Saturday, December 30, 2023

David Schwimmer slams survivor orgs. for not believing Israelis were brutalized on Oct. 7 - Jerusalem Post Staff

 

by Jerusalem Post Staff

Despite his experiences with organizations that work for the benefit of survivors of rape and sexual assault, many yet “refuse to believe” that people in Israel were assaulted by Hamas terrorists.

 

David Schwimmer (photo credit: REUTERS/MIKE BLAKE)

Actor David Schwimmer, known for his role as Ross Geller on the hit 90’s sitcom ‘Friends,’ slammed organizations and individuals who “refuse to believe” the testimonies of the Jewish survivors of Hamas’s assault on southern Israel on October 7.

Schwimmer’s statements came on his Friday post to his 8.3 million followers on the social media platform, Instagram. His message castigating those who, despite the abundant evidence, continue to doubt the testimonies of Israeli survivors,  captioned a screenshot of the recent New York Times article documenting cases of sexual assault and rape experienced by Israeli women during Hamas’s attacks.

“I served on the Board of Directors for The Rape Foundation for almost 20 years, and have been an advocate for child and adult survivors of sexual violence for almost 30,” Schwimmer wrote. He goes on to share how, during his time doing this work, he has encountered “the most incredible and courageous people” who survived “the most horrific conditions imaginable” and have been able to go on to lead normal lives after receiving proper treatment and care.

He continued to highlight that, regardless of an individual’s identity, such as their age, race, gender, religion, sexual orientation, nationality, education, or economic status, “One crucial aspect I learned early on about the healing process, and for justice to be served by the criminal offenders, is that the survivor be BELIEVED,” Schwimmer added.

However, he noted, despite his experiences with organizations that work for the benefit of survivors of rape and sexual assault, many yet “refuse to believe” that people in Israel were assaulted by Hamas terrorists.

David Schwimmer (credit: REUTERS)Enlrage image
David Schwimmer (credit: REUTERS)

Schwimmer: "Where is their outrage?"

“Where is their outrage?” Schwimmer wrote. “In the weeks and months that followed, it became clear that their activism, their advocacy, is conditional. They’ll fight like hell for ALL victims of sexual violence — unless they’re Jews.”

He goes on to suggest that denial of Hamas’s crimes against Israelis is a method of “avoiding compassion and personal responsibility,” but stated that he hopes the New York Times article will bring such people to admit their error and confront unconscious biases.

“Because — as they know better than most — their refusal to believe the survivors have RE-TRAUMATIZED them, as well as their families, friends, and those of us who did believe them,” Schwimmer emphasized. “But they can use their voice now. And it would be great to know who the real allies are.”

"Their refusal to believe the survivors have RE-TRAUMATIZED them, as well as their families, friends, and those of us who did believe them.”

David Schwimmer

 
Jerusalem Post Staff

Source: https://www.jpost.com/j-spot/article-780077

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Hamas Supporters Return to Ground Zero to Promote Terror - Daniel Greenfield

 

by Daniel Greenfield

What kind of nation allows this?

 


There’s really something about the Jihad and Ground Zero.

He Survived the Trade Center Bombing. ‘I Always Knew They’d Be Back.’ -Thirty years ago today, Tim Lang was injured in the first attack on the twin towers, an ominous but often overlooked prelude to 9/11. He does not forget.

We’ve forgotten though and that’s why they’re back.

After attacking Christmas Tree lightings, churches, synagogues, a Holocaust museum and airports, the Hamas mob returned to where they were always going to go.


Only a nation that had completely forgotten and lost touch with the recent past could allow this abomination to take place.

The two Islamic terror attacks on the World Trade Center were obsessed with the idea of bringing down the great symbols of Western Civilization.

That is what this is about more than any individual war.

This is the ancient Islamic Jihad against civilization.

The Jihadists have returned to Ground Zero.

 

Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center, is an investigative journalist and writer focusing on the radical Left and Islamic terrorism.

Source: https://www.frontpagemag.com/hamas-supporters-return-to-ground-zero-to-promote-terror/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Why is Hamas worried about the October 7 narrative of Iran, Hezbollah? - Seth J. Frantzman

 

by Seth J. Frantzman

Hezbollah, PIJ, and other groups coordinate with Hamas and Iran. It would seem unbelievable that only regarding October 7, there was no prior discussion about such an attack with Iran and its proxies

 

 Iranian Foreign Minister Hossein Amirabdollahian meets with Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh in Qatar. October 15, 2023 (photo credit: Hasan Shirvani/IRNA)
Iranian Foreign Minister Hossein Amirabdollahian meets with Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh in Qatar. October 15, 2023
(photo credit: Hasan Shirvani/IRNA)

Hamas put out two denials this week about October 7, both of which raised eyebrows. Neither of the Hamas statements denies its crimes on October 7; rather, it is proud of how it massacred civilians and kidnapped children and elderly people.

Instead, it is concerned about reports that Iran and Hezbollah knew about the attack. Iran backs Hamas, and in the wake of the attack, Iranian Foreign Minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahian met Hamas leaders in Qatar, many of whom live in Doha. Hamas officials also live in Lebanon and have traveled to Turkey since October 7.Despite all the support Hamas received, however, it remains concerned that eventually, evidence will emerge that other countries or groups had prior knowledge of the October 7 attack.
It is simply implausible that such a huge operation could be planned entirely in Gaza without anyone knowing. Iran has backed Hamas for years and has shown willingness to try to unify its various fronts against Israel to coordinate with Hamas.That means Hezbollah, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and other groups coordinate with Hamas and Iran. So, it would seem to be unbelievable that regarding October 7, there was no prior discussion about such an attack with Tehran and its proxies.

Hamas claims that Hezbollah did not know about October 7

Hamas, however, takes this issue very seriously. The terrorist group slammed a French newspaper for an article about the “timing of Operation al-Aqsa Flood.” Hamas claimed that the “journalist has included in his article full of fabrications and lies a claim about Yahya Sinwar asking Saleh al-Arouri to inform Mr. Hassan Nasrallah about the operation half an hour before it happened,” relating that to Osama Hamdan, a senior representative of Hamas in Lebanon.

Palestinian Hamas militants carry a rocket as they parade during an anti-Israel rally in Rafah, in the southern Gaza Strip (credit: REUTERS/IBRAHEEM ABU MUSTAFA)Enlrage image
Palestinian Hamas militants carry a rocket as they parade during an anti-Israel rally in Rafah, in the southern Gaza Strip (credit: REUTERS/IBRAHEEM ABU MUSTAFA)

Hamas claimed the reports that Hezbollah had learned about the attack just before it happened were false, going as far as to say that the article shows foreign media is “biased” and not “professional.”

Concerns about reports that Hezbollah knew about October 7, however, are not the only Hamas denial this week. It also slammed Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps spokesman for comments suggesting that October 7 was revenge for the US killing of IRGC Quds Force commander Qasem Soleimani.

“Hamas denies the validity of the remarks,” the terrorist group said. Hamas claimed that the attack on October 7 was due to “the dangers that threaten al-Aqsa Mosque.”These statements show Hamas is now waging a war over perceptions of October 7. It wants to portray its commanders in Gaza as solely responsible and able to perform attacks without Iran’s coordinating hand. It wants to showcase that it is a fully Palestinian movement that doesn’t need to coordinate with Shi’ite Hezbollah.It also wants to show it is not the junior partner of the Iranian-backed “axis” in the region; rather, Hamas is trying to show it is the “decider.”

This may tie into discussions relating to its leadership in Doha and officials in Beirut and how they relate to Sinwar’s leadership in Gaza. It doesn’t imply that the various leaders of Hamas are at odds, but it does seem to imply that the Gaza leadership wants the reins.

It also ties into other recent controversies, such as media claims that Hamas senior member Mousa Abu Marzouk had suggested the group could recognize Israel if Hamas came to lead the Palestinian Authority.

Furthermore, it ties into Sinwar’s letter this week to the Hamas “political” leadership abroad, his first statement since October 7, in which he bragged of Hamas’s defeating Israeli units in Gaza. 


Seth J. Frantzman

Source: https://www.jpost.com/israel-hamas-war/article-779924

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Why are so many of Israel's fallen soldiers from religious Zionist camp? - JPost editorial

 

by JPost editorial

Of the 11 IDF soldiers who fell in Gaza from Monday through Wednesday, eight came from the religious Zionist camp.

 

 An Israeli soldier with a prayer shawl seen during a morning prayer near his tank near the border with Lebanon, northern Israel, October 25, 2023 (photo credit: MICHAL GILADI/FLASH90)
An Israeli soldier with a prayer shawl seen during a morning prayer near his tank near the border with Lebanon, northern Israel, October 25, 2023
(photo credit: MICHAL GILADI/FLASH90)

‘In these difficult days of war, it is impossible to ignore the large number of fallen soldiers from the religious-Zionist camp,” read a Tuesday evening post on X. 

“We should salute this community that gives its life for the defense of Israel.”

What makes that post interesting is the man who wrote it: leading left-wing activist Uri Zaki, the executive committee chairman of Meretz, not a party with a particular soft spot for religious Zionism or its adherents.

Yet the reality of this war prompted Zaki to highlight that an inordinate percentage of the fallen have come from the religious Zionist community.

For instance, of the 11 IDF soldiers who fell in Gaza from Monday through Wednesday, eight came from the religious Zionist camp. And of the 167 fallen since the beginning of the ground invasion, some 30 have come from settlements in Judea and Samaria.

 An Israeli soldier prays, amid the ongoing conflict between Israel and the Palestinian Islamist group Hamas, near the Israel-Gaza border, in southern Israel, December 20, 2023.  (credit: RONEN ZVULUN/REUTERS)Enlrage image
An Israeli soldier prays, amid the ongoing conflict between Israel and the Palestinian Islamist group Hamas, near the Israel-Gaza border, in southern Israel, December 20, 2023. (credit: RONEN ZVULUN/REUTERS)

Almost half of Israel's fallen in this war have come from the religious Zionist camp

Channel 12 political commentator Amit Segal said Wednesday that 45% of the fallen in this war came from that camp, and that just as Israel salutes the Druze because of their sacrifice – six Druze soldiers fell in the war, and as a result, there was talk of changing the Nation-State Law, which the Druze community finds offensive – so too should there be acknowledgment of the sacrifice being paid by the religious Zionist community.

Some may take issue with this, saying that going through the list of the fallen and dividing them into sectors just perpetuates the divisions in the country, which helped lead to the Hamas decision to strike now when the country was so badly divided.

But the grisly statistics are worth pointing out for two reasons. The first is to recognize and try to duplicate elsewhere the values that are being transmitted within the religious Zionist camp toward the love of land, country, people and Torah of Israel, and a willingness to sacrifice for the collective.

The religious-Zionist camp – as distinguished from the hard right-wing Religious Zionist party that wrongly appropriated the name – is a big tent that includes left-wing members of religious kibbutzim and right-wing residents of settlements like Elon Moreh. 

Inside the religious-Zionist rubric, you have Chili Tropper and Elazar Stern on the Left side and Bezalel Smotrich and Orit Struck on the Right. 

Though they may differ on many issues – from possible concessions to Palestinians to LGBTQ rights – most within this camp agree that there is religious significance in the reborn State of Israel and that defending it is both a historic privilege and a religious value.

Furthermore, those in this camp generally educate their children with these values, something that can be seen in the high percentage of recruits from religious-Zionist schools opting to go into combat units. 

The disproportionate share of religious soldiers who have fallen reflects their disproportionate presence in these units.

The second reason why it is worth mentioning the number of religious Zionists who have fallen is that, over the years, parts of this community have been demonized as “messianists” and “fascists.”

One of the flagship institutions of the right flank of this community – the Bnei David pre-army IDF preparatory yeshiva in Eli – has been especially demonized, with its head, Rabbi Yigal Levenstein, literally chased out of Tel Aviv a couple of weeks before October 7, with protesters shouting at him: “Go away, fascist! Go back to the settlements; you don’t belong here!” 

Fifteen Bnei David alumni have fallen so far in this war.

As Segal said, “For years there was a campaign of defamation and slander against religious Zionism and settlers – for example, against Eli – it is poisonous, needs to be closed, [and] needs to be blown up.” Perhaps, he said, it is now time to think of this camp differently.

Or, as investigative journalist for the Uvda program Yair Eizenberg wrote on X recently, “I apologize to the religious Zionist community, in which I was raised, and which I have often criticized. I apologize for dismissing what I saw as its militarism and its sanctification of bereavement over life.”

Metaphorically referring to the religious Zionist community as a “factory,” he wrote: “I thank the factory that is responsible for raising masses of excellent young people who are willing to pay with their lives to protect mine.”

To which we can only add: Yes, thank you, indeed.


JPost editorial

Source: https://www.jpost.com/opinion/article-779945

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

ICE report unmasks staggering toll of Biden border crisis: illegal alien cases hit 6 million - John Solomon

 

by John Solomon

Total of non-detained illegal aliens has nearly doubled under Biden while straining resources, annual report shows

 

The Homeland Security Department agency entrusted with removing illegal immigrants is providing a staggering portrait of America’s border crisis, revealing the backlog of aliens inside the United States awaiting decisions has nearly doubled under President Joe Biden to more than 6 million while arrests of suspected terrorists and violent offenders have also exploded.

The year-end report from U.S. Customs and Immigration Enforcement released Friday showed nearly every measure of illegal immigration rose substantially in 2023, candidly admitting the southern border's being overrun by millions of illegal crossers has taken a major toll on the agency.

“While ICE carefully prioritized its resources to meet these evolving mission needs and agency personnel continued to perform at a high standard, these increased demands have strained a workforce that has remained relatively static for the past decade,” the report declared.

The report offered warning signs for both liberals who support loosened immigration enforcement and conservatives who are worried the nation’s security is being jeopardized by Biden’s policies, which have lured millions into the country and overwhelmed cities like Chicago thousands of miles from the southern border.

Liberal activists are certain to be alarmed by the number of illegal aliens kept in detention: ICE reported the number exploded 40.1% from 26,299 last year to 36,845 at the end of the 2023 fiscal year that finished Sept. 30.

Meanwhile, the number of illegal aliens permitted into the country without being detained, usually with court dates far in the future, leapt 30.3 percent in 2023 to more than 6.2 million, nearly double the 3.26 million total in the last year of Donald Trump’s presidency. The report said the vast majority of that total came from the Southwest border where illegal crossings have surged to as many as 12,000 or more a day.

You can read the full report here.

Administrative arrests rose sharply in 2023 to 170,590, with more than 43% of those apprehended having some sort of criminal conviction or pending charges. The figures confirm claims by Trump during his 2024 campaign that large numbers of illegal immigrants come with criminal baggage.

“[T]here were 290,178 charges and convictions for an average of four per individual,” the report noted. “These included many serious charges or convictions for offenses, such as 1,713 charges or convictions for homicide; 1,655 for kidnapping; 4,390 sexual assaults; 33,209 assaults; 3,097 robberies; 6,964 burglaries; and 7,520 weapons offenses.”

Expulsions of high-risk illegal immigrants by ICE’s Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) also jumped by historic proportions, the report said. “In FY 2023, ERO removed 3,406 known or suspected gang members, an increase of 27.7% compared to FY 2022, and 139 known or suspected terrorists, a 148.2% increase compared to FY 2022,” it noted.

Overall, ICE completed 142,580 deportations in 2023, nearly doubling the prior year’s tally. But the number is still a small fraction of the nearly 2.5 million illegal crossers encountered at the southern border alone. The agency also removed only 212 unaccompanied minors in FY 23, despite 137,275 arriving at the southern border, the report showed.

Beyond the human toll endured by ICE agents and border patrol officers, the report also gave glimpses of the growing cost of the illegal immigration wave for taxpayers.

The report revealed the office paying for health care for detained and non-detained illegal aliens spent nearly $352 million in 2023.

The ICE report is certain to give House Republicans more ammunition in their pursuit to impeach Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas when they return to work in January.

“This administration has completely neglected our Southwest border,” House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Mark Green, R-Tenn., said Friday amid reports that December was on track to set a single month records for illegal immigration at more than 275,000 crossers.

Republicans like Green have ramped up arguments that the Biden administration is creating the crisis intentionally, most recently citing a decision to reopen certain rail crossings where aliens have gained entry without creating a solution to stop new unlawful entries.

“Re-opening these rail crossings and border bridges without taking steps to prevent illegal crossings proves that this administration is intentionally continuing this border crisis,” Green said Friday on the X social media platform.

House Republican Conference Chair Elise Stefanik also weighed in, responding to the record numbers of border crossings.  “Despite these historic numbers, Extreme Democrats continue to turn a blind eye to our Border Crisis," she wrote Friday.

 
John Solomon

Source: https://justthenews.com/government/security/satice-report-unmasks-staggering-toll-biden-border-crisis-illegal-alien-cases

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

The Iranian Regime's Killing Machine - Majid Rafizadeh

 

by Majid Rafizadeh

[H]ow much more harm does the Iranian regime have to do to finally be stopped?

 

  • In addition to increasing the level of enriched uranium to near nuclear-weapons grade; helping to fund and plan a genocidal war against Israel; attacking US troops in Syria and Iraq with its militias more than 100 times in just the last two months to try to force the US out of the region, and incontinently bogus-trialing, torturing (even children) and executing its own citizens, the Iranian regime has also been orchestrating the assassinations of individuals, particularly those considered opponents to the ruling mullahs' clerical establishment.

  • With Iran's nuclear bombs now well on their way, how much more harm does the Iranian regime have to do to finally be stopped? ?

(Image source: iStock)

In addition to increasing the level of enriched uranium to near nuclear-weapons grade; helping to fund and plan a genocidal war against Israel; attacking US troops in Syria and Iraq with its militias more than 100 times in just the last two months to try to force the US out of the region, and incontinently bogus-trialing, torturing (even children) and executing its own citizens, the Iranian regime has also been orchestrating the assassinations of individuals, particularly those considered opponents to the ruling mullahs' clerical establishment.

Authorities in Cyprus recently thwarted an Iranian plot to assassinate Israeli businessmen in the country. Cypriot police apprehended two Iranian asylum-seekers who were in communication with another Iranian linked to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Crops, as disclosed by a Cypriot official on December 19, 2023. The official conveyed that the arrest of the suspects resulted from a collaborative operation with Israel's Mossad security service. A statement released by the Israeli Prime Minister's office on behalf of the Mossad, said that Iran's utilization of Turkish-occupied northern Cyprus for "terrorist purposes" and as an "area of activity and transit to attack Israeli and Jewish targets" is a matter of great concern.

This is not the first time the Iranian regime has plotted to kill Israelis in Cyprus. The attempt marks the third reported instance of an Iranian plot to target Israelis and Jews in Cyprus within the span of roughly a year. In July 2023, Cypriot authorities foiled a terrorist plot involving an Iranian-backed assassination squad targeting Israelis and other members of the Cypriot Jewish community.

The Iranian regime is also increasingly attempting to assassinate Iranian dissidents abroad. Iranian dissidents have been pointing out that they are encountering intimidation, abductions, and assassination attempts by the Iranian regime across the globe.

Iranian operatives recently offered a human trafficker $200,000 to carry out the assassination of two news anchors, referred to as "the bride and the groom," outside their London studio.

The intent behind this terror plot was most likely to demonstrate to critics of the Iranian regime that it can harm or kill anyone at any given moment. The Iranian operatives had also reportedly devised plans to car-bomb the studios of the Persian-language news channel Iran International, located in a business park in West London. An investigation by ITV News exposed the plotter; thanks to video recordings and text messages obtained as part of the investigation, their detailed plans were unveiled.

Since the Biden administration came to office in January 2021, the Iranian regime has also been attempting to carry out terrorist and assassinations plots on US soil. On August 11, 2022, Shahram Poursafi (aka Mehdi Rezayi) was charged with attempting to hire an individual in the United States, offering $300,000 to carry out the murder of former National Security Advisor John Bolton. The second target was allegedly former US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, with an offer of $1 million for his assassination. On top of those, a man carrying an AK-47 assault rifle appeared at the Brooklyn, NY home of Iranian-American human rights activist Masih Alinejad.

By attempting to assassinate US citizens on American soil, Iran is deliberately infringing upon US sovereignty. The directives for these extraterritorial assassinations likely originate from the highest levels of political leadership within the Islamic Republic.

The Washington Post highlighted that Iran's attempted abduction of Alinejad serves as a significant warning to the Biden administration:

"The message for the Biden administration, which has frequently proclaimed its intention to defend pro-democracy dissidents, is that Iran and other foreign dictatorships won't shrink from launching attacks inside the United States unless deterred...".

It is really high-time to stop giving billions of dollars to the Iranian regime, which is enlisting individuals globally to intimidate, abduct and assassinate persons perceived as enemies of the regime. Bribing Iran sets a catastrophic precedent. As Sen. Joni Ernst, a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee stated:

"President Biden's strategy of appeasement continues to risk the lives of Americans at home and abroad. Iran cannot be allowed to continue to attempt to kill U.S. citizens and Iranian dissidents with impunity. The world's number-one state sponsor of terrorism is not to be trusted. I'm holding President Biden accountable by preventing his administration from providing Tehran with another cent of sanctions relief. My PUNISH Act will put an end to this failed appeasement strategy and ensure Iran feels the maximum consequences of their actions from the United States."

With Iran's nuclear weapons now well on the their way, how much more harm does the Iranian regime have to do to finally be stopped?

 
Dr. Majid Rafizadeh is a business strategist and advisor, Harvard-educated scholar, political scientist, board member of Harvard International Review, and president of the International American Council on the Middle East. He has authored several books on Islam and US Foreign Policy. He can be reached at Dr.Rafizadeh@Post.Harvard.Edu

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/20262/iran-killing-machine

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Meet Linda Tigani, NYC’s Antisemitic Director of the Commission on Racial Equity - Hugh Fitzgerald

 

by Hugh Fitzgerald

An impressive history of calling for Jewish genocide.

 


Linda Tigani is the latest bureaucrat to be rising high in the diversity-equity-inclusion racket (NYC Division). She was recently appointed by New York Mayor Eric Adams to direct the city’s Commission on Racial Equity. When it comes to Jews her presumed commitment to “diversity-equity-inclusion” seems to evanesce.  She has quite a history, caught on videos proudly uploaded to social media, of urging, chanting, shouting at rallies “from the river to the sea/Palestine shall be free,” which means, of course, that the one tiny Jewish state must disappear, to be replaced by a 23rd Arab one. More on Linda Tigani can be found in a story from late October; unfortunately, since then nothing has changed. “New head of NYC racial equity commission has spewed antisemitic rhetoric,” by Matthew Sedacca and Deirdre Bardolf, New York Post, October 28, 2023:

Mayor Eric Adams’ new appointee to lead the city’s Commission on Racial Equity, Linda Tigani, has posted antisemitic messages for years, The Post has found.

Her views on the Israel-Palestine war aren’t so equitable.

Mayor Eric Adams’ new appointee for chair and executive director of the city’s Commission on Racial Equity has a history of spewing antisemitic rhetoric.

Linda Tigani, who raked in $143,938 in fiscal year 2022 as acting chief equity and strategy officer for the city Health Department, has repeatedly shared posts on X that include the phrase “from the river to the sea,” which is call by Hamas terrorists and their anti-Israel backers for the eradication of the Jewish state.

“FROM THE RIVER TO THE SEA! PALESTINE WILL BE FREE!!” Tigani wrote in a July 1, 2020, post, which also included a clip from the “Day of Rage” rally in Brooklyn, where protesters reportedly chanted “Death to Israel” and “Death to America” in Arabic in response to Israel announcing plans to annex parts of the West Bank.

Tigani shared a video of a Palestinian artist and cook, along with a variant on the antisemitic phrase again in a November 2022 post, writing “Beautiful. From the River to the Sea #PalestineWillBeFree.”

Tigani has also shared a slew of posts highlighting Israeli attacks on Palestinians earlier this year.

The city’s appointed leader of its new Commission on Racial Equity has repeatedly posted antisemitic messages on social media.X @LindaTigan

Tigani has also championed Palestinians in the Middle Eastern conflict on her Facebook page, with her banner image currently reading “Free Gaza!!! Ethiopian for Palestine.”

Gaza has been “free” of Israelis since 2005, when every last Israeli, of some 8,500 who had been living in Gaza, left the Strip. Within two years, the Gazans were most unfree, suffering under the barbaric rule imposed by Hamas, the terror group which has ruled Gaza ever since. The people of Gaza owe their impoverishment to two things. First, the leaders of Hamas, most of whom are now living in five-star hotels in Doha, Qatar, watching the fighting from a safe distance, have long been engaged in the massive theft of aid money. Mousa Abu Marzouk has a fortune of $3 billion, Khaled Meshal has $4 billion, and Ismail Haniyeh has $4 billion. Just three Hamas leaders have helped themselves to eleven billion dollars. Second-echelon figures in Hamas have not been idle, either; they have grabbed a few million dollars apiece.

The second explanation for the wretchedness of life in Gaza is that the billions that were not stolen by Hamas leaders were spent, not on the wellbeing of ordinary people, but on buying weapons and constructing more than 1,300 tunnels that are 311 miles in total length, more than half the total length of the New York City subway system.

“Ethiopian for Palestine” writes Linda Tigani. This is Tigani’s quaint way to signal that she is Afro-American. She doesn’t realize, of course, that the only Ethiopians who may right now be in Gaza are not fighting “for Palestine.” They are Ethiopian Jews, Falashas, fighting in the IDF to protect the people and state of Israel.

Tigani has yet to post publicly on her social media accounts in the wake of Hamas slaughtering 1,400 people in Israel on Oct. 7….

Now that her antisemitic posts from the past have been revealed, she is likely to be very careful not to add more incriminating posts. I expect that from now on she will maintain a discreet silence about Israel and the Palestinians. But she’s left ample proof of her deep anti-Israel animus —and some would say, of her antisemitism.

Tigani and City Hall did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

What can she say? More importantly, what will Mayor Adams do now? When he appointed her, he was unaware of Tigani’s bigotry. I think he’ll do the only thing a sensible person can do, and fire her from her new job as Director of the Commission on Racial Equity. Don’t worry about Linda Tigani. Al Jazeera may well snap her up as a commentator on “Racism in America.” Or she could write a column for the Tehran Times. Or she could become an English-language journalist for the Palestinian News Agency Wafa. She’ll land on her feet, this Linda Tigani. Such people always do.


Hugh Fitzgerald

Source: https://www.frontpagemag.com/meet-linda-tigani-nycs-antisemitic-director-of-the-commission-on-racial-equity/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Is the Cybertruck a ‘Go F yourself’ from Musk or another broken promise driven by public funds? - Kevin Killough

 

by Kevin Killough

“Elon’s main innovation is his ability to deploy humanist rhetoric to generate political support for his business ventures. Those businesses have been largely built by gaming the regulatory system and generous public funding,” said Alex Stevens, manager of policy and communications for the Institute for Energy Research.

 

When the long-anticipated Cybertruck was revealed during an event in Austin last month, the specs further cemented Tesla CEO Elon Musk as a man who makes a lot of promises he fails to deliver on, according to some critics.

Musk was once loved by the political left.

In 2016, he was praising carbon taxes, which tax companies for the carbon dioxide they emit, and presenting the concept as a libertarian one. He promised great innovations in solar, which would include running Tesla charging stations entirely on solar panels and batteries. That has yet to happen. More recently, he said that “civilization will crumble” without fossil fuels.

After he took over Twitter, and did away with the suppression of conservative viewpoints that Twitter was known for, the left began to turn against their former hero. Ted Cruz told Just The News that Musk's purchase of X was a free-speech victory.

This past month, Media Matters for America (MMFA), a left-leaning media watchdog launched a campaign claiming X hosted pro-Nazi content and convinced more than a dozen advertisers to pull their ads. Musk is now suing the organization, alleging that MMFA deliberately manipulated its algorithms to bypass existing safeguards for advertisers to prevent such pairings and instead intentionally created the false impression that such occurrences were pervasive on the platform. MMFA omitted its manicured search methodology from the article.

Musk also believes that the Biden administration has turned against him. The Federal Communication Commission turned down Musk’s SpaceX application for nearly $1 billion in subsidies for rural broadband programs.

“Doesn’t make sense. Starlink is the only company actually solving rural broadband at scale!” Musk said of the decision on X, in response to Republican commissioner Brendan Carr’s dissenting opinion.

When The Wall Street Journal opined that the federal government may have it in for Musk, he shared the editorial on X and said, “Sure seems that way.”

Contra capitalist

Musk has also had his share of criticism from conservatives for supporting so many of his ventures with tax dollars.

Alex Stevens, manager of policy and communications for the Institute for Energy Research, told Just The News that while Musk is held up as a great entrepreneur and says a lot of things with which conservatives agree, all his business ventures are backed up by subsidies. He called Musk the “quintessential contra capitalist.”

“Elon’s main innovation is his ability to deploy humanist rhetoric to generate political support for his business ventures. Those businesses have been largely built by gaming the regulatory system and generous public funding,” Stevens said on X.

In an interview, Stevens said that in a free market, the entrepreneur’s success depends on the reputation of his or her word, and Musk has often fallen short in that regard. “Market institutions in general incentivize honesty and being a reliable person,” Stevens said.

With so much vitriol from the left directed at Musk, the Cybertruck was bound to generate ideologically motivated criticism, but much of the disappointment stems from Musk’s promises purportedly not lining up with the final product.  

After promising a $40,000 truck with a range of 500 miles, the lowest-priced model, which won’t be available until 2025, only has a range of 250 miles and costs nearly $50,000. The lowest-priced model that can be delivered next year costs nearly $70,000.

Patrick Lawson, owner of the Wyoming-based charging station company Wild West EV, told Just The News that he and his family ordered several of the trucks. Lawson currently drives a Ford F-150 Lightning through the rural landscape of central Wyoming. When he’s not running charging stations in Wyoming, he’s the executive manager of Wind River Internet, which provides internet services to customers living in remote, sparsely populated areas of the state.

The company is converting its fleet of pickup trucks over to the EV Lightnings from gas-powered pickup trucks because Lawson said they’ll save money on gas and maintenance over the life of the vehicles.

Though, with the specs on the Cybertruck coming in short on what was promised, Lawson said he expects a large portion of those who plopped down a couple hundred dollars to get their name on the waiting list will ultimately cancel. “They over-promised and under-delivered,” he said.

Tesla is offering a range extender for about $16,000. It will increase the range of the truck by about 150 miles, but, Lawson said, it takes up one-third of the bed of the truck. “It’s kind of a solution, but people are not thrilled,” he said.

Lawson said the Cybertruck’s autopilot is “top notch,” but the rest of the specs are comparable to other EV pickup trucks, like the Lightning. Lawson said that with Fords, dealerships are more widely available.
“And they’re not crazy like Elon,” Lawson said with a laugh.

Truck expectations

Ford announced this week it would cut the number of Lightnings it produces by half next year due to “changing market demand.”

Lawson said the four fleet Lightnings the company ordered — two long range and two short range — were ordered a year ago and they were only recently delivered. They were expecting delivery in a few months. He said the production cuts are “confusing.” “We can’t buy them if they can’t sell them,” Lawson said.

He said the long-range Lightnings work well, even when the company’s employees are driving 150 miles in a day. The short-range versions, however, lose a lot of range during the colder months. “If we have to go out to one end of the [Wind River] Reservation and back more than once in a day, it's going to be a little bit dicey,” Lawson said.

Electric vehicle batteries lose range in cold weather. 

The Lightning trucks  have other benefits, he said. They provide a power source, which is handy for jobs at houses that are off the grid. The sites use solar and batteries, and often during a snowstorm, there’s no power. In many cases, Lawson said, they can use the power from the truck.

Aaron Turpen, an automotive journalist who has test driven and written about many models of EVs, told Just The News that the Cybertruck is not the kind of vehicle someone who wants a pickup truck is going to buy.
“It can only marginally do the things a pickup truck is meant for,” Turpen said.

When 4,000 dealerships wrote a joint letter to President Joe Biden in November, telling him that their lots were piling up with EVs they couldn’t sell, one of the points the signatories made was that the range of EV pickups drops considerably when pulling loads.

It’s a problem Turpen noted in a review of the Lightning for Cowboy State Daily. Turpen also noted that the Cybertruck has been shown to have limited off-road capabilities, as videos have demonstrated. The multi-ton vehicle doesn’t distribute weight in such a way to gain traction when going up steep, unpaved surfaces like a conventional pickup truck.

The limitations of the Cybertruck’s capabilities are true for other models of EV pickups as well. Turpen said one possible reason why Ford cut back on production of the Lightning is that they were hoping for more fleet orders. However, fleet trucks need to do the work of pickups, and the Lightning doesn’t tow like a conventional Ford F150.

Like Stevens, Turpen suggested that the federal tax credits that EVs enjoy may lead to some of Musk’s recklessness when it comes to what he says he’ll do. “Maybe he's less prudent in his business dealings and stuff, because he can rely on public funding,” Turpen said.

Turpen said that there’s a consumer base for the Cybertruck, and they placed orders for theirs. He said once that demand is satisfied, there’s unlikely to be much behind it.

“I expect sales to die like the Model X and others have. It's not a mainstream vehicle so it's going to have limited appeal,” Turpen said. “It’s a really cool beastly truck, and there’s a really limited market for that.”

Tesla didn’t respond to requests for comment on this article.


Kevin Killough

Source: https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/energy/cybertruck-go-f-yourself-musk-or-another-broken-promise-driven-public-funds

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Thursday, December 28, 2023

Our Razor’s Edge - Victor Davis Hanson

 

by Victor Davis Hanson

For weeks, the American people have been relatively silent as they digested these ongoing catastrophes. But at some point, their patience will run out.

 

At the end of the year, we are on the razor’s edge of many things that soon may blow up.

Americans are far beyond President Joe Biden’s serial untruths of some eight years that he never discussed Hunter Biden’s various get-rich-quick schemes.

All were predicated on the perception of foreign interests purchasing from the Biden family the influence of then-senator, vice president, and possibly soon-to-be President Joe Biden.

The Bidens now risk exposure to criminal charges of multimillion-dollar tax fraud, perjury, influence selling, and bribery as congressional committees and a special prosecutor unravel years of tangled-up quid pro quos. 

A newly indicted Hunter remains reckless and unpredictable. He continues to publicly blame his mounting legal problems on everyone and everything other than his own selfish excesses.

Hunter deliberately involves his family and may even bring down his own father. His tax lawyers have previously threatened to call President Joe Biden to testify on his behalf under oath.

He continues to court public scandal by hawking amateurish “representational” paintings to the quid-pro-quo wealthy and wannabes wishing clout with the White House.

His laptop messages reveal a prodigal son angry that his bagman services were never fully appreciated by his familial beneficiaries.

Hunter’s wayward laptop is a felonious trove of drug-addled, illicit Petronian excess and sex, interspliced with his self-incriminating family communications on the distributions of pay-for-play payoffs.

Hunter’s business aides will be called back to elaborate on their already incriminating testimonies.

The contents of Joe Biden’s various alias emails will soon see new scrutiny.

Given Biden’s physical and ethical frailties, age, and bad polling, the left-wing media and Democratic hierarchy may cease circling the wagons around him. Instead, some may fuel the effort to sandbag a 2024 Biden candidacy by releasing or even leaking incriminating evidence.

Harvard President Claudine Gay’s tenure is even more tenuous than Biden’s. Harvard can either claim to be the nation’s preeminent academic institution or continue to protect a plagiarist as president—not both.

It can profess to be at the center of academia’s moral and intellectual universe, but not if its president cannot punish those on campus who daily call for the destruction of Israel and the genocide of the Jewish people. Gay cannot lie to Congress that Harvard in the past has also allowed “hate speech” against entire groups the way it now allows against Jews.

Nor is it sustainable for Gay to fob off calls for her resignation as “racist.” In fact, the more the public learns about her academic career, the more she seems to be a lifetime beneficiary, not a victim of racially-weighted policies.

Since the October 7 Hamas massacre of 1,200 Jews, anti-Israeli/pro-Hamas protests, often violent, have swept the Western world, particularly in the big cities and on campuses of America.

Protestors no longer distinguish being anti-Israeli from being anti-Jewish. Now they just openly mouth anti-Semitic chants and harass individual Jews.

Almost every hallowed monument—from the Lincoln Memorial to the White House gates, nearly every cherished national icon from the famed Christmas tree in New York’s Rockefeller Center to New York’s Naivety scene, and our most famous infrastructure from the Manhattan Bridge to the Golden Gate Bridge—has either been swarmed, defaced, or disrupted by pro-Hamas demonstrators.

Americans are growing weary of these escalating protests for a variety of reasons. Most remember that the October 7 war started not with Israeli preemptive attacks on an independent Gaza, but only after Hamas killers launched a sneak attack to commit atrocities against Jews residing in Israel.

The current war is waged between a constitutional state of free elections and a cruel, autocratic terrorist clique.

Indeed, Hamas has refused negotiations over a ceasefire that would have led to internationally conducted free elections for the people of Gaza—something forbidden by enriched Hamas kingpins ensconced in luxury abroad.

Many of the loudest and most violent anti-Jewish protestors in the U.S. are immigrants, green card holders, or on student visas. That fact is confusing to Americans.

Why would those who have fled despotic regimes in the Middle East to study, work, or reside in a free America, once safely here, rally for the very dictatorships they left behind and apparently do not wish to return to?

Why trash the very foundation and values of their American hosts that ensure their newfound freedoms?

For weeks, the American people have been relatively silent as they digested these ongoing catastrophes. But at some point, their patience will run out.

Americans will then collectively conclude that Joe Biden has never been truthful about vast ill-gotten funds that have enriched his family; that Harvard is no longer preeminent or even prestigious; and that people who do not like us, our laws, and our values should try cheering on the work of Hamas from their own homes.


Victor Davis Hanson

Source: https://amgreatness.com/2023/12/28/our-razors-edge/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Insulating Old Joe from Hunter’s Legal Problems - Joseph Klein

 

by Joseph Klein

A case of journalistic malpractice.

 


[Make sure to read Joseph Klein’s contributions in Jamie Glazov’s new book: Barack Obama’s True Legacy: How He Transformed America.]

The publicly available documentary evidence and firsthand accounts from Hunter Biden’s former business associates already prove that Joe Biden was deeply involved with his son Hunter’s shady influence peddling schemes with foreign businesses and oligarchs. Moreover, the evidence points to Joe Biden’s benefiting financially from his son’s pay-to-play ploys that capitalized on the Biden “brand” of access to the “big guy.” The corrupt payoffs for access and use of Joe Biden’s influence went on for years, stretching back to then-Vice President Biden’s days during the Obama-Biden administration when he was the administration’s point man for Ukraine.

The extent to which the left-wing media continue to pretend that Joe Biden was not involved and received nothing of value in connection with his son’s corrupt business dealings knows no bounds. These media outlets won’t be satisfied unless Joe Biden himself comes forward to confess his guilt or a documented direct wire transfer to his bank account from an account belonging to one of Hunter’s foreign business clients is produced. And maybe not even then.

In the absence of a smoking gun, investigators often must rely on circumstantial evidence and the reasonable inferences that can be drawn from such circumstantial evidence to make out a case of wrongdoing. That is the situation we have here regarding Joe Biden’s complicity in his son’s influence peddling schemes.

Unlike a criminal case that requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt to convict a defendant, a lower standard of proof applies to impeachment and conviction under Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution. Bribery is specifically mentioned as grounds for impeachment and conviction.

The New York Times has just recently provided a striking example of an article that misleads its readers into believing that the evidence against Joe Biden is, in its words, “flimsy.” Adam Entous, who is described by the New York Times as “an investigative correspondent in the Washington bureau of The New York Times,” wrote this article entitled “Hunter Biden Text Cited in Impeachment Inquiry Is Not What G.O.P. Suggests.” It appeared on the front page of the New York Times’ December 23rd print edition.

Mr. Entous’s article tries to provide a perfectly innocent explanation for an incriminating text found on Hunter’s infamous laptop, which admitted his payments to his father. But Mr. Entous’s innocent explanation holds no water in light of the text’s language itself and the corroborating circumstantial evidence proving that Joe Biden benefited financially from Hunter’s influence peddling business activities.

The publication with the motto “All the News That’s Fit to Print” committed journalistic malpractice by masquerading this disingenuous article as news when it was little more than a fawning opinion piece.

The January 2019 Hunter Biden text to his daughter Naomi that Mr. Entous tries to explain away reads as follows: “I Hope you all can do what I did and pay for everything for this entire family Fro (sic) 30 years. It’s really hard. But don’t worry unlike Pop I won’t make you give me half your salary.”

The text, despite its typos, is crystal clear on its face. It refers to a thirty-year period during which, Hunter told his daughter, he paid “for everything for this entire family.” Hunter then said that he would not make his daughter pay him half her salary, in contrast to his own arrangement to split his “salary” with his “Pop.” There is nothing in the text to indicate that Hunter was revisiting a 30-year-old grievance about what he had to pay his father in the distant past from jobs that he had when he was a college student. And he certainly was not paying back then “for everything” for the “entire” Biden family from his meager wages.

Nevertheless, Mr. Entous claimed that his “close examination of the circumstances surrounding the 2019 text message” revealed that “the 2019 message was a reference to a story from Hunter’s youth that he repeated to his daughters when they became teenagers.” Entous’s “close examination” consisted of a “review of Hunter Biden’s communications and interviews with Biden aides, family friends, and Hunter and Naomi Biden [Hunter’s daughter].”

There is nothing like an “investigative” correspondent who relies on self-serving sources.

According to Mr. Entous, “The story behind Hunter’s allusion to handing half of his salary to his father can be traced back to his childhood, and to the family’s conflicted relationship with money and class.” Back in his college days, Mr. Entous wrote, Hunter “had to work in college and pay half of his salary to his father.” This was the story that family members said Hunter repeated often to his daughters “in hopes of encouraging them to be more self-sufficient.” The purpose of Hunter’s 2019 text message to his daughter Naomi, Mr. Entous wrote, was to deliver that same message once again during their fight over her sister’s medical treatment for a ski injury.

Mr. Entous ended his article with this quote from Naomi about what she thought her father meant in his 2019 text to her: “He was repeating a story from his university days that I grew up hearing. Do people really think he was texting me things like, ‘I give pop half of the Burisma money’? No. That’s crazy.”

It is certainly understandable that Hunter’s children would rally to his defense. But that does not excuse Mr. Entous for doing the same thing without any critical analysis or making the slightest effort to connect the dots.

Hunter’s text said that he paid “for everything for this entire family” during a 30-year span of time. This period covers the years that Hunter received millions of dollars in compensation from Ukraine’s corrupt energy company Burisma where he served on its board of directors. Hunter was being paid this money by Burisma while his father was vice president and the Obama-Biden administration’s point man for Ukraine.

Joe Biden’s quid pro quo for the monies Burisma paid to Hunter while Hunter was serving on Burisma’s board of directors was to use his influence as vice president to force out the Ukrainian prosecutor investigating Burisma in 2015. Then-Vice President Biden tried to rationalize his action by claiming that he was simply following U.S. anti-corruption policy in Ukraine. That excuse was not credible given the fact that other Obama administration officials gave the prosecutor’s office high marks for its progress in fighting corruption.

There are ample bank records documenting the shell companies that Hunter used to route monies he received from Burisma and other foreign entities and individuals to bank accounts he controlled as well as to other Biden family members’ bank accounts. It is most likely that this was what Hunter meant when he said in his 2019 text to his daughter that he has been paying “everything for this entire family,” including half his salary to his father. Not payments to his father from small salaries Hunter earned from his odd jobs while he was in college.

Joe Biden does not have to receive illicit money directly into his own personal account to be found guilty of bribery. The federal bribery statute applies to then-Vice President Biden if he was “influenced in the performance of any official act” in exchange for his corruptly accepting “anything of value personally or for any other person or entity.” (Emphasis added)

In exchange for the influence that he used as vice president to get the prosecutor investigating Burisma removed from office, Joe Biden corruptly accepted as value a financial benefit directed to his son by incentivizing Burisma to compensate Hunter lavishly. Other Biden family members benefited financially as well.

In any event, there is some evidence that then-Vice President Biden did receive a direct bribe of his own, which was routed through shell companies from Burisma. Mr. Entous omitted any reference in his article to the FBI 1023 reporting document in which a trusted informant implicated Joe Biden in an alleged criminal bribery scheme involving Burisma while he was vice president. The informant paraphrased a statement by Mykola Zlochevsky, Burisma’s owner at the time, to the effect that Hunter will take care of issues relating to the investigation of corruption at Burisma “through his dad.” According to the FBI report, Zlochevsky told the informer that he did not send any funds directly to the “Big Guy” (which the informer understood to be a reference to Joe Biden). The FBI report recounted Zlochevsky’s boast that it would “take them (Investigators) 10 years to find the records (i.e. illicit payments to Joe Biden).”

The banking records and FBI 1023 reporting document provide critical evidence corroborating the most logical reading of Hunter’s January 2019 text to his daughter Naomi, which flatly contradicts the New York Times “investigative” correspondent’s benign interpretation. Hunter Biden was claiming that he was keeping his “Pop” and the entire Biden family financially afloat. At least since the days when his father was serving as vice president, the money that Hunter funneled into the Biden family bank accounts came largely from foreign sources such as Burisma who were interested in buying access to the “big guy.”

A credible investigator collects, reviews, and analyzes all relevant evidence before reaching a fact-based conclusion. The New York Times’ “investigative correspondent” fell far short of that mark in his zeal to insulate Joe Biden from any responsibility for his involvement and value accepted in connection with his son’s unscrupulous business affairs.


Joseph Klein is a Harvard-trained lawyer, and the author of Global Deception: The UN’s Stealth Assault on America’s Freedom and Lethal Engagement: Barack Hussein Obama, The United Nations & Radical Islam.

Source:https://www.frontpagemag.com/insulating-old-joe-from-hunters-legal-problems/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter