Wednesday, July 3, 2024

Biden vs. presidential immunity - Michael Letts

 

​ by Michael Letts

Biden's attempt to distort the Supreme Court decision reveals the desperation in his re-election campaign.

 

In his prime-time address on July 1, 2024, President Joe Biden sought to respond to the Supreme Court's recent ruling on presidential immunity. However, instead of offering clarity, his speech seemed more like a political maneuver aimed at sowing fear and misunderstanding among the public.

The Supreme Court's ruling was clear: Presidents have immunity for all official acts performed during their tenure. This immunity extends to actions taken to protect or support national security and interests, both while in office and after leaving office, if those acts were deemed official at the time. On the other hand, like any other citizen, presidents do not have immunity for personal acts and decisions. The burden of proof regarding whether an act was official or personal falls on the plaintiff, not the president.

In his speech, President Biden painted a dire picture, suggesting that Trump could use presidential immunity to act as a tyrant, potentially even assassinating opposition. This is a gross misrepresentation of the ruling and a blatant attempt to instill fear for political gain. Presidential immunity is not a new concept; it has been a cornerstone of our democracy, reaffirmed by the Supreme Court, not created by it.

Historically, presidential immunity has been exercised across various administrations. For example, the Obama administration ordered the drone strike killing of Anwar al-Awlaki, an American citizen, without due process, because it was deemed necessary for national security. This action was protected under presidential immunity as it was considered an official act.

Similarly, the Biden administration could be held accountable by the families of American citizens who have died due to the open border policy. The tragic deaths and suffering caused by the lack of border security are a direct result of Biden's policy. However, he claims these actions are in America's best interest, thus falling under presidential immunity.

Biden's attempt to distort the Supreme Court decision reveals the desperation in his re-election campaign. Instead of addressing the nation's pressing issues, he chose to mislead the public, portraying Trump as a threat to democracy. This tactic is not only disingenuous but also underscores the erosion of Biden's credibility and the decline of his mental and physical health.

The American people deserve honesty and integrity from their leaders. Distorting Supreme Court rulings for political advantage does a disservice to our democratic principles and undermines public trust. It is crucial that we see through these political maneuvers and demand transparency and truth from our elected officials.

Image: White House


Michael Letts is a political commentator and CEO of InVest USA, an organization that supports law enforcement officers.

Source: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2024/07/biden_vs_presidential_immunity.html

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

No comments:

Post a Comment