Sunday, November 5, 2023

Israeli source says many hostages in Gaza are still alive - Tovah Lazaroff

 

​ by Tovah Lazaroff

An Israeli diplomatic source said that the pressure of a ground campaign may press Hamas to make a deal.

 

 Thousands gather as families of hostages vow to not return home until their loved ones are freed. (photo credit: AVSHALOM SASSONI/ MAARIV)
Thousands gather as families of hostages vow to not return home until their loved ones are freed.
(photo credit: AVSHALOM SASSONI/ MAARIV)

Israel has estimated that many of the over 240 Hamas held captives in Gaza are still alive, as it opposed any ceasefire understanding without the release of all the hostages.

An Israeli diplomatic source said that the pressure of a ground campaign may press Hamas to make a deal.

“Initially nothing was seen in that direction,” the source said. Now, “we see something, it hasn't matured yet.”

The source spoke as Israel is under international pressure for a ceasefire with US Secretary of State Antony Blinken pushing it to accept at least a humanitarian pause in the fighting.

The source said that any ceasefire understanding would in fact be temporary, more akin to a pause. This could only happen, the source said, in exchange for the release of the hostages and amid a clear understanding that Israel would continue to “work to defeat Hamas.”

 Tzili Wenkert, a holocaust survivor and the grandmother of Omer Wenkert who is held hostage by Hamas terrorists in Gaza, attends an event at the ''Hostages Square'', outside the Art Museum of Tel Aviv, calling the Israeli government to act for immediate release of the hostages on October 28, 2023 (credit: GILI YAARI/FLASH90)
Tzili Wenkert, a holocaust survivor and the grandmother of Omer Wenkert who is held hostage by Hamas terrorists in Gaza, attends an event at the ''Hostages Square'', outside the Art Museum of Tel Aviv, calling the Israeli government to act for immediate release of the hostages on October 28, 2023 (credit: GILI YAARI/FLASH90)

Qatar's foreign ministry said on Sunday that without a "period of calm" in Gaza its mediators would not be able to secure the release of Israeli hostages held there.

The source clarified that all Israeli contacts with Qatar are managed by Mossad Chief David Barnea, together with the intelligence team of IDF Maj. Gen. (Res) Nitzan Alon and Shin Bet Chief Ronen Bar.

All efforts by former Mossad Chief Yossi Cohen, are done under the auspices of Barnea as he does not have a separate role, the source said, adding that “parallel axis can complicate the situation.

His only sole independent effort was at the start of the war when he delivered a message to Netanyahu from Arab leaders, the source explained.

IDF may remain in Gaza

In looking toward, the aftermath of the Gaza War, the source hinted that the IDF may remain in Gaza.

“I don't see a situation where Israel will not have supreme security responsibility in Gaza,” the source stated. Work must also be done to change the mindset of Palestinian society there.

“It is not enough to restore Gaza. It must be put through a process of de-Nazification,” the source added.

The source noted that the problem was not limited to Gaza but was also included the West Bank.

“This culture [of wanting to kill Jews[ still exists in the Palestinian Authority, the source said, warning during the conversation that the West Bank settlements were in danger of Hamas attacks.

A Hamas victory, therefore, is also not just important for Gaza, but also for the West Bank and for Israel’s northern border, the source said.

The scope and strength of a victory over Hamas, would help ensure the security of the evacuated communities along Israel’s northern border, the source stated.

The possibility of a similar infiltration by Hezbollah along Israel’s northern border has also decreased because the IDF had now invested more forces to fortify the area, the source said. It has also changed its operational understanding of what must be done to protect that border, the source added.

Looking to the future the source said that an Israeli-Saudi normalization deal which had been under negotiation prior to the outbreak of the Gaza War on October 7, was still visible. But only if Israel defeats Hamas, the source emphasized.


Tovah Lazaroff

Source: https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-771829

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

This Time Israel Will Finish The Job - Roger Kimball

 

​ by Roger Kimball

The murderous attacks perpetrated by Hamas tore the mask off the 'poor, suffering Palestinians'

 

There are many reasons for any sane person to regret the existence of Hamas, the savage Sunni Muslim militia that controls the Gaza Strip in Southern Israel. Founded in 1987, the group has specialized in terror attacks against Israelis while maintaining vigorous side-concessions fomenting anti-Western sentiment and keeping their own populace in a state of wretched poverty.

Such are the convoluted workings of providence, however, that the world may eventually find itself grimly grateful for what one percipient observer called “the Sabbath Massacres”: the barbaric slaughter perpetrated by Hamas on October 7, 2023, which left some 1,400 dead, thousands wounded, and more than 200 kidnapped and held hostage in Gaza.

The main reason to be grateful for this horrific carnage follows from the revelation it afforded. In the first place, by acting with such savage and sanguinary abandon—deliberately targeting the young and helpless, the old and infirm, raping, mutilating, beheading—Hamas in effect signed its own death warrant.

We’ve seen all the usual suspects fulminating against Israel, “the Zionists,” “the Jews.” A prominent Hamas spokesman called Ghazi Hamad said in an interview that the Sabbath Massacre of October 7 was only the start, that there would be many more and similar attacks “until Israel is annihilated.”

But that is idle, impotent imprecation, of a piece with King Lear’s aposiopetic rant against his sisters:

– No, you unnatural hags,
I will have such revenges on you both,
That all the world shall – I will do such things, –
What they are, yet I know not; but they shall be
The terrors of the earth.

One of the  most brilliant spokesman for the the Israeli Defense Force, Lt. Col. Jonathan Conricus, was right when he described Hamad as a “rotten, vile, and cowardly terrorist.” Doubtless Hamad would slit the throat of any Israeli he chanced across. But he is likely to chance across very few, if any. As Conricus has explained in patient if steely detail, the IDF is going to dismantle Hamas piece by piece, tunnel by tunnel, terrorist by terrorist.

The Israelis will, as they have always done—and in sharp contrast with the procedure of Hamas—proceed deliberately and methodically, taking care to minimize civilian casualties wherever they can, but without bowing to the illegal emotional blackmail of using civilians a human shields, a regular practice of Hamas, which, in blatant contravention of the Geneva Conventions, builds command centers and rocket launchers under or adjacent to hospitals, schools, mosques, etc., and which employs ambulances as taxis across war zones, another violation of the rules of war.

But the main point is that, in sharp contradistinction to the many other times that Israel has responded militarily to Arab or Palestinian aggression, this time all signs are that they will finish the job. In the past, Israel has been cowed by “world opinion,” that marshy will-o’-the-wisp that emanates from such sinkholes as the United Nations and the news rooms of such discredited entities as The New York Times and CNN. But this time I predict, the extreme savagery of the October 7 attack—an attack that killed more Jews than any episode since the Holocaust—has put steel in the Israeli response. Hamas’s days are numbered, and the number is not large.

That is one real if paradoxical reason to be grateful for the attack by Hamas. They did not heed Gertrude Stein’s sage admonition to know how far to go in going too far. They went all the way, and they will pay the ultimate price for their horrible bloodletting.

The other chief reason that this grisly event may inspire gratitude alongside revulsion is that it seems to have shaken the world awake, disrupting the pathetic radical-chic infatuation with this species of violent, anti-Western guilt mongering. Yes, Western colleges and universities, especially the richest and most pampered of them, are full of anti-Semitic, pro-Palestinian animus. From Harvard to Stanford, from Columbia and Cornell to Georgetown and the University of Pennsylvania, students and faculty are making fools of themselves by mouthing such goads to genocide as “From the River to the Sea, Palestine Will Be Free.”

But these little eructations, along with the carefully coordinated mass rallies in major cities throughout the Western world, conceal an inexorable process of disenchantment. Much publicized has been the withdrawal of financial support by scores of major donors to the university industrial complex. The loss of money may sting at some few campuses. For most, it will be but a rounding error. What will matter much more is the loss of that much more precious form of spiritual currency, legitimacy.

Whatever else it accomplished, the murderous attacks perpetrated by Hamas tore the mask off the “poor, suffering Palestinians” and revealed the entire operation as the bloodthirsty, anti-civilizational impulse we have long known it to be. For that, at least, we must be grateful for this excruciating moment of clarity.


Roger Kimball

Source: https://amgreatness.com/2023/11/05/this-time-all-signs-are-that-israel-will-finish-the-job/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Saudi prince on Nasrallah's speech: Axis of Resistance is a big lie - Maariv Online

 

​ by Maariv Online

"The so-called Axis of Resistance has been dealing with the Palestinian issue for years and is only a means of implementing Iran's agenda in the region," Prince Abdulrahman bin Mosaad said.

 

 Supporters of Lebanon's Hezbollah leader Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah gather to watch his address during a ceremony to honour fighters killed in the recent escalation with Israel, in Beirut's southern suburbs, Lebanon November 3, 2023 (photo credit: REUTERS/ALAA AL-MARJANI)
Supporters of Lebanon's Hezbollah leader Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah gather to watch his address during a ceremony to honour fighters killed in the recent escalation with Israel, in Beirut's southern suburbs, Lebanon November 3, 2023
(photo credit: REUTERS/ALAA AL-MARJANI)

Saudi Prince Abdulrahman bin Mosaad launched a sharp attack against Hezbollah Secretary General Hassan Nasrallah on Saturday, after the speech he gave regarding the war in Gaza.

Mosaad said "There is no doubt that the Axis of Resistance is a big lie. The 100,000 missiles and massive weapons that Hezbollah has, have nothing to do with supporting the Palestinian cause.

"The so-called Axis of Resistance has been dealing with the Palestinian issue for years and is only a means of implementing Iran's agenda in the region," he continued.

"Hassan Nasrallah's speech in which he said that Operation Al-Aqsa flood is a Palestinian operation only – and that the resistance axis was surprised by this, and everything that was said in the speech – dropped all the masks."

He then said: "All illusions based on loud slogans and resonant speeches should fall with him. Nasrallah did not believe his own speech until he said that all efforts must be made to stop the war in Gaza. Why do you say what you do not do? It's so disgusting that you say what you don't do."

 Hezbollah leader Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah delivers his first address since the October conflict between Palestinian group Hamas and Israel, from an unspecified location in Lebanon, in this screenshot taken from video obtained November 3, 2023 (credit: AL-MANAR VIA REUTERS)
Hezbollah leader Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah delivers his first address since the October conflict between Palestinian group Hamas and Israel, from an unspecified location in Lebanon, in this screenshot taken from video obtained November 3, 2023 (credit: AL-MANAR VIA REUTERS)

Nasrallah speaks for the first time since October 7

Nasrallah's speech took place on Friday against the backdrop of the fear of an all-out conflict in the region.

During the speech, he said: "The Lebanese front and the escalation in all directions depends on two things - the course of events in Gaza and their development, and the second - Israel's activities in Lebanon. The possibility that the Lebanese front will expand is a real possibility."

"The war has expanded to more than one front - we salute the Iraqi and Yemeni armies who entered the heart of this blessed campaign. There is no more legitimate and righteous battle from a humanitarian, moral and religious point of view than a battle against the Zionists," said Nasrallah.

"The attack on October 7 was fully planned by the Palestinians and so was its execution. We have two goals before us - stopping the fighting for humanitarian reasons and achieving a victory for Gaza and Hamas."

He also said: "The Islamic resistance in Lebanon (Hezbollah) has been waging a battle against Israel since October 8. The first reason why the campaign broke out is the situation of the Palestinian prisoners in Israeli prisons, 'who have been in prison for many years.' The second reason is the situation on the Temple Mount, the third reason is 'The siege of Gaza', and the fourth reason is 'the threats to the West Bank by the extremist government in Israel, the daily killings and the demolition of houses.'"


Maariv Online

Source: https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/article-771712

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

MUST-SEE VIDEO: Why Muslim nations don’t want ‘Palestinians’ - Andrea Widburg

 

​ by Andrea Widburg

There’s a good reason that the same nations insisting that Israel must bow before the Arab “Palestinians” refuse to accept them in their own lands.

 

One of the things the left is desperately downplaying as it demands that Israel allow Hamas and its supporters to go unpunished and, ideally, cede to the Arabs the entire land of Israel is the fact that the surrounding Arab nations are refusing to take Gazans in as refugees. The reason is that nobody wants these “Palestinian” Arabs who have proven to be as destructive to Arab nations as they are to Israel.

When Barack Obama’s policies triggered the disastrous Arab Spring, with massive upheaval in the Muslim lands of Africa and the Middle East, Europe opened its doors to refugees from those wars. Europe did this even though its cultural connection to these refugees was minimal to nonexistent. It was, the Europeans felt, the right thing to do. (It’s also proved to have been a remarkably stupid thing to do, as Enoch Powell predicted, but that’s another story.)

Here in America, we’re told that our border is meaningless because we have a moral obligation to welcome in refugees from around the world—and not even refugees from war. Just refugees from places these migrants don’t like very much.

Image: The scourge of the PLO. Rumble screen grab.

We are required to accept their poverty and pathology, their sex trafficking and gangs. That these people have no cultural connection to America and do not share the core values that are the only thing binding one American to another is irrelevant. We must do this, we’re told, because it’s the right thing to do. (And as happened to Europe, we will soon learn that it was a remarkably stupid thing to do, but that’s also another story.)

Intriguingly, no one in the Muslim world seems to be burdened with this moral sense that the right thing for them to do is take in their co-religionists from Gaza. After all, Hamas is telling the world that thousands of Gazans have already died and that tens of thousands more will die. Yet no one wants them.

Of course, Hamas doesn’t want them to leave, a policy it's enforcing with ever-increasing, murderous brutality:

 


 

We can understand why Hamas doesn’t want civilians to leave: Its greatest weapon in any war is propaganda, and there is no propaganda more effective than dead bodies purportedly killed at Israeli hands.

But again, why won’t the surrounding Arab nations—which have a lot of empty land—take in these downtrodden, huddled masses purportedly yearning to breathe free?

Well, it’s because they’re horrible. Think Rashida Tlaib multiplied by a couple of million. That’s the message in a powerful short video from The Liberty Daily, which looks to history to explain why Muslims hate those “Palestinian” Arabs:

By the way, if you’re wondering why I’ve started using scare quotes around “Palestinians,” here’s the reason: History shows that the name, which implies a tie to the land going back millennia, is a lie. These people have no historical ties to a place Rome conquered in 70 A.D. and then named in honor of the Jews’ ancient—and vanished—enemy, the Philistines. That colonial name lingered for another 1,800-plus years.

Significantly, almost all the current Arab residents have roots that go back, at most, a couple of hundred years. They styled themselves as “Palestinians” only in the 1960s while working with the Soviets during the Cold War. To the extent the implications of the name are dishonest…scare quotes. As the left repeatedly shows, words and names matter, so let’s get the names right. Confucius would approve.

 

Andrea Widburg

Source: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2023/11/mustsee_video_why_muslim_nations_dont_want_palestinians.html

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Four weeks in, Biden now wants 'pause' in fighting after vowing 'unwavering' support for Israel - Ben Whedon

 

​ by Ben Whedon

Bowing to pressure? Biden visited Israel in mid-October in a diplomatic mission that appeared to be the high-mark of the administration's support for Israeli operations. Now that far-left progressives are pushing back, his "rock solid and unwavering" support for Israel may be changing.

 

In the wake of an Oct. 7 Hamas raid, President Joe Biden vowed that his administration's support for Israel would be "rock solid and unwavering" but has since softened his position and is now calling for a humanitarian "pause" in the ongoing conflict.

The terrorist raid saw Hamas forces storm out of the Gaza Strip, seize Israeli border towns, take roughly 200 hostages, and inflict more than 1,000 civilian casualties. Its sheer scope caught the Israel Defense Forces flat-footed and Jerusalem has since mounted strikes on Gaza, which houses a network of tunnels that serve as operation bases for Hamas among the civilian population. In the aftermath of Hamas' attack, Biden spoke with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and expressed the United States' support for Israel.

Biden backs Netanyahu

"When I spoke to Prime Minister Netanyahu this morning, I told him the United States stands with the people of Israel in the face of these terrorist assaults. Israel has the right to defend itself and its people. Full stop. There is never a justification for terrorist attacks. And my administration’s support for Israel’s security is rock solid and unwavering," he said on October 4.

To that end, President Joe Biden has asked Congress to approve a $106 billion security funding package, including $14.3 billion for Israel and $61 billion for Ukraine. House Republicans have attempted to push through an Israel-only aid bill, though Biden has vowed to veto any measure that does not pair support for both nations.

The hostilities meanwhile, have persisted throughout the subsequent month and have threatened to spill over into neighboring nations. Cross-border exchanges have already occurred between Israel and its northern neighbors, Lebanon, Yemen and Syria. Moreover, anti-Israel riots have erupted in nearby Islamic nations, with the most notable occurring in Jordan and Turkey.

Biden visited Israel in mid-October in a diplomatic mission that appeared to be the high-mark of the administration's support for Israeli operations. At the time, Israel was preparing for a ground invasion of the Gaza Strip. Biden, shortly prior to his arrival, had suggested that an Israeli occupation of Gaza "would be a mistake."

Internal dissent goes public

Amid Biden's visit, cracks began to emerge in the administration's thus-far-stalwart support. One senior State Department official publicly resigned over the administration's handling of the Israel-Hamas conflict.

"I believe to the core of my soul that the response Israel is taking, and with it the American support both for that response, and for the status quo of the occupation, will only lead to more and deeper suffering for both the Israeli and the Palestinian people – and is not in the long term American interest," Josh Paul, the former Director of Congressional & Public Affairs for the department's Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, said in his public goodbye letter.

The following day, reports emerged of a "mutiny" within the State Department over Biden's support for Israel as personnel began preparing a "dissent cable" to protest the administration's policy.

The narrative shifts

Roughly a week later, reports broke that the Biden administration was private urging Israel not to outright invade Gaza but to pursue more limited strikes against Hamas. 

"They have clearly shifted from an initial 'We have your back; we’ll do whatever you want' to now 'You really need to rethink your strategy.' And they’re doing it in a careful way," an unnamed source told the Washington Post in late October. The ostensible aim of limiting the campaign was to minimize civilian casualties and contain international backlash to an Israeli counteroperation. Israeli troops have since entered Gaza and pursued engagements with Hamas forces. 

Biden's transition from stalwart Israel-backer to voice of caution culminated this week with his call for a "pause" in the fighting to allow for the rescue or return of hostages.

"I think we need a pause," he said. "A pause means give time to get the prisoners out."

Netanyahu has since rejected the prospect of a "ceasefire" between Israel and Hamas unless the group releases its hostages first.

"Israel refuses a temporary ceasefire that does not include the return of our hostages," he said this week, putting the pair in apparent conflict.

Islamic-American outrage gets louder

The same day he called for a pause, Biden announced a national strategy to combat Islamophobia, amid mounting antisemitic threats nationwide and a litany of scandals involving elite academic institutions and their alleged complicity as a safe haven for anti-Jewish sentiment. Biden's discernible pivot in rhetoric amid the conflict and the clear dissonance between his statements and those of Netanyahu, may stem from intense Muslim-American backlash to his administration's stance.

The White House has remained silent upon the issue of several of his administration's officials pro-Palestinian social media postings. 

While far-left members of Congress, most notably Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., who is of Palestinian background, have openly expressed support for the Palestinian people and called for a ceasefire, public criticism of Biden from Arab-American and Islamic voices has escalated considerably in recent weeks. Tlaib accused President Joe Biden of supporting "the genocide of the Palestinian people," in a video posted on X last week.

The National Muslim Democratic Council, in late October, issued a pointed warning to Biden, asserting that if he did not secure a ceasefire by Tuesday, Nov. 7, the group would actively work against his candidacy in 2024.

"It has become evident that our voices are being ignored, but our votes will not be. Simply put, as Gaza turns red, so could crucial battleground states," the group said. "Your administration's unconditional support, encompassing funding and armaments, has played a significant role in perpetuating the violence that is causing civilian casualties and has eroded trust in voters who previously put their faith in you."

The polling data is sobering

The NMDC's threat's appear to be based in tangible public opinion changes. Nationwide, Muslims make up roughly 1.3% of the population and a survey published this week by the Arab American Institute revealed a marked decline in support for Biden among that constituency.

"The precipitous drop in Arab American support for the president was unprecedented in our 27 years of polling this community. It shows the importance of the Palestinian issue and deep disappointment with the failure of the administration to address it," AAI President James Zogby said, according to the Wall Street Journal.

Support for Biden's reelection bid among Arab Americans dropped from 59% in 2020 to a mere 17% this month. His approval rating moreover, went from 74% in 2020 to 29% now. In addition, The Guardian (UK) has noted that online, many progressives seethed, accusing Biden of further enabling violence against Palestinians and predicting that he would pay an electoral price next year with Muslim and Arab American voters, who have emerged as an important Democratic constituency in recent elections.

Arab frustrations with Biden have had a considerable impact on their view of his party moreover. The AAI noted that their October survey marked the "first time in our 26 years of polling Arab American voters in which a majority did not claim to prefer the Democratic Party."

Stunningly, a plurality of those surveyed, 32%, indicated they identified as Republicans. Just 23% said they were Democrats, with 31% identified as independents, 12% were unsure, and 2% backed another party. Compounding that development is former Donald Trump's attracting 40% support to Biden's 17.4% in a hypothetical matchup. Trump received 35% support among the blocked in 2020 to Biden's 59%.

A further 13.7% backed Robert F. Kennedy Jr., 3.8% chose Cornel West, and 25.1% were undecided.


Ben Whedon is an editor and reporter for Just the News. Follow him on X, formerly Twitter.

Source: https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/four-weeks-biden-wants-pause-fighting-after-vowing-unwavering-support-israel

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

IDF uncovers Hamas weapons cache, terror lab inside Gaza - Jerusalem Post Staff

 

​ by Jerusalem Post Staff

The IDF, which struck over 2,500 targets in Gaza in the past week as per Israeli media, operated in the vicinity of Beit Hanoun, in the northern Strip.

 

The IDF continued its counter-invasion of the Gaza Strip on Sunday, uncovering an arsenal of Hamas weaponry including armed drones and RPGs (rocket-propelled grenades) as Operation Swords of Iron entered its 30th day.

The IDF, which struck over 2,500 targets in Gaza in the past week as per Israeli media, operated in the vicinity of Beit Hanoun, in the northern Strip.

In a raid of a Gaza home conducted by the Israeli military's 551st Brigade, Israeli forces discovered a cache of weapons including Kalashnikov rifles, grenades, explosive devices, armed drones, and RPGs.

In addition, the cache included protective equipment and ammunition, hidden in the home for use by Hamas terrorists in continued fighting against Israeli soldiers inside the Strip.

The IDF said that some of the weaponry was destroyed while the rest was brought back into Israel for research purposes.

 A cache of weaponry uncovered by the IDF in northern Gaza on November 5, 2023 (credit: IDF SPOKESPERSON'S UNIT)
A cache of weaponry uncovered by the IDF in northern Gaza on November 5, 2023 (credit: IDF SPOKESPERSON'S UNIT)

Additionally, the forces uncovered and destroyed a lab used for manufacturing explosives, the military said.

Israel, Hezbollah resume fighting in Lebanon

Earlier on Sunday, one person was wounded to an unknown degree after an anti-tank missile fired from Lebanon hit a vehicle near the Shushan military outpost in northern Israel, adjacent to Kibbutz Yiftach, according to Israeli reports.

The IDF confirmed the rocket launch and responded with artillery fire toward Lebanon. 

Hezbollah announced on Sunday that 61 of its terrorists have been killed in fighting with Israel since war broke out between Israel and Hamas on October 7. 



Jerusalem Post Staff

Source: https://www.jpost.com/arab-israeli-conflict/gaza-news/article-771811

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

War Isn't What It Used to Be - Amir Taheri

 

​ by Amir Taheri

What Israel wanted from Hamas was for it not to launch an attack, something that Hamas could have easily offered. But what Hamas wanted, the elimination of Israel as a nation-state, was and remains impossible for Israel to contemplate let alone deliver.

 

  • [T]his strange war [Russia's invasion of Ukraine] is morphing into a pointless struggle that ignores the first rule of war, which is the setting of a final objective, in other words, a clear-cut victory.

  • Wars do not end with one protagonist declaring victory; they end when one protagonist admits defeat. In our postmodern era, however, a loser is not always allowed to accept his loss.

  • What Israel wanted from Hamas was for it not to launch an attack, something that Hamas could have easily offered. But what Hamas wanted, the elimination of Israel as a nation-state, was and remains impossible for Israel to contemplate let alone deliver.

  • Despite Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's rhetorical outbursts, the current struggle, presented as a war, may end up as a trompe l'oeil version of war. Even if possible, a return to the status quo that was shattered by the Hamas attack is undesirable, if only because of its conceptual fragility. A new status quo based on full reoccupation of the enclave is equally undesirable because, tested for decades, it provided no security for Israel.

(Image source: iStock)

Throughout history, at least until our post-modernist times, war was regarded as the highest of human pursuits, one that enlisted other pursuits such as politics, industry and even literature in its service. Aristotle gave war a thumbs-up because it was "the key to peace." Neo-Platonics regarded war as the ultimate organizer and guardian of hierarchies within the polis (city-state) and among various states.

Over time, however, war, like some other human pursuits, has lost part of what the French would call its "authenticity", leaving us with ersatz wars motivated by folie de grandeur, racial and religious hatred, and mercenary interests.

The old war was regarded as a continuation of politics by other means. In other words, it was resorted to when all other means including politics, diplomacy, trade and propaganda had failed to preserve the hierarchy needed to sustain a stable status quo.

Nowadays, however, war is often used as the opening gambit in many confrontations with those who start it indicating their unwillingness to stay the course. This leads to a sort of Dutch auction in which, instead of bidding above the price quoted, the bidder offers a lower figure.

Russia's war against Ukraine is one example.

Russian President Vladimir Putin launched the war by stating its goal to be "the demilitarization and denazification of Ukraine."

When it became clear that the stated goal was too ambitious, he reduced it to annexing certain chunks of Ukrainian territory plus Crimea.

Last month, Putin bid even lower by saying all he was interested in was protecting the ethnic Russian communities in the areas he already holds. Interestingly, Putin's Dutch auction attracted little attention, if only because Ukraine's supporters now had their own higher goal of cutting Russia down to size. How long will they stay the course before they, too, go for a Dutch auction remains to be seen.

As a result, this strange war is morphing into a pointless struggle that ignores the first rule of war, which is the setting of a final objective, in other words, a clear-cut victory.

Wars do not end with one protagonist declaring victory; they end when one protagonist admits defeat. In our postmodern era, however, a loser is not always allowed to accept his loss.

Israel fought several wars with Arab states and, in classical terms, emerged as victor. But then what is called "the international community" intervened to declare a draw and pass resolutions that put winner and loser on equal footing with an invitation to negotiate a peace accord.

In Vietnam, after the Tet Offensive, it was clear that the US had achieved complete military victory.

But, there, too Washington was forced to not claim victory but to give in to domestic and international opinion and hand over the country to the losing side.

Sometimes, the winner falls victim to hubris or missionary dreams. In both Afghanistan and Iraq, the US won the war against its stated enemies but was drawn into the nation-building trap that diluted the initial victory beyond recognition.

In both instances, a case could be made for using war as a means of removing hurdles to democratization. But it was naΓ―ve to believe that democracy could be built by war. What Afghans and Iraqis did after hurdles to democracy had been removed had to be left to them; they did what the most active, not say violent, elements among them decided to do.

Over time, all wars acquire a global aspect and, in a sense, could be regarded as world wars. The current war between Israel and Hamas has seen demonstrations and counter-demonstrations in more than 60 countries, and divided members of the United Nations into pro-Israel or pro-Hamas camps.

Always an important factor in waging war, propaganda has assumed a role never imagined before. What is called "information war" is now able to transform the aggressor into the victim and vice versa. The difference between what adversaries should and could do or not do is effaced.

For example, the fact that had Hamas not attacked Israel there would have been no war, if only because Israel had no interest in invading Gaza, from which then Prime Minister Ariel Sharon had evacuated in 2005.

What Israel wanted from Hamas was for it not to launch an attack, something that Hamas could have easily offered. But what Hamas wanted, the elimination of Israel as a nation-state, was and remains impossible for Israel to contemplate let alone deliver.

Despite Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's rhetorical outbursts, the current struggle, presented as a war, may end up as a trompe l'oeil version of war. Even if possible, a return to the status quo that was shattered by the Hamas attack is undesirable, if only because of its conceptual fragility. A new status quo based on full reoccupation of the enclave is equally undesirable because, tested for decades, it provided no security for Israel.

Israel would need to review other elements in the previous status quo. The ultra-technological Gaza fence has proved to be as fragile as Troy's fortifications though they had been built by Poseidon himself.

Hours after the attack, Netanyahu, impacted by the heat of the moment, declared the elimination of Hamas as the war objective. Three weeks later, he must have had time to realize that what matters beyond the physical elimination of Hamas is to build a new status quo that could turn Gaza from a base for attack on Israel into a glacis protecting it.

That means finding Palestinian partners who, while not sharing Hamas's unrealistic "wipe Israel off the map" narrative, enjoy a modicum of credibility among Gazans.

We have little information about what Gazans really think. But there is anecdotal evidence as well as some direct information, albeit limited, showing that Hamas ruled Gaza more through oppression, propaganda and corruption than genuine popular appeal.

Even if they share the dream of seeing Israel disappear, many Gazans might have realized that Hamas has failed to deliver and, even worse, shattered the living-and-half-living life that the enclave had built since Israeli occupation ended in 2005.

Unless Israel finds a way to translate its military victory, if such is the outcome, into a new status quo that makes enduring peace possible, it would look like one who wins a heap of chips in a casino only to find out he cannot cash them in at the counter.

This article originally appeared in Asharq Al-Awsat


Amir Taheri was the executive editor-in-chief of the daily Kayhan in Iran from 1972 to 1979. He has worked at or written for innumerable publications, published eleven books, and has been a columnist for Asharq Al-Awsat since 1987. He is the Chairman of Gatestone Europe.

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/20121/war-isnt-what-it-used-to-be

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Higher Ed: Now it’s Just Loco - Clarice Feldman

 

​ by Clarice Feldman

It took decades for this cancer to infect our colleges and universities. It will take time to eradicate it.

 

Decades ago, higher education was held to a standard of legal responsibility for the welfare of its students. The Latin term in loco parentis (in place of parents) gave them the right and duty to act as parents would. In recent decades, a better description of the how they manage their responsibilities to all students in their care is just plain loco.

David Burge explains:

@iowahawkblog

The idea that virulent antisemitism on campus is some kind of shocking unforeseen phenomenon that suddenly appeared out of nowhere in October 2023 is f***ing willful blindness. Every "elite" university in the US has spent 40 years creating sinecures and chairs and entire departments for Jew-hate-peddling lunatics, and for the last 20 years panhandled donations from every lunatic oil sheikhdom to pay for them.

So, college presidents and deans can spare me the shock when some of their edgy pity-hire faculty members chant support for Hamas into a bullhorn. You dumb f***ers knew full well what they were all about when you hired them in the first place, it was all there in their curriculum….

Hamas filmed and published with glee many of its barbarous atrocities in Israel. Unlike the Nazis, who tried to hide the worst of it. Dwight David Eisenhower, then commander of the European Theater of Operations, knew there would be Holocaust deniers and made neighboring German civilians join the press in touring concentration camps so that they and the world would have a hard time doing that. Today, there can be no question of what Hamas did: We have the audio of their phone calls and the videos they produced. After the war, Eisenhower was the president of Columbia University. Today, he’d be appalled to be connected with it in any way.

The media has downplayed much of the horrific barbarism, and this may be hard to hear, but here are just a few examples. In one family, a first responder reported the husband was shot, the baby was placed in a burning hot oven, and the wife, to the screams of her dying child, was gang-raped and then killed. Secretary of State Antony Blinken offers another:

"The father's eye gouged out, the mother's breast cut off, the girl's foot amputated, the boy's fingers cut off before they were executed, and then their executioners sat down and had a meal. That is what this society is dealing with."

In recent years higher ed has been a place where free speech was muzzled with lunatic claims of misgendering, misappropriation and such. This conduct now makes hash of the bull hockey.

Professor David Bernstein nails the hypocrisy: 

@ProfDBernstein

It was all stuff and nonsense, wasn’t it? All that talk of “hate speech” and “accountability culture” and “systemic oppression” and the need to ensure that everyone in the community feels “safe” at all times? It was all guff, flotsam, baloney. About 15 minutes passed between the news of the atrocities committed by Hamas and the crumpling of the progressive creed. Rarely has jetsam looked so vile. Pick, at random, a fashionable idea about the ideal limits of free expression, and you’ll observe that it has collapsed ignominiously into the dust. The prohibition on “tone policing”? Gone. The injunction to “believe all women”? Evaporated. The insistence that “silence is violence,” that “neutrality is complicity,” or that institutions are thus obliged to speak out about any injustice that they might see? Defunct. Obsolete. Kaput. In the annals of bad human ideas, has an ideology ever been as swiftly hollowed out as was this one? 

There are more than enough examples of the Loco in higher education today, but here are some, unfortunately not inclusive:

  • A professor at Harvard’s Kennedy School was found after an internal investigation to have engaged in anti-Jewish and anti-Israeli discrimination. No personnel action was taken and one Harvard publication hailed him as a “civil rights hero.” 
  • At the University of Pennsylvania President Liz Magill refused an effort to move off campus a festival called “Palestine Writes.” One of the featured panelists posts on X under the name Rafaat in Gaza. 

In response to the baby burned to death in his family’s oven, Rafaat Alareer posts “with or without baking powder.”

He’s a Gaza professor who was hailed by the New York Times as a “bridge builder” two years ago, a man so vile, Burge remarks that Alareer was “auditioning for humor columnist for Der Sturmer.” The paper has now admitted it was taken in by him.

  • UC San Diego’s ethnic studies department demanded “an end to genocide in Gaza” and cancelled a day of classes to conduct a general strike in support of Hamas. 
  • Yale’s Daily News editor, a major in “women’s, gender and sexuality studies” issued a “correction” to an article on the atrocities by Sahar Tartak, a correction which ignoring all evidence, said that the claims that Hamas raped women and beheaded men were “unsubstantiated” and was finally forced to correct the correction albeit still disingenuously. 
  • At Brandeis, a university founded by Jews after the Holocaust, the student government, padded with radicals, voted down a resolution to condemn Hamas.
  • At Stanford students wrote “Come chat about how Jewish babies should be burned alive.”
  • At Georgetown University (a big if not the biggest recipient of Qatar funds) Aneesa Johnson, who has a long history of anti-Semitic and anti-American conduct, was hired by the School of Foreign Service to be the "primary point of contact" for master's students on "everything academic," and only after public exposure was she placed on administrative leave.
  • At the University of Minnesota posters of kidnapped Israelis were repeatedly vandalized, and “posters too obscene to share …were plastered around campus, Students at Hillel there say they are struggling.”  
  • At Rutgers Professor Noura Erakat claims Israel is thirsty for Palestinian blood.
  • At Harvard, some students went to Palestine and returned to campus to endorse Palestine and harass Jewish students.

One of the founders of GS4P, Elon Tettey-Temalko, a graduate student at Harvard Divinity School was filmed this week allegedly assaulting an Israeli Harvard Business School student who was filming a pro-Palestinian demonstration. 

Tettey-Temalko is under investigation by campus police and the FBI, according to a report in the Washington Free Beacon. Neither Harvard nor Tettey-Temalko returned The Post’s requests for comment Friday. Tettey-Temalko is also a proctor, a staff member who advises undergraduates and lives in their dorm.

A Harvard Law Review editor was also among those harassing and assaulting a Jewish student.

According to the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), antisemitic incidents “more than doubled in May 2021 compared to the same time period in 2020.

Cornell President, Martha Pollack sent out a letter in which she noted the “alarming national rise in anti-Semitic hate crimes… amid ongoing tensions in the Middle East” and appealed for “rigorous discourse and debate, devoid of personal invective and attacks.”

Cornell SJP’s [Students for Justice in Palestine] response was to trivialize this increase in anti-Semitism and condemn President Pollack for her statement.

In response to President Pollack’s letter, the group rejected the university president’s call for “rigorous discourse and debate.” Instead, they promoted “the duty to resist colonial violence.” The chapter added, “In conclusion: Our expectations for you were low but Holy F#%k.”

Cornell SJP then called on their followers to “send an email to administration [sic] in regards to their complete dismissal of the ethnic cleansing and apartheid of Palestinians.” 

In an Instagram post, Cornell SJP attached a link to an email condemning President Pollack’s letter. It was signed by Cornell professors, students and student groups.

One Cornell student was charged by the FBI after issuing death threats to Jewish students.

  • At Cooper Union Jewish students took shelter in a locked library against a threatening mob.
  • At Columbia:

Jewish students at Columbia University facing growing antisemitism on campus say they are feel unsafe and abandoned by campus administrators and some of their faculty and classmates, as tensions from the war between Israel and Hamas spill over onto college campuses.

Their concerns are echoed by many students across other New York colleges, including Cornell University and Cooper Union, who have reported feeling threatened on campus or isolated in their condemnation of Hamas’ terror attacks on civilians.

“This is a failure of the university to create a setting where students see each other as human,” said Yoni Kurtz, 21, a junior at Columbia studying history.

Kurtz and dozens of his Jewish classmates at Columbia have been stunned by a series of incidents, including an assault on campus being charged as a hate crime and a swastika found Friday in a school bathroom. They gathered Monday to say the university’s official response to these reports and others has been inadequate.

“We got to this point because the Columbia administration by their inaction has enabled antisemitic rhetoric to spread,” said Eli Shmidman, who is in his second year at Columbia Law School. Shmidman reported a student who approached him in a main thoroughfare of Jerome Greene Hall in the middle of the afternoon and said “f*ck the Jews.” 

  • At Berkeley, Dean of the UC Berkeley School of Law Erwin Chemerinsky, a leftist whose record I’m sorry to say is not itself beyond reproach, says “Nothing prepared me for the antisemitism on college campuses.”
  • Oberlin, which now seems to exist only to expend its endowment on litigation fees, fines, and judgements for outrageous behavior while its Board of Trustees (like those at all these schools) looks away and fails to act on the administration, faces a Title VI investigation for tolerating anti-Semitism and hiring Mohammad Jafar Mhallati (Professor of peace) who called for the elimination of Israel and the death of Salman Rushdie. 

Apart from the question of who funds and endorses this outpouring of hate, the best explanation is again David Burge’s:

@iowahawkblog

The intellectual manifest for this (to the degree it even exists) is People With Perceived Power = Bad and People Lacking Perceived Power = Good, and any that all People Lacking Perceived Power must sympathize and unite with all other People Lacking Perceived Power, regardless of how many children they behead.

Truth told, not *regardless* of how many children they behead, but *because* of how many children they behead. Because beheading children only underscores how desperately their plight, and the righteousness of their fight against the evil People With Perceived Power. 

The anguish among Jews who so respected academia and supported it is real.

We are not the ones ripping down missing posters or celebrating deranged murderers, but our uneasy silence has allowed those people to monopolize our public squares until we no longer have space to mourn our dead. The past three weeks are what happens when we stay quiet and let others set the alarming temperature of the air in the elite institutions we inhabit. Because to take a stand would make it harder to enter certain rooms. It would interfere with the work -- the increasingly difficult, uncomfortable, queasy-making, indeed disfiguring work -- of belonging.

I see clearly now who occupies those rooms -- the moral arbiters of our generation, with their “pristine” ethical codes riddled with hypocrisy, their jargon-bloated excuses for antisemitic hate, their hollow pontification about empathy and justice delivered in the same breath with which they rationalize the murder and torture of people who might be my brothers, sisters, parents, grandparents, cousins, or friends. I don’t want to contort myself to be in those rooms anymore. Do you?

It’s time those outfits that rank colleges and universities (Forbes, US News, USA Today), include a measurement of safety and civility for all students. Other measures in response to this rot are worth consideration and support.

There’s Title VI and other legislation that would apply. The Departments of Education and Justice should be pressed to investigate.

Can the radicals who have rotted out what until a few years ago was a country with an outstanding higher education record, be removed? Steve Hayward says it’s unlikely.  

He looks to the example of Ward Churchill, who like Elizabeth Warren faked his way into a professorship by lying about his ethnicity.

Though he didn’t have a PhD or any major publications, the department granted Churchill tenure in an accelerated process, and in due course he became department chair. 

It is clear the reason for his surprising advancement was ideological and not academic merit.

How often is this ideological process duplicated today? Quite widely. 

Here’s a current job ad from Georgetown: “The Department of Economics seeks to hire a tenure-track assistant professor who aligns with the University’s social justice objectives by conducting outstanding research and teaching in the areas of race, gender, inequality, and social justice economics.” 

In other words, it wants an ideological leftist.

Ohio State’s English Department is seeking a scholar who will work on “settler colonialism, decolonization, genocide, Indigenous epistemologies, sovereignty, social movements and activism…”

Students hoping for lively readings of Shakespeare or Jane Austen will want to enroll elsewhere.

Not to be left out, Duke University’s literature program is looking for a professor who will focus on “political theory, decoloniality and post-colonial theory” and “critical race and ethnic studies.”

Or consider elite Williams College, whose German department wants an assistant professor “committed to inclusive and anti-racist pedagogy,” especially in the areas of “migration, race and anti-racism, post- and decolonial approaches.”

These are just a few of the current university job ads in the humanities and social sciences; I have enough to fill a file cabinet. 

The irony of the Williams German department seeking a plainly ideological hire is that these centers of virulent antisemitism would have been at home in the pro-Nazi German universities of the 1930s.

University presidents and especially provosts, who are supposed to be the quality-control officers of higher education, could put a stop to this by exercising their authority to veto such ads or disapprove tenure and advancement of politicized professors. 

The invertebrates who serve as college presidents will do nothing meaningful beyond appointing a task force to look into the issue, as Harvard has done to cover its shame.[snip]

Our universities are so far gone and the number of professors deserving of dismissal so large that every school will shrink in terror from the controversies any housecleaning will cause 

Tongue in cheek, he suggests on X “we should dust off the de-Nazification manuals from 1945 and update them for use on college campuses in America.”

Of course, you can pressure Boards of Trustees to fulfill their fiduciary and moral obligations to clean up these outrages and put an end to them. You can fight to change tenure. You can (especially at state colleges with public funding) demand the end to DEI departments which foster this and the elimination of the made-up studies programs both of which are designed to employ pity hires -- that is, people with no accepted academic credentials -- to pad their diversity quotas, and return to solid scholarship. 

Apart from government action and pressure on trustees, those few sane deans left could follow George Q. Daley of Harvard’s medical school and condemn such rotten behavior. Major law firms have offered to represent Jewish students at universities which have allowed this harassment. Other firms have withdrawn employment offers and threaten to never hire students involved in anti-Semitic campus attacks. A number of major donors have said they will no longer contribute to schools which tolerate this, Steve Eisman, for example, has said he no longer -- “ever” -- wants his name associated with the University of Pennsylvania. And similar big donors to the school are withdrawing patronage over its support for Hamas and anti-Semitism. We can endorse legislation that limits foreign donations to these schools and provides some real oversight into the use to which they are put. Whether a big or small donor, you can keep your wallets shut when the begging letters come, and fight to end federal and state contributions to these cesspools. It might be time, even, to raise much higher taxes on the big endowments of the Ivies which have abandoned their educational responsibilities, choosing instead to operate like hedge funds.

Work together to expunge this rot. It took decades for this cancer to infect our colleges and universities. It will take time to eradicate it, but do not give up. React, write, speak, demand federal and state action, sue the dickens out of them, hire no student who engages in this. Draw down through taxes the huge endowments by which they have insulated themselves from all decency. They made the rules of cancel culture and it’s time we used the rules they made.


Clarice Feldman

Source: https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2023/11/higher_ed_now_its_just_loco.html

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

IDF intel. starts to open up on October 7 failure - analysis - Yonah Jeremy Bob

 

​ by Yonah Jeremy Bob

How could blind spots on tunnels impact post-war outcome?

 

IDF soldiers engage in operational activities in relation to Israel-Gaza violence.  (photo credit: IDF SPOKESPERSON'S UNIT)
IDF soldiers engage in operational activities in relation to Israel-Gaza violence.
(photo credit: IDF SPOKESPERSON'S UNIT)

The full scale and scope of the Israeli intelligence and defense establishment on October 7 will likely only become clear several months or more down the road when evidence starts being brought before an expected commission of inquiry.

But after weeks of waiting, The Jerusalem Post has already learned about some pieces of the intelligence failure from IDF intelligence officials, both from what they have said and what they have not said.

One of the primary failures of Israeli intelligence was extremely high confidence that Hamas was deterred from starting any war with Israel in the foreseeable future.

Several pieces of information were used to prove this deterrence, including the fact that Hamas had stayed out of multiple fights between Islamic Jihad of Gaza and Israel.

It was costly for its reputation within Gaza that Hamas stayed out of these fights, something which seemed to prove even more that the terror group was deterred from starting a new conflict.

 OFFICERS LOOK at a map of the Middle East. (credit: IDF SPOKESPERSON'S UNIT)
OFFICERS LOOK at a map of the Middle East. (credit: IDF SPOKESPERSON'S UNIT)

What happened to the tunnels?

But a fundamental premise in believing that Hamas was deterred was also the exaggerated impact that the IDF thought its May 2021 attacks had on the Gaza-based terrorist group during that 11-day conflict.

One of the IDF’s highlights in that conflict was its claim to have destroyed most or at least a very substantial portion of Hamas’s underground tunnel network (also called “the Metro”), such that it could take many years to reconstitute.

As of October of this year, it has turned out that the IDF either did not damage the Hamas Metro in May 2021 nearly as badly as it thought, or that the military greatly underestimated Hamas’s capacity for and speed of repairing its tunnel network.

The tunnel network was only one of many pieces of the October 7 invasion, and likely not even a central one.

But the fact that the IDF so greatly misjudged how badly it had set back Hamas’s tunnel network goes to the heart of the Israeli intelligence community’s overall misjudgment about how deterred Hamas was as it came out of the May 2021 conflict.

PUT SIMPLY, Hamas or any similar actor, is more likely to fear fighting another conflict against an adversary who greatly damaged it, but is much less likely to fear fighting another one with that same adversary if the “losses” in the prior conflict were minor.

Since the tunnel losses to Hamas were far less significant than the IDF thought, Israel completely misunderstood not only the state of play on October 7, but the aggressor's entire perspective dating back to the end of the May 2021 conflict.

This Israeli misjudgment regarding the tunnels does not only have historic applications to October 7 and before, but also impacts the current conflict and going forward.

When IDF intelligence officials discuss how confident they are about their ability to thoroughly destroy and flush out the vast majority of Hamas’s forces from their tunnel hiding places, they apparently may once again be overestimating their understanding of the challenge.

IDF intelligence feels so omnipresent above ground and has improved so much in their ability to identify some tunnel entrances, that they may still be significantly overestimating their capacity to identify, fight, and kill Hamas operatives below ground.

When IDF intelligence officials are confronted with this premise, they say they have already adjusted to whatever they might have missed in May 2021, but given that so much of intelligence now is based on drones, aircraft, and other above-ground platforms, their renewed confidence on an issue they have repeatedly misjudged (the first big misjudgment was the 2014 Gaza War) is questionable.

To be clear, the IDF has radically progressed in its ability to detect and destroy tunnels a few years after the 2014 Gaza War – and does seem to have learned new tricks to handle tunnels even since May 2021. There seem to be at least dozens of victories in flushing out Hamas forces from tunnels in the last 10 days of the invasion. But Hamas has also adjusted, and generally appears to have such vast resources for digging new tunnels, that the IDF may still lag behind.

Combine Hamas’s tunnel resourcefulness with how little the IDF knows about which and what quantity of Hamas terrorists have faded into the civilian population in the North or the South (with no intention of fighting until some much later guerilla warfare stage), and IDF intelligence may make serious future mis-judgments about how many Hamas forces remain to fight.

This could impact not only how large an insurgency the IDF faces after it “wins” over Hamas in the “main” war, but also how effective any third party will be in controlling Gaza in the face of a Hamas-attempted resurgence further down the road.


Yonah Jeremy Bob

Source: https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-771806

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter