."

Plumbing the depths of Crossfire Hurricane

The FBI and DOJ “have received requests from members of Congress for materials related to the FBI's Crossfire Hurricane investigation and the DOJ Office of Inspector General's related review,” the DOJ filing said, and “responsive documents are reasonably believed to contain Page FISA information.” The DOJ said that it was seeking “permission for FBI and DOJ to disclose, internally within FBI and DOJ, responsive materials that likely contain Page FISA information, for the purpose of identifying and redacting all Page FISA information from the material to prevent disclosure in violation of sections 1809 and 1821 of FISA.”

The Republican-led Senate Judiciary Committee sent a March letter to Patel asking him to hand over dozens of transcripts from DOJ inspector general Michael Horowitz’s investigation into Crossfire Hurricane, while the GOP-led House Judiciary Committee sent a letter to Patel the same month asking him to provide a host of information tied to Russiagate and special counsel John Durham’s inquiry.

Simmering in the background of all of this is the recent publication by Just the News that CIA Director John Ratcliffe sent a criminal referral to Patel related to possible illegal acts committed by ex-CIA chief John Brennan, now an NBC Senior News Analyst, following a review by the CIA that critiqued the actions taken by Brennan related to the Russiagate scandal.

FISA court approves a "good faith" review by DOJ

The DOJ told the FISA court last month that “based on prior reviews of OIG [Office of Inspector General] transcripts in response to FOIA requests,” it believed that the material requested by the Senate Judiciary Committee (SJC) “includes Page FISA information.” The DOJ said that the House Judiciary Committee (HJC) also “asked for numerous documents likely to contain Page FISA information.”

The DOJ lawyer said that the department “is not seeking authority to disclose Page FISA information to Congress in response to the SJC and HJC Requests” but rather “the government proposes to review the materials requested by Congress for the purpose of redacting any Page FISA information that happens to appear therein.” 

The DOJ also said that “the FBI has created a task force of approximately 25 people who, in coordination with the Office of General Counsel, will review and redact responsive materials” requested by the House and Senate.

“The executive branch has an obligation to engage in the accommodation process by supplying responsive information that is not privileged or otherwise protected by law,” the DOJ lawyer told the spy court, adding that “because Page FISA information is comingled with non-Page FISA information in Crossfire Hurricane materials, good-faith review required government personnel to access Page FISA information.”

The DOJ lawyer said that the “materials requested by SJC and HJC will help guide future hearings and ultimately determine whether additional reforms of FISA are needed to prevent future unauthorized collection.”

Marc Elias, a former Perkins Coie lawyer who served as general counsel for Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign, played a key role in the funding and spreading of British ex-spy Christopher Steele’s discredited dossier, including by hiring the opposition research firm Fusion GPS, which then hired Steele. The dossier was used to obtain FISA warrants against Carter Page. 

The Elias Law Group specializes in filing lawsuits designed to assist Democrats in election-related lawfare, and to obstruct the implementation of Trump's policies. Open Secrets reported that his firm received $40,832,771 in the 2024 election cycle from almost exclusively Democratic Party entities, including the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and the Adam Schiff for Senate campaign.  

Judge Anthony Trenga, the presiding judge on the FISA court, said in the June 17 order that “the Court finds this argument persuasive as applied to the pending HJC and SJC Requests.”

Trenga was appointed to the FISA court by Chief Justice John Roberts for a term which began in May 2020 and which runs through May 2026. He served as a Judge in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia following his nomination by President George W. Bush in July 2008.

Trenga also said that “it is reasonable to interpret” the laws surrounding the FISA Court “as permitting disclosures of Page FISA information among OIG, FBI, and other DOJ personnel insofar as necessary to prepare redacted copies of the requested records in order to avoid further disclosure of Page FISA information outside of FBI and DOJ.”

Trenga said that “due regard for the FISA oversight roles of the HJC and SJC weighs against a contrary interpretation that would stymie production to those Committees even of suitably redacted records pertaining to cases of unauthorized electronic surveillance or physical search.”

And the judge ordered that “Page FISA information may be used by, and disclosed by and to, OIG, FBI and other DOJ personnel, insofar as necessary for review of records responsive to the above-described HJC and SJC Requests and redaction of Page FISA information from the copies of such records to be provided to the HJC and/or SJC.”

Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., had sent a March letter to Patel and Attorney General Pam Bondi noting that in April 2023 they had requested “unredacted transcripts” from Horowitz’s investigation into the FBI’s mishandling of the Trump-Russia investigation, but that those transcripts were never handed over.

The senators noted that there were 165 transcribed interviews in question, and asked Patel and Bondi to work to remove redactions from the documents and to hand them over to the Senate after years of delays.

Inspector General: "Significant errors and omissions" in obtaining warrants against Page

It appears that the FBI and DOJ are now working to make these records available to Grassley and Johnson.

In 2019, Inspector General of the DOJ Horowitz found egregious flaws with the FBI’s Russia collusion investigation, finding at least 17 “significant errors and omissions” related to the FISA warrants against Carter Page. He also criticized the “central and essential” role of Steele’s debunked dossier in the FBI’s politicized FISA surveillance.

Horowitz noted, among other things, that Steele’s FBI interview “highlighted discrepancies between Steele’s presentation of information in the election reporting and the views of his Primary Sub-source” and “revealed bias against Trump.” Horowitz said Steele source Igor Danchenko “contradicted the allegations of a ‘well-developed conspiracy’ in” Steele’s dossier.

A report by Special Counsel Robert Mueller in 2019 “did not establish” any criminal Trump-Russia collusion, but by then the false narrative had been widely adopted by left-leaning legacy media.

Jordan wants answers on Russiagate saga and Durham investigation

Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, sent a letter last March to Patel arguing that “the Committee still must fully assess and understand the lengths to which the FBI went to interfere in the 2016 presidential election.” He asked Patel to hand over a host of documents tied to the false collusion saga — documents which now-former FBI Director Christopher Wray had refused to provide.

Jordan’s March letter focused in part on Steele’s discredited anti-Trump dossier, with the Ohio Republican asking Patel to hand over “all documents and communications referring or relating to the so-called Steele dossier or the Crossfire Hurricane investigation” — including all records tied to the opening, closing, and conduct of the Trump-Russia investigation; all interviews conducted by the FBI related to the investigation; and all FISA applications and returns associated with Crossfire Hurricane.

Jordan’s letter also asked for any and all documents and transcripts in possession of the FBI which were cited or used by Durham’s inquiry, as well as “all transcripts and reports of interviews in the possession, custody, or control of the FBI that Special Counsel Durham and his team conducted as part of their investigation of Operation Crossfire Hurricane.”

Manipulation of the FBI under the microscope

Durham’s 2023 report said the launch of the FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane operation under then-Director Christopher Wray was hugely flawed and that an “objective and honest assessment” of the facts “should have caused the FBI to question not only the predication for Crossfire Hurricane, but also to reflect on whether the FBI was being manipulated for political or other purposes,” but “unfortunately, it did not.”

Durham’s report concluded that “neither U.S. law enforcement nor the Intelligence Community appears to have possessed any actual evidence of collusion in their holdings at the commencement of the Crossfire Hurricane investigation.” The special counsel noted that “the FBI ignored the fact that at no time before, during, or after Crossfire Hurricane were investigators able to corroborate a single substantive allegation in the Steele dossier reporting.”

Durham’s special counsel inquiry further undercut the dossier’s credibility and resulted in an indictment against Steele’s alleged primary source, Igor Danchenko, who was revealed to have been on the FBI’s payroll as a confidential human source from March 2017 to October 2020 before he was charged with repeatedly lying to the bureau.

Durham also charged Elias’s former Perkins Coie law partner, Michael Sussmann, also a campaign lawyer for Clinton, who pushed debunked allegations claiming there was a secret back channel between Russia’s Alfa Bank and the Trump Organization, and with whom Elias worked closely in 2016.

Danchenko and Sussmann were each acquitted on charges brought by Durham that they lied to the FBI.

Wray responded to the Durham report in the summer of 2023 by downplaying its findings and arguing to the House Judiciary Committee that “the conduct in 2016 and 2017 that Special Counsel John Durham examined was the reason that current FBI leadership had already implemented dozens of corrective actions, which have now been in place for some time,” while Wray contended that “had those reforms been in place in 2016, the missteps identified in the report could have been prevented.”

Jordan’s March letter also asked Patel to hand over “all briefing documents concerning the Crossfire Hurricane investigation” which were provided to “the FBI Director or other senior executive officials, including the President, Vice President, Attorney General, and Central Intelligence Agency Director” from January 2016 to Trump’s first inauguration in January 2017.

The Republican chairman also asked the FBI to provide the document titled “CF–CH Comparison” which was created during the Durham investigation and which “compared the treatment of the Crossfire Hurricane investigation and the Clinton investigation.”

Based on the filings with the FISA Court, it appears that the DOJ and FBI are in the process of responding to all of these requests from Jordan.

Hillary Clinton purportedly approved plan to conjure ties between Trump and Putin

Durham’s report said that then-President Barack Obama, then-Vice President Biden, and others were briefed on what Durham dubbed the “Clinton Plan intelligence” in the summer of 2016. The intelligence concerned the purported “approval by Hillary Clinton on July 26, 2016 of a proposal from one of her foreign policy advisers” to “stir up a scandal” against Trump by “tying him” to “Putin and the Russian hacking of the Democratic National Committee.”

For her part, Clinton has never admitted or denied involvement, but the Federal Elections Commission fined Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee for failure to disclose that they financed the bogus Steele Dossier.

Brennan briefed Obama and others on the intelligence, and Durham noted that “it was also of enough importance for the CIA to send a formal written referral memorandum” in early September 2016 to since-fired FBI Director James Comey and then-FBI special agent Peter Strzok.

“Unlike the FBI’s opening of a full investigation of unknown members of the Trump campaign based on raw, uncorroborated information, in this separate matter involving a purported Clinton campaign plan, the FBI never opened any type of inquiry, issued any taskings, employed any analytical personnel, or produced any analytical products in connection with the information,” the special counsel assessed.

Brennan in the hotseat — and Durham transcripts may reveal more

Ratcliffe released a ”lessons learned" review of the December 2016 Intelligence Community Assessment last week. The review sharply criticized Brennan for reportedly joining with anti-Trump forces in the FBI in pushing to include Steele’s baseless anti-Trump dossier in the assessment. In the review, the CIA also critiqued the “high confidence” assessment by the FBI and the CIA that Russian leader Vladimir Putin had “aspired” to help President Donald Trump win in 2016.

Ratcliffe tweeted last week, in announcing the CIA review being made public, that Trump “has trusted me with helping to end weaponization of U.S. intelligence” and that the report “underscores that the 2016 IC Assessment was conducted through an atypical & corrupt process under the politically charged environments” of Brennan and Comey.

Brennan was not one of the recipients of then-President Joe Biden's thousands of pardons and grants of clemency. Lying to Congress can be a federal crime under 18 U.S.C. § 1001, which forbids making false statements to the federal government, including Congress, even if not under oath.

The statute of limitations of five years starts to run when the crime is completed, which is when the false statement is made or the false document is submitted. Brennan spoke with Durham in August 2020 and testified before the House Judiciary Committee in May 2023, which could put him in the crosshairs of law enforcement action until August of this year or until May 2028, respectively.

Whether Congress will get its hands on the raw transcript of Brennan’s interview with Durham prior to this August remains to be seen.

The largely declassified CIA review released last week focused on the ICA about Russia and the November 2016 election. It was put together by the CIA's Directorate of Analysis (DA) at Ratcliffe’s direction and concluded that “the decision by agency heads to include the Steele Dossier in the ICA ran counter to fundamental tradecraft principles and ultimately undermined the credibility of a key judgment.”

Comey and former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe pushed in December 2016 to include Steele's debunked dossier in the body of the 2016 ICA on alleged Russian meddling. The dossier was included in a classified annex to the assessment with the agreement of Brennan and Comey. 

Comey also briefed then-President-elect Trump about the dossier’s most salacious allegations during a meeting at Trump Tower in January 2017. Neither McCabe nor Comey received pardons from President Biden.

The new CIA review stated that “the ICA authors and multiple senior CIA managers – including the two senior leaders of the CIA mission center responsible for Russia – strongly opposed including the dossier, asserting that it did not meet even the most basic tradecraft standards.” 

The agency review memo also stated that the CIA’s Deputy Director for Analysis warned in a December 29, 2016, email to Brennan that including the dossier in any form risked “the credibility of the entire paper.”

Brennan chose an anti-Trump narrative instead of solid analysis, review says

The review by the CIA also revealed that “despite these objections, Brennan showed a preference for narrative consistency over analytical soundness” and that “when confronted with specific flaws in the [Steele] Dossier by the two mission center leaders – one with extensive operational experience and the other with a strong analytic background – he appeared more swayed by the Dossier's general conformity with existing theories than by legitimate tradecraft concerns.” 

The CIA review memo stated that Brennan ultimately formalized his position in writing, arguing that “my bottomline is that I believe that the information warrants inclusion in the report.”

A spokesperson for the DOJ told Just the News that “we do not comment on ongoing investigations.” 


John Solomon and Jerry Dunleavy

Source: https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/spy-court-greenlit-doj-review-carter-page-fisa-order-give-more-russiagate

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter