Sunday, December 1, 2024

Trump nominates Kash Patel for FBI director - Joseph Weber

 

by Joseph Weber

Patel is among President-elect Donald Trump's most ardent supporters.

 

Kash Patel, Minden, Nev., Oct. 8, 2022
Kash Patel, Minden, Nev., Oct. 8, 2022
Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

President-elect Donald Trump announced Saturday night that he has picked Kash Patel to serve as FBI director.

“I am proud to announce that Kashyap “Kash” Patel will serve as the next Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation,” Trump posted on Truth Social, about the nomination of one is most loyal supproters. “Kash is a brilliant lawyer, investigator, and ‘America First’ fighter who has spent his career exposing corruption, defending Justice, and protecting the American People.”

The 44-year-old Patel is an attorney with experience in counterterrorism, intelligence and national security. His name surfaced a finalist for the nomination just days after Trump's Nov. 5 presidential victory.


Joseph Weber

Source: https://justthenews.com/government/white-house/trump-nominates-kash-patel-fbi-director

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Trump White House affords chance to confront Lebanese terror bank - David Isaac

 

by David Isaac

The Middle East & Africa Bank (MEAB) has evaded sanctions despite evidence it's a major financing arm of Hezbollah.

 

President-elect Donald Trump’s electoral victory offers a golden opportunity to shut down a Lebanese bank, one critical to Iran and Hezbollah, that has so far escaped sanctions even as it serves as one of the main conduits of terror financing, observers tell JNS.

While numerous Lebanese banks and individuals have been slapped with sanctions by the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), the Middle East & Africa Bank (MEAB), the 15th largest by deposits in Lebanon, has fallen through the cracks.

 

In 2019, MEAB bank was named as a defendant in a case, still ongoing, in the U.S. District Court of the Eastern District of New York, brought by American citizens and the families of American citizens who were killed or injured in Iraq between 2004 and 2011 in attacks orchestrated by Hezbollah in coordination with other terrorist groups.

In 2006, MEAB Bank’s offices were targeted by Israeli fighter jets after a fundraising appeal aired on Hezbollah’s Al-Manar television station asking that donations for the terrorist group be sent to a specific account at the bank.

Haig Melkessetian, a former intelligence operative for the U.S. Defense and State departments, has investigated MEAB extensively. He told JNS that the reason MEAB has evaded sanctions is that it has friends in high places.

In January 2015, during the Iran nuclear talks, Mohammad Zarif, the Islamic Republic’s foreign minister at the time, asked then-U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry “to go easy on MEAB,” in other words, that it be kept off the OFAC sanctions list, Melkessetian said.

David Wurmser, a senior analyst at the Washington-based Center for Security Policy, who has researched the bank and the Shi’ite clan behind it, told JNS, “It’s very clear that the Iranians were out to preserve their core structures, and this bank really lies at the center of the global reach of Hezbollah, and through Hezbollah, the global reach of Iran.”

The Obama administration, which had already signaled it intended to sanction MEAB bank, couldn’t simply drop its plan entirely, Melkessetian said, so instead of sanctioning MEAB, the U.S. sanctioned its chairman, Kassem Hejeij.

The African connection

Kassem Hejeij bears responsibility for the August 2020 Beirut port explosion, according to the Global Fight Against Terror Funding (GFATF), a website dedicated to exposing individuals, institutions and states contributing to the spread of global terrorism.

The ammonium nitrate that exploded, causing 218 deaths and more than 7,000 injuries was supposed to go to a company in Mozambique, Fabrica de Explosivos de Moçambique, after it left the Republic of Georgia, where it had been produced.

Kassem used an African connection to offer the company $700,000 to pretend to be the official destination of the ammonium nitrate, and after that to shut down, GFATF reported. The company, in financial straits, agreed.

In June 2015, the U.S. labeled Kassem a Specially Designated Global Terrorist with direct links to Hezbollah.

“[Kassem] Hejeij has helped open bank accounts for Hezbollah in Lebanon and provided credit to Hezbollah procurement companies. Hejeij has also invested in infrastructure that Hezbollah uses in both Lebanon and Iraq,” the U.S. Treasury Department said, announcing its sanctions against him.

Hejeij had himself sanctioned, rather than his bank, making the best of a bad situation. He hired lobbyists in Washington to plead his case, leading to the agreement to shift the target of sanctions from the bank to himself. As part of the deal, he would step down as bank chairman in favor of his son Ali.

“The former chairman has no relationship whatsoever or ownership interest in MEAB,” claimed the bank in its June 15, 2015, announcement that Kassem was removing himself from his position as head of the bank.

“Kassem isn’t supposed to be involved with banking, but his office is in the bank. Across the hall from him is his son,” Melkessetian said. “Do you think the son is going to be more loyal to U.S. Treasury sanctions or to his father?”

According to a 2017 article in The Daily Caller, Hejeij told a Lebanese government source that “turning the bank over to Ali changes nothing because me and my son are one and he is following my orders.”

He also said that “he never has to worry about business, because of go-betweens connecting him with U.S. lawyers and lobbyists willing to represent Treasury sanctioned individuals.” (This is likely a reference to his brother, Mohsen Hejeij, who can operate freely in the U.S. and hired law firm Squire Patton Boggs and consulting firm Alvarez & Marsal to help keep MEAB bank off OFAC’s list.)

“I have the Americans in my pocket and I can buy Washington,” Kassem boasted, according to The Daily Caller report.

It’s impossible to talk about MEAB Bank without understanding the Hejeij clan that runs it. The GFATF website describes the clan as “one of the pillars of Hezbollah’s financial structure and operative mechanism.”

The clan is led by Kassem and his brother Mohsen. They operate business ventures in various countries with a network of “governors, bank managers, lawyers, accountants, police officers and organized crime members,” the website reported.

The opportunity to deal with that network may be at hand. The incoming U.S. administration brings a clear understanding of the danger of these “mafioso underworld” type networks, which enjoy illicit and political ties throughout Latin America and sub-Saharan Africa, Wurmser said.

The incoming administration also understands that the 2021 China–Iran Comprehensive Strategic Partnership agreement has opened these strategic terrorist networks to the Chinese. “It becomes a very dangerous struggle to shut these networks down because they also serve Chinese interests in sub-Saharan Africa, and particularly in Latin America,” Wurmser said.

The Hejeij clan

In a September 2020 paper for the Center for Security Policy, Wurmser took a deep dive into the workings of the Hejeij clan, concluding it owes its success to its connection to Hezbollah and Amal, a secularist Shi’ite Lebanese movement and ally of Hezbollah.

“Without lineage nor pedigree,” this undistinguished family tied its coattails to the rise of those new powers in Lebanese politics, he wrote, describing it as a creation “bootstrapped up from insignificant origins” by Hezbollah, Amal and Iran, “to become the new—and entirely beholden—elite of the Shi’ite community in Lebanon.”

The Hejeij clan would be nothing without Hezbollah and Iran and so it is “all-in” with the terrorist group as the clan’s survival depends on it, he wrote.

Hejeij family members often post on social media in support of Hezbollah and broadcast their attendance at Hezbollah meetings and events. “While we in the West might wonder why they tip their hand so, we must remember that their stature is entirely dependent within Lebanon at this point on being understood as an extension of the reigning Hezbollah power. So, they must flaunt their connection as loudly and widely as possible for validation,” Wurmser explained.

The clan members’ work on behalf of Hezbollah is what led it to establish the bank in the first place. Starting their own bank was their answer to the problem of maintaining an international business presence when reputable banks were reluctant to lend money or issue credit to a group on which hung a “thick cloud of suspicion,” Wurmser noted.

The problem of the Hejeij clan, and others like it, goes beyond terrorism financing. History shows that unless uprooted, such criminal networks become strategic assets that survive their patrons, in this case, Iran, he said.

To think that Shi’ite criminal networks such as the Hejeij clan wouldn’t survive the Islamic Republic’s demise is “pollyannish,” Wurmser wrote. “They will seek new masters, and China and [Turkish President Recep Tayyip] Erdoğan are eagerly awaiting them.”

Sectarian divides are no barrier. “The history of the Middle East shows that there’s a fluidity of identity that allows for transfer of bad behavior. They basically transfer networks from one global threat to another,” Wurmser told JNS.

“The Nazis developed extensive networks across the Middle East, which were absorbed wholesale into the KGB structure of networks in the whole region, which then were easily transferred and absorbed into the Islamist network that the Iranians employed,” he added.

“These terror networks, thus, are no longer just criminal problems. They are strategic assets and commodities with flexible talents used by adversarial powers for strategic objectives. And they are playing an increasingly important role in great power rivalries worldwide, not only in the Middle East,” Wurmser said.


David Isaac

Source: https://www.jns.org/trump-white-house-affords-chance-to-confront-lebanese-terror-bank/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

A-G to decide if Netanyahu is to be deemed unable to serve as PM during testimony - Bini Ashkenazi, Avraham Bloch

 

by Bini Ashkenazi, Avraham Bloch

At this point, Netanyahu has not sought private legal representation.

 

Illustrative photo of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Attorney General Gali Baharav Miara in front of the Knesset building. (photo credit: TASOS KATOPODIS/REUTERS/MARC ISRAEL SELLEM/THE JERUSALEM POST, YONATAN SINDEL/FLASH90)
Illustrative photo of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Attorney General Gali Baharav Miara in front of the Knesset building.
(photo credit: TASOS KATOPODIS/REUTERS/MARC ISRAEL SELLEM/THE JERUSALEM POST, YONATAN SINDEL/FLASH90)

Attorney-General Gali Baharav-Miara is expected to present her position to Israel's High Court on Sunday evening regarding whether Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is to be deemed unable to serve as PM during his testimony.

At this point, Netanyahu has not sought private legal representation.

If the two do not reach a mutual agreement on the matter, the prime minister is expected to request separate representation to present his position.

It is highly likely that, as part of preparing the response to the petition, the attorney general will ask the judges for an extension to submit her response. The attorneys who filed the petition are expected to oppose this request.

Options being considered

Netanyahu's office is examining the options available to him. Among them is the possibility that Netanyahu will temporarily step aside for a limited period during the hours of his testimony to allow him to focus solely on the testimony. During this time, Justice Minister Yariv Levin would serve as acting prime minister.

 Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu attends a state memorial ceremony for victims of terror, at Mount Herzl military cemetery in Jerusalem, May 13, 2024. (credit: Chaim Goldberg/Flash90)Enlrage image
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu attends a state memorial ceremony for victims of terror, at Mount Herzl military cemetery in Jerusalem, May 13, 2024. (credit: Chaim Goldberg/Flash90)
The government opposes Netanyahu stepping aside for the entire duration of his testimony. If his testimony extends for more than 100 days in total, the government would fall, and the Knesset would head to elections.

The only option currently being positively considered is for Netanyahu to step aside anew for a few hours each day of testimony—an approach that would not endanger the continuation of the government.


Bini Ashkenazi, Avraham Bloch

Source: https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news/article-831475

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Air Force intercepts ballistic missile from Yemen over central Israel - Jerusalem Post Staff

 

by Jerusalem Post Staff

A police spokesperson said that Israel Police is conducting scans to locate fallen remnants of the intercepted missile.

 

Sirens across central Israel following missile launch from Yemen, 1 December 2024 (photo credit: Tzofar)
Sirens across central Israel following missile launch from Yemen, 1 December 2024
(photo credit: Tzofar)

A ballistic missile was launched from Yemen, the IDF announced early Sunday morning, after sirens sounded in multiple areas across central Israel.

The IAF intercepted it prior to its crossing into Israeli territory.

A police spokesperson said that Israel Police was conducting scans in the city of Beit Shemesh and surrounding communities to locate fallen remnants of the intercepted missile.

Four people were injured on their way to protected areas in Rishon Lezion, Rehovot, Be'er Ya'akov, and Lod, Israel's emergency service Magen David Adon (MDA) said, adding that others were being treated for anxiety.  

The Houthis military spokesman, Yahya Sarea, responded to the missile launch, saying that the group will continue its attacks until "Israeli aggression on the Gaza Strip is halted, and the siege is lifted."

 Houthi military spokesman, Yahya Sarea, looks on during a rally to show support to Palestinians in the Gaza Strip and Lebanon's Hezbollah, in Sanaa, Yemen September 27, 2024. (credit: KHALED ABDULLAH/REUTERS)Enlrage image
Houthi military spokesman, Yahya Sarea, looks on during a rally to show support to Palestinians in the Gaza Strip and Lebanon's Hezbollah, in Sanaa, Yemen September 27, 2024. (credit: KHALED ABDULLAH/REUTERS)

Previous Houthi attacks

Yemen's Houthis have been responsible for several ballistic missile launches towards Israel, including one that struck Tel Aviv in September. 

The IDF has previously employed its "Arrow" system system to intercept Houthi missiles before reaching Israeli soil.


Jerusalem Post Staff

Source: https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news/article-831424

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Under Biden-Harris administration, federal DEI initiatives, spending exploded, report - Casey Harper

 

by Casey Harper

A report from the conservative-leaning policy advocacy group Do No Harm also concludes the Biden-Harris administration “infused DEI into the federal government” in 500 different ways.

 

Biden Harris
President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris.
Getty Images

(The Center Square) -

President-elect Donald Trump has promised to reduce government waste and employed successful entrepreneurs Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy to lead the charge.

So far, spending on federal Diversity, Equity and Inclusion policies are prime targets for Musk and Ramaswamy, and a recent report shows just how widespread federal DEI spending has become.

The report from the conservative-leaning policy advocacy group Do No Harm concludes the Biden-Harris administration “infused DEI into the federal government” in 500 different ways.

Those examples include federal agencies starting dozens of equity training programs, doling out federal contracts and jobs based on race and gender and teaching Americans more about their country’s racism – past and present.

The DEI explosion took off after Democratic President Joe Biden issued executive orders on his first day in office as well as another in June 2021. The first executive order “established that affirmatively advancing equity, civil rights, racial justice, and equal opportunity is the responsibility of the whole of our Government.”

The second order established “that it is the policy of my Administration to cultivate a workforce that draws from the full diversity of the Nation.”

Biden also issued other executive orders, including around gender and sexuality, to the same effect his first year in office. Those orders gave federal bureaucrats direct orders, not just permission, to embrace DEI policies across the board.

And Do No Harm’s report shows they did, citing 80 “Equity Action Plans” submitted by agencies that promised over 500 taxpayer-funded actions.

Some of the actions are seemingly mild, such as the U.S. Social Security Administration tracking more racial data, while others, such as a blog for the Treasury Department that lectures Americans on racial inequality, appear more extreme.

The federal government also began implementing training programs for many federal employees that critics say embrace racial ideology and call “woke."

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, for example, invested in training for employees to consider equity more in its regulatory decisions.

“Training will address how equity and environmental justice involves removing barriers underserved communities may face in the context of the Commission’s practices, processes, and policies,” FERC said in its Equity Action Plan. “Training also will address how, consistent with FERC’s mission and statutory duties, the Commission considers the impact of its actions on such communities. More specific trainings geared toward the responsibilities of different program offices and issue areas also may be identified or developed and offered.”

Other actions seem to favor some groups over others. Changing the “percentage” of benefits received necessarily requires giving contracts, grants, or other federal resources to certain groups, almost always at the expense of white Americans, even more often white men.

For example, the American Battle Monuments Commissions in its Equity Action Plan called for “expanding the percentage of U.S.-based contracted goods and services awarded to minority-owned, women-owned, and service disabled veteran-owned enterprises.”

In fact, the ABMC pledged to pay a worker for this sole purpose.

The Smithsonian Institution, the federal steward of America’s past, promised to begin promoting a historical framework that emphasizes American racism in the past and today.

The federal group pledged to “Address the historical roots and contemporary impacts of race and racism in the United States and globally through interdisciplinary scholarship, creative partnerships, dialogue, education, and engagement.”

The Center Square has reported on other examples of DEI policies and grants becoming the norm in recent years as well, though much of this kind of spending began before the Biden-Harris administration.

Those include:

Roughly $2.6 million in taxpayer dollars to train students to promote critical race theory. Millions to train school teachers in DEI ideology around race and gender. A portion of New York's $9 billion in federal COVID funding was spent training staff in ‘privilege’ and to recognize ‘equity warriors,’" among other related themes. $1.2 million for research find evidence that racism is the culprit for minorities struggling to sleep at night.

However, a recent report from the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research found the federal government awarded more than $1 billion in contracts last year to consulting firms – based on a search of contracts, grants and other programs that mentioned “diversity, equity, and inclusion.” 

Institute senior fellow Christopher Rufo's finding also showed a rapid increase in such spending from 2019, when the federal government spent only $27 million in contracts that mention diversity and inclusion.

“But after the death of George Floyd in 2020, the federal government and private contractors went all-in on DEI, seeking to implement the Biden administration’s ‘whole-of-government’ equity agenda,” Rufo writes in an article for the institute’s publication City Journal.


Casey Harper

Source: https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/federal-dei-spending-explodes-under-biden-harris-administration

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

What is the Administrative State? - Roger Kimball

 

by Roger Kimball

‘The administrative state’ is that quota of political power that covertly fills the vacuum left by the failure of the legislative branch to discharge its obligations.

 

 

Last week in this virtual space, I wrote that Donald Trump would make a renewed effort during his second term to dismantle “the administrative state.” As in his first term, he would employ various strategies to blunt the effects of the administrative apparatus that governs us. He would, for example, disperse some parts of the government outside the overwhelmingly left-progressive swamp of Washington, D.C.

As an aside, I should note that I regard the persistence of Washington as the seat of our government as a serious impediment to the goal of “deconstructing” the administrative state. “It has,” I wrote back in 2022, “long been obvious to candid observers that there is something deeply dysfunctional about that overwhelmingly Democratic, welfare-addicted city.”

It is a partisan sinkhole. Jefferson wanted the capital moved from New York to Washington in part to bring it closer to the South, but also to place it in a locality that was officially neutral. There is nothing neutral about Washington today. The city has some impressive architecture and urban vistas. They should be preserved and staffed as tourist attractions. But the reins of power should be relocated.

I doubt that will happen. Which means that the eternal vigilance that MAGA must maintain around its enemies will have to be redoubled. Trump attempting to govern from Washington will be like Ike trying to undertake the Normandy invasion with half his planners on loan from the German general staff.

Still, there are some symbolic gestures that he and his aides might consider. I have long suggested that the inauguration be held somewhere other than Washington, D.C. There is nothing in the Constitution that requires the inauguration be in Washington. LBJ, remember, was sworn in on Air Force One just a couple of hours after Kennedy was assassinated. When Warren Harding died, Calvin Coolidge was visiting the family homestead in Vermont. His father, a justice of the peace, administered the oath of office in the parlor. I think the next inauguration should be well away from the swamp of Washington. Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach is one venue that springs to mind, but I am sure there are other attractive spots. At a minimum, I hope the inauguration committee will consider having some of the parties elsewhere. A ball in Butler, PA, for example, would not only be celebratory but also serve as a useful reminder of how close Trump came to a fatal encounter with an assassin’s bullet.

But the trouble with “Washington”—I use scare quotes to indicate that we are dealing with spiritual as well as geographical dispensation—is not only its partisan nature. There is also its apparently unstoppably expansionist character. No matter which party is in power, the business of Washington is to make government bigger—forever. Republicans talk about “limited government.” They then sign on to nearly every scheme to make government bigger and more intrusive. Democrats do the same, of course, but they generally skip the rhetorical foreplay about making government smaller.

One huge difference this time around will be the Department of Government Efficiency, DOGE for short, an ad hoc executive initiative that will be overseen by Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy. They outlined their bold plan in an op-ed for The Wall Street Journal last week. “Unlike government commissions or advisory committees,” they noted, “we won’t just write reports or cut ribbons. We’ll cut costs.” Will they? It would be pretty to think so. Musk has said that he wants to cut government expenditures by $2 trillion. If he could manage even a quarter of that amount, it would be something to write home about. It may seem utopian. But remember, Musk bought Twitter and instantly cut the workforce by 80 percent. He vastly improved the platform, salvaged free speech, and transformed a dying company into a dynamic one.

As usual, the devil will be in the details. Musk and Ramaswamy may identify the ideal candidates for downsizing or elimination. Exactly how will they move from pen to scissors is the $64,000—or rather, the $2 trillion—question. I take solace from the thought that if anyone can do it, the triumvirate of Trump, Musk, and Ramaswamy can. Naturally, opposition will be ferocious. Will it also be effective? Time will tell.

I have not yet answered the question posed in my title: “What is the administrative state?” A friend asked me that in the course of our conversation about my column last week. Isn’t it possible, he asked, that “administrative state,” like its scarier sounding cousin, “deep state” is just a polysyllabic synonym for “state,” for the complex activities of government in a complex, technologically advanced polity? Maybe “administrative state” is just an invention of right-wing “conspiracy theorists” who find goblins where there are only harmless bureaucrats?

I nattered on about the growth of the regulatory state, the battalions of unelected and unaccountable bureaucrats who govern us from their perches in the alphabet soup of modern, Kafkaesque governance, and put in a plug for Tocqueville’s analysis of “democratic despotism.” I also noted that the phrase “conspiracy theorist” is generally used in a prophylactic, not a descriptive sense. That is, it is a phrase that is wheeled out when the aim is to end, not further, the conversation. The problem is not conspiracy theories, but conspiracies in fact.

One example.  When revelation of the contents of Hunter Biden’s “laptop from hell” threatened to upend Joe Biden’s 2020 presidential campaign, Anthony Blinken asked acting CIA director Michael Morell to organize a letter signed by 51 former intelligence officers stating that the laptop bore all the signs of “Russian disinformation.” Morell did this, he said,  in order to give Biden a “talking point” for his forthcoming debate with Donald Trump. The public did not know this at the time. When the truth leaked out, the establishment claimed it was only a “conspiracy theory” put about by Trump supporters. But it wasn’t a conspiracy theory. It was a conspiracy in fact. 

I stand by everything I said, but I did not say enough, and what I did say was not precise enough. Formulating definitions is often a mug’s game. This is because, for any important matter, a definition that is true will also have to be so general as to be vacuous or at least unilluminating. What is love? What is virtue? What is knowledge? In everyday life, these chestnuts from the philosophy seminar tend to get assimilated to the indefinite definition Justice Potter Stewart offered for “obscenity”: “I know it when I see it.”

Still, there’s something to be said for making the effort. So here goes. “‘The administrative state’ is that quota of political power that covertly fills the vacuum left by the failure of the legislative branch to discharge its obligations.”

Two things are critical. One is the displacement of sovereignty. No longer are the people sovereign. The bureaucracy is.

The second critical thing is the covert nature of the enterprise. The question “What is the administrative state?” can seem difficult to answer because it is not supposed to exist in the first place. You know it only by its actions. You cannot look it up in the statute book, much less in the Constitution. Indeed, the very fact of the administrative state violates any number of Constitutional norms, not least its being a sort of “fourth branch” of government when the Constitution provides for only three.

Edmund Burke touched on an essential aspect of this process in Thoughts on the Cause of the Present Discontents (1770). Criticizing the Court of George III for circumventing Parliament and establishing by stealth what amounted to a new regime of royal prerogative and influence-peddling, Burke saw how George and his courtiers maintained the appearance of parliamentary supremacy while simultaneously undermining it. “It was soon discovered,” Burke wrote with sly understatement, “that the forms of a free, and the ends of an arbitrary Government, were things not altogether incompatible.” That malign co-habitation stands behind the growth of the administrative state. We still vote. We still have a bicameral legislature. But behind these forms of a free government, the essentially undemocratic activities of an increasingly arbitrary and unaccountable regime pursue an expansionist agenda that threatens liberty in the most comprehensive way, by circumventing the law. 

The shadowy nature of the administrative state helps to explain why it is so hostile to free speech and, by the same token, why it tends to be receptive to the deployment of censorship and police power to achieve its ends and stymie the ends of its critics. That is why the rise of the administrative state goes hand in hand with the loss of public confidence in society’s guiding institutions. Talk of “democracy” and “our democracy” is ever on their lips. SWAT teams, prosecutorial abuse, and lawfare are out on the street for all to see. Bottom line: The age of the administrative state is at the same time an age of declining legitimacy in the foundational institutions of civil society.

Officially, the administrative state is not supposed to exist.  Having people talk about the fact that it does exist and that it often pursues ends that are contrary to the ends of the people outside its magic circle of custodians means that by definition free inquiry is a threat to its perpetuation. That is one reason that the administrative state is so hostile to democracy. It is also an important reason why it must be dismantled and returned to the graveyard of rebarbative systems of political obfuscation and bureaucratic tyranny.


Roger Kimball

Source: https://amgreatness.com/2024/12/01/what-is-the-administrative-state/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

The New Cold War is at Sea - James E. Fanell and Bradley A. Thayer

 

by James E. Fanell and Bradley A. Thayer

If there ever has been a time to educate America about the strategic utility of maritime power, and its essential role in advancing American security, this is the time.

 

 

Since the end of Operation Desert Storm and the fall of the Soviet Union, the U.S. Department of Defense has failed to maintain one of the principal dictates of great power competition—the necessity of having a well-balanced military force. This deficiency has been most evident in the maritime domain. Tellingly, the size of the U.S. Navy has shrunk from about 600 warships in 1986 to just over 290 ships today. This decline in the size, and capabilities, of the U.S. Navy occurred in large part because the nation’s leader was obsessed with what has been termed as “endless wars”—those fought in the land domains of the Middle East (ME), Southwest Asia (SWA), and now Eastern Europe. Unfortunately, this myopic focus on ground war has occurred just as the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has conducted the largest naval build-up and modernization of any nation since the end of World War II.

The reality of these two diametrically opposed trendlines was brought to a head this past week by a series of announcements from both the PRC and U.S., which signals what can be declared as the end of “endless ground wars” and what should be a return to a balanced national defense strategy—namely one that includes the foundational importance of maritime power—something that has been sorely neglected over the past three decades.

The first announcement was made by the PRC’s Foreign Minister Wang Yi who made the unusual statement that “China is ready to work with other countries to use the three global initiatives as an opportunity to elevate global maritime governance and improve the well-being of all people.” Since coming to power in late 2012, Chinese Communist Party (CCP) General Secretary Xi Jinping has implemented three global governance initiatives: the Global Development Initiative in September 2021, the Global Security Initiative in April 2022, and the Global Civilization Initiative in March 2023.

Foreign Minister Wang justified the PRC’s announced global maritime initiative by unabashedly revealing that the promotion of “global maritime governance and the construction of a maritime community” as being an “integral” part of the CCP’s goal of creating a new global order—one that they allege is for all of mankind.

This announcement is a clear and unambiguous further challenge to the U.S. and the existing post-WWII order that rests on the foundation of “freedom of navigation” for all nations.  An order that has benefited America, and mankind, more than any other in history. The PRC’s global maritime initiative will further weaken U.S. maritime power vis-à-vis existing protocols like the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), which extends the concept of freedom of the seas for America’s benefit, as well as all the rest of the world.

What this means in practical terms is that Beijing will continue its agenda by rewriting UNCLOS or creating a new forum under the auspices of the PRC’s Global Maritime Initiative—backed up by the power and might of the PLA Navy, the world’s largest and increasingly most powerful navy on the high seas.

Against the backdrop of this announcement from Beijing, were the recent comments made by the Commander of the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command, Admiral Sam Paparo regarding the preparedness and capabilities of the PLA Navy. The admiral noted the PRC has demonstrated it has improved its maritime power when this past summer, the PLA Navy participated in the largest joint exercises the Admiral had ever witnessed in his career. He revealed that on one day the PLAN had “152 vessels at sea, including three-quarters of their amphibious force” engaged in “breaching obstacles and military operations in urban terrain.” He further noted that the PLA Navy was engaged in the largest invasion rehearsals ever seen during Taiwan’s 1010 Anniversary, which he observed had “demonstrated the upward trajectory of PLA modernization.“

The two announcements remind us of the importance of maritime power for the national security and prosperity of America. In other words, “America First” requires the largest and best Navy on the planet. There is a compelling need to restore American maritime power to advance America’s interests. This is largely because there has been a great emphasis on land power to fight the wars in the ME and SWA. That emphasis has been detrimental to the Army, as it now adapts to the prodigious demands of a potential great power war against the PRC.

Likewise, this unbalanced approach to American national security has been acutely damaging to the U.S. Navy, as the service subjugated its historic great power responsibility of command of the seas to support wars in the ME and SWA. Most exemplified when the former Chief of Naval Operations Admiral Mike Mullen proudly, but to his shame, boasted that there were more Navy sailors ashore in the 5th Fleet and were afloat. So while the U.S. Navy struggles to adapt to this kind of poor strategic leadership, the enemy has kept moving with alacrity and strategic purpose to best the U.S. Navy and establish global maritime supremacy. Turning over the control of the high seas to Xi, the CCP and the PLA Navy is not in America’s or our allies’ best interests.

A PLA Navy that controls the high seas will be a Navy that can strangle American trade and directly threaten our homeland. Significantly, Xi is the most dedicated leader to the PRC’s maritime power and aspiration for global maritime dominance that has existed in history. He has transformed the PLA Navy, Chinese Coast Guard, Maritime Militia, and fishing fleets into the largest on the globe. Despite the PRC’s mighty economic and social challenges, Xi and the CCP have now embarked on the goal of sailing and ruling the world’s oceans.

Fortunately, President Trump and his incoming team are aware of this threat and are prepared to address the rebalancing that must occur within the Department of Defense. For instance, the first of the service secretaries to be announced was the Secretary of the Navy (SEVNAV)—John Phelan. When confirmed, the new SECNAV will have his hands full in leading the charge to rebuild the U.S. Navy and establishing a new American Maritime Strategy, one that is prepared to deter and, in worst cases, defeat the PLA Navy in a war at sea.

Given the urgency of the PRC threat, if there ever has been a time to educate America about the strategic utility of maritime power, and its essential role in advancing American security, this is the time.  That knowledge will provide the necessary and sustained support from the American people required as this country rebuilds its Navy and its naval infrastructure to meet the colossal demands of the 21st century in the maritime domain, not more endless land wars.

James E. Fanell and Bradley A. Thayer are authors of Embracing Communist China: America’s Greatest Strategic Failure. The views expressed are their own.


James E. Fanell and Bradley A. Thayer 

Source: https://amgreatness.com/2024/12/01/the-new-cold-war-is-at-sea/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Hamas may agree to gradual withdrawal of IDF troops from Gaza, Saudi outlet reports - Jerusalem Post Staff

 

by Jerusalem Post Staff

During the transition period, Hamas would also accept that the Palestinian Authority control the Rafah Crossing.

 

Illustrative image of IDF soldiers and Hamas terrorists (photo credit: Canva, IDF SPOKESPERSON'S UNIT, REUTERS/IBRAHEEM ABU MUSTAFA)
Illustrative image of IDF soldiers and Hamas terrorists
(photo credit: Canva, IDF SPOKESPERSON'S UNIT, REUTERS/IBRAHEEM ABU MUSTAFA)

Hamas is open to a ceasefire agreement and may be more open to compromise than it has previously been, according to the Saudi-owned news outlet Asharq Al-Awsat on Sunday, citing Palestinian sources familiar with the matter. 

The sources reportedly noted that the terror group had indicated it would accept a gradual withdrawal of Israeli troops from the Gaza Strip, including the Philadelphi and Netzarim corridors. 

During the transition period, Hamas would also accept the Palestinian Authority's control of the Rafah Crossing, the sources told the Saudi outlet. 

However, Hamas reportedly conditioned such an agreement on the ability of residents of northern Gaza to return to their homes.

The sources further claimed that the terror group had agreed to the Palestinian Authority and Arab countries administering various sectors of the Gaza Strip.  

 View of the Philadelphi Corridor between the southern Gaza Strip and Egypt, on July 15, 2024.  (credit: Oren Cohen/Flash90)Enlrage image
View of the Philadelphi Corridor between the southern Gaza Strip and Egypt, on July 15, 2024. (credit: Oren Cohen/Flash90)

'Internal consensus for agreement'

"There is an internal consensus to push for an agreement in Gaza,” the sources were cited as saying. 

On Saturday, an Israeli official was cited by Walla as saying that Israel believed Hamas would agree to compromise on some subjects on which there had been a lack of agreement. 

According to the official, the terror group's release of the video showing hostage Edan Alexander was a positive sign from Hamas. 

Further, a new proposal was on the table "to halt the fighting in Gaza for at least 60 days and allow Israel to maintain a military presence in the enclave," The Wall Street Journal reported on Saturday, adding, "Hostages held in Gaza would begin to be freed after seven days."

Last week, the New York Times reported that some leaders in Hamas were considering a Gaza hostage-ceasefire deal, in which the IDF would remain temporarily in the Philadelphi Corridor in the Gaza Strip.

Walla contributed to this report. 


Jerusalem Post Staff

Source: https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-831464

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

'Unbridled Jew-hatred': Yoseph Haddad kicked out of 'anti-Israel' Oxford Union debate - Keshet Neev

 

by Keshet Neev

"I faced insults, boos, and threats during the confrontation, but there was one thing I wasn’t willing to tolerate—the disgrace of our hostages," Haddad said about what occurred.

 

Footage of Yoseph Haddad being kicked out of the Oxford Union debate (photo credit: SCREENSHOT/X/VIA SECTION 27A OF THE COPYRIGHT ACT)
Footage of Yoseph Haddad being kicked out of the Oxford Union debate
(photo credit: SCREENSHOT/X/VIA SECTION 27A OF THE COPYRIGHT ACT)

Arab-Israeli journalist and activist for Israel Yoseph Haddad was kicked out of an Oxford Union debate on Thursday, footage on social media showed.

The debate, which attracted pro-Palestine protesters, concluded in a vote that determined "Israel was an apartheid state responsible for genocide." This was passed by 278 votes to 59, according to a Friday Jewish Chronicle report. 

Haddad posted on X/Twitter that he was kicked out because he "was not ready to accept the humiliation of the Israeli hostages."

Footage posted on X showed Haddad being escorted out of the event as people in the audience shouted in his direction.

When explaining in a post on X what happened at the event, Haddad began by writing that "Oxford was occupied by supporters of terrorism. 90% of the participants are distinctly anti-Israeli."

 Yoseph Haddad at a London demonstration calling for support for Israel and the return of the hostages. (credit: Elliot Jacobs)Enlrage image
Yoseph Haddad at a London demonstration calling for support for Israel and the return of the hostages. (credit: Elliot Jacobs)

He then continued to explain that during the "biased discussion," extreme statements were made that supported terrorism and the October 7 Hamas attacks.

"When one audience member cried over Gaza residents in an exaggerated and insincere manner, I pulled out a photo of the Muslim hostages and asked if she was crying for them, too. One participant took the photo, threw it on the floor, and others stepped on it," Haddad continued.

"I faced insults, boos, and threats during the confrontation, but there was one thing I wasn’t willing to tolerate—the disgrace of our hostages," Haddad wrote and then added that afterward, he demanded the audience members be removed.  

"I wasn’t willing to let the discussion continue, even when the anti-Israel moderator, who was practically part of the confrontation, warned me. In the end, he decided to have me removed from the hall," Haddad explained.

He also added that before he was kicked out of the event hall, he put a T-shirt over his suit that featured former Hezbollah head Hassan Nasrallah and had a large X marked over his face with the text, "Your hero-terrorist is dead! We did that."

Escorted by eight security guards to 'stay alive'

In an additional post that Haddad shared on X after the event, he posted a video of him in which he explained how he had to be escorted by eight security guards "in order to stay alive."

"Everyone is talking about freedom of speech, freedom of speech. That's fine, but it's freedom of speech only for one side. When it comes to the Israeli side, the freedom of speech stops, and that's why we need the security to be with me all the time."

As he waited for security to arrive, the video continued, "Waiting for evacuation from Oxford. Not from Gaza, not from Lebanon, not from a terrorist that has war. From Oxford. Because Oxford has been occupied by anti-Israel terrorist support from the Middle East."

When the security guards came to escort Haddad back to London, where he was staying, the video concluded with him saying, "We need eight security guards in order to take us back to safety. Oh UK, you are in trouble."

Additional attendees of the debate 

Mossab Hassan Yousef, the son of a Hamas co-founder and an advocate for Israel, also attended the event and made a Saturday X post writing that "Oxford Union is controlled by terrorist supporters."

"Last night, I asked the participants and pro 'Palestine' opponents during a debate at Oxford Union if they would have reported Hamas plans to authorities to prevent the October 7 massacre. 75% of the participants voted they would have chosen not to report Hamas plans to the authorities," he wrote.

Additionally, journalist Emily Schrader, who attended the debate, explained in an X post that she had never seen "such appalling mob-incited, unbridled Jew-hatred being endorsed and emboldened by one of the most respected institutions in academia."

"We should not need seven security guards with us to be proud of who we are. We should not have to scream over bloodthirsty lunatics to have our voices heard on a forum like the Oxford Union," she wrote.


Keshet Neev

Source: https://www.jpost.com/diaspora/antisemitism/article-831417

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Jerusalem: A Journey Through Time: Bar-Ilan launches new course on ancient Israel - Raquel Guertzenstein Frolich

 

by Raquel Guertzenstein Frolich

Students will study ancient Jerusalem starting from the prehistoric period through key historical phases.

 

The Mikveh Complex and the Remains of Herodian Construction, Looking West (photo credit: HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM)
The Mikveh Complex and the Remains of Herodian Construction, Looking West
(photo credit: HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM)

A new online undergraduate-level course, titled “Jerusalem: A Journey Through Time,” was recently launched by Bar-Ilan University, the institution announced in a Sunday statement. 

The course, available as a Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) on the edX platform, is taught by Prof. Aren Maeir, who specializes in the archeology of ancient Jerusalem and the southern Levant, the statement said.

Students will study ancient Jerusalem starting from the prehistoric period through key historical phases such as the periods of the Hebrew Bible/Old Testament, the Christian Bible/New Testament, the First and Second Temple periods, and the Persian, Hellenistic, Roman, and Byzantine periods. 

Biblical archeology

Maeir, who teaches a separate course on biblical archeology on the educational platform, is the director of the Tell es-Safi/Gath Archaeological Project and a faculty member at Bar-Ilan University’s Martin (Szusz) Department of Land of Israel Studies and Archaeology.

"I believe this course can serve as a gateway to understanding not just the history of Jerusalem but also the broader fields of archaeology, ancient history, and the methods used to study the past," Maeir said.

 Prof. Aren Maeir (credit: BAR-ILAN UNIVERSITY)Enlrage image
Prof. Aren Maeir (credit: BAR-ILAN UNIVERSITY)

"It’s designed to be accessible to anyone, regardless of their background in history or archaeology. I’m excited to bring this knowledge to a global audience, offering both educational insights and a chance to explore the city in ways that were previously inaccessible to most."

The course—which is taught in English and does not require prerequisites—is free and comes with the option to upgrade at a cost of $120 for unlimited access to course materials, a shareable certificate upon completion, and graded assignments and exams.

According to the statement, the course comes with 16 weeks of content, an estimated two to four hours of work each week, and features video lectures, virtual tours, and interviews with leading scholars and researchers in the field.


Raquel Guertzenstein Frolich

Source: https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-831461

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter