Sunday, December 13, 2020

SCOTUS opens up a constitutional can of worms - Mark Landsbaum

 

​ by Mark Landsbaum

 

An ugly truth is revealed about how the United States enforces its laws.

 

Have we opened a can of worms, constitutionally speaking? 

The highest court in the land ruled that Texas, and the 18 other states that supported its lawsuit, have no standing to seek relief for gross and obvious violations of the U.S. Constitution. 

Texas alleged that four swing states blatantly violated the Constitution's Electors Clause by allowing unauthorized politicians and bureaucrats to change election law when the supreme law of the land grants that power exclusively to state legislatures.  The Lone Star State also charged that those swing states, which are now determinative in deciding who won the presidency for the entire nation, also violated equal protection under the Constitution's 14thth Amendment by writing rules for some counties within a state that did not apply to other counties.  For good measure, Texas said those constitutional violations opened the door to widespread cheating, including illegal voting, unverifiable ballots, ballot box–stuffing, and a host of other crimes backed up by hundreds of sworn affidavits by eyewitnesses and election and computer experts. 

But in a decision Friday, the high court dismissively refused even to hear Texas's complaint.  Two justices indicated they would hear the case but not give Texas the relief it asked for.  Oddly, the decision came after SCOTUS asked defendants Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin to submit responses to Texas's charges.  Why bother with responses if the lawsuit was ineligible for the court to even consider? 

Fine.  Up to a point, we longtime supporters of states' rights sympathize with the logic.  Who is Texas to tell Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin which portions of the Constitution they may or may not violate?  Let that thought sink in. 

If SCOTUS's reasoning is followed to its logical extension, then what about these ramifications? 

  • If Louisiana decides that it wants to reinstitute human slavery in violation of the 13th Amendment to the Constitution, who are the other 49 states to complain?  Why would they have standing to seek relief? 
  • How about if Alaska decides to limit voting rights to only men in clear violation of the 19th Amendment to the Constitution?  What legitimate basis would Nebraska or New York have to complain? 

Texas sought protection from electoral harm by invoking an original provision of the Constitution, adopted in 1787.  The 13th Amendment outlawing slavery wasn't adopted for another 68 years.  And women's suffrage provided by the 19th Amendment was adopted 131 years after the Constitution.  Do those Johnny-come-lately amendments deserve different treatment from what the original document they amended gets? 

The reflexive explanation for the national court's current inconsistency is that constitutional disputes are not supposed to be hashed out between states.  Instead, such disagreements are the purview of the national Department of Justice.  According to that reasoning, the federal DOJ may intervene when the Constitution is blatantly violated, as it did to prevent black children from being barred from entering unconstitutionally segregated Southern public schools in the 1950s and 1960s.  

So where has the DOJ been amid the revelation of massive fraud in the 2020 election?  If you say "silent," you've been paying attention.  One might say absent without leave. 

Does anyone seriously believe that the DOJ would have shown such a lack of interest if polling places had turned away voters based on their skin color or sex?  Why the difference?  The cynical explanation may be the best.  It's because enforcement of your "rights" boils down to what elite people in positions of authority decide are rights worth defending. 

So what are Texas and its like-minded 18 states to do?  If they choose to secede as did the original colonies from England in 1776, my guess is that you will find out real fast what the touted Department of Justice considers worth enforcing. 

If you think our esteemed authorities will turn a blind eye to serious secession efforts the way they did to blatant violations of the Electors Clause and 14th Amendment in the Texas case, go ahead and try.  But something tells me your effort won't get far before it's met with overwhelming opposition from the national government, including its courts. 

As I am wont to say at such times, it's a fallen world. 

Once again I ask, have we opened a can of worms, constitutionally speaking?  

Or, perhaps, have we merely exposed how arbitrarily the United States enforces the rights it claims to recognize for all its people, just as all self-serving authorities have in every civilization from the beginning of time?  Yours truly suspects that the second question has become rhetorical. 

 

Mark Landsbaum is a Christian retired journalist, former investigative reporter, editorial writer, and columnist.  He also is a husband, father, grandfather, and Dodgers fan.  He can be reached at mark.landsbaum@gmail.com.

Source: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/12/scotus_opens_up_a_constitutional_can_of_worms.html 

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

A Nobel Peace Prize for President Trump and His Majesty King Mohammed VI? - Mohammed Habib

 

​ by Mohammed Habib

 

The international community has been trying to broker a peace for the Western Sahara for 30 years.

  • Salmi Gailani, who was born in 1991, the year of the ceasefire, "blames the U.N. for the fact that for 30 years, Western Sahara has been a frozen conflict.... '30 years is long enough to place ballot boxes,' he said." — Euronews, November 17, 2020.

  • The international community has been trying to broker a peace for the Western Sahara for 30 years. Some observers, however, suggest that "if the Polisario Front were to have sovereignty over the Western Sahara, it would mean that Algeria was effectively surrounding Morocco."

  • Along with last week's the triumph for President Trump and King Mohammed VI, there have also been charges that Morocco could have joined the Abraham Accords without the US recognizing Morocco's sovereignty over the Western Sahara. So far, however, no one has quite said how.

Last week, US President Donald J. Trump and His Majesty King Mohammed VI of Morocco (pictured), in a move that immediately prompted calls for a Nobel Peace Prize, agreed that Morocco would be the fourth Arab country -- joining the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain and Sudan -- in establishing a solid peace with Israel this year. (Photo by Carlos Alvarez/Getty Images)

Last week, US President Donald J. Trump and His Majesty King Mohammed VI of Morocco, in a move that immediately prompted calls for a Nobel Peace Prize, agreed that Morocco would be the fourth Arab country -- joining the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain and Sudan -- in establishing a solid peace with Israel this year. A felicitous reciprocity is that Morocco was the first country to recognize the United States.

Since 1975, when Spain gave up its colony in the Western Sahara, the sovereignty of the territory has been under dispute. The area, about the size of Britain, wedged between Morocco and Mauritania, runs southward along the Atlantic Ocean. The territory and its waters are rich with phosphates, bauxite, fish, and possibly offshore oil reserves. Although Morocco has officially administered the area for the last 30 years, it has been claimed by the Polisario Front, (an abbreviation for "Popular Front for the Liberation of Saguia el-Hamra and Rio de Oro"), an Algerian-backed group composed of a nomadic people, the Sahrawis.

In 1975, the Polisario Front, in a bid to "liberate" the territory to create an independent state, rebelled against the colony, then ruled by Spain. A guerrilla war ensued, lasting for 16 years until a ceasefire was signed in 1991, with a referendum on self-determination expected to follow. So far, it has yet to be seen.

Salmi Gailani, who was born in 1991, the year of the ceasefire, "blames the U.N. for the fact that for 30 years, Western Sahara has been a frozen conflict.... '30 years is long enough to place ballot boxes,' he said."

Last year, after the Polisario Front blockaded all commerce on the sole road to export all commerce from Morocco to Mauritania, the 1991 ceasefire collapsed. For weeks, trucks carrying fruit and vegetables on which Mauritania depends, were lined up for miles, stranded, unable to move.

When Moroccan forces eventually tried to reopen this sole road to Mauritania, they had "received rules of engagement, according to the FAR [Moroccan Royal Armed Forces] statement. Morocco's military stated it would avoid all contact with civilians and its military officers were only permitted to use force after sustaining fire."

On November 17, the Polisario Front declared war on Morocco.

The Moroccan Ministry of Foreign Affairs replied in a statement:

"In the face of provocations from the militias of the Polisario, the Kingdom of Morocco had no other choice but to assume its responsibilities in order to put an end to the deadlock situation generated by these actions and restore free civil and commercial movement."

When Morocco finally sent in forces to reopen the road, a report in Moroccan World News said that the "Polisario and Algeria are presenting Morocco's response to weeks of provocation as an outright declaration of war...." The report added:

"Supporters of Polisario shared images of an ambulance beside a Moroccan helicopter as 'evidence' of Moroccan casualties, yet the photograph dates back to 2015. The image was part of a story on two Spanish speleologists who died due to an accident in the High Atlas mountains."

"Algerian outlet Liberte Algerie described the events in the border region as 'Moroccan military aggression,' calling the militant group and its supporters blocking the border peaceful demonstrators. Reports did not mention how a 'sit-in' by 'peaceful demonstrators' had successfully managed to block all trade in the region."

The international community has been trying to broker a peace for the Western Sahara for 30 years. Some observers, however, suggest that "if the Polisario Front were to have sovereignty over the Western Sahara, it would mean that Algeria was effectively surrounding Morocco."

Along with last week's the triumph for President Trump and King Mohammed VI, there have also been charges that Morocco could have joined the Abraham Accords without the US recognizing Morocco's sovereignty over the Western Sahara. So far, however, no one has quite said how.

 

Mohammed Habib  

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/16852/nobel-peace-prize-trump-king-mohammed 

 Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Frauds: The Election, Media, Congressional Dems, and the FBI - Clarice Feldman

 

​ by Clarice Feldman

The rot has spread to every last apple in the barrel.

The first of this week's two biggest stories was Friday evening’s action by the Supreme Court refusing to hear the lawsuit brought by Texas and other states respecting the evident fraud in the balloting in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Georgia, and Michigan. I expressed my views on this yesterday here: 'A Republic, If You Can Keep It' | The Pipeline

In short,  I believe if the Court had decided to take it, it would not have decided who won these states. Instead, had it decided that the electors from those states were chosen illegally, it would have remanded the complaints to the legislatures of these states, which have the responsibility to fashion a remedy. In any event, had they decided to throw out the electoral votes of those states,  Biden would still have one more electoral vote than President Trump, as the majority is determined by the number of electoral votes actually cast. It’s now up to the state legislatures and Congress to decide what to do with the votes from the states in question and the Texas filing provides an excellent template for deciding the votes from those and other states where fraud was rampant -- either pick a different slate of electors or provide no slate from those states. If the state legislatures fail in their responsibilities, at the demand of one congressman and one senator, any electoral slate can be challenged and the outcome of the challenge is determined by the House of Representatives voting by delegation, a system in which the Republicans have the most delegations and, therefore, the most votes.

The second most significant matter, in my view, was the clear gaslighting the media and former intelligence officials carried out on the Hunter Biden story, hiding the fact that he’s been under criminal investigation since 2018 for bribery, tax evasion, and money laundering from, among other sources, China. Drew Holden and Arthur Schwartz rounded up the evidence of this gaslighting. That it was effective in its bad faith effort at keeping relevant information about Chinese bribery of the Biden family and their consummate corruption in time to affect the election is clear. One survey reports that nearly 10% of those who voted for Biden in key states would not have had they known about this scandal which the major media deeply hid from them.

Knowing about the scandals involving Biden’s son Hunter’s dealings with officials and firms in China, Ukraine and Russia would have prompted 9.4 percent of those surveyed to change their vote, according to the survey of 1,750 Biden voters in Nevada, Georgia, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Arizona, and Michigan.

All the fact-free media claims that the Biden corruption was “Russian disinformation” served only to bury the truth that these and other government figures were captives of the Chinese government, a government of ruthless ambitions against both us and their own people. Interestingly, the press that swatted away the report in the NY Post about Hunter as “Russian Disinformation” were the very same people who on zero evidence accused President Trump of Russian collusion for 3 1/2 years.

Just as interesting were the 50 former intelligence officers, including John Brennan and James Clapper, who had not been briefed about Hunter Biden, but all the same claimed that the story about his corruption had all the characteristics of “Russian Disinformation.” 

Hunter and Joe Biden were not the only people unmasked as Chinese stooges this week. Congressman Eric Swalwell was as well when the story broke that he had been too close -- how close he hasn’t denied -- to a Chinese honeypot spy while he sat on the House Intelligence Committee, recipients of the most secret of our intelligence gathering. Even more damning is that Speaker Nancy Pelosi put Swalwell in that position after the FBI notified her that he had been compromised. Congressman Adam Schiff, chair of that committee, was also informed and it didn’t bother him. Instead he peddled lies about Trump and Russia for years and bottled up evidence that the claims were baseless. Just as the agency stoked and never rebutted the claims of Russian Collusion against Trump, which it knew at the very outset were false, they did nothing to deal with Swalwell’s having been compromised.

Tammy Bruce nailed it:

Now clear: FBI *knew* Rep. Swalwell was compromised via a Chinese spy,  yet spent the last 4 years pushing an accusation against @realDonaldTrump they KNEW was false & helped perpetuate. But don't worry, our system would totally not compromise the election. 

-- Tammy Bruce (@HeyTammyBruce) December 8, 2020

Indeed, the FBI has a great deal to answer for and in a better world would be stripped of its counterintelligence functions and more. 

Don Surber has dubbed the agency “The KGB for Democrats” and he has a solid point. It has, as he notes, been in recent years covering up for Democrats and besetting those that the Democrats don’t like. It’s hard to take issue with his examples:

The FBI actually aids and abets crime. Its investigation of Hillary's sale of state secrets through 33,000 private emails focused not on prosecuting her, but on destroying all evidence of her crimes, including the computer she used. [snip]

Then there is Seth Rich, the man who blew the whistle on the DNC and sent to Wikileaks a thumb drive of incriminating emails. Everyone in DC knows he was murdered. No one is investigating.

Ty Clevenger represents Brian Huddleston in a lawsuit against the FBI. He cannot get the bureau to turn over records. His FOIA lawsuit did get an admission from the bureau.

Clevenger wrote:

"After three years of claiming that it could not find any records about murdered Democratic National Committee employee Seth Rich, the FBI admitted today that it has thousands of pages of information about him, further admitting that it has custody of his laptop." [snip]

The FBI does not work for the American people. If it did, it would have told Obama to pound salt when he demanded the FBI spy on Donald John Trump. Instead it lied to federal judges and spied.

Four years later, only one poor soul has been prosecuted. No other prosecution is expected.

Then there is Hunter Biden's laptop filled with details of corruption, bribes, and sex with underage women in Red China.

It sat on that laptop for a year. The good citizen who turned it in lost his business and is now in hiding. 

The corrupt agency is now involved in a wide-ranging investigation of sexual misconduct.

At week’s end Senator Ted Cruz wrote to FBI Director Christopher Wray and Attorney General William Barr, noting that under oath former director James Comey and former deputy director Andrew  McCabe‘s testimony about their knowledge and approval of the 2016 Clinton media leak is at odds, that one of them lied under oath, a federal crime. He wants an investigation to determine which one is the liar.

Lying partisans from top to bottom.

With all this going on, it’s no surprise that disinfectants are in such demand they are hard to find in the market.

 

Clarice Feldman  

Source: https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/12/frauds_the_election_media_congressional_dems_and_the_fbi.html 

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Our Chinese Sister Cities: "Use the Countryside to Surround the City" - Judith Bergman

 

​ by Judith Bergman

China has used its sister cities to boost its "mask diplomacy", in which it plays both the arsonist and the firefighter, and has written about this new initiative in state media

  • "While American local governments value such "exchanges" for financial and cultural reasons, 'exchange' (交流) has always been viewed as a practical political tool by Beijing, and all of China's 'exchange' organizations have been assigned political missions". — China's Influence & American Interests, Report of the Working Group on Chinese Influence Activities in the United States, by the Hoover Institution at Stanford University and the Center on US-China Relations at the Asia Society in New York, 2019.

  • "We will keep connecting schools in the U.S. and China one at a time". — USA-China Sister Schools Association.

  • China has used its sister cities to boost its "mask diplomacy", in which it plays both the arsonist and the firefighter, and has written about this new initiative in state media with quotes from "grateful" US sister cities thanking China for sending them masks.

  • Local politicians and others, such as school principals, are simply easy targets for the sophisticated tactics of CCP officials, who prey on the goodwill and naiveté of unsuspecting Americans, although willful blindness doubtless plays a role. "Local politicians typically know little about China and have no responsibility for national security, and because their Chinese interlocutors present themselves as offering people-to-people exchanges and 'opportunities for local business', these politicians have a strong incentive to remain uninformed". — Clive Hamilton and Mareike Ohlberg, Hidden Hand: Exposing How the Chinese Communist Party is Reshaping the World.

In February, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo warned: "Chinese Communist Party officials... are cultivating relationships with county school board members and local politicians – often through what are known as sister cities programs... Last year, a high school – a high school, a high school in Chicago – disinvited a Taiwanese representative to serve on a climate panel after Chinese pressure." (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)

On November 17, four US Senators introduced legislation to investigate the "sister city" partnerships between communities in United States and China. According to Senator Marco Rubio:

"The Chinese government and Communist Party has a history of exploiting cultural and economic partnerships to conduct malign activities, and it's clear that opaque, sister-city partnerships deserve increased scrutiny. We must do more to better understand, and then counter, Chinese influence operations at the state and local level, which are often conducted under the benign auspices of sister city relationships."

In February, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo warned:

"Chinese Communist Party officials... are cultivating relationships with county school board members and local politicians – often through what are known as sister cities programs... Last year, a high school – a high school, a high school in Chicago – disinvited a Taiwanese representative to serve on a climate panel after Chinese pressure."

Take Cascade Elementary School in Orem, Utah, which has a Chinese language immersion program. Orem has been the sister city of Urumqui, China since 2000. In March, China Daily, the English language newspaper of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), published an article, "US 4th-graders proud to be pen pals with Xi," featuring interviews with staff and children at the school. The article appeared after 50 fourth-graders from Cascade Elementary School sent Chinese New Year's cards to China's President Xi Jinping and he replied to them. In his letter, according to China Daily, Xi praised the children for their Chinese language skills, including being able to write Chinese characters, and told them, "I hope you will keep at it, make even bigger progress and become young 'ambassadors' for Sino-US friendship". According to China Daily:

The idea of writing to the Chinese president came from those students and was supported by their Mandarin teacher, Zheng Yamin, who also gives lectures on Chinese culture and festivals at the Salt Lake City Public Library in Utah's capital.

...

"It's an amazing thing for our students to get a personal letter from the president of China," Principal Darrin Johnson said. "President Xi said he hopes to visit us here one day, but we also hope to follow up with a visit by our students to China next year so they can see for themselves how interesting and beautiful China is.

"I think it's a great honor. The Chinese president is incredibly busy, running a country and dealing with the new coronavirus."

According to "China's Influence & American Interests," a report by the Working Group on Chinese Influence Activities in the United States, put out in 2019 by the Hoover Institution at Stanford University and the Center on US-China Relations at the Asia Society in New York:

"China pursues sister-city relationships under an organization called the Chinese People's Association for Friendship with Foreign Countries... that aims to strengthen the rule of the Chinese Communist Party and increase China's influence overseas... under the administration of Communist Party leader Xi Jinping, the association has been revitalized as China seeks to groom local business, political, and media leaders in countries around the world...

"Beginning in the early 1970s, China and the United States built trust and common prosperity through cooperation at the local level. The work of two hundred sister city pairs and over forty sister state/province partnerships was reinforced by state and city trade and investment promotion offices, chambers of commerce, Chinese American and traditional clan associations, Chinatown cultural centers, and various and sundry activities at US colleges and universities, secondary schools, church groups, and museums...

"After forty years of engagement, the US-China focused foundations, educational and exchange programs, research institutes, and arts and entertainment initiatives throughout the country are too many and various to be cataloged. American mayors, county executives, and governors—many of whom travel to China often and host an unending stream of Chinese visitors—have leveraged the work of these groups to enrich local coffers and local culture..."

While American local governments value such 'exchanges' for financial and cultural reasons, 'exchange' (交流) has always been viewed as a practical political tool by Beijing, and all of China's 'exchange' organizations have been assigned political missions."

"The Xi administration", according to Professor Anne-Marie Brady who, among other things, has studied Chinese influence activities in New Zealand, "has revived traditional CCP policies of utilizing people-to-people... relations in order to coopt foreigners to support and promote China's foreign policy goals". One of the ways that they do that, according to Brady, is to "[u]se sister city relations to expand China's economic agenda separate to a given nation's foreign policy. The CCP front organization, the Chinese People's Association for Friendship with Foreign Countries is in charge of this activity".

According to Brady:

"CCP united front officials and their agents are tasked with developing relationships with foreign and overseas Chinese personages to influence, subvert, and if necessary, bypass the policies of their governments and promote the interests of the CCP globally...The Xi administration's strategy of working more with local governments for economic projects has now revitalized the CPAFFC, as well as the local equivalents they work with such as in New Zealand, the New Zealand-China Friendship Society ".

An American equivalent of the New Zealand-China Friendship Society is the US-China Peoples Friendship Association, a not-for-profit organization that describes as its purpose "to develop and strengthen friendship and understanding between the peoples of the United States and China. USCPFA was founded as a national organization in 1974, working on people-to-people diplomacy between Americans and Chinese. Nearly 35 chapters in four regions spanning the U.S. comprise the organization".

The State Department is currently reviewing the activities of the U.S.-China Friendship Association, which Secretary of State Mike Pompeo recently called a CCP United Front Work organization.

"These organizations ...have apparently attempted to exert influence on groups all across the public sphere, including in our schools, in our business associations, impacting local politicals – politicians, media outlets, and Chinese groups here inside the United States."

In July 2019, the fourth US-China Sister Cities Mayors' Summit was held in Houston, Texas. It was co-hosted by Ron Nirenberg, mayor of San Antonio, Texas, and chairman of Sister Cities International, the US organization that co-hosted the summit, and Xie Yuan, vice-president of the Chinese People's Association for Friendship with Foreign Countries.

"Subnational cooperation and people-to-people exchanges are the highlights in the history of China-US interactions and a driving force for the growth of our relations," said Cui Tiankai, China's ambassador to the US, in a message sent to the summit.

"The 277 pairs of relationships at the state, provincial and city levels between China and the US -- 227 pairs of sister cities and 50 pairs of sister states/provinces -- have led to win-win cooperation as both sides share resources and complement each other's strengths".

According to China Daily:

"More than 100 municipal representatives traveled from China to join their US counterparts from over 20 cities in the one-day summit, as the two sides engaged in broad-ranging discussions on topics including innovation and smart cities, the Maritime Silk Road, educational exchanges and how to energize and engage existing and prospective sister city relationships".

There are, apparently, also direct US-China school partnerships. According to the website of an organization that calls itself the USA-China Sister Schools Association, it has "been dedicated to connecting students, teaching staff and administrators of K-12 schools in the U.S. and China since our founding in 1992."

"Over the past two decades, we have witnessed the creation and execution of vibrant exchange programs between more than 20 sister school partnerships. These partnerships spread out in states like Maryland, Virginia, Wisconsin and Kansas and are continuing to expand to other parts of the country. Given the fact that Sino-American relationship is one of the world's most important bilateral relationships, we believe that interpersonal interaction between the youth of the two countries will greatly enhance mutual understanding, which in turn will contribute to the peace and development of the world. We will keep connecting schools in the U.S. and China one at a time".

China has used its sister cities to boost its "mask diplomacy", in which it plays both the arsonist and the firefighter, and has written about this new initiative in state media with quotes from "grateful" US sister cities thanking China for sending them masks.

In an article titled, "US sister cities get help from Chinese friends in virus fight", China Daily quotes Jennifer Priest, executive director of the Norfolk Sister City Association, as thanking the Ningbo Beilun District People's Government for a donation of 2,000 masks. "We are so grateful to our counterpart in China," she said. According to the article:

"Utah, which has enjoyed a 'sister-state' relationship with Liaoning since 2006, received a batch of donations from the Chinese province that included 7,000 N95 masks, 70,000 disposable surgical masks, as well as 7,000 protective suits and 3,000 face masks for children. Leaders from the Utah Legislature expressed their gratitude to officials from Liaoning through a virtual special ceremony to celebrate the arrival of the medical supplies.

"Also presented during the Skype meeting were teachers and students from Cascade Elementary School, who were the recipients of parts of the 3,000 children's masks. The school's students in the Chinese-language immersion program shared stories of their correspondence with President Xi Jinping, which took place in the beginning of the year...

"Maryland's Deputy Secretary of State Luis Borunda praised the long-term friendly relationship between Maryland and China, and extended sincere gratitude to the sister province Anhui."

These quotes from "grateful" sister cities are invaluable propaganda for the Chinese Communist Party.

Local politicians and others, such as school principals, are simply easy targets for the sophisticated tactics of CCP officials, who prey on the goodwill and naiveté of unsuspecting Americans, although willful blindness doubtless plays a role. According to Clive Hamilton and Mareike Ohlberg, in their recently published book, Hidden Hand: Exposing How the Chinese Communist Party is Reshaping the World:

"Local politicians typically know little about China and have no responsibility for national security, and because their Chinese interlocutors present themselves as offering people-to-people exchanges and 'opportunities for local business', these politicians have a strong incentive to remain uninformed...

"The focus is typically on economic and cultural ties and it's easy to pretend that there is no political element... however, these local ties are in fact highly political, and where necessary they can be leveraged to pressure national governments. This is the tactic of 'use the countryside to surround the city'".

 

Judith Bergman, a columnist, lawyer and political analyst, is a Distinguished Senior Fellow at Gatestone Institute.

 Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/16810/china-sister-cities 

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

UN targets Israel with 7 different resolutions - JNS and ILH Staff

 

​ by JNS and ILH Staff

The language condemns the Jewish state for "repressive measures" against Syrian citizens in the Golan Heights and renews the mandates of the UN Relief and Works Agency.

The UN General Assembly targeted Israel on Thursday with seven different resolutions.

The language condemns Israel for "repressive measures" against Syrian citizens in the Golan Heights and renews the mandates of the UN Relief and Works Agency, as well as the United Nation's "special committee to investigate Israeli practices affecting the human rights of the Palestinian people and other Arabs of the Occupied Territories."

The seven resolutions were previously adopted on Nov. 4 by the UN General Assembly's Special Political and Decolonization Committee, known as the Fourth Committee.

The first resolution, adopted with 169 votes in favor, two against, and seven abstentions, was about "expressing grave concern at the especially difficult situation of the Palestine refugees under occupation, including with regard to their safety, well-being and socioeconomic living conditions."

The second, adopted with 162 votes in favor, four against and nine abstentions, was about "calling upon Israel to ensure the expedited and unimpeded import of all necessary construction materials into the Gaza Strip and to reduce the burdensome cost of importation of Agency supplies."

The third, adopted with 160 votes in favor, five against and 12 abstentions, "reaffirms that the Palestine refugees are entitled to their property and to the income derived therefrom, in conformity with the principles of equity and justice."

The fourth, adopted with 76 votes in favor, 14 against and 83 abstentions, "deplores those policies and practices of Israel that violate the human rights of the Palestinian people and other Arabs of the occupied territories, as reflected in the report of the Special Committee covering the reporting period."

The fifth, adopted with 150 votes in favor, seven against and 17 abstentions, "reaffirms that the Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and in the occupied Syrian Golan are illegal and an obstacle to peace and economic and social development."

The sixth, adopted with 147 votes in favor, 10 against and 16 abstentions, states that the United Nations is "gravely concerned by the tensions and violence in the recent period throughout the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem and including with regard to the holy places of Jerusalem, including the Haram al-Sharif, and deploring the loss of innocent civilian life … ."

The seventh, adopted with 151 votes in favor, three against and 20 abstentions, "determines that all legislative and administrative measures and actions taken or to be taken by Israel, the occupying Power, that purport to alter the character and legal status of the occupied Syrian Golan are null and void."

Earlier this month, the Palestinians were able to push a series of resolutions drafted by the General Assembly's Palestinian Rights Committee, dedicated to promoting the Palestinian narrative with regards to the regional conflict.

Israeli Ambassador to the UN Gilad Erdan said at the time that "no other country in the world is discriminated against in international bodies as Israel is. It is time for more countries to join our struggle to change the anti-Israel agenda at the UN."

Reprinted from JNS.org.

 

JNS and ILH Staff  

Source: https://www.israelhayom.com/2020/12/13/un-targets-israel-with-7-different-resolutions/

  Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

The makings of a true Israeli-Arab friendship - Dr. Ahmed Charai

 

​ by Dr. Ahmed Charai

The new Middle East that has emerged since the Arab Spring is a region that is more divided on the one hand, while showing increased interest for rapprochement with Israel on the other hand.

 

The new Middle East that has emerged since the Arab Spring, the rise and fall of Islamic State – as well as the rise of Iran's role in Iraq, Lebanon, Syria and Yemen – is a region that is more divided and also one where openness to Israel has increased among Arab states.

Israel and Morocco agreed to normalize relations, US President Trump and King Mohammed VI of Morocco said Thursday. "This will be a very warm peace," Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Thursday, adding that Israel and Morocco would quickly set up liaison offices and introduce direct flights between the two countries.

The historic announcement marks a true turning point in Middle East affairs.

Count me among many Arabs who have long believed that the peace between arabs and Israel through full normalization deserves a chance – albeit one of the few who says so publicly. I have held this view to the surprise of many American, Israeli, and Palestinian friends.

Senior White House adviser Jared Kushner has been key to pushing the peace deals. Kushner's years of patient and quiet behind-the-scenes negotiation paid off. Tossing out the tired scripts of past talks, he listened, he learned, he summarized to show his understanding, and he asked fresh questions.

Kushner succeeded in getting his vision adopted.

Israeli observers of a certain age will recall the statesmanship of the present king's late father, Hassan II, who worked tirelessly to foster rapprochement between Israel and its neighbors, including the Palestinians. He did so privately as well as publicly – on the one hand, facilitating every major initiative from Camp David to Oslo behind the scenes; King Hassan II is considered the main architect of the first peace agreement between Egypt and israel.

King Mohammed VI maintains the same commitment to advancing Israeli-Arab rapprochement – and the same willingness to do so discreetly.

The Arab world has never been monolithic. Other Arab states may probably follow countries that do not border Israel are not directly affected by the plight of they Palestinian people, other than by considerations of international law, charity and mercy. Without the unity of the Arab world supporting a stalemate that has dragged on for half a century, the Palestinians will have to readjust their strategies.

Israel, too, may change. Trade, the peaceful exchange of goods and ideas, may forge new connections among the young and ambitious, on both sides of the Arab-Jewish divide. In time, the bitterness of the old may be replaced by the hopefulness of the young.

On a very important subject for Moroccans, and in an unprecedented move, Trump recognized Morocco's sovereignty over Sahara provinces.

Morocco's serious, credible and realistic autonomy proposal is the only basis for a just and lasting solution for enduring peace and prosperity!"President's Trump said in a Tweet. "Morocco recognized the United States in 1777. It is thus fitting we recognize their sovereignty over the Sahara."

The White House released a statement formally proclaiming the recognition of Morocco's territorial claim over the Sahara.

"Now, therefore, I, Donald J Trump, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim that the United States recognizes that the entire Western Sahara territory is part of the Kingdom of Morocco."

The vast majority of Moroccans really do stand behind the monarchy in that regard. The separatist movement, often known as the Polisario, jeopardizes peace and security in the whole region, rendering it a breeding ground for terrorism. This is an issue that's been out there for a long time, and there's just been no progress on a resolution. As part of the recognition agreement, the United States diplomatic mission to Morocco will open a consulate in Dakhla, a city in the south Sahara.

By recognizing Morocco's sovereignty over an area where Morocco engaged a hundred of billions of dollars of investments for the Sahraoui population could possibly break the logjam.

In that, the agreement between Morocco and Israel should be praised for being truly game-changing, laying the groundwork for genuine Israeli-Arab friendship, and signifying the long-awaited acknowledgment of each other's humanity.

 

Dr. Ahmed Charai is a Moroccan publisher. He sits on the board of the Atlantic Council and is a member of the global board of advisers of the Jerusalem Institute for Strategy and Security.

Source: https://www.israelhayom.com/opinions/the-makings-of-a-true-israeli-arab-friendship/ 

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Regarding the Supreme Court, Dick Morris says an unsayable truth - Andrea Widburg

 

​ by Andrea Widburg

A lot of theories are circulating about the Supreme Court decision to reject the Texas case, but Dick Morris’s theory currently makes the most sense.

Friday night, the Supreme Court’s rejected Texas’s case against the disputed states for “lack of standing.” There are a lot of theories for this decision, but Dick Morris said the unsayable: The Supreme Court was intimidated by the Democrats’ promised court-packing scheme.

The Texas lawsuit went directly to the Supreme Court because it is the only court that can litigate a dispute between two states, and therefore has original jurisdiction for such disputes. Texas’s claim was that the defendant states, by violating constitutional mandates for conducting their elections, injured Texas – which used legal means to vote for Trump – by fraudulently handing the election to Biden.

The Supreme Court, by a 7-2 margin, swiftly rejected the case:

The State of Texas’s motion for leave to file a bill of complaint is denied for lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution. Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections.

That facile statement is an insult to Trump supporters. “Standing” is not a complicated concept. In Whitmore v. Arkansas (1990) 495 U.S. 149, 155, the Supreme Court explained,

To establish an Art. III case or controversy, a litigant first must clearly demonstrate that he has suffered an “injury in fact.” That injury, we have emphasized repeatedly, must be concrete in both a qualitative and temporal sense. The complainant must allege an injury to himself that is “distinct and palpable,” . . . as opposed to merely “[a]bstract,” . . . and the alleged harm must be actual or imminent, not “conjectural” or “hypothetical.” *** Further, the litigant must satisfy the “causation” and “redressability” prongs of the Art. III minima by showing that the injury “fairly can be traced to the challenged action” and “is likely to be redressed by a favorable decision.”

Texas met those requirements, showing an “injury in fact” that is “distinct and palpable,” that “can be traced to the challenged action” and that can be “redressed by a favorable decision.” Texas was not just whining how “another State conducts its elections.” This was not a case of “they ought to have used pink paper, not blue paper,” or “the polls should have been open an extra two hours.” Such inconsequential statements would have been claims of the type the Court’s statement described.

What Texas alleged was more profound: The defendant states engaged in unconstitutional conduct to create the circumstances by which Democrat activists (and, possibly, foreign agents) could commit fraud in order to hand the election to Biden. Understood the proper way, not only does Texas, in which Trump won, have a say in what those states did, so does every Trump voter in America.

It’s indisputable that the defendant states unconstitutionally changed their election laws through court action or settlement agreements. Additionally, in each defendant state, there is voluminous (and mostly uncontested) evidence that these rule changes allowed Democrats to engage in massive fraud to shift their citizens’ votes from Trump to Biden.

Had this unconstitutionally enabled fraud not happened, the disputed states would have elected Trump and Trump would have won the national election. That Biden “won” the national election through this fraud is a real harm to every Trump voter and can be remedied through the Court’s intervention. There’s your standing.

That being the case, why did the Supreme Court punt? One theory is that it wants “clean” cases that come up through the state court systems. Another theory is that the Court believes that this is an issue that legislatures, not the Court, should address. Marco Rubio has the right answer to that one:

 

And then there’s Dick Morris’s take:

“The Supreme Court is after justice, of course, but primarily they are after making sure the Supreme Court survives – that’s their institution and that’s their duty,” Morris told Saturday’s “The Count.” “I believe the Supreme Court was sent a message by Joe Biden and Kamala Harris and the Democratic Party during the election.

“And the message was: ‘If you overturn this election, we will pack you, and make your Court basically meaningless.’”

[snip]

“And just ask yourself: Who raised the issue of Court packing? We didn’t. Why would the Democrats raise an issue that was hurting them? We would never bring it up; we never thought of packing the Court. They did.”

Morris concluded, “it was a systemic effort, that succeeded, to intimidate the U.S. Supreme Court.”

Unless the Supreme Court surprises me this coming week (and I really hope it does and that I am being wrong and unfair here), there’s every to believe reason that the justices are more concerned with status and safety than they are with election integrity and constitutional principles.

IMAGE: Supreme Court of the United States by Joe Ravi. CC BY-SA 3.0.

 

Andrea Widburg  

Source: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/12/regarding_the_supreme_court_dick_morris_says_an_unsayable_truth.html 

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Tehran Should Ask 'Then What?' - Amir Taheri

 

​ by Amir Taheri

Launching the attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, the Japanese high command also forgot to ask "what next?".

  • Reacting to the killing of Major-General Qassem Soleimani and Brigadier-General Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, regime "thinkers" promise "revenge" and suggest this could be done with a single deadly blow to the "enemy".... Needless to say, when Khomeinists speak of "the enemy," they mean the American "Great Satan" and its sidekick Israel.

  • Even Ghulam Esmaili, spokesman for Islamic Judiciary, has joined the armchair strategists by suggesting "the clearing out of America and Israel" with a "single blow."

  • Launching the attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, the Japanese high command also forgot to ask "what next?".

  • [T]he Kayhan editorialist who urged the attack on Haifa... says because the Islamic Republic has "all US bases within range", cowardly Americans won't react to a destructive attack on Israel. And if they did, he says, Tehran could pour missiles against US bases in Iraq, the United Arab Emirates, the US 5th Fleet headquarters in Bahrain, the CENTCOM in Qatar, bases in Omani part of Musandam Peninsula. The editorialist believes the US would simply grin and bear each attack.

Iran's daily newspaper Kayhan, reflecting the views of "Supreme Guide" Ali Khamenei, says that Iran's "single blow" should come in a rainstorm of missiles against the Israeli port of Haifa. It then insists that the attack should not be merely symbolic but should cause total destruction and kill lots of people. (Image source: khamenei.ir)

In the One Thousand and One Night tale of the princes of Serendip, all three have one desire: To achieve all their wishes with a single throw of the dice.

However, not confined to the world of oriental tales, that dream has dictated quite a few tragic, comical and tragi-comical events in history.

The latest appearance of the "one throw" theme could be witnessed in Tehran these days, where Islamic Republic leaders offer both tragic and comical versions of it.

Reacting to the killing of Major-General Qassem Soleimani and Brigadier-General Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, regime "thinkers" promise "revenge" and suggest this could be done with a single deadly blow to the "enemy".

The daily Javan, reflecting the views of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), insists that further delay in taking revenge is unwise and that "the enemy" could be knocked out with a single blow from which it can't recover. Needless to say, when Khomeinists speak of "the enemy," they mean the American "Great Satan" and its sidekick Israel.

Khomeinist philosopher Rahim-Pour Azghadi even suggests that, if asked, he could deliver the killing final blow himself.

Former National Security Council Secretary Saeed Jalili claims that the Islamic Republic came close to a knockout victory eight years ago but missed the opportunity because of internecine feuds.

Dr. Hassan Abbasi, nicknamed "Kissinger of Islam" also believes that the "one throw of the dice" is the best strategy in the jihad to wipe Israel off the map and destroy America as collateral damage.

Major-General Hussein Salami, who heads the IRGC, shares the belief. He claims that he has "thousands of battalions" ready to trigger the Armageddon.

Former Defense Minister Brigadier-General Hussein Dehghan, now a presidential candidate, says wiping Israel off the map was the goal of the Islamic Revolution from the start. As one of the "students" who raided the US Embassy in Tehran in November 1979, Dehghan believes that the seizing of American hostages showed how effective the "single blow" could be in neutralizing "the enemy".

Even Ghulam Esmaili, spokesman for Islamic Judiciary, has joined the armchair strategists by suggesting "the clearing out of America and Israel" with a "single blow."

However, the most concrete exposé of the "one throw of the dice" has come from daily Kayhan, reflecting the views of "Supreme Guide" Ali Khamenei.

In an editorial headlined "Delay is not Permissible" it says the "single blow" should come in a rainstorm of missiles against the Israeli port of Haifa. It then insists that the attack should not be merely symbolic but should cause total destruction and kill lots of people. Haifa is doubly attractive as a target because, apart from being in Israel, it is also the center of the Baha'i faith, the bête noire of mullahs for two centuries.

In the One Thousand and One Night, a wise old man suggests that before the dice is thrown one last time, we must ask: "then what?" What if the last throw turns out against what we wished for?

Throughout history, the "last throw" strategy has deceived more experienced strategists than Khamenei and Salami.

In 53 BC Marcus Licinius Crassus, a member of Rome's ruling triumvirate persuaded the Senate to let him go east and finish off the Parthian Empire with a single blow. He set up a huge army for one last throw of the dice to rid Rome of its last serious enemy while filling his pockets with loot. The last throw turned out against him, and Crassus was slain in battle on June 9 in Carrhae.

Fast forward, we had Napoleon Bonaparte struck by the "one last throw" obsession, triggering the battle of Lübeck in 1806, with the aim of finishing off the Prussian "enemy" forever.

He won the battle on November 6, humiliating the greatest Prussian commander, Gebhard Leberecht von Blücher. But the Prussians came back nine years later, this time in alliance with the English and Russians, to destroy the Napoleonic Empire and send him into exile.

In Waterloo, Blücher was back, having the last laugh.

Napoleon also tried the "last throw" against the Russians and even managed to burn their capital Moscow. But, once again, the dice rolled out against him, sending his shattered "Grande Armée", pursued by "unwashed Cossacks", into the most humiliating retreat in history.

In 1941, Adolf Hitler tried the "last throw" with Operation Barbarossa, the fastest advance by the largest military force in history. General Friedrich von Paulus was at the gates of the Caucasus before Stalin could finish his bottle of peppered Vodka. Yet, everyone knows how the "what next" question, never asked by Hitler and his minions, was answered.

Launching the attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, the Japanese high command also forgot to ask "what next?". Their one throw of the dice was to knock the US out of competition for world leadership, turning Hawaii into a "kaban" (Japanese word for local police station) for the Pacific.

Again, the dice fell in a different way.

In May 1967, it was the turn of Egypt's Col. Gamal Abdel Nasser to trigger an unnecessary war by falling for the one-throw illusion without asking "then what?".

On a smaller scale, Al-Qaeda tried the same strategy with 9/11 with its leader Osama bin Laden hoping to "drive out the Americans forever" as the Afghan Mujahedin had sent the Soviets packing.

Again, the spoiled rich kid of a sick ideology forgot to ask "then what?"

In his book on how to write a novel, E.M. Forster advises aspiring writers to always ask "then what?" before triggering a sequence of the plot.

Even then, one may pose the question but give wrong answers.

This is what happened with the Kayhan editorialist who urged the attack on Haifa. He says because the Islamic Republic has "all US bases within range", cowardly Americans won't react to a destructive attack on Israel. And if they did, he says, Tehran could pour missiles against US bases in Iraq, the United Arab Emirates, the US 5th Fleet headquarters in Bahrain, the CENTCOM in Qatar, bases in Omani part of Musandam Peninsula. The editorialist believes the US would simply grin and bear each attack.

Let's hope there are cooler heads in Tehran who won't fall for serendipity without asking "then what?"

This article was originally published by Asharq al-Awsat

 

Amir Taheri was the executive editor-in-chief of the daily Kayhan in Iran from 1972 to 1979. He has worked at or written for innumerable publications, published eleven books, and has been a columnist for Asharq Al-Awsat since 1987.

 Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/16848/iran-ask-then-what 

 Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

This little light of mine: 2,000-year-old lantern found in Jerusalem - Yori Yalon

 

​ by Yori Yalon

"It's not every day that we get to find a candle preserved in its entirety. We are all very excited," says Ari Levy, director of excavations for the Israel Antiquities Authority.

 

This little light of mine: 2,000-year-old lantern found in Jerusalem
"We will empty the contents of the candle and examine what kind of oil was used to light it" | Photo: Gil Mezuman/Ir David

Archaeologists have unearthed a candle holder from the Hasmonean period in the City of David in Jerusalem.

The 2,000-year-old lantern, which has been preserved in its entirety, was discovered during excavations in the Old City of Jerusalem, lead by the Israel Antiquities Authority and the Ir David Foundation.

Archaeologists were excavating the road that was used for pilgrimages in the days of the Second Temple about 2,000 years ago. The road is nearly 600 meters (2,000 feet) long and 8 meters (26 feet) wide. It connects the Siloam Pool in the south of the City of David and the foot of the Temple Mount.

The candle holder is made of clay and has plant decorations on its tip, probably a branch with leaves. It is typical of the first century BCE, at the end of the Hasmonean rule during the Second Temple period.

"One of the archaeologists approached me with something hidden in his hands and asked me to guess what he had found. He opened his hands and showed me the candle that was preserved in its entirety. I was really excited," Riki Zlot Har-Tov, field manager of the Ir David Foundation, said.

Israel Antiquities Authority Director of Excavations Ari Levy said that "these candles were used for different purposes – from simple everyday uses such as lighting rooms and streets, to religious ceremonial uses for Shabbat and Hanukkah.

"We will empty the contents of the candle and examine what kind of oil was used to light it," Levy added. "We are used to finding only parts of candles. It's not every day that we get to find a candle preserved in its entirety. We are all very excited."

 

Yori Yalon 

Source: https://www.israelhayom.com/2020/12/13/jerusalem-archeologists-reveal-2000-year-old-candle/ 

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Saturday, December 12, 2020

Hunter, Pelosi, Swalwell, Omar – pick a scandal - Jack Englehard

 

​ by Jack Englehard

The crime of the century began in US newsrooms. The media are the villains, guilty of fixing an election as never before in US history.

 

Joe and Hunter Biden
Joe and Hunter Biden                                                                              REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

Let’s pretend you’re the editor of a major American newspaper and one day find yourself swamped with four stories, each worthy of a stop-the-presses headline.

Can’t run them all…not all at once. You’ll need your nose-for-news to feature which scandal tops them all as being most despicable.

Let’s pretend further that you are an honest and fearless journalist, which mathematically puts you in the one percent category. Pretty near one-of-a-kind.

But as we said…fearless…and here she comes again, Ilhan Omar (D-MN), always with a story…a who’s who between husband and brother…and this time a real whopper.

Then of course those insinuations of hers that Jews are money-hungry when, of all people, we read that when it comes to money, no one scoops it off the table as smoothly as she does.

She can smell a “Benjamin” a mile away.

Ilhan Omar                                                                                                                      Reuters

I am not good with math, nor with money, so I rely on the New York Post to explain how it works with her, this money-grubbing cookie from Somalia who learned awfully fast how to game the American Enterprise system…and how to spread even stimulus money, intended for needy Americans…among family.

That would definitely be my top story. How about this for a headline? – “From dirt poor, to filthy rich.”

However, within hours, along comes the story that tells how Hunter Biden, son of Joe, is under federal investigation for tax fraud related to his “overseas business.”

What business? Don’t ask. The media certainly didn’t. Word of the shenanigans could have spoiled it for Joe and kept Trump in the White House another four years.

There is also a grand jury looking into Hunter’s “business”…specifically as tied to China…and, just a guess, as tied to Joe, Hunter’s dear old dad.

But now Hunter’s follies are trickling out and what looks bad for Hunter could look worse for Joe, the man who would be president…but already under a cloud.

If you ask me, that is the topper.

But wait. Does the name Eric Swalwell ring a ball…the same bell that tolls for Adam Schiff? Not yet for Schiff, but Karma has found Swalwell.

Swalwell (D-CA) was the congressman who, high on smugness, never missed a chance to accuse President Trump of being a spy for Russia.

He was dead wrong on Trump, of course, but when it comes to spies, Swalwell should know. He’s been caught dallying with an alleged Chinese spy.

We don’t know what sweet nothings were whispered and exchanged, but for sure he is a compromised member of the House, and of the House Intelligence Committee.

Not Foreign Relations?

Anyway, that…Swalwell… should surely be the boldfaced banner.

However, Nancy Pelosi pretty much said “Let them eat cake” when she admitted that she sat on a stimulus package intended for starving Americans…because it might help Donald Trump.

Steny Hoyer, Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer                                                          Reuters

That is as low as it gets…except…

As we suggested in this column, a day too early, the entire election could have gone the other way if voters had been told about any of these wrongdoings…mainly the Biden scandal.

But the media suppressed the story. The media are the villains over and above all the rest…guilty of colluding and fixing an election as never before in American history.

In a perfect world, every single editor and reporter who had a hand in this would stand trial and punishment for the crime of duping the American people. (The factual full story in this thriller.)

The crime of the century began in this nation’s newsrooms…with no end in sight.

 

Jack Englehard writes regularly for Arutz Sheva. He wrote the worldwide book-to-movie bestseller “Indecent Proposal,” the authoritative newsroom epic, “The Bathsheba Deadline,” followed by his coming-of-age classics, “The Girls of Cincinnati,” and, the Holocaust-to-Montreal memoir, “Escape from Mount Moriah.” For that and his 1960s epic “The Days of the Bitter End,” contemporaries have hailed him “The last Hemingway, a writer without peer, and the conscience of us all.” Website: www.jackengelhard.com 

Source: https://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/292923 

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter