Saturday, November 12, 2016

Hillary and Obama should tell rioters to accept the election results - J. Marsolo




by J. Marsolo

This conduct by the rioters is not unexpected, given the savage attacks by the MSM, Hillary, and Obama against Trump during the last week of the campaign

There is no valid reason for the "protests" each night since Trump's election in cities such as New York and Miami and the riots in Portland. What exactly are they protesting? We had an election, Trump won, and Hillary conceded. It is over. If the "protesters" do not like the results, there is nothing they can do about it under our laws. We do not reverse election results because mobs riot in the streets. They should go home and work on reforming the Democratic Party to nominate a better candidate for 2016. 

The MSM have reported that these actions are "constitutionally protected speech," but these appear to be well organized rallies by anarchists and others opposed to our system of elections. What do these "protesters" expect to achieve by rioting and vandalizing, as they have done in Portland? The Portland district attorney should convene a grand jury to investigate who is organizing these "protests." The Obama Justice Department certainly will not investigate. 

The MSM spent the weeks before the election agonizing over whether Trump would "accept" the results of the election. Mike Wallace pressed Trump on whether he would "accept" the results and kept at it when he questioned Mike Pence. Of course, Wallace and the MSM assumed that Hillary would win, because they never asked her if she and her supporters would accept the results. 

Hillary and her chief campaigner, Obama, have not stepped up to denounce this rioting. They should tell these protesters that the election is over, Trump won, and under our system, there is nothing to accomplish by this conduct. 

This conduct by the rioters is not unexpected, given the savage attacks by the MSM, Hillary, and Obama against Trump during the last week of the campaign. They accused Trump of being a KKK racist, a sexist, and totally unfit to be president. 

Obama and Hillary contributed to this polarization. It is time they step up to tell the rioters to accept the results of the election. 

J. Marsolo

Source: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/11/hillary_and_obama_should_tell_rioters_to_accept_the_election_results.html

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Copyright - Original materials copyright (c) by the authors.

Arab World Reacts To Trump's Presidential Win With Cautious Optimism, Hope For Future Cooperation - MEMRI




by MEMRI

The different positions of Arab countries was manifested in their leaders' reactions to Trump's victory.

Donald Trump's election as the 45th U.S. president was received in the Arab world with mixed emotions. While Syria and Egypt welcomed the result and expressed hopes for cooperation with the new American administration, reactions in the Gulf states, especially Saudi Arabia and Qatar, were ambivalent. Although the Gulf states were glad to see the back of the Obama administration, which had brought them tremendous disappointment because of its Iran and Syria policies, and expressed cautious optimism that Trump's policies would be radically different, they were at the same time very concerned because of his hostile statements regarding Muslims.

The different positions of Arab countries was manifested in their leaders' reactions to Trump's victory. Egyptian President 'Abd Al-Fattah Al-Sisi was among the first leaders to call and congratulate him, and also invited him to visit the country.[1] Others, including Saudi King Salman, sufficed with sending congratulatory letters stressing the importance of their countries' relations with the U.S.

This document will review reactions in several Arab countries to Trump's win, as expressed in statements by officials as well as in press articles, especially editorials and op-eds by prominent journalists. It should be mentioned that the Palestinian press has yet to publish editorials addressing Trump's victory.

Egypt: We Expect Trump To Bring New Spirit To Egypt-U.S. Relations 

The Egyptian regime, under President 'Abd Al-Fattah Al-Sisi, welcomed Trump's election. As soon as his win was announced, Al-Sisi was one of the first to call him and congratulate him.[2] A statement by the president's office read: "Egypt expects that Trump's presidential term will bring a new spirit to the relations between the countries" and that the two countries will become closer.[3] 

Editor Of Official Egyptian Daily Al-Ahram: Trumps' Victory – An Opportunity For Egypt To Regain Regional, International Prominence 

Muhammad 'Abd Al-Hadi 'Allam, editor-in-chief of the official Egyptian daily Al-Ahram, wrote in a similar vein: "The phone conversation between Egyptian President 'Abd Al-Fattah Al-Sisi and U.S. President-Elect Donald Trump, and the congratulations [Al-Sisi] conveyed to [Trump], are a direct reflection of [the former's] honest desire for deep relations with a country that, for over three decades, has had tight strategic diplomatic and economic ties  with Egypt – although in the last few years these relations were marred by disagreements about internal [Egyptian] and security matters that created a schism between the largest Arab country and the world's most powerful country...

"Trump's victory and Clinton's defeat [deliver] a crushing blow to the foundations of the tamkin project [the Muslim Brotherhood's plan for strengthening Islamic rule in Egypt], and pave the way for Egypt to regain its natural role as the pivot of the Middle East and the Arab world. The opportunity exists, and both sides must seize it. If we what to seize this opportunity to cooperate with the new administration in Washington, which understands that Egypt's role can be realized only [if there is] cooperation and understanding on crucial issues, we must recalibrate [our course] and make changes, so we can play a more central role and dare to confront the existing positions of [certain] regional countries that openly sponsor terrorist organizations."[4]   

Similar sentiments were expressed by Al-Ahram Ahmed 'Abd Al-Tawab: "Whatever the commentary on his tendencies and ideas, most of which concern domestic U.S. matters... from now on we must consider the positive points where we can collaborate with him, especially in light of his explicit remarks on the war on terrorism, and specifically his promise to eliminate ISIS.

"As for Hillary Clinton, her defeat is highly profitable for Egypt and the Arab region. She was involved in all the destructive actions that harmed the region since she became secretary of state. It was she who adopted and helped spread the policy of reliance on the so-called 'moderate Islam,' that included the Muslim Brotherhood [MB] in that moderate camp. Therefore, the MB is miserable over her defeat, since while she deluded herself into thinking that she was ahead, she promised to help them return to Egypt's political life. She also boasted of her support for Israel and questioned her rival Trump's support for it, and even ratcheted up presidential campaign with overblown slogans about who supports Israel more! She also acknowledged U.S. involvement in establishing the notorious Al-Qaeda terrorist organization. Trump once accused her of participating in creating ISIS..."[5] 

On the other hand, Al-Shurouq editor-in-chief 'Imad Al-Din Hussein, known for his criticism of the Al-Sisi regime, wrote: "We forget that it was the various organizations' increasing extremism and terrorism in the name of Islam, and their operations in Europe and the U.S., that triggered the rise of Western extremism. Extremists everywhere, especially ISIS, will be the ones who are happiest with Trump's victory, as he will breathe new life into them.

"We in Egypt and in the Arab world must read and understand the Americans' real feelings, how they think, and what motivated them to elect a man believed by nearly the entire world to be insane. Most world leaders did not yearn for a Trump victory, and some even openly hoped he would lose. But everyone in politics will forget about that and look ahead. This is the reality in the cruel world of politics...

"Personally, hand on my heart, I am afraid of Trump's surprises [to come, which may pose] the greatest danger to the world. But in politics we must learn to be pragmatic, and must completely separate passionate emotions and aspirations from interests..."[6] 

Egyptian TV Host Tamer Amin: At Least Trump Says He's An Enemy to Your Face – Democrats Wear One Million Masks

On Egypt's Al-Hayat TV, on November 9, television host Tamer Amin said that he was happy that Trump had won, adding that he couldn't stand Obama’s policies in the Middle East, and accused Clinton of founding and financing ISIS. He further said that Republicans tell the truth to your face, while Democrats have "70 faces and one million masks." He concluded: "We congratulate ourselves that we will get to see First Lady Trump, as well as his daughter, who is truly a sight for sore eyes."

To view the MEMRI TV clip, click here or below.

Editor Of Syrian Daily: Trump's Election Brings Joy To Syria

In Syria, there was optimism and joy at Trump's win, because of his positions on terrorism, but primarily because of his defeat of Clinton, who as secretary of state when the Syria crisis erupted in 2011 was firmly against the regime's violent suppression of the revolution against it.

President Bashar Al-Assad's political and military advisor Bouthaina Sha'aban expressed caution in an interview with NPR: "Syria does not interfere in the results of the elections and in who won them. What interests Syrians is the policy of the new president. If the policy is in line with Damascus's aspirations, then Syria will be open to any collaboration with the U.S. as well as with other nations that respect national sovereignty and preserve the interests of people, instead of interfering in their affairs. American interference in the affairs of other countries has brought nothing but disaster. The U.S. must undertake a policy of collaboration with countries, as opposed to one of superiority and [issuing] dictates."[7] 
 
However, Syrian MP Muhammad Kheir Al-Akam, who is one of the regime's representatives in talks with the opposition, was more decisive: "A Trump victory is better than a Clinton victory. [Had she won], the situation in the region would have been far worse, and the Gulf states would have been the big winners."[8] 

Waddah 'Abd Rabo, editor-in-chief of the Syrian daily Al-Watan, which is close to the regime, was thrilled at Trump's win, saying that all his views "benefit Syria." In an article titled "Trump – Crisis For Global Elites, Joy For Syria," he wrote that the American street "has chosen extremism over manipulation and honesty over lies and deception." He said that the win of both Brexit in the U.K. and Trump in the U.S. clearly showed that both peoples "are more aware [than before] of their politicians' deceit, lies, and destructive wars, as well as their reliance on Gulf money, their obsequiousness to backwards and reactionary [Gulf] emirates, and their disregard for the spread of Wahhabi Islam in their own countries' mosques and suburbs – and of the fact that they had enabled Al-Sa'ud [the Saudi royal family] and others to arm and fund terrorist organizations..."

Explaining why he was glad about Trump's win, he wrote: "U.S. President-Elect [Trump] has no aspirations regarding Syria and the region, and does not believe that the Gulf states' plans to destroy Syria are beneficial. He, like most Syrians, seeks the elimination of ISIS and other extremist terrorist groups, and could take the hands of Russia and Syria so that they together could end one of the most horrible crimes of the century, which was perpetrated by the previous American administration along with its Saudi, Qatari, and Turkish allies; he could also protect his own country's borders and revive its deteriorating economy. These positions all benefit Syria. Therefore, you could not miss the joy on the faces of most Syrians, many of whom spent the entire night watching the tally of the votes, while others awoke to the results for which they had hoped but did not expect." 'Abd Rabo added: "There is no way that Trump will take, and hold, power without seriously changing his country's foreign policy..."[9] 

Senior Figure In Syrian Opposition: We Expect To Cooperate With Trump In Order To Stop Killing Of Syrian People

At the same time, the Syrian opposition also congratulated Trump on his win and expressed hope to cooperate with him in order to end the tragedy of the Syrian people. The general coordinator of the High Negotiations Committee (HNC), Riyad Hijab, sent a letter to Trump in which he congratulated him on his own behalf and that of the HNC, and "on behalf of millions of Syrians yearning for freedom and democracy," and wrote: "This is a historic opportunity that we must seize in order to deepen the friendship between the Syrian and American peoples... We in Syria expect to deepen the ties and the coordination with you in order to bring peace to our region and find just and expedient solutions to the threat of terror that is endangering the region, in all its forms and organizations, especially the state terror that the [Syrian] regime is employing against the Syrian people – [a people] that is fighting to rid itself of a repugnant dictatorship and enjoy freedom and democracy like all other nations of the free world... We expect to cooperate [with you] in order to stop the killing of Syrians and find, along with [the U.S.] and Syria's other allies, the best and most expedient ways to defend [Syria's] citizens, relieve their suffering and bring peace and security to our region."[10]    

Qatari Dailies: "Trump's Win Is Greatly Worrying For Arab Rulers And Leaders"

In the Gulf countries there was cautious optimism and hope that Trump's policies on issues of regional concern, particularly Iran and Syria, would differ from those of his predecessor. Gulf leaders sent Trump congratulatory messages expressing their desire for closer relations with the U.S.

However, the London daily Al-Quds Al-Arabi, owned by Qatar, that openly supported Clinton, reported that "far from [diplomatic] protocol, Trump's win is greatly worrying for Arab rulers and leaders. They are facing a new America led by Trump, and they fear that he will change the regional order that existed for decades." The daily also stated that Gulf leaders "want an American president who understands their fears, after eight years of lack of confidence because of Obama, with whom they did not have the kind of personal relationship that they highly value."[11] 

The daily's November 11, 2016 editorial expressed these apprehensions felt by the Gulf states. It noted that the first to rejoice at Trump's victory and congratulate him were Russian President Vladimir Putin, Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, Egyptian President 'Abd Al-Fattah Al-Sisi and the Syrian regime of Bashar Al-Assad, whereas the Gulf states felt "considerable apprehension" about his win. He added: "One of the controversial aspects of Trump's election campaign was his position towards the Arab Gulf states, and his statements to the effect that the U.S. would not defend these states for free, but would exact a price for this protection. This is close to blackmail... The fact that he made similar statements regarding [America's] allies in NATO may comfort the Arabs somewhat, but this statement nevertheless alerts [the Arabs] to how he truly sees them: as weaklings who need to bribe someone to defend them!

"Some might say that Trump the president will be completely different from Trump the candidate who wanted to collect votes, and that the U.S. is a state of institutions. Those are reasonable arguments, but Trump is known as an authoritarian figure, and unlike Obama, his party has a majority in Congress. Add to that the fact that the Supreme Court will be under his influence, [and we are led to the conclusion that] the distance between his slogans and his actions may not be so big. Therefore,  some of the Arabs' and Muslims' fears may unfortunately come true."[12]      

Cartoon in Qatari daily: "The real end of the world" will not be the result of "a meteor hitting the earth," "the eruption of a super-volcano" or "the return of the ice age," but of "trump's victory in the U.S. presidential elections (Al-Quds Al-Arabi, London, November 11, 2016)


Cartoon in Qatari daily: "The scream of the U.S. elections" (Al-Quds Al-Arabi, London, November 10, 2016)

In an editorial, the Qatari daily Al-Raya called on Trump to take seriously the Gulf countries' apprehensions about U.S. policies in the region, and to rethink them so that they are more in line with these countries' regional and international status: "The history of solid relations between the Arab Gulf states and the U.S., which evolved into a strategic partnership, mean that the new American president must take seriously the concerns in the Gulf about U.S. policy, particularly the U.S. position on problems in the region – the bizarre JASTA [Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act], Iran's interference in regional affairs, Israel and the Palestinian problem, and the situation in Yemen, Iraq, and Syria – because these issues impact relations between the U.S. and the Gulf states...

"Trump's presidential win, and the beginning of a new presidential era for the U.S., offer the perfect opportunity for the American administration to reexamine its positions on Gulf and Arab issues. Therefore, the U.S., which is facing a new era, must realize that the international and regional situation has completely changed, and that the Gulf Cooperation Council states will no longer stand on the sidelines of the regional and international crises that affect them. This is especially true after they became main and central actors, whose positions on all matters are listened to, and after they became central partners regionally and internationally who cannot be dismissed, circumvented, or glossed over, as the past.
"Therefore, the Gulf states, including Qatar which has congratulated the new American president on his victory, openly yearn for the glorious future that awaits their relations with the U.S., because they grasp their importance. They hope that the Gulf and the U.S. will act together to overcome the fears impacting their relationship and will strengthen their strategic partnership on the basis of new principles that meet Gulf demands. This hinges on settling of matters that are pending, which is the most important thing being demanded of the new American administration."[13] 


Cartoon in Qatari daily: Trump in the White House (Al-Sharq, Qatar, November 10, 2016)

Saudi Editorial: Perhaps Trump, Unlike Obama, Will Once Again Acknowledge The Existence Of A Global Axis Of Evil

Saudi King Salman bin 'Abd Al-Aziz sent his congratulations to Trump, underlining the close U.S.-Saudi relations and expressing his wish for even greater closeness in a way that will serve the interests of both.[14] Saudi prince and businessman Walid bin Talal, who last year called Trump a "disgrace... to all America" and demanded that he withdraw from the presidential race for his remarks about Muslims, tweeted: "President elect @realDonaldTrump whatever the past differences, America has spoken, congratulations & best wishes for your presidency."


(Twitter.com/Alwaleed_Talal, November 9, 2016)

Several editorials in Saudi dailies expressed optimism about Trump's future policies. The official Saudi daily Al-Watan's stated: "Trump promised that he would reexamine international treaties signed between the U.S. and other countries, chiefly Iran, whose foreign minister yesterday asked the new American president to honor past agreements. Perhaps Trump will [re-acknowledge the existence of] the global axis of evil declared by George Bush Jr., [a recognition] which Obama abandoned when he negotiated [with Iran on the nuclear issue], saying at that time that this was a good thing...

"There is no doubt that Trump, who blamed Obama and his administration for the failure of American foreign policy, will be successful in his own foreign policy, as the years past have been one long failure because of false red lines, empty promises, and agreements that damaged international peace and security. There will be no radical changes to the strategy of U.S. policy around the world despite eight years of weakness and withdrawal to the domestic arena. But Trump will restore confidence in the U.S. government, which has lost credibility worldwide [due to events in] Crimea, Syria, China, and Libya..."[15] 

In its editorial, the official daily 'Okaz stated: "We are hopeful – [although] it is hope mingled with fear  – that the new [American] policy that we will see in Trump's presidency will be more positive vis-à-vis the important issues in the Middle East, after the waning of the U.S. role [here] changed the situation in the region from one end to the other."[16] 




Cartoon in Saudi daily: Following Trump victory, "American Muslims and Arabs" immigrate to "Canada and other countries" (Al-Medina, Saudi Arabia, November 10, 2016)
 
Former Editor Of Saudi Daily: Trump's Position Against Terrorist Muslims Should Not Be Considered Racist 

Senior Saudi journalist 'Abd Al-Rahman Al-Rashed, formerly editor of the London-based Saudi daily Al-Sharq Al-Awsat and also former director of Al-Arabiya TV, sought to reassure readers, writing that the U.S. is a state of institutions, and that even if Trump does make changes in U.S. foreign policy, there will not be a complete reversal: "Don't look at President-Elect Trump, but at the U.S., which is an establishment state... Perhaps there will be changes, but there will be no reversal of [U.S.] foreign policy. Trump won the U.S. presidential election, so the debate that comprised the election campaign is over, and you will hear no more statements against Muslims and foreigners... 

"Will Trump go very far from the policy of his predecessor Obama? He may do so on issues that the previous policy failed to tackle, and on issues that have been proven by developments to threaten the interests of the U.S. or its allies in Europe, or that are connected to the international balance of power..."

With regard to Trump's statements about Muslims, Al-Rashed wrote: "The president-elect has a rich background in his attitude towards Muslims, and he never took a racist stance and never joined informational or political campaigns against Muslims in the U.S. or outside it, even in the wake of the phobia that prevailed following the September 11 terror attacks in New York, his own city...

"Being against Muslims involved in terrorism and in extremism should in no way be seen as racist. This is also the Muslims' position. It is groups of ideologies with a terrorist perception that are trying to blur [the difference between] hostility to extremism and hostility towards Islam, and it is they are trying to disrupt and incite for their own political aims. The Arab countries have much to do in order to create a relationship with the new administration in Washington once it is established, and in order to work with the U.S. superpower that impacts the region's stability and prosperity. We must not blame Washington [for our troubles] and ignore the fact that most of our problems stem from our own decisions and actions, and that most of the solutions are in our own hands."[17]   

 
Cartoon in Saudi daily: U.S. presidents change; U.S. policy stays the same ( Al-Sharq, Saudi Arabia, November 10, 2016)

A post on the Twitter page of Saudi blogger and human rights activist Raif Badawi likewise reacted to Trump's election. Badawi, founder of the "Liberal Network" website and a prominent figure in Saudi Arabia's liberal movement, was sentenced in May 2014 to 10 years in prison and 1,000 lashes for insulting Islam. The post on his Twitter account, which is managed by his wife, congratulated Trump and urged him not to forget to defend human rights and the prisoners of conscience against extremism.[18] 
 
Jordan: Relations With The U.S. Are Not Impacted By Election Results
 
In Jordan too, it was emphasized that the U.S. is a state of institutions, and that relations with it will not be impacted by the election results. King Abdullah sent a letter of congratulations to Trump expressing his hope that U.S.-Jordan relations will become closer.[19] 

Jordanian government spokesman Muhammad Al-Momani said: "Our relations with the U.S. are friendly and strategic in economic, political, military, and security aspects, and they are genuine relations between institutions, not only between leaderships... The U.S. is a state of institutions and cooperation with it continues regardless of the election results... President[-Elect] Donald Trump has already expressed his esteem for Jordan, in several statements in the past, saying that he, like the Congressional leaders, expects to cooperate with King Abdullah II, particularly in matters pertaining to fighting terrorism and to security and stability in the region."[20] 

Editor In Official Jordanian Daily Al-Rai: Jordan's Good And Strategic Relations With U.S. Will Continue In Trump Era

On the day after the elections, the official Jordanian daily Al-Rai published on its front page an article titled "Jordan-U.S. Relations Are Good and Strategic," by Faisal Malkawi, a senior member of the paper's editorial board. He wrote: "Over the last decades, Jordan's relations with the U.S. have developed from [mere] bilateral ties into strategic ties and an alliance in various domains. This did not change with the changing U.S. administrations, whether Democratic or Republican... The various U.S. administrations [all] appreciated Jordan's role and the leadership of King Abdullah II, [and Jordan's] positions on regional and international issues...

"Jordan-U.S. relations will [continue to] develop in all areas under the administration of the 45th American president, Donald Trump...

"At all stages and in all conditions, and under various U.S. administrations, the Middle East, with all its issues, crises and circumstances, has been at the focus of U.S. concern, and it is expected to remain a central issue of concern for the new U.S. president Donald Trump... In the coming days we will witness strategic Jordan-U.S. relations anchored in a long history and with a present and future based on cooperation and trust... There is nothing to keep Jordanian diplomacy from embarking on a new path of [joint] work with President[-Elect] Donald Trump and the new U.S. administration..."[21]   


Cartoon in independent Jordanian daily: Statue of Liberty seeks to emigrate to Canada following Trump's win (Al-Ghad, Jordan, November 10, 2016)[22]
 
Newspaper of Lebanon's March 14 Forces: Trump Will Necessarily Adopt A Middle East Policy That Differs From Obama's
 
Lebanese Prime-Minister Elect Sa'd Al-Hariri sent a congratulatory telegram to Trump, stressing that in light of the great challenges faced by the Middle East, his leadership is "essential for achieving stability, security, and peace in it." He stressed in the telegram that Trump will find Lebanon to be a partner for his efforts, and that the Lebanese "have high hopes for his help in advancing peace, security, stability, and democracy in our region that suffers from instability, [and this] begins with a political, peaceful solution for the Syria crisis." 

In its editorial, the Lebanese Al-Mustaqbal daily, which Al-Hariri owns, stated that in light of the failure of the Obama administration's policy, the Trump administration would certainly change U.S. foreign policy, but wondered whether this would be better or worse for the world: "After Trump's election, the Lebanese and the Arabs in general cannot but hope for an improvement in the atmosphere in the region, in a way that will advance a policy of tackling explosive issues instead of letting them be a main cause of loss of human life, property, and resources and a wide arena for terrorism...

"There is no argument that Obama's policy, characterized by hesitation, withdrawal, and passivity, was one of the main reasons for the escalation and spread of these crises, for the increase of the human and humanitarian tragedies that they brought, and for their spilling across their geographic borders, particularly in Syria and Iraq, into farther-flung areas in the region and in the world. 

"Therefore, no one disputes that the only sure thing now is that President-Elect Donald Trump will change the policy of his predecessor and adopt a different perception with regard to what is going on inside and outside the Arab region, as he himself said. The question is whether this change will help or hurt the region and the world."[23] 


Cartoon in UAE daily:  Trump, just like Obama, dives blindly into Middle East waters (Al-Arab, London, November 10, 2016)

 Endnotes:

[1] On Egyptian regime's preference for Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton during the election campaign, see MEMRI Inquiry & Analysis No. 1278,  Egypt's Severe Economic Crisis Sparks Harsh Criticism Of Regime's Economic Policy, Calls To Topple Regime On November 11 , November 10, 2016.
[2] Al-Ahram (Egypt), November 9, 2016.
[3] Al-Watan (Egypt), November 9, 2016.
[4] Al-Ahram (Egypt), November 11, 2016.
[5] Al-Ahram (Egypt), November 10, 2016.
[6] Al-Shurouq (Egypt), November 10, 2016.
[7] Al-Watan (Syria), November 10, 2016.
[8] Al-Watan (Syria), November 10, 2016.
[9] Al-Watan (Syria), November 10, 2016.
[10]  Twitter.com/hijab_riad, November 9, 2016.
[11] Al-Quds Al-Arabi (London), November 10, 2016.
[12] Al-Quds Al-Arabi (London), November 11, 2016.
[13] Al-Raya (Qatar), November 10, 2016.
[14] Alarabiya.net, November 9, 2016.
[15] Al-Watan (Saudi Arabia), November 10, 2016.
[16] 'Okaz (Saudi Arabia), November 9, 2016.
[17] Al-Sharq Al-Awsat (London), November 10, 2016.
[18] Twitter.com/raif_badawi, November 11, 2016.
[19] Petra news agency (Jordan), November 9., 2016.
[20] Al-Rai (Jordan), November 10, 2016.
[21] Al-Rai (Jordan), November 11, 2016.
[22] It should be noted that the cartoon was also posted the same day in the Jerusalem-based Palestinian daily Al-Quds.
[23] Al-Mustaqbal (Lebanon), November 10, 2016.

MEMRI

Source: www.memri.org/report/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/9546.htm

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Copyright - Original materials copyright (c) by the authors.

Voters target Electoral College members to switch their Trump ballots, elect Clinton - FoxNews.Com




by FoxNews.Com

“It’s our chance of getting Trump out of the whitehouse.”

Voters upset that Republican Donald Trump had been elected president -- or think that the presidency was unfairly taken from Democratic rival Hillary Clinton -- are scrambling for ways to change the results.

Their major focus is trying to get members of the U.S. Electoral College to change their vote, arguing that Clinton should be the next president because 60.47 Americans voted for her, compared to 60 million for Trump.  

The college is part of the Constitution and is composed of 538 members, with each state and the District of Columbia having one member, or electorate, for every senator or House lawmaker.

Trump won 290 of the so-called electoral votes, in the race to get a minimum 270.

However, members don’t officially cast their ballots until December 19, which has Trump opponents making long-shot efforts to reverse the outcome, including petition drives to get the electorates to switch their votes.

The largest effort is through the website Change.org, which as of Saturday has about 3 million signatures, getting closer to its goal of 4.5 million.

Petition organizers argue on the site that some states don’t require their electorates to vote for the presidential nominee who had the most votes in their state.

And for electorates in states that by law require them to ballot for the nominee who won the most votes, “their vote would still be counted, they would simply pay a small fine,” the organizers write. “We can be sure Clinton supporters will be glad to pay!”

One online petition signer wrote on the site via Twitter: “It’s our chance of getting Trump out of the whitehouse.”

The most recent presidential election in which a nominee won the popular vote but lost the election through the Electoral College vote was 2000, when Democrat Al Gore lost to Republican George W. Bush following a days-long recount of votes in Florida and other states.

Another grassroots petition drive is being launched by Faithlessnow.com, as reported by Yahoo News.

Organizers in that drive are targeting roughly 160 Republican electorates in the 15 states that Trump won and don’t have laws bounding the electorates to the winner: Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Missouri, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Utah and West Virginia.

Clinton and Trump at the time called for an end to the entire Electoral College system. And renewed calls emerged after Election Day 2016, on Tuesday, in large part because voters think the system is no needed to safeguard the country from a dangerous president.

A Baltimore Sun editorial this weekend called the college a “convoluted system” and “the product of an 18th century compromise forged over issues that no longer apply and resting on assumptions about the wisdom of the average person we no longer hold.”

“It has not worked the way it was intended almost from the very beginning,” continued the editorial, which also suggests states follow Maryland’s lead by essentially joining a movement that could side-step needing a constitutional amendment to change the system.


FoxNews.Com

Source: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/11/12/voters-targeted-electoral-college-members-to-switch-their-trump-ballots-elect-clinton.html

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Copyright - Original materials copyright (c) by the authors.

Thursday, November 10, 2016

America's Gag Reflex - Scott McKay




by Scott McKay

At the end of the day, the Democrats simply asked more of the American people in 2016 than was possible.

Here we are not attempting to minimize Donald Trump’s achievement Tuesday night in topping 300 electoral votes and capturing the White House amid a shocked pundit class. What Trump managed was, unquestionably, the greatest upset in American political history, and arguably, the greatest electoral upset in the history of the modern world.

It may be impossible to minimize such an achievement. Thus let us agree that what follows is an explanation, or perhaps a description of the road which opened for Trump to ride to victory.

Interestingly, despite the idiotic blatherings of CNN’s resident urban communist Van Jones, Trump’s election didn’t represent a “whitelash,” or some spasm of racial animus on the part of white voters. Trump actually underperformed with whites compared to Mitt Romney in 2012.

And just as interestingly, Trump got less overall votes than Romney. Or John McCain in 2008.

To put fully paid to the narrative Jones and other pundits on the Left are spinning, that Trump’s victory was a triumph of American racism and bigotry, an ugly slur which has encouraged thousands of this country’s worst residents to take to the streets in childish and un-American protests of democracy, it turns out that where Trump did make improvements over Romney’s performance was with black and Hispanic voters.

You read that correctly. Trump improved Romney’s 27 percent share of the Hispanic vote to 29, and Romney’s six percent to eight in the black community.

Now — it might be said that the white voters Trump attracted were not the same as those supporting Romney. Trump’s vote, particularly in Appalachia and the Rust Belt, came much more from downscale white voters without college degrees than Romney’s did; assuming, given the numbers above, that it was hate that drove his victory seems more a reflection of bigotry against non-college educated whites than any sort of cogent analysis.

And it’s the Left’s bigotry, and moreover its obnoxious arrogance and never-ending cultural and political aggression, that explains Trump’s victory.

Hillary Clinton lost this race more than Trump won it. Which is not a disparagement of Trump’s upset; if nothing else, his late surge came from an excellent display of political discipline in largely refraining from any controversial words or deeds once Clinton’s legal troubles began multiplying 10 days out from Election Day — that restraint allowed her to lose the race and made him President of the United States.

Because what happened on Election Night was that the national gag reflex manifested itself. And the Democrats’ attempts at forcing down a charmless Alinskyite grifter under multiple FBI investigations ran afoul of that reflex. She found herself the victim of a massive laryngeal spasm on the part of the electorate.

So did the Democratic Party, which found itself winning only six House seats and a net of just two Senate seats when it crowed lustily over the possibility of capturing both houses outright. Democrats will have only 16 governorships in January, and control only 12 state legislatures. On Election Night as the smoke cleared it became obvious that America is sick and tired of the party in the White House.

And why shouldn’t it be? Nominating Clinton was an exercise in arrogance and corruption never before seen in American politics. It was a political aggression well in line with a long string of other affronts both political and cultural; for example, a sitting president encouraging illegal aliens to vote, attempts to install transvestites in girls’ bathrooms in American schools, efforts to punish religious people who don’t want to participate in gay weddings, Black Lives Matter, Lena Dunham, the IRS scandal, Bob Creamer, the Obamacare premium spike, Colin Kaepernick.

Americans have been lectured, scolded, robbed, demoralized, and gaslighted relentlessly for the past eight years. And to top it all, the Democrats demanded that if they wouldn’t swallow a “feminist icon” whose only employment came courtesy of her professional relationship with her husband, who we are meant to believe put the nation’s state secrets forfeit to foreign powers as an innocent mistake and who is obviously guilty of running a pay-for-play influence-peddling scam disguised as a charity alongside what is advertised as “public service,” then that would constitute sexism. Internet memes circulated by Democrats demanded that Clinton be elected in order to rectify the wrong of no previous female presidents, and her victory party featured a giant “glass ceiling” that she would figuratively shatter once elected.

Sorry, said the country, but too far is too far. If that means making the guy from The Apprentice president, so be it. America emitted an unpleasant noise, expectorated, and delivered the Democrats to the floor covered in sputum.

Here’s a favorite quote circulating on social media. It’s the response of the normals to the Left, and the lesson given to the Democrats following the Clintons’ banishment from the political scene…
Years ago I was handed a president that I didn’t want nor did I like. He brought on policies and debt that I didn’t want nor did our country need. Four years ago, more of the same. Any time I spoke out against this, I was labeled a racist. Meanwhile the other side celebrated and cheered and shoved their mockery in my face, and their socialist policies down my throat. I was forced to sit quietly and take it.
Today I have gained a president, that while he wasn’t initially my first choice, having heard his plans for our country, I believe in him, and have chosen to support him wholeheartedly (especially given the opposition).
However today I’m not allowed to celebrate the victory because I’m being called, yet again, a racist. Meanwhile the other side is literally crying, whining, bitching and moaning.
There is something deeply wrong with this country, but I do not feel it is with me or my fellow “racist deplorables.”
Just so. Trump may carry with him lots of problems, but among them do not include relentless abuses of power seeking to force unwanted change on a beleaguered population. The country has had enough and has demanded a break from the Left.

Lord willing, that break will be long and prosperous.


Scott McKay

Source: http://spectator.org/americas-gag-reflex/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Copyright - Original materials copyright (c) by the authors.

Elite Media Meltdown - Joseph Klein




by Joseph Klein

The most egregious reactions from the mainstream press on the Trump victory.

President Obama and Hillary Clinton struck positive notes of healing and reconciliation in their public remarks following President-elect Donald Trump’s stunning victory. However, the elite liberal media establishment, which had largely served as a propaganda arm of Hillary Clinton’s campaign, continues to lash out at the president-elect as if the campaign were still in full swing.

The New York Times’ lead editorial on November 9th, entitled “The Trump Revolt,” regurgitated the charges the Times’ editors and columnists have leveled at Trump so frequently during the last year. Trump “has shown himself to be temperamentally unfit to lead a diverse nation of 320 million people,” the post-election editorial proclaimed. “We know he lies without compunction,” intoned the Times’ editors, who seem to have forgotten the description by the Times’ late columnist William Safire of Hillary Clinton as a “congenital liar.”   Using typical left-wing race-baiting tactics, the editors wrote that Trump “has recruited as his allies a dark combination of racists, white supremacists and anti-Semites,” citing a celebratory tweet by David Duke, whom Trump and his campaign have repeatedly disavowed.

To top it off, the Times’ editors darkly warned that the change Trump’s supporters had voted for risks placing the United States “on a precipice.”

One of the New York Times’ lead op-ed writers, Thomas Friedman, wailed that “at the moment I am in anguish, frightened for my country and for our unity. And for the first time, I feel homeless in America.”

The leftist Huffington Post’s senior politics editor, Sam Stein, wrote that Americans “chose to jump into the abyss” by electing Trump. Mirroring the Times’ race-baiting, Stein wrote that Trump “is a nativist, and one who has brought in his wake a scary thread of anti-Semitism and racism that has marred the entire 16-month presidential campaign.”

Slate featured articles with such outrageous headlines as “White Women Sold Out the Sisterhood and the World by Voting for Trump” and “White Won.” The latter article’s sub-heading was “We are still the country that produced George Wallace. We are still the country that killed Emmett Till.” One headline Slate did probably get right was “Donald Trump Will Erase the Obama Era.” Obama had made the election a referendum on his own legacy and the voters gave him their verdict.

David Corn wrote in Mother Jones that “America is broken.” Trying to be too clever by half, Corn added that “Hate did trump.”

ABC’s Martha Raddatz, who had moderated one of the presidential debates, had to hold back tears acknowledging Trump winning the presidency, insinuating soldiers’ lives could be in danger.

CNN’s Van Jones called the election of Donald Trump a “nightmare,” which represented a “white lash against a changing country…a white lash against a black president in part.”

Finally, MSNBC’s commentators were apoplectic. Chris Matthews certainly did not have the Obama-induced thrill up his leg when he complained, “This is a shot against meritocracy, I think.” Rachel Maddow told her audience, as Trump’s victory was becoming a reality, “you’re not having a terrible, terrible dream. Also you’re not dead and you haven’t gone to hell.”

The left-leaning media establishment lives in a bubble. It cannot accept the fact that many Americans are sick and tired of being told how they should think, how they should speak and how they should act. They are sick and tired of political correctness. They are sick and tired of being branded Islamophobes just because they have genuine concerns about the safety of themselves and their families if many thousands of “refugees” from countries beset by jihad-inspired violence are allowed to settle in this country without careful vetting. They are sick and tired of being branded racists because they want real security to be put into place at our southern border and an end to “sanctuary cities” where illegal immigrants with criminal records can return time and again from deportation to inflict more harm on innocent American citizens. They watched the news of Kate Steinle being shot to death by an illegal immigrant who had been deported multiple times from the United States. They could not understand why no action was taken by the Obama administration to prevent such tragedies from happening again, and why the Democrats in the Senate killed Kate’s Law. And many Americans are sick and tired of the crony capitalism and double standards practiced by the elite establishment at ordinary Americans’ expense.

Pollster Pat Caddell, who lived through an analogous game-changing election in 1980 when Ronald Reagan soundly beat Caddell’s client Jimmy Carter, saw the change coming this time around. Caddell understood that a major structural re-alignment of the electorate was taking place that defied traditional party and ideological labels. Caddell concluded, based on an exhaustive study of public opinion, that an overwhelming majority of Americans believe (1) “America is in actual decline,” (2) their “children will be worse off than they themselves are today,” and (3) there are “different rules for well-connected and people with money.” 
Caddell found that likely voters questioned the fairness of the system. 87 percent of those polled agreed with the statement, “The country is run by an alliance of incumbent politicians, media pundits, lobbyists and other powerful money interests for their own gain at the expense of the American people.” 67 percent agreed with the statement, “The real struggle for America is not between Democrats and Republicans but between mainstream American and the ruling political elites.”

Caddell wrote that the mainstream media “refuse to recognize much less acknowledge” the widening gap between ordinary Americans and “the actions and leadership of their establishment institutions.” President-elect Donald Trump was able to successfully tap into many Americans’ frustrations in this regard. The mainstream press, however, continues to exist in its own elitist bubble, blaming the messenger rather than absorbing the true message the voters have delivered.


Joseph Klein is a Harvard-trained lawyer and the author of Global Deception: The UN’s Stealth Assault on America’s Freedom and Lethal Engagement: Barack Hussein Obama, the United Nations & Radical Islam.

Source: http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/264785/elite-media-meltdown-joseph-klein

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Copyright - Original materials copyright (c) by the authors.

President Trump: Now What? - Robert Spencer




by Robert Spencer

Steps he should take as President to roll back the global jihad.

A key element of Donald Trump’s popularity as a presidential candidate was his willingness to stake out policy positions that made establishment politicians cower in fear. His success as President will depend upon his willingness to do the same thing. Among his most important tasks will be to take the hard steps necessary to establish a sane and realistic stance for the United States toward the global jihad threat. To do that, he should implement measures such as these:

[1] Suspend (as promised) immigration from nations that are hotbeds of jihad terror activity.

While excoriated as “racist,” this proposal is a simple matter of national security. No one who opposed Trump’s proposal ever offered an alternative way to keep jihadis out of the country. (Of course, the problem of those who learn jihad inside the U.S. is also acute, and must be addressed). Some glibly opined that Trump should ban “Islamists,” not Muslims as a whole, yet never suggested a reliable way to distinguish “Islamists” from ordinary Muslims. Indeed, the Islamic State has instructed its operatives to appear secular -- to avoid ostentatious displays of Islamic piety that might arouse suspicions of “radicalization.” Can America really afford the national security risk of importing whole Muslim communities from Iraq and Somalia, as is happening now, without even making any serious attempt to screen out potential jihadists?

[2] Tell the truth about Islamic jihad and supremacism

Ever since 2011, it has been official Obama administration policy to deny any connection between Islam and terrorism. This came as a result of an October 19, 2011 letter from Farhana Khera of Muslim Advocates to John Brennan, who was then the Assistant to the President on National Security for Homeland Security and Counter Terrorism, and is now head of the CIA. The letter was signed not just by Khera, but by the leaders of virtually all the significant Islamic groups in the United States: 57 Muslim, Arab, and South Asian organizations, many with ties to Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood, including the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), the Muslim American Society (MAS), the Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA), Islamic Relief USA; and the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC).

The letter denounced what it characterized as U.S. government agencies’ “use of biased, false and highly offensive training materials about Muslims and Islam.” Despite the factual accuracy of the material about which they were complaining, the Muslim groups demanded that the task force “purge all federal government training materials of biased materials”; “implement a mandatory re-training program for FBI agents, U.S. Army officers, and all federal, state and local law enforcement who have been subjected to biased training”; and moreto ensure that all that law enforcement officials would learn about Islam and jihad would be what the signatories wanted them to learn.

Brennan immediately complied. Numerous books and presentations that gave a perfectly accurate view of Islam and jihad were. Today this entrenched policy of the U.S. government ensures that all too many jihadists simply cannot be identified as risks, since the administration is bound as a matter of policy to ignore what in saner times would be taken as warning signs. Trump must reverse that. He has spoken about the threat from “radical Islamic terrorism” on the campaign trail; he must follow through as President and remove the prohibitions on allowing agents to study and understand the motivating ideology behind the jihad threat.

[3] Remove all those linked with the Muslim Brotherhood from any position of responsibility, and end all government agencies’ interaction with groups linked with Hamas. 

This shouldn’t even have to be said, but there has been evidence of Muslim Brotherhood operatives having influence in the U.S. government back to 2012, when Representative Michele Bachmann called for an investigation of that infiltration. It’s high time that investigation was actually conducted.

[4] Enforce existing laws.

Section 2385 of the federal criminal code states that “whoever knowingly or willfully advocates, abets, advises, or teaches the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying the government of the United States or the government of any State, Territory, District or Possession thereof, or the government of any political subdivision therein, by force or violence, or by the assassination of any officer of any such government…shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction.”

It may be that the proviso in this statute that the overthrow of the government must be planned as taking place by “force and violence” may prevent this law from being applied against Muslim Brotherhood groups that are intent on subverting America from within. Legal minds should study that issue. But surely – somehow -- working toward “eliminating and destroying Western civilization from within,” as the Muslim Brotherhood has stated its own strategic goal for America, ought to be a prosecutable offense.

[5] Reclassify Muslim organizations

The U.S. government should call upon Islamic advocacy groups in this country to renounce, any intention now or in the future to replace the Constitution of the United States with Islamic Sharia. This renunciation should be backed up with transparent action to teach in mosques and Islamic schools against this intention, and against the elements of Sharia that contradict American freedoms. Those that refuse to do this, or are found to be teaching these aspects of Sharia, should be immediately closed and prosecuted.

[6] Reconfigure our international alliances.

Such that no state that oppresses women or non-Muslims in accord with Sharia provisions gets a penny of American aid, or is considered a U.S. ally.

The swamp needs draining indeed. These measures, if adopted, would go a long way toward putting the U.S. back on dry land.


Robert Spencer

Source: http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/264783/president-trump-now-what-robert-spencer

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Copyright - Original materials copyright (c) by the authors.

My election night in Hispanic TV - Silvio Canto, Jr.




by Silvio Canto, Jr.

It's time for Democrats to stop calling everyone a racist and listen to what is happening in the inner city. The Democrats have failed the black community big time.

On election night, I was the GOP analyst in the coverage for Telemundo Dallas.

I was not a Trump supporter in the primaries. However, he did something rather amazing on election day. It was truly awesome. He deserves full credit and now total support of the GOP.

Hillary Clinton was a horrible and corrupt candidate. The Democrats sold their soul to the Clintons and this is what they got. How did they nominate a woman who used a private server to carry out secret diplomatic business? Are you kidding me? 

Hispanic Democrat leaders thought that they'd would win by simply calling Trump a monster. Instead, Hispanics actually wanted to hear about ObamaCare, the lousy Obama economy and the public schools that most elected Hispanic legislators do not send their kids to. In other words, calling Trump a monster had a limited value because ObamaCare premium notices were more important. 

Blacks did not really show up, as some warned us days ago. It's time for Democrats to stop calling everyone a racist and listen to what is happening in the inner city. The Democrats have failed the black community big time.

Obama was also defeated last night because his coalition did not show up. His legacy got blown up on election day. He was on the ballot, and an Obama third term did not happen. ObamaCare's numbers do not add up and Democrats running for reelection in 2018 will do everything possible to disconnect from it. The Iran nuclear deal is an open question. The economy just never got "stimulated" as they promised in 2009.

We face huge problems and we are divided. Trump will be tested early and time will tell whether or not he can meet them.

My sense is that a lot of Americans last night said some of these things:

1) Stop calling me a racist because I disagree with Obama;
2) stop calling me a homophobe because I believe that marriage is a state issue; and,
3) stop saying that white policemen target black young men.
It was a very bad night for Democrats. The party has actually been devastated by eight years of Obama. 

There are no leaders in the horizon. It's the Democrats who will now have a civil war.


Silvio Canto, Jr.  P.S. You can listen to my show (Canto Talk) and follow me on Twitter.
  
Source: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/11/my_election_night_in_hispanic_tv_.html

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Copyright - Original materials copyright (c) by the authors.