Saturday, February 23, 2008

Palestinian Women and Children in the Throes of Islamikaze Terrorism Part III

By Raphael Israeli

The Debate over Children Martyrs

Interestingly enough, though the universal Palestinian jubilation vis-à-vis martyrdom has peaked during the Aqsa Intifadah that broke out in October 2000, the Palestinians were "educated" and prepared for martyrdom much before. There are tapes of incitement of school children to become martyrs dating back to 1998, though in most of them martyrdom per se is extolled without necessarily encouraging the young to blow themselves up in the process. Indeed, martyrdom was instilled in them as an ideal not only in the context of the dramatic and much hallowed Islamikaze actions, but also as a routine of a grinding confrontation with Israeli troops, where the demonstrating children, imbued with the audacity to face the enemy and provoke him, could end up dying. In that case of passive death too, unlike the active search of death by the Islamikaze, they would be considered martyrs. Clips abound of young teen-agers vowing martyrdom on Palestinian television, but the most dramatic and world renowned, which was played and replayed by the world media, concerned Muhammed al-Dura. In November, 2000, at the very onset of the intifadah, he was killed in cross-fire, apparently shot by Palestinians as it later turned out, in an area of confrontation where children should have been kept away from in the first place. But since it is part of the Palestinian strategy to push their children to the frontline and then turn their own callousness towards their children into a propaganda campaign against Israel, he was led there by his careless father, and the child paid the price of this life. But then, the Palestinian machine started operating for the glorification of Dura domestically, and calling other Palestinian children to follow his model, and for accusing Israel of his death externally.

The clip on Dura on Palestinian Television was re-enacted by actors, following his tragic death, with his genuine picture being shown lying in the field and, interspersed with many violent scenes of battle, he is always shown in beautiful, peaceful places, running along the beach, or through the Plaza of the Aqsa Mosque, or alongside wonderful fountains, flying a kite in a green pasture, approaching a giant wheel. The soundtrack is telling the children that death in conflict with Israel will bring them to a child's paradise, where Muhammed is tranquil, as we see him playing and waving to the audience of children to "come, follow me here". The main lyrics pass up and back from narrator to choir, to 'A'ida, a popular woman singer ( whose name incidentally means "the Returnee"), with long tresses and dressed in striking flowing red robes. The dead boy Muhammed talks to his father :" till we meet, my father, till we meet !, I go with no tears, with no fears, how sweet is the fragrance of the Martyrs!!! I shall go to my place in Heaven, how sweet is the fragrance of the martyrs!!". The narrator continues:" How sweet is the fragrance of the martyrs, how sweet is the fragrance of the earth, its thirst quenched by the gush of blood flowing from the youthful body"… The screen at this point is filled with two huge roses which are closing in slow motion, accompanying the narrative: "the earth, its thirst quenched by the gush of blood from the body of youth". 'Ai'da continues :"How sweet is the scent of the earth, its thirst satisfied by the gush of blood, flowing from the body of youth". These refrains are repeated several times ending with 'Ai'da singing: " Oh the children of the world say 'till we meet, oh Muhammed till we meet!'. The clip closes with the following credit : "Produced by the Ministry of Information and culture- the Palestinian National Fund".[1]

These harrowing concepts with which the children of Palestine are indoctrinated on their national television, by their own leaders, to adopt as their own, are supported by the clerics of the Palestinian Authority in general, chief among them is the same 'Akrama Sabri cited above. In an interview to the Egyptian weekly Al-Ahram al-'Arabi, the Sheikh not only lay claim, as a matter of course, to all Israel, as part of his struggle, but he stressed the need for martyrdom of children in the process of "liberating" Jerusalem and all the rest of Palestine, in order to prove that the "new generation will carry on the mission with determination". He said:

We have not sacrificed enough yet to be worthy of liberating Al-Aqsa…To liberate Jerusalem, Salah a-Din al-Ayyubi made great sacrifices for a long time, and we have to sacrifice until Allah's victory is completed…The land of Palestine is not only Jerusalem. This land stretches from the Jordan River to the sea. The Palestinian problem relates to all this land. We cannot establish a homeland only by liberating Jerusalem. It is true that Salah-a-Din did not rest until he liberated Jerusalem, but this does not mean that the rest of this blessed land should be neglected or given up…

Every Palestinian is in fact in a state of Jihad. I feel the martyr is lucky because the angels usher him to his wedding in Heaven… There is no doubt that the child martyr suggests that the new generation will carry on the mission with determination… The younger the martyr, the greater he is, and the more I respect him… One wrote his name on a note before he died… It said 'I am Martyr so and so' .In every martyr's pocket we find a note with his name on it. He sentences himself to martyrdom even before he becomes a martyr… The mothers [who cry in joy when they hear of their sons' martyrdom], willingly sacrifice their offspring for the sake of freedom. It is a great display of the power of belief. The mother is participating in the great reward of the Jihad to liberate al-Aqsa. I talked to a young man who said :' I want to marry the black-eyed women of Heaven'. The next day he became a martyr. I am sure his mother was filled with joy about his heavenly marriage. Such a son must have such a mother…

…I am filled or rage towards the Jews. I have never greeted a Jew when I come near one and I never will. They cannot even dream that I will. They do not dare to bother me because they are the most cowardly creatures Allah has ever created… Palestinian children are thus taught, almost from their birth to hate Jews and to glorify Jihad, even to the point of their own death and martyrdom, as an essential part of their culture[2].

So much for the Chief Cleric of the Palestinian Authority, and his underlings, who are not known to have sent their own children to the "martyrdom" they have been ardently preaching to others. However, in contrast to the clerics who encouraged acts of Islamikaze, obviously in response to the huge wave of popular support for that mode of struggle, there were some mainstream professionals, such as Ashraf al-'Ajrami, a columnist in the Palestinian Authority daily, Al-Ayyam, who realized the damage that the outrageous procedure of using children caused to national interest, and counseled to desist from it. He acknowledged the fact that "the phenomenon of martyrdom was on the increase, especially among minors", but expectedly blamed the "Israeli occupation" for the "degradation of life which pushes many to disdain life and seek the shortest way to the hereafter". But he also admitted that it was the "honor and esteem that the Palestinian people give to the martyr that has had a crucial effect on the emergence of this phenomenon". He also imputed a great importance in this regard to the "funerals of the martyrs and the celebrations held in their honor, which have always been accompanied by talks of everlasting life and eternal serenity in Paradise". Therefore, the rationale of these youngsters goes, why wait through the tribulations of life if one can take a shortcut to Paradise by pressing a button, or purposely come into close range of Israeli shooting ? At the same time, he contends that the enthusiasm among minors to be hailed as heroes and martyrs might encourage their gratuitous exploitation by others. He also concedes that some Gaza children are influenced by mosques and schools, an admission to the ruinous character not only of religious sermons, but also of the Palestinian textbooks[3], some funded by the European Union, which cultivate the senseless Islamikaze death.[4]

The columnist, who appears to be well-updated on the techniques and motivations of the young Islamikaze, delves into terrifying details and counsels to desist from this practice, not for the moral burden it puts on the Palestinian leadership, that would be too daring a criticism, but for the damage it causes to Palestinian propaganda:

Some are willing to arm them for money –with pistols, hand grenades, and readily available pipe bombs that cost only a few Shekels. These brainwashed children are imbued with motivation to approach the nearest settlement where they are shot dead by the soldiers of the occupation….

The children's martyrdom promotes the hostile propaganda of the enemies, particularly in reinforcing their claims that the Palestinians send their children to the front line. These are false claims aimed at justifying the indiscriminate shooting at all the Palestinians…The phenomenon also causes the children to rebel against their parents, insofar as the children threaten their parents that they would martyr themselves if the parents did not accede to their demands or did not turn a blind eye on their inappropriate behavior…Moreover, some of the children have used pipe-bombs during arguments amongst themselves…

Collective efforts should be made to contain this phenomenon… All activities having an ill-effect on the children's emotional stability, pulling them in directions outside the normal matters of children, must be monitored… The security apparatuses should apprehend the arms traffickers and collaborators, who are acting among the youths to make money or to exterminate this generation together with its nationalist enthusiasm and its will to fight… It is also important to stop the mosques from engaging in exaggerated political activity and providing grounds for anyone who wants to abuse the minds of youth and minors… The Palestinian media also have a role in refraining from broadcasting pictures affecting the emotional state of children, and from exaggerating in reporting tragic news that arouses the children's feelings of frustration and despair…[5]

A rare courageous Arab voice against the self-immolation of children was raised by a female Arab journalist, Huda al-Husseini, who was incensed at the systematic sacrifice of children in a war they did not initiate and they perhaps ill-comprehended:

Some Palestinian leaders… consciously issue orders with the purpose of ending the childhood [of their youth], even if this means their last breath. I want to know why we, the Arabs, insist on dying rather than living for our homeland. If these children have nothing to lose, and they think the training is a game, are we supposed to continue pushing them with hypocrisy and stupid enthusiasm to actually lose their lives? Have we exhausted all means and used every argument, have we exhausted our brains, and have nothing left but to gamble with the lives of children and push them to confront Israel? Or maybe the Palestinian leaders –those who are in the PA or those who get ready to fill a role in it—put their trust in the humanity of Israel? If this is what they do, they are wrong…What kind of independence is based on the blood of children while the leaders are safe and so are their children and grand children?.. Are only the miserable destined to die in the spring of their lives? Those children who are killed may not, in their short lives, have enjoyed a fresh piece of bread, sleeping in a warm bed, the happiness of putting on a new piece of cloth, or carrying books with no torn pages to school…

The time for Arafat and those around him has reached its dusk… First of all, these children deserve to live, before we push them to find death. But, what are we doing to them? We abuse their innocence, we supply them with tons of stones, while we sit in our offices and commend their death. Then we accept an invitation for a working lunch or dinner and talk about those children who died holding stones, those that died, probably hungry…[6].

But others in the Arab world, including supposedly enlightened academics, and certainly populist self-made clerics who do not conform to the establishment, as well as non-Palestinian jurists and other notables, remain unflinching in their support to the Islamikaze. For example, Halim Barakat, a Professor at Georgetown University, castigated the Arab states for their oppression of their populations, but credited the Arab peoples for their awakening from their slumber. He created a rule of thumb whereby the "more technologically advanced the people [of any country], the less moral and more barbaric it becomes", implying that Western countries like the US, which has given him asylum, and Israel, are so technologically advanced that they qualify for his definition of barbarism in their actions against the Muslims in Afghanistan and Palestine. Thus, he turned on its head the definition of terrorism: the barbarians are not those who blew up the Twin Towers or the restaurants and buses in Israel, but those who moved decisively to eliminate them[7]. Another "enlightened" person, in the person of the Saudi Ambassador to London, wrote a poem praising the Palestinian Islamikaze. The man, Dr Ghazi al-Gosaibi (interestingly, many of the most ardent supporters of the martyrdom attacks, proudly carry the title of PhD, a sign of their Western education), an acknowledged Arab poet, heaped laudatory terms on Ayat al-Akhras, the 17-year old Palestinian girl who blew herself up in a Jerusalem supermarket, killing two Israelis and wounding 25[8].

The respectable Ambassador, who has been serving his country in London for a decade, so that one could suspect that some civility may have rubbed off to him, wrote of teen-ager Ayat that "doors of Heaven are opened to her"and that the "heart of the White House was filled with darkness". The British Foreign Ministry, which released a statement dubbing "suicide bombing as a form of terrorism", pledged that some senior official would make clear British views to the Ambassador, but did not rebuke the Ambassador nor undertook any other measure against him. The Board of Deputies of British Jews stated that it was "appalled", but no action was taken to oust from civilization the author of that appalling statement[9]. Another Saudi notable, also a holder of a PhD, Dr Ibrahim al-Sa'adat, a columnist in the government-owned daily al-Jazira, came out with a campaign of idolization of 'Abd-al-Baset 'Oudeh, who detonated himself in the Netanya Hotel during the Passover Seder, killing 29 people and wounding scores of others, and also the young Ayat al-Akhras. His description of his "heroes" is almost as horrendous as the acts themselves:

May Allah have mercy on you, Mujahid and martyr, the quiet hero who infiltrated so elegantly and spoke so gaily. You defended your religion, your homeland, and your people… Courageously, full of willingness to wage Jihad… you executed your assignment and sacrificed your pure soul… The Israeli military, armed to the teeth, did not remove a hair of your head…You knew the Zionists do not honor promises, treaties and understand only the language of resistance and Jihad…

May Allah have mercy on you, 'abd-al-Baset, the beloved son of the Arab nation. You awakened the hope that had begun to dissipate, you restored life [by killing 29 innocent civilians] that had begun to expire; you revived the Arab pride, chivalry, valor and sacrifice that had begun to die, and you caused pain to the people who had begun to celebrate and sing atop the bodies of the children, youth and mothers of your people.. You entered silently, with the faith and the confidence with which Allah inspired you… You reached your destination, you sat down at one of the tables, talked, told a few jokes and laughed with them, and then Allah decreed for you a martyr's death. What heroism, courage and strength – almost unmatched on the face of the earth !

May Allah have mercy on you Ayat al-Akhras ! You left your home for the path of martyrdom and Paradise…You proceeded with a determination, will and strength rarely found, even impossible to find, in a 16 year old girl…

You did not seek advise from the American or Russian governments… you knew that the hand of Allah is supreme, that self-sacrifice is the highest form of Jihad. You were not tempted by, nor did you rejoice in, the life of this world… Oh, beloved of the Arab nation of 16 springs. Marriage was before you, you were a girl engaged and looking forward to …wed; except that you chose Allah, Paradise and martyrdom… You taught the Arab nation a lesson never taught in the schools and universities, and you breathed your last and awakened in us the sensations that had begun to disappear…. May Allah have mercy on you, you Ayat and all male and female Mujahideen. We ask Alllah that the angels welcome you as righteous martyrs, and beseech Allah to give you the highest level of Paradise[10].




[1] . I am indebted to my colleague Dr Daphne Burdman, who brought to my attention the transcript of the clip that was repeatedly shown on Palestinian television throughout 2001 and 2002.

[2] . Al-Ahram al-'Arabi, 28 October, 2000. Memri, cited by David Kupelian, in 2000 WorldNetDaily.com. See also Gerald Steinberg, the Jerusalem Post, 27 October, 2000.

[3] . For details on Palestinian textbooks, see R. Israeli "Education, State Building and the Peace Process: Educating Palestinian Children in the Post-Oslo Era", Journal of Terrorism and Political Violence, January 2000.

[4] .Al-Ayyam (Palestinian Authority), 3 May, 2002, Memri 376, 6 May, 2002. On

[5] . Ibid.

[6] .Al-Sharq al-Awsat (London), 27 October, 2000. Ibid.

[7] . Al-Hayat (London), 4 April, 2002.

[8] . BBC News, 18 April, 2002.

[9] . Ibid.

[10] .Al-Jazirah, (Saudi Arabia), 1 April, 2002. Memri 367, 12 April, 2002.

Palestinian Women and Children in the Throes of Islamikaze Terrorism Part IV

           By Raphael Israeli

 

           4TH PART OF 4

 

Sad Conclusions

The centrality of martyrdom in Palestinian life after the outbreak of their September 2000  Al-Aqsa Intifadah is reflected  not only in their writings, broadcasts and the written media, but also in leaflets that are disseminated in the territories under their rule, as well as audio- and video-cassettes that extol acts of Islamikaze, sanctify their perpetrators and cause families who have sacrificed one of their sons to pledge the souls of the rest of them for the sake of Allah. Wasn't it Arafat himself, who in the heat of the battle against Israel coined the  war-cry "We are coming to Jerusalem, as martyrs in the millions!!" ? Here is one of those poems, ominously addressed to the Israelis, that became popular in the Palestinian street:

Because I am a Palestinian

Because I am enamored of fate

And my fate is to have my blood

Turned into songs,

That sketch out the road to freedom,

My fate is to become a human bomb,

Because I am a Palestinian.

 

Oh, lovers of cruelty, we

Inform you in the name of our hopes

Either I will meet Allah by means

of perfume and musk[1]

or I will live on my land in

Freedom and honor.

 

Much to your distress,

 we will not forget Haifa and Acre

To your distress,

all of Palestine is ours

Because I am a Palestinian.

 

We have nothing for you but death

Plant as many Ghargad trees[2] as you like

Build as many shelters and hiding places as you desire,

And, if you want, create your own artificial peace.

 

Your history is black and covered

Your ancestry is a tree whose

Branches are corrupt,

Because I am a Palestinian.

And the Arab rulers in this homeland

Lie in a perpetual sleep

Eating from the fruit of your tree

And drinking of your humiliation

As if they were not Muslims.

 

Because I am a Palestinian,

Because I bear the flag

And long for the memory of Hittin[3],

I will place the parts of my body as bombs

In your hatred, in your origin

In your accursed fruit

And in spite of you, they will germinate

The most beautiful of flowers

They will germinate the most beautiful Palestine

Because I am a Palestinian[4].

 

This petrifying idealization of violence and death that has been expanding to ever wider circles, beyond the radical  Islamic groups which had adopted it in the first place, and under the instigation of the Palestinian leadership, religious  and otherwise, is rooted in the wide-ranging  and all-encompassing theology that lay at its base; in  the embrace that non-radical Muslims groups have given to this ideology in order not to be seen as lagging behind their radical rivals in the national struggle; and the callous modes of behavior adopted by the Palestinians, which lend legitimacy to the application of this ideology and turn it into a horrifying and matter-of-course routine. On the theological level, none other than the Chief Mufti of Jerusalem, Sheikh  'Akrama Sabri, an Arafat appointee, criticized the Muslim authorities who did not approve of Islamikaze attacks, and stated that the acts are justified and to be encouraged. He meant Sheikh Tantawi of Egypt who had prohibited such attacks in general, and then limited the prohibition to only innocent civilians, and a Saudi Mufti who also banned this kind of operations. According to the Palestinian Mufti, the rulings of those clerics were the result of international pressure, and admonished "those who do not have the courage to speak the truth,  to remain quiet and not say things that create confusion". He added that " resistance is legitimate, and those who give up their lives do not require permission from anyone", and that "we must not stand in the way of the Intifadah and Jihad. Rather, we must stand at their side and encourage them". When asked whether no differentiation should be made between civilians and fighting personnel, he clarified: "Who is civilian and who is military? There have been many more Palestinian civilians than fighters killed in the Intifadah, school children whose bodies were torn to pieces, pregnant women who were prevented from reaching hospitals, and many times both the mother and child died"[5].

 

If this is the position of the highest cleric of the Muslim establishment of the Palestinian Authority, how much more so for the Hamas, which rebels against that authority and often virulently accuses it of "collaborating" with Israel  against the martyrs?[6].  In fact, the mouthpiece of the  Hamas, Al-Risala, posited the struggle waged by the Jihad martyrs as a veritable clash of civilizations. It is worth citing  that analysis in full:

… The starting point of Islamic civilization is the basic fact that the Umma is guided in all its deeds by the divine Straight Path, which constantly oppresses the natural propensity of humans towards evil… Conversely, their [Western] civilization, was not blessed by that  enlightened aspect, which should have oppressed their desire to control others and to rob their resources….Therefore, violence has come to characterize Western civilization throughout its history…Let us respond to some of their false accusations that they try to market…

They accuse us of violence. For example, they take the rapid Islamic conquest of many countries,  by  the force of the sword in their view, to be the best evidence of violence in Islam. Our response is that the only way to explain the Islamic conquests is  that they were in implementation of Divine Will, which charged the Muslims with the responsibility to disseminate it, in consequence obliging Muslims to transmit that message to those who did not receive it yet. When that message reaches non-Muslims, they only face two choices: either to convert to Islam or pay Jizya[7] to the Muslim government, which today may be interpreted as taking up civil obligations [under the Muslim state].

As to conquest by the sword, Islam does not resort to that means unless it feels impelled to remove obstacles in the way of the Divine Message. If we examine that principle thoroughly, we would find its parallel in modern Western civilization, which regards the freedom of speech a sacred right. Therefore, if no obstacles are put on Islam's road to deliver that Message, it would have no need to use the sword… History proves the peace-loving nature of Islam.  Caliph 'Umar captured Jerusalem peacefully, and the inhabitants of the  conquered countries were acculturated to the Islamic Umma and enjoyed the same rights and duties. In other words, Muslims did not go to those countries as colonialists who oust the native inhabitants and replace them, as America had done with the Indians and Israel with the Palestinians. For example, when the Muslim armies conquered Samarkand, its inhabitants applied to the Muslim judge, claiming that they were not given the choice between conversion, paying the jizya [i.e. dhimmitude]  , or waging war [to the finish] that the Muslim conquerors had customarily accorded to others. Thus, the Muslim judge had no option but to order the Muslim armies to evacuate the city… How can one then say, that Islam is a violent civilization?

Conversely, Western civilization was profoundly influenced by [Roman] civilization which sanctified force and used to throw gladiators to the arena to fight each other or be swallowed by lions, in order to satisfy their own inferior bestial instincts. The characteristics of this civilization consist of oppressing the other and robbing his resources. It is known for its egotism and arrogance towards the weak. Many wars broke out only to enable it to lay its hand over more wealth. The peak of its appetite was evinced in its kindling two world wars within a quarter-century, in the latest of which nuclear bombs were used that annihilated hundreds of thousands of people… [8].

 

This understanding, even sympathy, for the Islamikaze, by intellectuals, professionals and journalists, some of them at the hub of supposedly moderate and pro-Western Arab societies, goes a long way to teach us about those societies, more than about the bestiality of the attacks by those hallowed "martyrs", who blow up indiscriminately innocent people. For the voices of sympathy and support are those of public opinion makers, who have a great impact on their crowds, through the press, talk-shows etc. What is particularly puzzling is that those self-righteous "humanists" and "enlightened" intellectuals, not only have no words of condemnation for those horrendous  acts, that any civilized person should disown, and even no words of condolence for the victims, but by elevating those acts to the level of heavenly missions and national heroism, they thereby contribute to building up their legitimacy,  expectation among the crowds for more, and the motivation among young Muslims to flock to the ranks of the Islamikaze. No wonder then, that those words of encouragement feed the spiral of  senseless Islamikaze attacks, and forces their victims to adopt harsher measures of defense against them. So, in the final analysis, even according to the logic of these machines of death, they are bound to bring more destruction and bereavement, including the loss of young men and women, to their own people and their supportive audiences who now applaud them.

 

 

The tragedy inherent in this seemingly across the board all-Arab unqualified lack of concern for human life, without "if"s , "because"s and  "but"s, their inability to sympathize with innocent victims, and their self-centered sentiment of being the victims of the West, have all combined to create this distorted state of mind which enables them to glorify the Islamikaze and to regard them as a "glowing light" that would lead them somewhere. Where exactly, it is not known. It would seem that it is much more important for them to destroy the West whom they demean, because they cannot be like it, than  try to rise to its level. They want to destroy it (and Israel) because they cannot help compare their drab existence and gloomy future  with the more attractive alternative they see in their western neighbors, but are unable to appropriate to themselves. Therefore, they support any violent means likely to destroy that alternative so as not to have to face their own impotence. Because they are incapable of matching the technological superiority of the West, on which they depend much to their chagrin, they despise it culturally and claim to have an edge on it.  And if they  cannot  face the humiliation of technological inferiority, then they would use the ultimate weapon of Islamikaze terrorism to terrify western populations, with their own women and children participating in that chilling national endeavor, be it in New York or in Tel-Aviv. This is the underlying state of mind which not only condones indiscriminate killings of civilians, but sanctifies them and encourages their festering.     

 

           Raphael Israeli

 

           Copyright - Original materials copyright (c) by the authors.

 



[1] . According to Muslim tradition the bodies of the martyrs do not putrefy but gives off the scent of musk

[2] .According to Muslim tradition, which is incidentally also cited at the end of Article 7 of the Hamas Charter (see R. Israeli, "The Charter of Allah…" op. cit. p. 137), on the Day of Judgment  the Muslims will fight the Jews [and kill them],and the Jews will seek to hide behind rocks and trees, which will cry: "Oh, Muslims!  A jew is hiding behind me ! Come on and kill him !!!". This will not apply to the Gharqad,  a sort of raspberry bush which is  considered a "Jewish" tree. As rumor among the Arabs has it, Israel has been planting many of those trees in order to avoid the massacre awaiting her.

[3] . That is the decisive battle in which Saladin routed the Crusader armies in 1187 and evicted them from much of Palestine. In Palestinian and Arab imagery, Israel is often likened to the Crusader Kingdom whose days are numbered.

[4] . By Ayman al-Skafi, an unknown poet, Al-Istiqlal  (The Weekly of Islamic Jihad in Gaza), 13 December, 2001.

[5] . Al-Hayat, 7  December, 2001, cited by Ha'aretz (Israel), 9 December, 2001.

[6] . A leaflet distributed in the streets of the major Palestinian cities on 27 November, 2001,  accused the Palestinian authority of exchanging intelligence with Israel and bringing about the liquidation of many Jihad fighters. Citing a verse from the Quran (17:18), the statement promised that its "truth would smash the Authority's lies", and that the latter would literally be sent to Hell.

[7] .. The  Jizya was limited to the Scriptuaries (Jews and Christians), while pagans were subjected to the sword. The payment of Jizya symbolized  the subjugation of the dhimmis to Muslim rule, and in return for it they received protection from the Muslim state, the assumption being that no other state was legal.

[8] . Al-Risalah,  (Palestinian Authority), 11 October, 2001.

Expert: Saudi Arabian Bankers Fueling Global Islamic Jihad

by Talia Zarbiv

Rachel Ehrenfeld, Director of the American Center for Democracy, said at the Jerusalem Conference Tuesday that Saudi Arabian bankers are the main financiers of global terrorism.

Corrupt "Sharia financing" banking practices - legal under Islamic law - are a fairly new phenomenon, Ehrenfeld said. They were first developed by the Muslim brotherhood in the 70s, following the financial power gained by Saudis during the oil boom.

"Saudis are using money in order to corrupt the West, to fund terrorism, and eventually to take over the West," said Ehrenfeld.  "For years, Saudi Arabia has been a main supporter of terrorism, both physically and financially, and their illegal activity is now causing many innocent investors to commit serious crimes without even the knowledge that they are doing so."

According to Ehrenfeld, Saudi Arabian bankers have roughly $1 trillion ready to be invested through means of what she terms "financial Jihad." The financial practices she refers to as "Sharia financing" are run according to Islamic law, governed solely by the Koran and with no distinction between public and private practices. "Legitimate financing goals are literally indistinguishable from immoral and illegal practices, causing unsuspecting companies and individuals to unknowingly fund terrorism."
 
"Sharia financing means complete and total submission to Islamic bankers," Ehrenfeld explained. "Investors give over all rights to choose what their money supports. They are virtually forced to divest from any company or concept that is not in agreement with Muslim ideology or belief, including any company that is even inconsequentially involved with Israel. Additionally, Saudi Arabian bankers have the right to list and delist companies as they please, without legitimate cause or legal course of action."

"Not surprisingly, these illegal banking practices do not have security, which comes at a very large price to investors, who are at great risk both of losing their money, endangering their shareholders, and being prosecuted by American banking laws, which strictly forbid the financial support of terrorism. Besides the money that is used to support Islamic agenda, 20% of funds are labeled 'mandated charity' and go directly to foreign companies in support of terrorism."

Ehrenfeld warns: "They are expanding fast, and are now in more than 80 countries, and more than 300 financial institutions around the world. This is really spreading like wildfire."

Talia Zarbiv

Copyright - Original materials copyright (c) by the authors.