Saturday, March 28, 2020

California Dem-olition Drive - Lloyd Billingsley

​
by Lloyd Billingsley

Democrat legislation represses independent Californians and imperils the coronavirus response.





California Assembly Bill 5, by San Diego Democrat Lorena Gonzalez, limits freelance writers, photographers and videographers to 35 submissions, per publication, per year. The openly repressive measure, signed last year by Gov. Gavin Newsom, also targets independent contractors, even those in the medical field, and that is challenging efforts to fight the coronavirus suffering in the Golden State.

“Those challenges are particularly acute in rural California, where hospitals and clinics don’t have sufficient patient loads to support full time positions in a number of physician and nursing specialties,” former California congressman Doug Ose told the California Globe. “In the past, such needs have been met by contracting with independent contractors to provide services.  That approach is problematic now that AB 5 has become law.”

Rural Californians, notes Globe editor Katy Grimes, are “particularly vulnerable to the impacts of AB 5 during the coronavirus scare, largely because they already do not have enough doctors, nurses or even hospitals.”

Ose wrote to Newsom urging the governor to “immediately waive the application of AB5 at rural hospitals and medical clinics using your emergency powers. This will allow administrators to provide medical care with trained personnel who are independent contractors, just as they were previously able to do prior to the adoption and implementation of AB 5.” If AB 5 was not suspended, “then the consequences of the coronavirus collapse will be magnified,” and the measure was already causing damage in other areas.

“At a time when most Californians can’t work outside the home, AB 5 is stopping many of them from working inside the home,” California Assemblyman Kevin Kiley told the Globe. Suspending AB 5 is “one easy thing” the governor could do to “make a big difference.”

According to California’s Legislative Analyst, AB 5 has already affected more than 1 million independent contractor and freelance working Californians, and the list of industries impacted by the law has surged past 300. As Doug Ose explained, suspending the measure is “the right thing to do,” but at this writing the Democrat governor has made no move to restrict AB 5  in any way.

Assembly Republicans recently advanced a measure to suspend AB 5 while corrective legislation is under consideration. Assembly Democrats killed it, which gives little hope for Kiley’s Assembly Bill 1928, an urgency measure to repeal AB 5.

As he announced restrictive measures on 40 million Californians, Gov. Newsom touted House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who turned 80 on Thursday, proclaiming, “we are so blessed to have her leadership in California.” Pelosi’s district includes San Francisco, where indigents, junkies and such deposit tons of excrement on the streets, a major health hazard. As the World Health Organization notes, human excreta has been implicated in the transmission of “many infectious diseases including cholera, typhoid, hepatitis, polio, cryptosporidiosis, ascariasis, and schistosomiasis.”

San Francisco district attorney Chesa Boudin, child of Weather Underground terrorists, declines to prosecute “quality of life” crimes such as public defecation. Gov. Newsom, a former San Francisco mayor, has been uncritical of Boudin, even as a pandemic imperils public health. As Newsom ignores Boudin and AB 5, other Democrats target President Trump and his handling of the crisis.

Consider “Will Californians let coronavirus kill their grandparents to please Wall Street? Hell no,” in the March 24 Sacramento Bee, flagship of the bankrupt McClatchy newspaper chain and for decades a virtual Democrat propaganda organ. As this editorial contends, “Trump now appears to be on the side of the virus,” which he initially downplayed as a “hoax.” 

The president is now, “floating the idea of letting COVID-19 kill more Americans in an effort to boost the stock market” and “acting against the advice of experts like Dr. Anthony Fauci.” And so on, and as Howard Beal said in Network, none of it is true.

This screed is the work of Bee editorial director Gil Duran, a former press secretary for Jerry Brown, the hereditary, recurring California governor who appointed William Newsom, Gavin’s father, as a judge in Placer County, and later to the state court of appeals. Duran was also communications director for California Senator Dianne Feinstein, one of the first to cry “racism” over the Wuhan virus, also known as the Chinese virus.

China received favored trade status largely due to Feinstein, who played down the regime’s human rights record by comparing Tiananmen Square with Kent State. Feinstein maintained a Chinese Communist spy on her staff for almost 20 years, through three election cycles, but never faced charges of channeling foreign influence in American elections. 

Sen. Feinstein has kept rather quiet about the democratic protesters in Hong Kong. After a briefing on the coronavirus, Feinstein was one of three Senators to sell off stock, prompting calls for an investigation of insider trading.

Gov. Newsom, meanwhile, hails the blessed leadership of Nancy Pelosi, who greenlighted the impeachment crusade against Trump and floated a 1,200-page leftist wish list as an alternative to the Senate coronavirus response package. Nancy’s boy Newsom, doubtless being groomed as a 2024 presidential contender, declines to suspend legislation that represses independent California workers and harms the effort to fight the coronavirus.

If 40 million Californians believe that Gavin Newsom, Nancy Pelosi and Dianne Feinstein were more concerned about fighting Trump than the coronavirus it would be hard to blame them.


Lloyd Billingsley

Source: https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2020/03/california-dem-olition-drive-lloyd-billingsley/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter



Israeli Startup Tries to Figure Out What Coronavirus Sounds Like - Meir Orbach

​
by Meir Orbach

Israel’s Ministry of Defense is testing technology developed by voice analyses startup Vocalis Health on confirmed coronavirus patients to see if it can detect a vocal coronavirus fingerprint to help with diagnosis


Is it possible to detect coronavirus (Covid-19) by the sound of a patient’s voice?

Israel’s Ministry of Defense is technology developed by voice analyses startup Vocalis Health on confirmed coronavirus (Covid-19) patients to see if the virus has a unique vocal fingerprint that can help with diagnosis, the company announced Tuesday.

Coronavirus checkup in Tel Aviv. Photo: Shaul Golan Coronavirus checkup in Tel Aviv. Photo: Shaul Golan

As part of the defense ministry’s testing, confirmed coronavirus patients are asked to give voice samples that are compared to those of a control group from the general population. The testing is being conducted at several hospitals and throughout the country, with results expected in four-six weeks, according to the company’s statement.

Founded in December 2019 as a result of a merger between two Israeli digital health startups—Beyond Verbal Communication Ltd. and Healthymize Ltd.—Vocalis Health develops artificial intelligence, machine learning-based voice analysis applications for the health sector. The company’s technology help healthcare providers assess a person’s health based on his or her voice and assist in the diagnosis of conditions that influence the vocal cords, such as heart and respiratory diseases and depression. The company has raised $9 million to date.


Meir Orbach

Source: https://www.calcalistech.com/ctech/articles/0,7340,L-3803369,00.html

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter



Watch: Former terrorist admits: 'Occupation' is largest industry of lies in entire world - Arutz Sheva Staff

​
by Arutz Sheva Staff

Former Palestinian Arab terrorist: 'Occupation' is largest industry of lies in entire world, is perpetuated for reasons of profit.




"The so-called occupation is the largest industry of lies in the entire world," explains former Palestinian Authority terrorist-turned-peace activist Mohammed Masad in a new viral video.
The video, released by the pro-Israel groups Canadians for Israel's Legal Rights and Im Tirtzu, has already been viewed over 150,000 times in 24 hours.

In the video, Masad contends that the "[occupation] is a business, a way to make money," that is perpetuated by far-left organizations and the Palestinian Authority "so they can make more money by trafficking the blood" of Israelis and Palestinians.

Masad was part of the infamous Fatah Black Panthers terror cell that carried out a number of terrorist attacks against Israel in the late 1980s and early 1990s

In 1991, he was arrested by Israel and sentenced to jail after his terror cell conducted a failed mission to kidnap an IDF soldier near Beit She'an.

He has since renounced terrorism and advocates for peace and against the corruption of the Palestinian Authority and all those who support it.

The video was released by Canadians for Israel's Legal Rights and Im Tirtzu in the framework of a new campaign aimed at "debunking the occupation lie."

According to the groups, the utterly baseless notion that Israel occupies "Palestinian land" is one of the most pernicious lies used to discredit, demonize, and de-legitimize the Jewish state and the Jewish people.

"The 'Big Occupation Lie' has become the driving source of BDS and modern-day anti-Semitism," the organizations explained, "and with all the discourse surrounding the 'Deal of the Century,' it is critical to explain the simple truth that Jews are indigenous to the Land of Israel."

The campaign coincides with the 100th Anniversary of the seminal San Remo Conference, convened by the Allies of World War I in April 1920, which entrenched Israel's legal rights in International Law.


Arutz Sheva Staff

Source: http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/277718

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter



Watch: Fauda vs the coronavirus - Arutz Sheva

​
by Arutz Sheva

What happens when the Eretz Nehederet comedy team tackle the renowned Israeli TV series and the dangerous virus? Watch the sketch.




Courtesy of Keshet 12

 
Arutz Sheva

Source: http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/277942

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter



Thursday, March 26, 2020

China, Article III: Every corona patient is a victim of China - Giulio Meotti

​
by Giulio Meotti

Can the Chinese government be held responsible for 'criminal negligence'? This is the single most important political and cultural issue in our global crisis. Giulio Meotti Interviews an expert on China who heads the Population Research Institute.


“Can the Chinese government be held responsible for 'criminal negligence' in relation to Covid-19?”, asks the economist Branko Milanovic. This is the question that many columnists and observers ask themselves.

I talked with Steven W. Mosher, an American expert on China and head of the Population Research Institute about this, the single most important political and cultural issue in the present global crisis. 

Meotti: What doesn’t the West get about the Chinese regime?

Mosher: Even after the end of the current pandemic--which will, sooner than we think, end--China will not be looked upon the same way again.  Its relationship with the West in general, and the U.S. in particular, will be fundamentally different.  It will no longer be seen as merely an economic competitor, or even a strategic rival. 

It will be seen as a hostile force to be confronted at every turn.  

China will not give up its hegemonic aspirations and return to its previous status as a non-expansionist regional power.  But it will no longer be aided in its quest for global domination by any country other than its handful of dictatorial allies whose dictators have, in one way or another, been paid off.  China's Belt and Road Initiative will come to be seen not as the high road to riches, but as deceitful debt-trap diplomacy, not to mention a one-way ticket to Coronavirus hell.

Meotti: Why is this epidemic, as you said, “made in China”? 

Mosher: With every day that goes by we learn more about the evil and incompetent regime that unleashed this horror upon the world.  Whether or not the Wuhan virus leaked from one of its biolabs or not, Beijing deliberately concealed the outbreak for as long as two months.  Although it was finally forced by the rising death toll to admit it had a problem, it has continued to dissemble about virtually everything else in the two months since. 

Why wasn't the world warned in time? Estimates are that 95% of the infections in China, and almost 100% around the world, could have been stopped with timely medical intervention.

I am a frequent visitor to Italy, and have over the years traveled to all parts of the country, from Turin and Venice in the north, to Bari in the south.  It pains me to learn that in northern Italy hundreds of elderly Italians are being denied ICU beds and ventilators, and are dying.  They are dying because of the incompetence and evil of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).  

Italy signed on to the same Belt and Road project, the only G-7 country to do so, on the promise that it would lead to prosperity.  At the present time, however, China's New Silk Road seems to be a fast track to death. 


The problem is not that there are hundreds of thousands of Chinese citizens living in Italy, not counting illegal immigrants.  The problem is that their government allowed the Chinese Coronavirus to reach epidemic proportions in China, and then allowed it to be spread around the world.  The CCP could probably have not done a better job of "seeding" a global pandemic if it had been trying to.

Let’s be crystal clear about one thing: Everyone who falls ill from the Chinese coronavirus, everyone who dies from the Chinese coronavirus, everyone who is denied medical care because the hospitals are treating Chinese coronavirus patients,  everyone who loses a job, or loses weeks out of their lives because of a quarantine—each and every one of those individuals is a victim of the Chinese Communist Party.

That because it is the CCP—and only the CCP—that is responsible for this deadly outbreak.  

Meotti: A regime that aborted females, that imprisons millions, that take organs from prisoners, persecute religions… Where is the scandal in the West? 

Mosher: The Chinese coronavirus has also put the spotlight on the Peoples Republic of China’s (PRC) outsized influence in the United States. 

Every Fortune 500 company that has invested in China has become a hostage to the Beijing regime, and its lobbyists argue against taking action against China's multifarous human rights abuses.  Wall Street has become the financial services arm of the Beijing regime, providing the financing and the hard currency it needs for its military buildup and relentless expansionism in the South China Sea and elsewhere.  

Its penetration of U.S. colleges and universities to implant or suborn professors also gives it influence in academe.  These professors work for China's interests, not America's. Such academics not only advocate pro-China policy positions, they sometimes steal research and technology. 

The FBI has recently arrested "students" who were actually intelligence agents and other "researchers" who were actually officers in the People’s Liberation Army.

Why is today's China a threat to our civilization, freedom of expression,WHO etc..?

The Chinese Coronavirus pandemic has focused the world's attention on the dangers of a rising China is a way that nothing else has.  It has also exposed the way that the Chinese Communists have corrupted the international order, starting with the World Health Organization. 


Incredibly, the WHO helped China to hide the epidemic for a couple of weeks.  WHO researchers were kept out of China until February 15, more than two months after the first cases were discovered. Even today, the WHO is not given access to the kind of data that would allow a complete understanding of the spread of the virus in China.  Without this information, we are fighting in the dark against a largely unknown enemy.

We should have known certain basic facts about the coronavirus weeks ago. 
  • We should have known that it was contagious during the incubation period.  
  • We should have known that the incubation period was two or three weeks, or even longer.  
  • We should have known that it could be transmitted by aerosols.  
  • We should have known how long it was able to survive on surfaces. 
  • We should have known what antiviral drugs were effective in treating the disease. 
Instead, we were told virtually nothing.  And what we were told often turned out to be false.  The numbers of infected and dead, for example, in China are certainly much higher than the official numbers.

China's model of governance would mean an end to all the things that we hold dear, from human rights and popular sovereignty, to freedom of expression, association, and assembly.  None of these things are permitted in China.  Nor would they be long tolerated in a world dominated by China.

The post-coronavirus world is unlikely to be a world dominated by China, however.  The Chinese Communist Party's evil and incompetence has now been exposed on the world stage in an unforgetable way.  

Americans will never forget that, in the middle of a viral epidemic unleashed by China, the Beijing regime threatened to withhold vital prescription drugs and medical devices in order to let "America drown in a coronavirus sea."


America and the world will now move beyond the "China Dream," even if the Communist Party leaders there continue to cling to it. 
  • The world will reassess its dependence on China for, among other things, prescription drugs and medical devices. 
  • The Belt and Road Initiative will grind to a halt as China desperately tries to avoid a financial collapse. 
  • The U.S. tariffs on Chinese-made goods will go back up when China defaults--as now it must--on Phase I of the trade deal it signed with President Trump.  
  • Chinese investment in places like northern Italy, where PRC controls much of the textile industry will be reassessed. 
The world will pull back from China.

As the world order reconstitutes itself after the current pandemic subsides, it will take a different shape.  China will no longer be regarded as a responsible member of that order, because it has proven that it is not.  Instead it will be on the outside, looking in. 


Giulio Meotti, an Italian journalist with Il Foglio, writes a twice-weekly column for Arutz Sheva. He is the author of the book "A New Shoah", that researched the personal stories of Israel's terror victims, published by Encounter and of "J'Accuse: the Vatican Against Israel" published by Mantua Books.. His writing has appeared in publications, such as the Wall Street Journal, Frontpage and Commentary.

Source: http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Articles/Article.aspx/25437

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter



Curbing China's Dominance of Medical Supplies - Ron F. Hale

​
by Ron F. Hale

China is now the global kingpin in the supply of key ingredients for many prescription drugs, over-the-counter medicines, vitamins, and supplements


Rosemary Gibson is senior advisor at the Hastings Center and a national authority on health care reform. In 2014, she won the highest honor from the American Medical Writers Association. She is an editor for JAMA Internal Medicine. She has received the Lifetime Achievement Award from the American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine.

Speaking to journalist Sharyl Attkisson in an April 23, 2018, interview, Gibson warned: "What happens if we have a Fukushima type event or the trade routes are blocked in the South China Sea? Or if there's a global pandemic? And the United States and virtually every other country in the world is dependent on a few companies in China for the ingredients to make critical antibiotics."

Gibson provided a detailed picture of China’s growing domination of the medical drug and equipment market in her 2018 book China Rx: Exposing the Risks of America’s Dependence on China for Medicine (co-authored by Janardan Prasad Singh).

China is now the global kingpin in the supply of key ingredients for many prescription drugs, over-the-counter medicines, vitamins, and supplements. The Chinese now control most of the active and inactive ingredients for the manufacture of medicine in the world.

Suppose your blood pressure medication is factory-made in Canada and you feel your supply line is safe. Your health is still in jeopardy because Communist China could choose to ban the export of your drug’s active ingredient to Canada. 

In China Rx, Gibson and Singh lay out the facts in how drug manufacturing has experienced a paradigm shift over several decades. Communist China has followed an aggressive plan in becoming the global supplier of necessary ingredients for medicines.

Penicillin, a longstanding drug in the fight against bacterial infection, is a prime example of America’s market loss and China’s economic seizure and takeover.

Around 2004, the Chinese government had its national companies dump penicillin ingredients on the global market. Most Western countries, including the U.S., could not compete with their low prices and went bankrupt. Then China issued a major price increase on these important ingredients, thereby cornering the market and making billions.

Although the penicillin that you purchase at your local drugstore may not be manufactured in China in its final form, the keys to its production (active ingredients) are under communist control. 

Forget about a vital drug like heparin, the only anticoagulant used in the U.S. for heart surgery and kidney dialysis. What about something simple, like Vitamin C? 

China is now the primary supplier for the key ingredients for manufacturing this vitamin in the U.S. and around the world. Chinese companies created an artificial shortage of vitamin C around 2005 by slowing production and exports. American companies filed a class-action suit resulting in a legal battle lasting over eight years. The evidence was strong and convincing against China. The judge ordered China to pay over $160 million in damages to U.S. corporations.

The Seattle Times in June 2007 reported, “In less than a decade, China has captured 90 percent of the U.S. market for vitamin C, driving almost everyone else out of business… Chinese pharmaceutical companies also have taken over much of the world market in the production of antibiotics, analgesics, enzymes and primary amino acids. According to an industry group, China makes 70 percent of the world’s penicillin, 50 percent of its aspirin and 35 percent of its acetaminophen (often sold under the brand name Tylenol), as well as the bulk of vitamins A, B12, C and E.”

In China Rx, Gibson also reveals that China is the main supplier of the active ingredients for acetaminophen and aspirin now used in over 600 prescription and over-the-counter drugs.
How were these warning signs missed for these less-complex drugs, not to mention the more expensive heart and cancer medications? 

Who is listening to Rosemary Gibson on Capitol Hill?

Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL), while chairing a hearing of the Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship on March 12, sounded the alarm concerning critical shortages in our drug supply chain, the offshoring of American drug manufacturing for two decades, and now the threat of a global pandemic.

He warned, “The inability to quickly increase the production of key supplies, such as surgical masks, medical gowns, and pharmaceutical drugs limits our ability to mitigate the worst effects of disease in this emerging crisis and in any future pandemic. It is unacceptable that China holds this much leverage over America’s public health and economy, which are both essential components of our national security.”

Thank you, Senator!

Ron F. Hale

Source: https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/03/curbing_chinas_dominance_of_medical_supplies.html

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter



What the Political Scene in China Says about the Coronavirus - Gary Gindler

​
by Gary Gindler

Warring factions within China shed light on the disease.


The COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic began in China in late November and early December 2019. Now many accuse the Chinese authorities of negligence and the fact that they did not take sufficient measures to prevent the spread of the virus, thereby contributing to the infection of the inhabitants of all countries on the planet. However, the Chinese Communists had a completely different task.

In order to understand the logic of the Chinese authorities, you need to know what China is. In modern China, there is not a traditional nation-state, but a party-state. They have no separation of powers as in Western countries. Nevertheless, there is still a particular division of power in China.

Power in China is divided among several opposing communist groups.

The most famous are the Communist Youth League (CYL) faction and the Shanghai faction. The CYL faction was significantly weakened in 2016 by the secretary-general of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), Xi Jinping. Former CCP secretary-general Hu Jintao and current prime minister Li Keqiang belong to the CYL faction. Another former secretary-general of the CCP, Jiang Zemin, belongs to the Shanghai faction.

Xi Jinping came to power in November 2012 entirely unexpectedly. The Hu Jintao faction insisted on one candidate, while the Jiang Zemin faction supported the other. Xi Jinping skillfully played the role of a compromise candidate. He looked like a suitable candidate for all the main warring factions, because, although he was one of the "communist princes" (his father was a close associate of Mao Zedong), he gave the impression of a somewhat "weak" leader. Xi Jinping belongs to the faction long forgotten in China, which at one time was aligned with the Soviet Union and Joseph Stalin.

Hopes for easy manipulation of the new party boss did not materialize. Secretary-General Xi Jinping toughened the persecution of those who do not support the party's official line. In 2013, shortly after coming to power, Xi Jinping even banned the teaching of freedom of the press, civil rights, and the rule of law.

The massive party inquisition and the purge of the party apparatus, which began in China in 2013, led to the fact that many supporters of the previous leader of the country, Hu Jintao, appeared on the dock. Xi Jinping not only established effective internet censorship in China, but also achieved almost a lifetime post.

The Chinese communists have been fighting for many years with all kinds of "deviations" from their own dogmatic interpretation of Marxism. On this front, they clashed with the Soviet communists, the Marxist Dalai Lama, the Fourth (Trotskyist) Communist International, and numerous internal factions.

The congress of the CCP, which meets every five years, is the supreme arbiter of all covert battles. But between congresses, the establishment of political influence materializes in the manipulation of cadres — each faction seeks to place as many of its people into leading posts as possible.

Recently, a faction of Wang Qishan, an associate of Xi Jinping in mass party purges, has begun to gain strength in China. Wang Qishan is a representative of the "power bloc" in the government and is a peculiar Chinese analog of Torquemada. Wang's faction is relatively new, but he still managed to put his people in key positions. For example, in 2016, Chen Wenqing became the head of the "Chinese KGB," and American-educated banker Jiang Chaolyan became the party boss of Hubei Province.

Hubei Province, with its capital in Wuhan, has always been "problematic" for the Chinese communists. The relationship between Beijing and Wuhan is somewhat reminiscent of the relationship between Washington and New York, Moscow and St. Petersburg, Madrid and Barcelona. The parallels here are unambiguous – this is not just a conflict between the current and previous capital of the country (Wuhan was the capital under Chiang Kai-shek). Wuhan has always been a rebellious city that triggered the events that led to the tragedy in Tiananmen Square in 1989.

When the epidemic of the new coronavirus started, Beijing faced the challenge — to ensure that the party authorities of the rebellious and freethinking Wuhan made mistakes, and to deal with them under this pretext.

Now many say that if the Chinese authorities acted three weeks earlier, the number of diseases could have decreased by 95%, and its spread would be significantly limited. This could happen only if the main objective were human health. But in fact, the main task of the Chinese communists was to win the intraspecific struggle.

All these warring factions of China at the most critical time of the outbreak of the epidemic were engaged in what they always did: to protect and strengthen their political positions and interests, and not to fight the spread of the virus.

For China, such an epidemic is a typical phenomenon. Influenza outbreaks occur in China, as in all countries, every year, but generally, in 2019, China was ready for the flu season, and no panic was expected. Xi Jinping needed a crisis to settle accounts with dissent in the party ranks.

Without a doubt, the Chinese left operates on the same principles as the American left: these people "never let a serious crisis to go waste."

There is a widespread belief that Beijing was silent about the scale of the epidemic in Wuhan. Initially, that was the case, but only until January 7, 2020. On this day, Xi Jinping intervened and changed the essence of events — from medical, they became political. From that moment, it was Beijing that methodically and purposefully stepped up the situation around the epidemic.

What the Chinese leaders did not take into account was the fact that their ensuing panic would be picked up by the world's mass disinformation media. The surrealistic footage of the Apocalypse from China, created by skillful Chinese propagandists, was very photogenic and was instantly circulated by the world press.

The crisis inflated by the Beijing elite was the result of an ideological confrontation among the Chinese factions, which clashed over some of the nuances of Marxist dogma.

Xi Jinping's ruling group has skillfully used the epidemic to blame the party leadership of Hubei and the leadership of Wuhan. As a result, the political goal was achieved. The party boss of Hubei province, Jiang Chaoliang (from the Wang Qishan faction), and the party boss of Wuhan city, Ma Guoqiang (from the Shanghai faction), "paid for the epidemic" and were removed from their posts on February 13, 2020. Only after this reprisal did Beijing embark on a full-scale suppression of the true extent of the epidemic, which continues to this day.

The connection with the coronavirus is indicative of the fate of Wang Xiaodong, the governor of Hubei province since 2016. As a man of Xi Jinping, Wang Xiaodong remained at his post, even though he is the governor of the province most affected by the coronavirus of China.

From this point of view, the undercover political operation of the Chinese communists was successful. But the panic they created turned out to be more contagious than the coronavirus itself.

As soon as the political reprisal in Hubei was over, Beijing instantly switched from internal to external efforts and began openly accusing the United States of creating and spreading the coronavirus. The Chinese communists simply had to do this because they had lost control of the situation — the panic they created, and then the coronavirus itself, spread throughout the world.

What was initially conceived as a local and time-limited episode of reprisals against party comrades unexpectedly gained a global status. The genie jumped out of the bottle: the situation in China took the form of a comprehensive economic crisis and spread throughout the whole world.

On the surface, the current situation looks as if microorganisms are capable of reformatting the world macroeconomics. However, the difference between the current pandemic and all previous ones is that in 2020, the Information Coronavirus won a convincing economic victory over the real one.


Gary Gindler, Ph.D. is a conservative columnist at Gary Gindler Chronicles and the founder of a new science: politiphysics. Follow him on Twitter and Quodverum.

Source: https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/03/what_the_political_scene_in_china_says_about_the_coronavirus.html

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter



The Coronavirus and the November Election - Bruce Thornton

​
by Bruce Thornton


What does it all mean for Trump’s chances to win again?




Early in the new year, President Trump seemed in good shape to be reelected. The economy was booming, with record-setting stock-market highs and unemployment lows. The over three years of various inquisitions into “scandals” like the Russian collusion or Ukrainian quid pro quo had culminated in no evidence of any crimes, and in a failed impeachment conviction. The opposition Democrats looked increasingly likely to be settling one of two old, rich, white mediocrities as their standard-bearer for November, with nothing to recommend them other than utopian, expensive anti-free market policies and their irrational hatred of Donald Trump.

The more prudent prognosticators knew that despite such tail-winds, Trump still faced the greatest fear of every politician: events. Some are known possibilities, such as an economic downturn, a shooting war, or some Harvey Weinstein level of scandal. But no one foresaw that a pandemic starting in a Chinese wet market would incite mass hysteria and containment policies that have wounded our economy, tanked the market, raised unemployment, and threaten to bring on a deep recession, if not a depression.

What does all this mean for Trump’s chances to be reelected?

On the one hand, economic bad news usually overrides the advantage of being the incumbent, especially when it is accompanied by a foreign policy disaster, as Jimmy Carter learned when his reelection was hampered by, among many other things, the stagflation of the Seventies and the Iranian hostage crisis. But the current economic woes have not been caused by Trump’s or his party’s policies, which in fact created the boom in the first place. Nor does he face abroad anything as serious as the hostage crisis.

The current economic debacle is the consequence of an unforeseen contingency no state can adequately plan for. And unlike Carter’s blunders, Trump’s occasional misspeaking or exaggerations, all hyped and distorted by the media, have been redeemed by his swift move to ban all air travel from China, and a few weeks later from Europe as well. These actions no doubt have saved thousands of American lives.

Trump also has been lucky in his enemies: The NeverTrump media have continued their obsessive-compulsive habit of demonizing Trump’s decisions to the point that they circulate patent lies.

No, banning flights from China was not “racist,” but a reflection of the simple fact that the outbreak began in China and worsened by their secrecy and lies.

No, banning flights from Europe was not thoughtless disrespect to our allies, but common sense. Even the Europeans have seen the light, basically gutting their Schengen zone of free border-crossing between states by bringing back border controls.

No, Trump did not call the outbreak a “hoax,” a blatant, contrived misreading of his comments.

No, he did not cut funding for the CDC, another lie that even progressive outlets like AP and the Washington Post had to correct.

No, Trump’s “incompetent” leadership did not delay the production and distribution of test kits. Look to the federal, bureaucratic CDC and its network of intricate rules and regulations that hindered a more nimble response.

By this point, at least half of American voters have become used to the media and Dems crying wolf. Many voters no doubt will see these antics as a despicable search for partisan advantage at a time when the whole country faces a serious health crisis. What they see on the news nearly every day is Trump’s attention focused on resolving the crisis and instituting policies to soften the economic blow. At the same time, they also see the Democrats holding up legislation because they want to do a favor for powerful clients like unions, Green Energy grifters, Planned Parenthood, and the “diversity” racket. The RNC no doubt will constantly remind voters of this contrast come November.

Then there’s the way this crisis graphically reinforces Trump’s pull-back from the globalist, one-world paradigm and its scorn for national borders.

After the China virus invasion, how will the Dems sound when they start plumping for open borders, sanctuary cities, liberalized immigrant entry policies, the release of illegal alien felons, and the demonization of ICE?

Or when they intensify their war against carbon-based energy and fracking, the domestic development of which has made us nearly energy independent, no longer a hostage to the dysfunctional politics and disorder of most petrostates?

Or when they start up with stale charges of “racism” and “xenophobia” that they claim motivates Trump’s America First policies, when thousands are dying because China’s totalitarian regime lied about it and then tried to spin a preposterous conspiracy theory implicating U.S. soldiers, one given support by progressive chants of “racism”?

And how does the “global marketplace” and its fabled “harmony of interests” fare when a nuclear armed rival blatantly steals our intellectual property, cheats on its treaty obligations, and threatens to use against us its outsized dominance of our critical pharmaceuticals? Or a transnational institution like the U.N.’s World Health Organization, whose president was elected with China’s help, and has been paying China back by parroting its lies about the origins and infectability of the virus?

Finally, Trump will face in November one of the weakest presidential candidates in the postwar period. Joe Biden for decades has been a political hack, a serial plagiarist, and a shameless opportunist, as will become clear when in his campaign he has to pivot away from the wacky socialist programs like Medicare for All or the Green New Deal. His whole career he has carried water for credit-card companies and banks, making sure, for example that student loan debt cannot be forgiven through bankruptcy. The odor of corruption still clings to him and his family, including his brother as well as his son. Biden’s nice talk about China appears hinky given the sweetheart deals worth millions that Hunter secured from a Chinese investment fund and a private equity firm.

And on top of all that, he is showing clear signs of cognitive decline. Always a gaffe-meister and inappropriate squeezer of women and girls, the 77-year-old Joe’s outbursts, spatial confusion, bizarre comments, and tall tales have now gone beyond the typical politician who stretches the truth and spins facts. They have become frighteningly surreal. As the campaign progresses, and he appears on the debate stage with a candidate full of energy, confidence, and pizzazz, questions  about Joe’s cognitive state and stamina will lead to further questions about his fitness to fill the most stressful, consequential job in the world. And on election day he may be damaged by the Bernie Bros who sit out the campaign, or actively work against it with protests or even violence. If the election is close, those internal enemies may tilt the scales.

And yet.

We don’t know at this point whether this crisis will have peaked by November, how great the toll of dead by then, how deeply damaged the economy will be. In the coming weeks, if not days, Trump will face choices whose outcomes cannot be predicted. Should he let people go back to work and get the economy going again? Or should we stick with the radical social distancing that will worsen the economic damage every week it is in force. In other words, fix the economy at the price of more infected and dead, or let it continue to tank and cause more misery and suffering down the road––with the media peanut gallery ready to hiss, heckle, and whistle at his decisions. Don’t forget, Trump has done as well as he has in spite of a concerted, non-stop effort on the part of the media and the government agencies like the FBI and DOJ to cripple his administration. We have to assume that these efforts will redouble between now and then.

In the end, it all comes down to a critical mass of voters who have enough common sense and practical wisdom to filter out the noise and hysteria, and vote for the candidate who upholds America’s political and economic principles of freedom, enumerated rights, limited government, and self-rule. Right now, with irrational hoarding of toilet paper and eggs, it doesn’t seem like there’s a lot of common sense. If conditions don’t improve over the summer, fear and panic may make even a weak candidate attractive, if he promises to take control and manage people’s lives, and, as Tocqueville’s writes of “soft despotism,” “to spare them all the care of thinking and all the trouble of living.”

“Anxiety,” Kierkegaard said, “is the dizziness of freedom.” At times like these, freedom can appear a necessary sacrifice in order to find a seeming peace. November will be a plebiscite on that trade-off.

* * *
Photo from Wikimedia Commons


Bruce Thornton is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center.

Source: https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2020/03/coronavirus-and-november-election-bruce-thornton/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter



Edelstein sacrificed himself for the Knesset - Mati Tuchfeld

​
by Mati Tuchfeld

There are rules, laws and statutes that finely regulate the balance of power within the Knesset's walls. The High Court's intervention in this process is a dangerous precedent of the highest order.


In two-and-a-half weeks Benny Gantz will lose the mandate he received from the president to form the next government, after failing to make any headway thus far. Ever since President Reuven Rivlin tasked him with forming the next government, Gantz has mostly focused on seizing control of the legislature while almost completely neglecting the main goal of the mandate he was given. 

If he fails in his mission – and as of now this appears to be the direction – Rivlin won't be able to give Gantz a two-week extension and will have to transfer the mandate to Benjamin Netanyahu. Even if the prime minister won't even want to form a government, preferring another election instead, he will ask for the president's mandate just to stop the rampaging Blue and White and left, which are treating the Knesset as their own personal headquarters.

According to the precedent established by Knesset legal adviser Eyal Yinon, chairmanship of the Knesset's Arrangements Committee also transfers to the party of the person tasked with forming the government. Avi Nissenkorn will be replaced by Miki Zohar, who will block any additional attempt to use the Knesset against Netanyahu.

When the High Court required Knesset Speaker Yuli Edelstein to convene the plenum to discuss his replacement, he was faced with two bad options: disobey, or obey. It's unclear which is worse.  

On one hand, the time has come for the legislative branch to show the judicial branch that its days of unlawfully appropriating authority are over. To this end, Edelstein should have declared he has no intention of honoring the High Court's ruling, and stayed the course. But Edelstein is more stately than people think. Doing this would have been out of character. He can argue with the judges, criticize them, but he will always follow their rulings. 

This time, however, there is a second issue, no less critical than the first. Respecting the High Court's decision, from Edelstein's perspective, would have been crossing a red line. Obedience would have created a dangerous precedent, allowing the High Court to complete its takeover of the Knesset. Appointing a Speaker or any other position in the government or Knesset is part of the normal political give and take which occurs in the Knesset on a daily basis. Political arm-twisting between the coalition and opposition, parliamentary games, muscle-flexing by committee leaders – are an inseparable part of the political experience. 

There are rules, laws and statutes, however, that finely regulate the balance of power. The Knesset knows how to handle recalcitrant committee leaders uninterested in bringing issues under their purview to a hearing, just as it's capable of giving the Knesset Speaker the authority to occasionally override a majority bloc of MKs seeking heavy-handed legislation. Obeying the High Court this time would have removed all the restraints completely – a dangerous precedent of the highest order. Because after that point and moving forward it would mean just one thing: The court would be running the country's democratic house, not the elected officials. 
Edelstein, therefore, took the middle path. He didn't obey the ruling, but also won't be continuing as Knesset Speaker. He is taking personal responsibility and resigning. And while he won't be able to save himself anymore from the boot of the High Court, he will likely save the Knesset. At least for now. Edelstein didn't believe the High Court judges would exhibit such a degree of imperviousness, and therefore chose to invest quite a bit of energy in his appeal, which was penned by two of the more prominent attorneys in the country. After formulating their response, which essentially rejects the High Court's intervention in the political game inside the Knesset, Yinon expressed astonishment at its depth of thought and quality of arguments.    

The legal document, however, was of absolutely no interest to the appeals panel. From the moment it was sent from the Knesset to the Supreme Court, a mere 25 minutes passed before Yinon received word that a 19-page ruling would be delivered by the judges within a quarter of an hour. The judges wrote their ruling before Edlestein's appeal was even submitted. The judges stopped bothering with doing justice a long time ago. Now they don't even think they have to maintain appearances.


Mati Tuchfeld

Source: https://www.israelhayom.com/opinions/edelstein-sacrificed-himself-for-the-knesset/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter



We know Biden has roaming hands, but how far have they roamed? - Andrea Widburg

​
by Andrea Widburg

A former Senate staffer claims that, in 1993, Biden’s hands roamed right into her underwear and got very aggressive there.


Before you even begin to read this post, remember what Hillary Clinton, the voice of the left in 2015, said about sexual assault allegations: “Every survivor of sexual assault deserves to be heard, believed, and supported.” With that fixed in your mind, it’s time to talk about Joe Biden.

The #MeToo movement in America reached its crescendo in 2017. The diminuendo phase happened soon after, when it seemed as if every Democrat man in America, especially in Hollywood and the media, had been playing fast and loose with women, even while pandering to feminists.

Up until spring 2019, when he began his presidential run, Joe Biden seemed immune. That was when, Lucy Flores, a Bernie Sanders supporter, claimed that, in 2014, when he was still Vice President, Joe Biden touched her inappropriately and kissed her head at a campaign rally. In other words, she claimed that he did to her what he did to the women and girls in this video:



Biden denied the accusation. And because Biden seemed like the best hope to beat President Trump, he got a pass. (Recall that, back in 1998, feminist reporter Nina Burleigh said of Clinton, “I would be happy to give him a blowjob just to thank him for keeping abortion legal.” Politics before principles....)

Tara Reade, however, believed Flores’s claims. To support Flores, she went public with her own story about the time that Biden had “put his hand on my shoulder and run his finger up my neck.” However, because Reade was threatening the man who would save America from Trump, the Democrats threw at her the worst insult they could think of, calling her a Putin puppet. Reade retreated.

As the Democrat Party began to consolidate around Biden, Reade decided that, for her daughter’s sake, it was time to tell the whole story about Joe. She reached out to Time’s Up, a post-#MeToo organization that was established to help survivors of sexual assault and harassment tell their stories. Because Reade supported Sanders, Time’s Up bowed out of helping her. The organization was afraid that doing so would look like a political act and threaten its non-profit standing. Additionally, Reade had written nice things about Putin, which gave credence to the charge she was a Russian operative. 

Eventually, Reade found her way to Katie Halper, a podcaster and journalist who often works with Rolling Stones’ Matt Taibbi (one of the last honest left-leaning journalists). On Wednesday, Katie Halper released a short excerpt of a more extended interview with Reade. In the excerpt, Reade gives graphic details about what Biden allegedly did to her in 1993.

According to Reade, she was working in Joe Biden’s office in 1993. Her supervisor asked that she deliver a gym bag to Biden. Reade reached Biden just as he was finishing a conversation with someone, after which they were alone. 

Suddenly, Biden pushed Reade up against a wall, slithered his hand down the outside of her skirt and up the inside, and then thrust his fingers, not just into her underwear, but into her. At the same time, he started kissing her and asking her if she wanted to go somewhere else.

Reade’s body language must have alerted Biden to the fact that, no, she didn’t want to go somewhere else, for Biden pulled away. He then said either “Come on, man. I heard you liked me,” or, perhaps, “Come on, man. I thought you liked me.”

Reade was shattered. Up until then, she’d admired Biden, whom she considered a father figure, for he was the same age as her father. More than that, “He was, like, this champion of women’s rights in my eyes, and I couldn’t believe it was happening. It seemed surreal.”

Even worse than the assault, said Reade, was what Biden did when it was over. “He took his finger. He just, like, pointed at me and said, ‘You’re nothing to me.’” And at that moment, Reade truly felt like nothing. While she told her brother and a close friend what happened immediately after the event, she remained silent until Flores’s words, and the treatment meted out to Flores, caused her to act.

Keeping in mind Hillary Clinton’s words, which were the mantra of the Democrat Party until too many Democrat men got hit by them, Reade must be believed. And frankly, listening to her, she sounds believable, not least because it’s so easy to envision gropey, arrogant, hair-sniffing Biden being gropey and arrogant with Reade – and then calling her “man,” as he does everyone else.

Joe Biden's accuser finally tells her full story


Andrea Widburg

Source: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/03/we_know_biden_has_roaming_hands_but_how_far_have_they_roamed.html

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter