Sunday, March 29, 2026

Israel intensifies strikes on Iran’s industry, crippling key economy sectors - JNS Staff

 

​ by JNS Staff

Two major steel plants were targeted, as well as critical production facilities of the Islamic Republic’s nuclear and munition programs.


An Israeli Air Force fighter jet. Credit: Israel Defense Forces.
An Israeli Air Force F-15I “Ra’am” fighter jet. Credit: Israel Defense Forces.

 

The Israeli Air Force on Friday struck major steel complexes in the cities of Isfahan and Ahvaz, as part of an intensified campaign to pummel the Islamic Republic’s industrial infrastructure, The New York Times reported, citing Iranian officials.

The attack on the Mobarakeh Steel Complex in Isfahan killed one person and injured 15, according to the Times.

Two large electric power plants that supply the steel complex were also damaged, the report added, citing the governor of Isfahan Province as saying.

The strike on the Khuzestan Steel Industries facility in Ahvaz injured 16 workers, the Times cited the deputy governor of Khuzestan Province as saying.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi accused Israel on X of hitting two of Iran’s largest steel factories, a power plant and civilian nuclear sites, among other infrastructure facilities.

He said the attacks contradicted U.S. President Donald Trump’s pledge to give diplomatic talks a chance to end the conflict, and threatened that Tehran will exact a “heavy” price in response.

Israel’s broadcaster Channel 14 reported that the strikes were conducted at the instruction of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Israel Katz, coordinated in advance with U.S. Central Command.

The complexes are partially owned by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, and hitting them is expected to significantly impair the Iranian economy, the report noted.

The Iranian steel industry is ranked ninth or 10th in the world and accounts for some 14% of Iran’s non-oil and natural gas exports, according to Channel 14.

Earlier in the day, Katz warned in a statement that “IDF strikes in Iran will escalate and expand to additional targets and domains that assist the regime in developing and operating weapons against Israeli civilians,” per Ynet.

“We warned the Iranian terrorist regime to stop firing missiles at the civilian population in Israel. Despite the warnings, the fire has continued. They will pay a heavy and increasing price for this war crime,” Katz said.

In the wake of the damage to its steel industry, Iran issued a threat against six steel plants across the Middle East, facilities in Israel, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Bahrain and Kuwait, Ynet added.

IDF hits key nuclear, munition production sites

The IAF overnight Friday conducted three waves of attacks on Iran that targeted central factories of its nuclear weapons program and munitions production industry, the Israel Defense Forces said in a statement.

These included the heavy water plant in Arak, whose product is used to operate nuclear reactors, and a factory that extracts uranium from ore in Yazd, both in central Iran.

The heavy water plant was struck after efforts to fix previous damage were detected by the IDF Military Intelligence Directorate.

Originally, it was “designed to have the capability to produce weapons-grade plutonium. These materials are also used as a source for extracting neutrons for nuclear weapons. In addition, the plant served as a significant economic asset for the terrorist regime and was a source of income for the Iranian Atomic Energy Organization. Its operations generated tens of millions of dollars annually for the regime,” the IDF Spokesperson’s Unit said in a statement.

The plant was struck during “Operation Rising Lion” in June.

The factory in Yazd is a one-of-a-kind Iranian facility that uses precursor materials required for the uranium enrichment process, the military said.

“This is a critically important process for the nuclear weapons program advanced by the regime, and it constitutes the beginning of the value chain required for producing nuclear weapons,” the army added.

“The IDF will not allow the Iranian terror regime to continue its attempts to advance the nuclear weapons program, which poses an existential threat to the State of Israel and the entire world,” the statement read.

More than 50 aircraft took part in the sorties, which lasted hours, according to the IDF.

Moreover, the IAF struck the headquarters of Iran’s Maritime Industries Organization, guided by the Israeli Naval Intelligence Division, the military said in a separate statement.

The headquarters is responsible for research, development and production of a wide variety of naval weapons systems, including surface and subsurface vessels, manned and unmanned vehicles, as well as engines and weapons, according to the IDF.

Simultaneously, Israeli aircraft struck numerous sites used for producing and developing a variety of weapons systems and air defense systems so as to preserve the IAF’s aerial superiority in Iranian airspace, the IDF said.


JNS Staff

Source: https://www.jns.org/news/israel-news/israel-intensifies-strikes-on-irans-industry-crippling-key-economy-sectors

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

'Long-term regional change:' IDF publishes operational preparations that led to the war - Israel National News

 

​ by Israel National News

The IDF publishes for the first time the the operational preparations from the dramatic moments leading up to Operation Roaring Lion.

 

הרמטכ"ל אייל זמיר 

One month ago, IDF troops in the air, at sea, and on the ground launched Operation “Roaring Lion," an operation intended to remove an immediate threat to the State of Israel and to degrade the enemy’s infrastructure and capabilities.

In the days leading up to Operation “Roaring Lion," focused operational preparations took place, including situational assessments, intelligence updates, approval of plans, multi-front readiness, and inter-service coordination, until the conditions were met for issuing the order to commence the operation.

The operation was carried out on the basis of precise intelligence, orderly operational planning, and coordination between IDF branches, alongside cooperation with international partners in the United States.

0:00 / 0:13
הרמטכ"ל בישיבת תיאום עם הכוחות האמריקנייםצילום: דובר צה"ל

פקודת המבצע
פקודת המבצעצילום: דובר צה"ל


Israel National News

Source: https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/424753

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Yemen's Houthis join Iran conflict, launch missiles at Israel - The Foreign Desk Staff

 

​ by The Foreign Desk Staff

The involvement of the Houthis could further complicate global shipping already crippled by the closure of he Strait of Hormuz

 

Yemen’s Houthis have entered the month-old Iran conflict with a short wave of attacks on Isreal, further threatening global shipping. 

Just as Iran can exert control over marine traffic through the Strait of Hormuz, Yemen can do the same with the Red Sea. 

While the Strait of Hormuz is an essential bottleneck for shipments of petroleum and liquified natural gas, the Red Sea is more important for shipments of general commerce between the East and West.

The Iran-backed Houthis, which are a rebel group in Yemen but not representatives of the Yemini state, previously blocked shipping through the red Sea in 2023, in response to Israel’s war in Gaza.

The developments come as U.S. Marines arrive in the region and the Pentagon prepares for potential ground operations in Iran. 


The Foreign Desk Staff

Source: https://justthenews.com/world/middle-east/yemens-houthis-join-iran-conflict-launch-missiles-israel

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Associated Press runs paid PR ads for Chinese telecom Huawei as CCP seeks to influence UN agency - Jerry Dunleavy

 

​ by Jerry Dunleavy

The AP is taking cash from Huawei to run paid ads for the Chinese telecom which the U.S. has dubbed a national security threat.

 

The Associated Press is running paid public relations advertisements on X and on the wire service’s own website on behalf of Huawei as the blacklisted Chinese telecom behemoth and the CCP seek influence over a key United Nations tech agency.

The U.S. government has long pointed to the national security threat posed by Huawei and has sought to limit the firm’s spread inside the United States and around the world. At the same time, the AP took cash from the Chinese company to promote Huawei’s efforts to burnish its image as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) seeks to influence the UN’s International Telecommunication Union (ITU) and increase the penetration of Chinese telecoms and networks worldwide.

The paid tweet by the AP — sent on Mar. 12 and now boasting more than 75 million views — highlighted Huawei’s links to ITU and its efforts on the world stage, and a paid article from Huawei published by the AP promoted Huawei’s efforts in AI. The tweets are clearly marked as "Paid advertisement."

"National Champion" firms

The U.S. National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence stated in 2021 that “national champion” firms such as Huawei help “lead development of AI technologies at home” and “advance state-directed priorities that feed military and security programs.”

“China is the most capable competitor in the AI space, and aims to displace the U.S. as the global AI leader by 2030,” the Office of the Director of National Intelligence assessed in March. “China is driving AI adoption at scale — both domestically and internationally — by using its sizable talent pool, extensive datasets, government funding, and burgeoning global partnerships.”

Neither Huawei nor the Associated Press responded to a request for comment from Just the News.

Tens of millions of views for a “Paid Advertisement from @Huawei”

The tweet by the AP from earlier this month noted that it was a “paid advertisement from @Huawei” and it touted Huawei’s role in hosting the TECH Cares Forum in Barcelona earlier this month.

“From AI infrastructure to biodiversity protection, Huawei shined a light on both digital inclusion and conservation tech ahead of Mobile World Congress 2026,” the AP said on X.

The video in the AP tweet related to Huawei and the forum featured an interview with Cosmas Zavazava, the director of the Telecommunication Development Bureau at the ITU, who said, “Artificial intelligence has as its foundation. We need local data, we need local infrastructure, we need local talent.”

Zavazava has been the director of the Telecommunication Development Bureau at ITU since 2023, and in the past he led the Republic of Zimbabwe's Government Telecommunications Agency and served as a senio​r diplomat for the African nation. Zavazava’s curriculum vitae noted his previous ITU work in numerous countries, including China.

Huawei noted in its own separate press release in March that Zavazava had “commended Huawei's achievements and work to bridge the digital divide” and quoted the UN agency official as saying that “I applaud Huawei's commitment to universal and meaningful connectivity and I am proud of our strong and successful partnership."

The Chinese tech firm claimed in its separate press release that “Huawei has provided digital connectivity to 170 million people in remote areas across more than 80 countries, surpassing its pledge to the International Telecommunication Union Partner2Connect Digital Coalition.”

AP video for Huawei highlights Chinese government’s influence efforts at UN agency

The AP video from Huawei also included an interview with Lucia Prieto, a leader at the International Union for the Conservation of Nature and a Tech4Nature coordinator, who said that “for us, effective collaboration is about bringing everyone on board, so we are collaborating with the technological sector, we are working with Huawei.”

The tweet by the AP also linked to a paid Huawei advertisement published on the AP’s own website.

The top of the Huawei PR on the AP website noted that it was “Advertiser Content by Huawei” and directly linked to Huawei’s own web page about the TECH Cares Forum in March.

“The AI era offers life-changing opportunities for all – but only if we can all access those opportunities. Huawei is committed to bringing the benefits of the intelligent world to everyone, connecting the unconnected, providing inclusive services and promoting essential digital skills," the Huawei press release said. "Because innovation has to do more than trigger economic efficiencies. Tech has to care,” the linked Huawei website contended.

The Huawei website also said that a speech about “delivering on our ITU Partner2Connect Pledge” featured Zavazava from ITU and Yang Chaobin from Huawei, and that a speech on “driving digital inclusion for a sustainable world” was given by Jeff Wang of Huawei.

Huawei said the forum also included a speech on “promoting inclusive development in the AI era” given by Columbia University professor Jeffrey Sachs, with the Huawei website featuring a quote from Sachs, who said that “AI offers incredibly powerful tools that when combined with the great digital networks Huawei enables, are completely transformative for social inclusion and for economic advancement.”

Sachs is a regular at CCP-sponsored forums and on Chinese state media, where he predicts the end of U.S. primacy and lauds the rise of China. He wrote a 2018 piece for The Project Syndicate titled “The War on Huawei” where he attacked the first Trump Administration’s efforts to address the national security concerns posed by the Chinese tech firm.

“The Trump administration's conflict with China has little to do with US external imbalances, closed Chinese markets, or even China’s alleged theft of intellectual property,” Sachs claimed. “It has everything to do with containing China by limiting its access to foreign markets, advanced technologies, global banking services, and perhaps even U.S. universities.”

National Review wrote in 2021 that Sachs “routinely takes Beijing’s line on a number of issues, including COVID’s origins, China’s role in the world, and the Uyghur genocide” and that “the Columbia professor has long expressed views with a forgiving attitude toward authoritarian regimes, including the Chinese Communist Party.”

The Free Beacon noted in 2023 that Sachs “bashed the United States at a recent Chinese Communist Party business forum, accusing American leaders of trying to ‘undermine’ Chinese companies like TikTok and ‘escalating’ a trade war with Beijing” and that “Sachs's remarks have served as a useful propaganda tool for Beijing.”

AP highlights “not-for-profit” status as it takes Chinese tech cash

The AP story paid for by Huawei included a pop-up screen seeking donations for the wire service.

“News without an agenda. AP is a not-for-profit organization with no corporate parent, no shareholders, and no government influence,” the AP contended. “Our mission is journalism, not profit margins. Your donation supports independent reporting that serves the public interest, not corporate shareholders.” The AP is a cooperative venture funded mostly by member news organizations.

The paid advertising by Huawei on the AP website included a lengthy press release-style description of the Chinese tech firm’s actions in AI and elsewhere.

The press release/advert published by the AP included quotes from Huawei Information and Communications Technology Business Group CEO Yang Chaobin, who argued that “high-speed networks and robust computing facilities are essential foundations for an inclusive and sustainable AI era.”

The Huawei story on the AP website also quoted Jeff Wang, the president of Huawei public affairs and communications, who said that “to bridge the digital skills gap, Huawei works closely with governments and partners to enhance digital access, deliver skills training, and advance STEM education for underserved communities.”

The PR-style AP article for Huawei also featured a quote from Zavazava of ITU, who said that “AI must strengthen meaningful connectivity and support inclusive digital transformation.”

Huawei’s paid AP post contended that “answering this call to action, Huawei said it has fulfilled its commitment under the ITU Partner2Connect Digital Coalition to help expand connectivity in remote regions. By the end of 2025, the company said its initiatives had supported digital access for 170 million people in rural and underserved areas across more than 80 countries.”

“This paid content was produced by AP Content Services and approved by the advertiser, who is solely responsible for its accuracy and any claims made,” the AP article’s disclaimer at the bottom said. “The Associated Press news staff was not involved. The views expressed are not necessarily those of the AP, and the AP does not endorse any products, services or opinions mentioned.”

U.S. government has pushed back against Huawei for years

The House Intelligence Committee as far back as 2012 assessed that “the risks associated with Huawei’s […] provision of equipment to U.S. critical infrastructure could undermine core U.S. national security interests” and said that Huawei poses “a security threat to the United States and to our systems.”

Huawei founder and CEO Ren Zhengfei was a member of the CCP and had served in the People’s Liberation Army. The heads of the FBI, CIA, NSA, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Defense Intelligence Agency, and the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency all warned in 2018 against using Huawei services or equipment.

The Congressional-Executive Commission on China said in 2019 that “Chinese security authorities continued to work with domestic companies” — including Huawei — “to expand the reach and analytical power of government surveillance systems.”

The Commerce Department also concluded in 2020 that “Huawei is engaged in activities that are contrary to U.S. national security or foreign policy interests and its non-U.S. affiliates pose a significant risk of involvement in activities contrary to the national security of the United States.” 

The FCC added Huawei to its blacklist as well, concluding in 2020 that Huawei “poses a national security threat to our nation’s communications networks and the communications supply chain.”

Meng Wanzhou, Huawei’s CFO and the daughter of the company’s founder, was arrested by Canadian authorities in December 2018 at the request of the U.S., indicted in the Eastern District of New York in January 2019, and charged with bank fraud and wire fraud as well as conspiracy to commit both, but after admitting her crimes was allowed to walk free by the Biden Administration in a deferred prosecution agreement in 2021.

CCP and Huawei have spent years trying to influence International Telecom Union

The Chinese Foreign Ministry in March announced that it had sent a diplomatic delegation — Jiang Feng, the head of the CCP’s mission to the African Union, along with other Chinese counselors — to a meeting of the ITU.

“The meeting was chaired by Dr. Emmanuel Manasseh, Regional Director for Africa of ITU,” the Chinese Foreign Ministry said. “Dr. Cosmas Luckyson Zavazava, the Director of the Telecommunication Development Bureau of ITU gave a detailed introduction to the work done by ITU in promoting network interconnection and digital transformation across the African continent since the World Telecommunication Development Conference 2022. He expressed appreciation for China’s active assistance in bridging the digital divide in Africa.”

The Chinese Foreign Ministry added: “Jiang exchanged views with the Regional Director for Africa and the Director of BDT of ITU, and ambassadors from various countries. He introduced China’s cooperation with Africa in the fields of telecommunication, digital economy, and cybersecurity, which were highly praised by representatives from all parties.”

The CCP’s targeting of the ITU has been happening for many years. The CCP propaganda outlet People’s Daily back in 2017 had touted China’s efforts to influence the ITU with help at the time from Zhao Houlin, the now-former secretary-general of the ITU, who had been a Chinese government official before getting the UN gig.

"The Belt and Road Initiative recognizes the critical role played by information and communication technology as a foundation for development," said Zhao said in an interview with the Chinese state media outlet at the time.

The Financial Times reported in 2020 that “China has suggested a radical change to the way the internet works to the UN” and that “Huawei, together with state-run companies China Unicom and China Telecom, and the country’s Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, jointly proposed a new standard for core network technology, called ‘New IP’, at the UN’s International Telecommunication Union.”

A report by the Center for Strategic and International Studies in 2020 similarly concluded that “U.S. competitors, notably from authoritarian states, have increased their interest and activism in the ITU, leading to concerns that their outsized influence in standards setting may lead to the bifurcation of the internet. Zhao Houlin is a Chinese national known for highly favorable comments and decisions in support of Chinese companies. China also has a memorandum of understanding between its Belt and Road Initiative and the ITU’s operational efforts.”

The conservative Heritage Foundation also argued in 2022 that “China has prioritized placing its citizens in positions of influence in these standard-setting organizations and subsidizing the participation of its companies in study groups, advisory groups, conferences, and meetings that negotiate technical standards and guidelines.”

“This expanded presence and influence is manifest in the ITU. Houlin Zhao is completing his second term as Secretary-General. During his tenure, he has deepened and institutionalized ties between the ITU and Beijing, endorsed the Belt and Road Initiative, and increased Chinese employment in the organization,” the think tank said. “China also sends the largest delegations to ITU study groups and has flooded them with proposed specifications and contributions. China leads all nations with SEP applications. The goal is to make Chinese standards global standards and thereby give Chinese companies greater market share, increased revenues, and the inside track on next-generation technologies.”

The think tank noted that “China sends the largest delegation to the ITU’s various study groups and is also represented by Huawei and other state-owned enterprises that are members” and that “with the support of high-level ITU leadership, Huawei has introduced some 2,000 new standard proposals to ITU study groups on topics including 5G, cybersecurity, and artificial intelligence.”

Huawei said that it “signed a Joint Declaration to drive digital development and inclusive growth” with the UN agency “at the ITU’s Asia-Pacific Regional Development Forum” in 2023.

“The two parties vowed to boost collaboration in six key areas across Thailand and the Asia Pacific, including co-building open and high-level dialogue platforms in Information and Communication Technologies policy and regulation, joint research, inclusive infrastructure, digital capacity-building, girls and youth empowerment, and digital practice-sharing,” the Chinese tech firm said.

“I would like to acknowledge Huawei as one of our key partners globally and in the region. They have been supporting the work of the ITU in digital transformation from Latin America to Africa to Asia Pacific,” Zavazava said at the time. “We would like to continue to strengthen our working relationship, and the signing of this Declaration is going to be impactful and transformative.”

Republicans in Congress warn about CCP influence inside the ITU

Dr. Melanie Hart, a China expert, testified before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in January 2025. “The United Nations International Telecom Union sets global telecom standards. PRC national (and former PRC telecom ministry official) Zhao Houlin served as ITU  Secretary-General from 2015 to 2022, giving Beijing an avenue to shape global telecom standards in ways that favored Huawei and ZTE over non-PRC firms,” Hart argued. 

“The Biden administration made ITU leadership a priority from day one. The State Department identified and ran a compelling candidate, Dorreen Boden-Martin, in the leadership election, and launched a whole-of-Department effort to support her candidacy. In September 2022, she won the member state vote for ITU Secretary-General, defeating Russia's (and China's) attempt to put a former Russian telecom ministry official and Huawei executive in that position.”

Rep. August Pfluger, R-Texas, alongside eleven more Republican congressmen, warned Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, and War Secretary Pete Hegseth in September 2025 that “our foreign adversaries leverage international standard-setting bodies, such as the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), to advance their interests at the expense of U.S. national and economic security.”

Pfluger warned about ITU’s ties to China’s Belt and Road and the CCP’s efforts to lead the World Radiocommunication Conference. “China’s coordinated strategy has involved … utilizing Belt and Road partner countries in support of China’s telecommunications policies and assuming leadership roles in international bodies such as the ITU and WRC to formalize these positions globally,” Pfluger wrote. “This coordinated approach allows China to influence global technology standards and restrict the free flow of information domestically and internationally.”

Pfluger added: “Hosting the WRC provides several significant advantages, including setting the agenda, guiding discussions, and influencing themes, thereby enabling the host country to exert substantial “soft” influence over global telecommunications standards and policies. China’s role as host thus raises concerns about potential impacts on U.S. leadership in innovation and open, secure communications.”

The Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation’s Subcommittee on Telecommunications and Media held a hearing earlier in March titled, “U.S. Leadership at the World Radiocommunication Conference 2027: Strategy and Challenges Ahead of Shanghai.”

Sen. Deb Fischer, R-Neb., noted this month that “the World Radiocommunication Conference – convened by the International Telecommunication Union every four years – is one of the most consequential global fora for spectrum policy” and lamented that “next year’s conference will be hosted in Shanghai, and the Chinese Communist Party will certainly be prepared to advance positions meant to undermine the United States’ leadership.”

Former U.S. Ambassador Stephen Lang said during the Senate hearing that “the stakes are high at the ITU” and that "China is aggressively promoting its approach to digital technology around the world — an approach that uses technology to restrict speech, control assembly, and repress dissent.” Lang warned that the CCP “has targeted the ITU as a venue for expanding its global technology reach.”

“It was a significant blow to U.S. interests when the ITU Council, the organization’s governing body, voted to accept China’s offer to host WRC-27 in Shanghai, despite the aggressive U.S.-led diplomatic campaign to prevent such an outcome,” Lang said. “A Chinese official will now be the presumptive chair of the conference, and information security for the delegations attending will be a serious concern.” 


Jerry Dunleavy

Source: https://justthenews.com/accountability/media/associated-press-runs-paid-pr-ads-chinese-telecom-huawei-ccp-influences-un

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Ukraine's Zelenskyy signs defense cooperation pacts with three Gulf states - The Foreign Desk Staff

 

​ by The Foreign Desk Staff

Ukraine's anti-drone technologies and expertise are in high demand as Iran strikes out as its neighbors amid conflict with Israel, U.S.

 

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy signed defense cooperation agreements with Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Qatar, proving those countries with cutting-edge drone interceptor technologies in return for financial support and air-defense missiles Ukraine needs to counter Russian attacks.

Zelenskyy said the ten-year deals were helping transform Ukraine from a net recipient of military aid to a supplier.

The Gulf states’ need of anti-drone technologies has dramatically increased since the start of the month-old Israeli- and U.S.-led conflict against Iran. As part of its defense strategy. Iran has begun striking targets in the region located in countries that host U.S. military bases. 

Ukraine has developed an expertise in defending itself against Russian drone attacks in its four-year-old war with Russia.

The air-defense missiles Ukraine will receive as part of the new deals will be used to step up the country’s own defense amid potential cutbacks in support from the U.S. as it diverts military resources to the Middle East as the conflict there stretches out beyond original estimates. 


The Foreign Desk Staff

Source: https://justthenews.com/world/ukraines-zelenskyy-signs-defense-cooperation-pacts-three-gulf-states

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Iran issues directive to counter potential US ground operation - Omid Habibinia

 

​ by Omid Habibinia

The state-affiliated Tehran Times, citing “an Iranian security analyst,” reported that in the event of a US ground attack, Iran would seize the coastlines of the UAE and Bahrain.

 

This image shows one of Iran’s military exercises in recent years near the Strait of Hormuz.
This image shows one of Iran’s military exercises in recent years near the Strait of Hormuz.
(photo credit: Erfan Kouchari/Tasnim News Agency)

A well-placed source told The Media Line that, under a newly issued directive, the regime ruling Iran is taking measures to prepare for a potential US ground assault, as well as to counter possible diversionary and disruptive operations in the capital and major cities, particularly in the south and northwest of the country. 

For more stories from The Media Line go to themedialine.org

According to the source, the directive - circulated by bodies operating under the General Staff of the Armed Forces and, by implication, aligned with decisions of the Commander-in-Chief and his two key institutions, the Supreme Defense Council and the Supreme National Security Council - has been disseminated to various military and security units.

These units have been instructed to ensure readiness, secure sensitive areas, establish necessary deployments, and prepare for the possible “intervention of hostile field elements across different regions.” Crucially, they have also been authorized, if necessary, to engage independently, even without direct orders from central command.

The directive, which bears resemblance to “Operation Valkyrie” during Nazi Germany, effectively grants each military and security unit the authority to act autonomously - what authorities describe as “fire at will” (Atash be Ekhtiar) - without awaiting instructions from higher command.

This suggests that the regime anticipates an escalation of the war, including the possibility of a US ground incursion into Iranian territory, and even the seizure of parts of the south or strategic islands. 

Farzin Nadimi, an analyst of Iranian military and security affairs, told TML that a US ground operation aimed at temporarily controlling certain islands or coastal positions overlooking the Strait of Hormuz appears plausible.
Farzin Nadimi, an analyst of Iranian military and security affairs, told TML that a US ground operation aimed at temporarily controlling certain islands or coastal positions overlooking the Strait of Hormuz appears plausible. (credit: COURTESY THE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE)

It also indicates that authorities are preparing for a scenario in which centralized command structures or communications networks could be severely disrupted, necessitating the decentralization of operational authority.

The directive further reveals that Iranian military commanders view the threat posed by armed groups in Tehran and other major cities, as well as in Iranian Kurdistan, as highly serious. In addition, large segments of tribal populations and communities across western and southwestern Iran have access - often illegally - to firearms, primarily hunting rifles. In eastern Iran, armed Baloch groups also remain active. 

It appears that propaganda by the Mojahedin-e Khalq regarding operations by its so-called Liberation Army and “Rebel Units,” along with rumors about the existence of an “Immortal Guard” (Gard e Javidan) aligned with monarchist supporters - recently addressed publicly for the first time by Reza Pahlavi ahead of the Chaharshanbe Suri celebrations - has heightened regime concerns.

US preparations for potential ground operation

Recent US military activity, including the deployment of Marines and airborne forces to the region, as well as repeated references by Donald Trump and other American officials to the possibility of a ground operation, have further intensified fears within the Islamic Republic leadership.

This concern is reflected in statements by Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, the Speaker of Parliament - despite holding no formal executive or military authority - who has publicly warned the United States against any ground attack on Iranian islands.

Farzin Nadimi, a senior fellow at the Washington Institute and an analyst of Iranian military and security affairs, told The Media Line that a US ground operation aimed at temporarily controlling certain islands or coastal positions overlooking the Strait of Hormuz appears plausible.

He said, “What appears more likely in the near term is not a full-scale ground invasion, but rather limited, selective, and complementary ground operations - such as special forces missions and efforts to temporarily control certain islands or strategic coastal positions overlooking the Strait of Hormuz.”

“Such a scenario differs fundamentally from an all-out ground war, yet remains costly and high-risk. Entering mainland Iran for occupation or deep advances would require a large force, substantial logistical support, and sustained political will - factors that could quickly turn the conflict into a prolonged and attritional war,” he added.

Despite the importance of such a development in weakening the regime’s position, Nadimi explains, the ultimate outcome of the war will still depend on the continuation of the air campaign and its ability to decisively throw the Islamic Republic off balance.

Previously, The Media Line published an audio recording attributed to a Basij commander in Tehran, in which he explicitly stated that, in the event of a drone attack, Basij forces should “clear the area,” retreat into surrounding alleys, and take up positions “so that if any hostile armed force activated, they can engage.”

The assessment within the Islamic Republic’s armed forces is that the next phase of the conflict could involve ground warfare and urban combat. On Thursday, the state-affiliated Tehran Times, citing “an Iranian security analyst,” reported that in the event of a US ground attack, Iran would seize the coastlines of the UAE and Bahrain.

Amid reports suggesting that the US military is preparing for a “final strike,” Iranian authorities appear to consider scenarios such as a military invasion, the seizure of Kharg Island or other strategic islands, and even parts of southern Iran near the Strait of Hormuz as entirely plausible.

The newly issued directive indicates that, in the absence of Mojtaba Khamenei - the nominal leader, who has largely disappeared from public view - the regime’s leadership is preparing for an escalation of the war and the prospect of direct ground engagement. 


Omid Habibinia

Source: https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/iran-news/article-891500

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Constitutional right to castration? DOJ, 25 states fight court ruling for transgender sex offender - Greg Piper

 

​ by Greg Piper

Briefs ask 9th Circuit to overturn judge who said its precedent required him to find 8th Amendment right to "gender confirming surgery" for child sexual abuser. Judge got it backward on what's "cruel and unusual," ethics group says.

 

"Men lack a Constitutional right to sleep with, bathe with, and observe naked women. We would like to end this brief there, as such a proposition is not reasonably debatable."

Thus opens a friend-of-the-court brief by the Independent Women's Law Center (IWLC) in a case over whether states must pay for inmates' surgical procedures to resemble the opposite sex, which has implications for the placement of males who identify as women in women's correctional facilities, also a hotbed of litigation.

A federal court's order that Alaska cannot "de facto" deny "gender confirming surgery," finding the state Department of Corrections acted with "deliberate indifference" to child sexual abuser Emalee Wagoner's "serious medical need" to remove his genitals and construct a nonfunctional vagina, spurred a flood of briefs in the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

The Department of Justice, 23 states led by Indiana and Idaho and medical advocacy groups are urging the historically most overturned appeals court in the U.S. to overturn the district court's finding that the 8th Amendment prohibition on "cruel and unusual punishment" requires taxpayers to fund so-called gender-affirming surgeries for inmates.

That's an uphill battle, as a three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit ruled in 2019's Edmo that Idaho's refusal to pay for a prisoner's "sex-reassignment surgery" – a scientifically nonsensical term — constitutes cruel and unusual punishment, prompting blowback from nine judges when the full court declined to rehear the case.

Several briefs emphasize Wagoner thought he could get transferred to a women's prison if he got a vaginoplasty, but IWLC's brief – cowritten by former Trump White House lawyer May Mailman – says the district court required Alaska to "effectuate [Wagoner's] transfer to a female prison" after surgery. Just the News could not find such an order or media reporting.

Magistrate Judge Matthew Scoble implied he was skeptical of automatically granting inmates surgeries as gender dysphoria treatments if "reasoned review of the ongoing science" shows "other treatments or therapies" are effective, or the literature shows "good-faith questions" on effectiveness, but said the 9th Circuit tied his hands in Edmo.

Emmanuel J. Cancel, Wagoner's birth name, was sentenced to 60 years in prison under a 2018 plea that reduced the counts from 50 to just three, according to Frontiersman, though the news media now says the sentence is 40 years. He is housed at a medium-security men's facility.

Superior Court Judge Eric Smith said the "sheer horror of what he did" was matched by "only two or three other cases that I have seen," Frontiersman reported.

Inmate was doing well on hormone therapy, so why surgery?

The horrors of Wagoner's attempts to resemble a woman are documented in the Justice Department's brief, which warns that Judge Scoble's "expansive misapplication of the Eighth Amendment threatens dire consequences for prison officials."

Wagoner has a "record of severe mental illness and self-mutilation," the brief says, describing the inmate's repeated gruesome attempts at "self-surgery," in Wagoner's phrasing, and his continued crushing of his testicles with the goal of stopping testosterone production.

"While Wagoner’s then-fiancée was not incarcerated, Wagoner’s plan was apparently to be transferred to a women’s facility where the fiancée could then also be housed once she committed an appropriate crime that would result in imprisonment," the brief says, citing Wagoner's letter to his female partner.

Yet Wagoner has already "responded favorably to less extreme treatment," with the inmate saying the hormone therapy he started in 2021 gave him a "rather peaceful" feeling.

DOJ emphasizes Scoble's "deep discomfort" with the 9th Circuit precedent Edmo upon which he ruled for Wagoner, without which the judge would have put "more weight on the inexperience" of the inmate's experts with prison populations. 

Scoble also faulted World Professional Association for Transgender Health guidelines for "self-referencing consensus rather than evidence-based research," which do not address "custodial care" in any case, and worried about "giving judicial imprimatur to what is fundamentally a medical question."

The precedent itself cautions it's limited to the facts of Edmo, and DOJ said the defendants there failed to "raise any prison security interests or to dispute that WPATH guidelines dictated the Eighth Amendment analysis." 

The 2nd Circuit recently called Edmo a "stray" decision ignored by other appellate courts.

The 9th Circuit's own definition of "cruel and unusual" is nearly impossible to meet, requiring officials to withhold the "minimal civilized measure of life’s necessities" in "conscious disregard of an excessive risk" to the inmate's health, beyond even "malpractice or gross negligence," says the brief by 25 GOP attorneys general and the Arizona Legislature.

It's hard to find a more disputed course of treatment than "sex-change surgeries," the brief says, again using unscientific terminology for cosmetic procedures to create superficial resemblances to the opposite sex, especially in adults long past puberty such as inmates.

The AGs quote from the Supreme Court's Skrmetti decision upholding Tennessee's ban on gender-affirming care for minors, which notes the "fierce scientific and policy debates" around medicalized transitions, and "the poor quality of data and lack of evidence" for gender dysphoria surgery as reflected in the scientific literature.

Edmo only established that WPATH's standards of care at the time "supported the requested surgery" but "did not resolve for all time" that the science was "so settled that no competent medical practitioner would refuse to provide them," the brief says. Years later, WPATH got caught watering down its standards under Biden administration pressure.

The surgery itself is "not available" in Alaska or 23 other states, meaning the Land of the Midnight Sun would have to transfer Wagoner "to the custody of a State with no interest in the case," not only violating the Prison Litigation Reform Act but raising "serious federalism concerns," the AGs said.

'The constitutional bar does not lift for volunteers'

Scoble inverted the 8th Amendment like Wagoner tried to invert his penis, according to the Ethics and Public Policy Center's brief, which says the "original and historical understanding" of the amendment "marks castration as cruel and unusual punishment" regardless of whether a prisoner requests it.

"When the Supreme Court has treated capital punishment as unconstitutional in certain settings ... it would have been unthinkable for a state to defend an execution on the ground that the condemned prisoner had asked to be put to death or had previously attempted suicide; the constitutional bar does not lift for volunteers," the brief says.

It quotes Justice Robert Jackson's concurrence in 1942's Skinner, which prohibited compulsory sterilization for certain crimes: "There are limits to the extent to which a legislatively represented majority may conduct biological experiments at the expense of the dignity and personality and natural powers of a minority [convicted criminals]."

IWLC's brief makes only a passing glance at the Eighth Amendment dispute, emphasizing what happens if surgeries become a gateway for male entry into women's prisons.

"Incarcerated women live in conditions where privacy is limited and bodily exposure is unavoidable, including shared sleeping quarters, communal showers, strip searches, and medical examinations," the brief says. "Indeed, the mere presence of male inmates … imposes unique and unavoidable burdens on female inmates."

It cites a documentary by IWLC's sibling Independent Women's Forum about inmate Alissa Kamholz, who was forced to share a room with a male inmate transferred to her women's prison under California's SB 132, which lets inmates choose male or female facilities based on gender identity.

A child sexual abuse victim, Kamholz endured "severe psychological distress" from the male's presence, especially after learning he was from her town and "was familiar with the location where that abuse occurred." 


Greg Piper

Source: https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/health/constitutional-right-castration-doj-25-states-fight-court-ruling-transgender

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Iran: The Danger of the Venezuelan Model - Amir Taheri

 

​ by Amir Taheri

The mistake that successive US administrations, European powers and some of our neighbors have made is to narrow down the choice in dealing with a rogue regime to appeasement or war, and often deciding that the former card trumps the latter.

 

  • Trump surely knows that even if Tehran meets all his demands now, there is no guarantee it would abide by them beyond his presidential tenure or even after the US midterm elections.

  • In other words, the Venezuelan "solution" would just mean kicking the ball down the road. If there is an "Iran problem", and I have said there is for the past 47 years, the wisest and least problematic solution is regime change.

  • The mistake that successive US administrations, European powers and some of our neighbors have made is to narrow down the choice in dealing with a rogue regime to appeasement or war, and often deciding that the former card trumps the latter.

  • Between appeasement and war, there is a third option: regime change through Iran's internal political dynamics. A process of people-based change started almost four years ago and in late 2025 developed into the largest national uprising the region has seen in contemporary history.

The Venezuelan "solution" for Iran would just mean kicking the ball down the road. The wisest and least problematic solution is regime change. Pictured: Venezuela's then President Nicolás Maduro meets with Iran's then Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on October 22, 2016, in Tehran. (Image source: khamenei.ir)

The latest ultimatum issued to Iran by US President Donald Trump is due to end as this column appears.

What happens next is anybody's guess.

The president might issue another ultimatum (I have lost count of how many he has issued in the past few weeks), or he might intensify his "special military operation" against the Khomeinist regime in Tehran by using the elite of the US Army to capture the Iranian island of Kharg.

Whatever he does, he might render the very word ultimatum meaningless in the political and diplomatic lexicon. "Ultimatum" entered that lexicon more than 2,000 years ago when Julius Caesar, the then "strongman" of Rome, sent an ultimatum ("final word") to his arch-enemy Pompey not to cross the Rubicon River with his rebel army on the way to the capital.

"If you do, you will die!" was the message. Pompey did and died.

I don't think we should take Trump's ultimatum as a "do and die" warning. He is a dealmaker, not a bounty hunter.

In any case, he may remember President Bill Clinton's response to those who asked why the US wouldn't just go after its foes and bomb them:

"I have one question: Can I kill them tomorrow? And if the answer was yes, then I'd say: then we're not weak because if we kill them today, I can't bring them back tomorrow."

Should we sneer at Trump's ultimatums (or is ultimata the plural?) as some smug Europeans do with a smirk? I think not.

Trump has a native genius for using every opportunity to make his way out of a tight spot with a dexterity that would have made Houdini jealous.

By playing yo-yo with his ultimatums, Trump achieves a number of goals.

The first is to show that he is in control of a ticking bomb that could explode in everyone's face.

For the past few weeks, armchair generals and TV eggheads have been citing Sun Tzu and von Clausewitz about the need to have an exit strategy in any war.

Trump says: I issue an ultimatum and offer a roadmap for negotiations. In fact, his latest 15-point roadmap is labeled "for peace," not just a ceasefire.

To be sure, the Khomeinist bunch in Tehran started by rejecting the deal and offering a 6-point plan, which they knew would be unacceptable to Trump. But these are opening gambits. What matters is to stop a war that is unlikely to produce the results that either adversary hoped for while doing damage to a dozen other nations not involved in this deadly game.

Trump says Tehran has already given him a "big prize". He is right.

According to French economic experts, the announcement by Tehran that the Strait of Hormuz isn't closed except for "hostile" nations helped a handful of speculators who had "inside information" to make more than $500 million in extra profits on stock exchanges.

You have two guesses as to who those lucky gamblers were and where they got their inside information.

In his latest chat about the war, Trump mentioned what he sees as his success in Venezuela, indicating his wish to repeat it in Iran, where, as he says, the baddies have been eliminated, and some "good people" are emerging as credible interlocutors for Washington.

If the latest attempt at engaging the mullahs fails, Trump could blame Tehran for derailing his peace process. And that could go some way towards silencing those who oppose the war in the US and across the globe.

At some point Trump would also need to get congressional approval for military engagement beyond the 60-day-limit after which the operation needs congressional authorization. Again, the claim that he did all he could to obtain peace but failed because of the other side's intransigence could be helpful.

Furthermore, the latest ultimatum and deal game help Trump remind everyone that he, and not Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, is in the driver's seat as far as ending this war is concerned. Israel has said that it will continue strikes in Iran until its military objectives are met, regardless of whether US-Iran talks are happening, unless those talks produce an outcome it accepts.

However, Trump surely knows that even if Tehran meets all his demands now, there is no guarantee it would abide by them beyond his presidential tenure or even after the US midterm elections.

After all, seven US presidents have made deals of different kinds with the Khomeinist regime but never managed to change its vicious nature. A scorpion doesn't sting as a tactical aberration; it is in its nature to do that.

On Tehran's side, even those "good people" Trump says he has identified as the new ruling clique know that the grand "dealmaker" makes promises that are not in his gift to fulfill. The Islamic Republic has become subject to four sets of sanctions in the past 47 years.

The first set consists of sanctions imposed by the UN Security Council in seven resolutions. Who is going to pilot their cancellations and risk being blamed if Tehran restarted misbehaving after a while?

The second set consists of sanctions imposed by the US Congress. Removing them would require bipartisan accord, something of a mirage in an America going through a politico-cultural civil war.

The third set of sanctions consists of those set by the US president via executive orders. Trump could remove them with a series of signatures. But even if that happens, rewinding their effects through the complex legal, political and economic systems would need time, much time.

The fourth set of sanctions, including the notorious snapback mechanism that Trump mentions, are those imposed by the European Union. Removing them would require unanimous approval by the Council of the European Union, something that won't happen with a Trumpian whistle.

In other words, the Venezuelan "solution" would just mean kicking the ball down the road. If there is an "Iran problem", and I have said there is for the past 47 years, the wisest and least problematic solution is regime change.

The mistake that successive US administrations, European powers and some of our neighbors have made is to narrow down the choice in dealing with a rogue regime to appeasement or war, and often deciding that the former card trumps the latter.

Between appeasement and war, there is a third option: regime change through Iran's internal political dynamics. A process of people-based change started almost four years ago and in late 2025 developed into the largest national uprising the region has seen in contemporary history.

After mass repression claiming thousands of lives, the uprising seemed to have subsided but restarted with fresh vigor just before the war forced it, I believe temporarily, out of the scene.

A seriously weakened and increasingly unpopular regime is using war as a pretext for more repression while citing patriotism, the last refuge of the scoundrel.

Gatestone Institute would like to thank the author for his kind permission to reprint this article from Asharq Al-Awsat. 


Amir Taheri was the executive editor-in-chief of the daily Kayhan in Iran from 1972 to 1979. He has worked at or written for innumerable publications, published eleven books, and has been a columnist for Asharq Al-Awsat since 1987. He graciously serves as Chairman of Gatestone Europe.

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/22391/iran-venezuelan-model

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

The First Alt-War: Online Fantasy vs. Reality in the Iran Campaign - Roger Kimball

 

​ by Roger Kimball

While commentators trade in familiar fears, events on the ground point to a far more decisive outcome than the online debate suggests.

 

 

A commentator in (mirabile dictuThe Washington Post made an excellent point about how the war in Iran is being understood. “We are living through the first alt-war,” the Tel Aviv University scholar Jen Brick Murtazashvili wrote. On the one hand, we have the war as it is fought online. On the other, we have the war as it is fought in reality, on the ground. The two “have diverged so completely,” Murtazashvili noted, “that they might as well be happening on different planets. It’s not that people lack information; it’s more that they are constructing an entirely different alternate reality—one that confirms what they already believe.”

The online narrative—I hesitate to call it “reality”—takes place not just online but in the propaganda press more generally. The dominant theme here is excited angst and handwringing, typified by a recent cover story in The Economist, “Advantage Iran.” Yes, really. “A month of bombing Iran has achieved nothing. . . . For now, at least, the advantage lies with the Islamic Republic.”

The painful truth is that this is essentially the same narrative being peddled by the Iranian regime itself. See, for example, the silly Lego videos the regime has been releasing. They are supposed to expose the U.S.-led anti-regime coalition to ridicule. The effect is a self-deconstructing farce. What genius, I wonder, came up with that embarrassing gambit?

Most of the legacy media is caught in the grip of painful nostalgia. Not only do generals tend to fight the last war, but media hacks also reach into yesterday’s satchel of clichés to describe the new conflict. Thus, we see Politico solemnly opining that “The administration’s interest in pinpointing a negotiating partner signals a desire to find some way out of the quagmire that Iran has quickly become, jolting world markets, spiking oil prices, and renewing concern about inflation.”

“Quagmire”? The war against the theocratic lunatics who have oppressed Iran since 1979 began just a month ago. Is that enough time to become mired in anything, let alone a quag or swamp? Hugh Hewitt treated this lazy, politically charged gambit to some portion of the contempt it deserves:

Quagmire? 70-year-old B-52s are lumbering across defenseless Iranian skies using precision JDAMs at will to continue pummeling the military-industrial complex of #Iran and that’s a ‘quagmire?’

‘Quagmire’ was appropriately applied to Vietnam in 1968–1969 when LBJ had 538,000 American troops in the country, up from the 11,000 JFK had there in 1962. By the time RN ended deployment of American troops there in 1973, more than 58,000 troops had died there. That is a quagmire.

Hewitt is right: The campaign against the Iranian regime is an astonishing success story, “achieving its military objectives in rapid fashion with near total dominance of the battlefield. It is not a quagmire in any way. Looking for a sane actor to guide the radicalized elite out of its fanaticism is not a ‘signal’ of anything other than appropriate planning.” Game, set, and match.

Reaching into the same lexicon that produced “quagmire,” the legacy media warns about this conflict becoming an “endless war” à la Iraq or Afghanistan. We’re only four weeks into this campaign; almost all of Iran’s leadership has been killed, its navy sunk, its air force destroyed, and its offensive capabilities largely neutralized. But the media remembers the neocons. It likes President Trump even less than it liked them, so they cast Trump in the role they both know and love to hate. The problem is, Trump is not a neocon. He did not start a war with Iran. He is ending the war against the West that Iran’s mullahs started in 1979. This internet commentator is right: “The President is no neo-con; he’s a calculating strategist focused on results, not rhetoric. Once American objectives are secured, he’ll let the Middle East resolve itself on its own terms.”

Meanwhile, as the legacy media crows that President Trump is “backtracking,” “blinking,” and so on because those crafty Iranians reminded him that a lot of oil moves through the Strait of Hormuz—why hadn’t he thought of that?—the U.S. and Israel continue their strikes against Iranian infrastructure and regime personnel. That’s the reality side of the disjunction Murtazashvili discerned. Last week, President Trump issued an ultimatum. Open the Strait of Hormuz within 48 hours, or we will destroy your energy infrastructure. He then decided to extend the deadline. Then he extended it again. But that wasn’t blinking. It was smiling. The U.S. and Israel continued to destroy military targets and eliminate key government personnel and scientists. Trump temporarily exempted Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad-Bagher Ghalibaf and Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi from the coalition’s kill list. Weakness? Blinking? Backtracking? I think it is searching.

President Trump sees the incidents of the Iranian people targeting IRGC and Basij forces. He hears people like the Iranian-American actor Sam Asghari, who just said on X that “The people of Iran are in love with America. The gap between Iran’s regime and its people is vast. They want freedom. And I’m happy this situation is happening.” President Trump is searching for plausible candidates for Iranian leadership with whom he can negotiate. This is not an alternative to victory. The U.S. and Israel have already won the military victory. That is the reality. Now it just needs to be codified by a new Iranian regime. That will happen very quickly, in a matter of weeks, if not days. The imminent arrival of two Marine Expeditionary Force contingents and paratroopers from the 82nd Airborne will help concentrate the mind.

I don’t expect the legacy media to be happy about it. I am not even sure they will acknowledge the victory. But what they do or do not do hardly matters. They are more and more like those computer-generated figures in Iran’s pathetic anti-Trump Lego clips. Those online battles are the only ones they can win. The alternative is the war we have been fighting with deeds, not memes. On that battlefield, America, the Iranian people, and the Middle East as a whole have won a remarkable victory. It remains only to discover the names of the people President Trump decides he can do business with.

 

Photo: WASHINGTON, DC - FEBRUARY 28: A White House news reporter participates in a TV interview on the White House driveway on February 28, 2026 in Washington, DC. U.S. President Donald Trump announced that the United States and Israel had launched an attack on Iran Saturday morning. (Photo by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images) 


Roger Kimball is editor and publisher of The New Criterion and the president and publisher of Encounter Books. He is the author and editor of many books, including The Fortunes of Permanence: Culture and Anarchy in an Age of Amnesia (St. Augustine's Press), The Rape of the Masters (Encounter), Lives of the Mind: The Use and Abuse of Intelligence from Hegel to Wodehouse (Ivan R. Dee), and Art's Prospect: The Challenge of Tradition in an Age of Celebrity (Ivan R. Dee). Most recently, he edited and contributed to Where Next? Western Civilization at the Crossroads (Encounter) and contributed to Against the Great Reset: Eighteen Theses Contra the New World Order (Bombardier).

Source: https://amgreatness.com/2026/03/29/the-first-alt-war-online-fantasy-vs-reality-in-the-iran-campaign/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter