Saturday, October 19, 2024

‘Alarming’ Report exposes over 30 Hamas-affiliated individuals and organizations in 7 European countries - Vered Weiss

 

by Vered Weiss

Even though Hamas is a designated terror organization in Europe, the organizations and people identified in the report raise funds, recruit members, and disseminate misinformation freely.

 

‘Alarming’ Report exposes over 30 Hamas-affiliated individuals and organizations in 7 European countries
Norwegian student Marie Andersen carries an antisemitic sign at an Oct. 21 pro-Hamas demonstration in Warsaw, Poland. (Photo: Screenshot)

The European Leadership Network, ELNET, released a report it described as “alarming,” detailing the extent of Hamas infiltration and influence among individuals and organizations throughout Europe.

“The findings are alarming,” ELNET wrote in a review of the report, which exposed 30 Hamas-affiliated individuals and organizations in seven countries throughout Europe.

The report highlights reveal that Majed Al-Zeer, Adel Doghman, and Mohammad Hannoun, as well as Italy’s Association of Solidarity with the Palestinian People (ABSPP) are closely connected to Hamas.

The report’s results were confirmed by the U.S. Department of Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC).

Even though Hamas is a designated terror organization in Europe, the organizations and people identified in the report raise funds, recruit members, and disseminate misinformation freely.

They manage to bypass legal frameworks by keeping their ties to Hamas secret or, when discovered and exposed, creating new shell organizations to hide their identities.

In addition to separate organizations, ELNET identified networks of entities, including Palestinians in Europe Conference (EPC), which hosts annual events featuring Hamas-affiliated speakers, European Palestinian Council for Political Relations (EUPAC), created by individuals linked to Hamas, Palestinian Return Centre (PRC) in the U.K., ABSPP in Italy, and VPNK in Germany.

The report also named Hamas-affiliated Al-Hiwar, EPAL, Infopal, and Shehab, which issue propaganda for Europeans about Hamas’s activities.

Emmanuel Navon, CEO of ELNET, added, “In light of these findings, ELNET urges European governments to take swift action by thoroughly investigating and shutting down these Hamas-affiliated organizations in order to prevent Hamas from further destabilizing both the Middle East and Europe.”

He added, “Banks and financial institutions must closely monitor the activities of the individuals named in the reports and review their financial dealings to prevent further support for terrorist activities.”

“ELNET further calls on research institutions and think tanks to help expose these activities to the public and ensure that Hamas’s fundraising networks in Europe are dismantled,” Navon concluded.


Vered Weiss

Source: https://worldisraelnews.com/alarming-report-exposes-over-30-hamas-affiliated-individuals-and-organizations-in-7-european-countries/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Sinwar’s death will hurt Iran’s ‘axis of resistance’ - analysis - Seth J. Frantzman

 

by Seth J. Frantzman

The elimination of Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar marks a significant setback for Iran's regional strategy, potentially weakening the "axis of resistance" that has long threatened Israel's security.

 

Yahya Sinwar during his prison sentence. (photo credit: VIA MAARIV/SECTION 27A COPYRIGHT ACT)
Yahya Sinwar during his prison sentence.
(photo credit: VIA MAARIV/SECTION 27A COPYRIGHT ACT)

The death of Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar is a serious blow to Iran and its “axis of resistance” in the region. The Islamic Republic has backed Hamas for many years. When Sinwar took charge, it was a major game-changer for Iran. Under Sinwar’s leadership and guidance over the past decade, Hamas has become a major terrorist group that carried out the worst massacre of Jews since the Holocaust.

Iran invested heavily in Sinwar’s Hamas. It helped it with long-range rocket technology and also encouraged it to develop drones and other new technology. The Gaza-based terrorist group also studied Israel carefully and likely had some Iranian guidance in this respect.

Hamas became a massive danger by 2023, much worse than it was back in the Second Intifada (2000-2005). This was a combination of Iranian backing and Sinwar’s dedication. With backing from Turkey, Qatar and Russia, Hamas felt that October 7 could change the region.

Iran worked with Hamas to knit it into its multi-front war on Israel. It wanted to have Hamas coordinate with Hezbollah and the Houthis. Iran would bring the Iraqi militias back to help against the Jewish state. This was a multi-front war that Tehran wanted to launch to sap Israel of its technological capabilities.

Sinwar pushed for this war to happen sooner. He innovated with the Great March of Return and other antics on the Gaza border. With Iranian backing, he launched the 2021 ten-day war. He and Iran learned a lot from this. What followed were meetings in Lebanon and talks about how to accelerate coordination.

Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on a conceptual image of war between Israel and Iran using chess pieces and national flags. (Illsutrative) (credit: AFP PHOTO / HO / KHAMENEI.IR, Canva, INGIMAGE)Enlrage image
Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on a conceptual image of war between Israel and Iran using chess pieces and national flags. (Illsutrative) (credit: AFP PHOTO / HO / KHAMENEI.IR, Canva, INGIMAGE)

Iran got Hezbollah to attack Israel on October 8, a day after the Hamas attack, and brought in the Houthis to attack as well. This was Iran’s game plan. Sinwar was a significant jewel in its crown in terms of Iran’s assets in the region and its “axis,” which includes the Houthis, Hezbollah, and the militias in Iraq.

Regional dynamics

It’s important to look at the regional blow that Iran has suffered now. It has lost Sinwar and Nasrallah. These were major figures in two powerful groups that have been harming Israel. For most of the year, Iran felt it was winning. It had helped massacre 1,000 Israelis. It had depopulated the northern border. It carried out direct attacks with drones and long-range ballistic missiles in April and early October. The militias in Iraq have also targeted Israel with drones. The Houthis have been wreaking havoc in the Red Sea – they even targeted Tel Aviv with a drone.

However, for Iran, it was Hamas that was the pawn closest to Israel. Palestinian Islamic Jihad is a smaller proxy group. Hamas is a powerful group and a key to Iran’s plans. Hezbollah is a Shi’ite group in Lebanon. It was Hamas that Iran hoped could advance the plans to defeat Israel and destroy the two-state solution.

Now that Sinwar is dead, Iran will have to rethink the equation. Qatar had been backing Hamas and paying money to Sinwar’s Hamas. Via Qatar, Tehran hoped that they could influence the US to pressure Israel into a ceasefire. Doha had tried to get a ceasefire to preserve Hamas in Gaza and preserve Sinwar.

But Israel turned the tables by eliminating Hamas leaders. Ismail Haniyeh was killed and so was Salah al-Arouri. Marwan Issa and Mohammed Dief were killed.

Now Hamas has very few leaders. Most of them reside in Doha. Now is the time that the US can use pressure on Qatar to stop hosting Hamas. Iran is now on the back foot. It could lose in Lebanon; it could face humiliation at home. The death of Sinwar could cause other dominoes to fall in the Iranian multi-front war on Israel.

Israel must play its cards right now. It has a chance now to reverse a year of difficulty. It has a chance to remake this regional chess board. Removing the Sinwar pawn on Iran’s chessboard is important. Now is the time to take a shot at Iran’s proverbial “queen” in this game and strike at the regime itself.

 
Seth J. Frantzman

Source: https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/article-825060

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

‘He’s still alive' vs. 'died courageously': The battle for Sinwar's death narrative begins - Ohad Merlin

 

by Ohad Merlin

Arab reactions on social media ranged from praise to disbelief to celebration

 

POSTERS DEPICTING Yahya Sinwar (right) and Hassan Nasrallah hang from a building near Begin Boulevard in Jerusalem as part of an ‘Ahdut Achshav’ campaign for unity among Israelis, earlier this year. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has played directly into Sinwar’s hands, posits the writer.  (photo credit: Chaim Goldberg/Flash90)
POSTERS DEPICTING Yahya Sinwar (right) and Hassan Nasrallah hang from a building near Begin Boulevard in Jerusalem as part of an ‘Ahdut Achshav’ campaign for unity among Israelis, earlier this year. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has played directly into Sinwar’s hands, posits the writer.
(photo credit: Chaim Goldberg/Flash90)

As Israel formally announced the assassination of Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar, online reactions to the news began to accumulate, ranging between praise to disbelief and rejection, with some trying to build a narrative of a courageous death rather than a fleeing attempt.

Glorification and praise

One notable trend was an endeavor to glorify Sinwar’s death in an attempt to cloak his assassination with an aura of majesty. Many of these attempts focused on the fact that Sinwar was killed in a building and not in a tunnel, a fact used by many to portray him as “fighting in the front with his soldiers and dying during armed clashes with the enemy.” One pro-Hamas commenter named Nawras wrote, “Military quiver, ground engagement, and martyrdom. Just as he wanted. Martyrdom of leader Yahya Sinwar after clashing with enemies of God in Rafah.”

Hafid Derradji, a popular Algerian journalist with almost 3.5 million followers, tweeted: “If the news of the martyrdom of the leader Yahya Sinwar is true, then congratulations to him for the martyrdom that only the honorable attain. If it is not so, then we ask God to prolong his life and grant him martyrdom. We always remember the men’s saying: ‘When a master is absent, a master rises. The resistance is not diminished by the martyr who departs,’ because all of our people are potential martyrs. Welcome to God’s will and destiny.”

One anonymous blogger tweeted a viral post that reached hundreds of thousands of users, adding: “News about the martyrdom of Yahya Sinwar, Allah willing, in a clash with the Israeli army. If this news is true, then it is enough honor for him that he butted heads with the enemy and did not hide in a tunnel as was the case with the deceased Hassan Nasrallah.”

Another user praised Sinwar for being a “martyr,” adding, “Sinwar won, by the Lord of the Kaaba, and Allah fulfilled his wish to die a martyr...Another Sinwar will appear, and another...until Palestine is liberated...The fighter expects to be killed at any moment...so what about the one who wishes for the death of a martyr? The news of the martyrdom of the leader saddened us, and the loss was made easier for us by the fact that he was martyred as a fighter with his weapon.”

Enlrage image

One user added: “Allahu Akbar. If Yahya Sinwar is alive, he will remain the symbolic leader, the hero who fights in the field with the heroic mujahideen (religious fighters). And if he is killed, God will increase his honor with martyrdom, so that he may be killed as a martyr in the trench of battle, not in hotels abroad or hiding in tunnels. He was martyred on the battlefield, defending Islam, land, and honor.”

Another user tweeted: “No Zionist will ever be able to stand and be proud of assassinating Yahya Sinwar. Today, Israel has failed to assassinate him forever. Abu Ibrahim was one step ahead of them, even in his death. He was martyred in a clash on the front!”

Disbelief and rejection

Some replied with disbelief to the news of Sinwar’s death, with Hamas-affiliated outlets warning users against believing the news.

Hamas-affiliated outlet Gaza Now posted: “Warning, the news that spoke about the assassination of Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar is completely false, and the occupation’s publication and circulation of this news is an attempt to collect intelligence information, and it did previously with leader Muhammad al-Deif. Please be careful.”

Another user posted: “Sinwar is alive, God willing, unless Hamas issues a statement about his martyrdom.”

Yet another posted the photo of a person resembling Sinwar and was arrested by the IDF in Gaza several months ago, adding: “Focus, guys. Everyone in the pictures here looks like Sinwar, and it’s natural that all Palestinians look like Sinwar because he’s Palestinian, not Russian. In any case, the resistance has previously said that it is the only one that announces the martyrdom of its leaders. Wait,”

Celebrations and exhilaration

Adhwan Al-Ahmari, a journalist at Independent Arabia, wrote, “Nasrallah is finished, Sinwar followed him after they left Beirut, and Gaza destroyed and caused the displacement of hundreds of thousands and left them homeless. Iran was paying the salaries, and it was the one who gave the orders. There was no destruction in Tehran, but the destructive tools exploited the name of Jerusalem, so the Golan and northern Gaza were lost. Palestine was not liberated, and no state was established.”

Some users referred to older videos circulating of Gazans cursing Sinwar. A blogger named Zahran added, “Our joy at the death of Sinwar is due to religious, humanitarian, and moral motives, thank Allah. I congratulate this bereaved woman (in the video) and millions of other victims. May God curse all the (Muslim) Brotherhood, living and dead.”

Likewise, a Saudi user, showing another video of a woman slamming Sinwar, wrote, “Tell this honorable Palestinian old woman that the head of the treasonous (Muslim) Brotherhood movement Hamas, the Zoroastrian Brotherhood member, the impure Yahya Al-Sinwar, has been annihilated, and the (Iranian) agent has gone to the dustbin of history.”

A third Saudi user named Abdullah wrote, “I ask you by God, O people of Gaza: Tell her, Tell her, Tell her. Give this poor bereaved woman the good news that Allah has taken revenge for her on the rat Yahya Sinwar.”

Amjad Taha, an Emirati peace activist and blogger, added, “Congratulations to humanity on the death of the terrorist, rapist of women, kidnapper of children, and despicable Yahya Sinwar. To hell and a miserable fate.”

Khaled Bin Thani, another Emirati writer, wrote, “I do not rejoice at the killing of anyone, whether Sinwar, Nasrallah, Haniyeh, or others. Rather, I feel sorry for them because they lived deceived by an illusion, like millions of Arab and Muslim people. They are the sons of this environment. The only difference between them and these millions is that they have found the opportunity for leadership and command with the temptations of money and power.”

Likewise, another Saudi user named Abdullatif tweeted: “Our joy today is very great with the death of Sinwar. Congratulations to every Arab and Muslim in the East and West of the Earth.”

Hani Mashour, also from the Gulf, added, “We congratulate the people of Gaza and the beloved people of Palestine on getting rid of Yahya Sinwar.”

Likewise, Lebanese blogger Raymond Hakim wrote, “He for whom Lebanon was destroyed has died.”

Finally, another user posted an infographic reading: “He is not a martyr and not a hero. He carried out the idiotic October 7 on Iran’s orders and went to hide under the houses of the innocent so that they would suffer the consequences. He died while running away, hiding, like a foreign agent who carried out Iran’s agenda at the expense of Gaza’s innocent. He died and decomposed after the escape of all of his companions. He led to the death of over 50,000 martyrs.”


Ohad Merlin

Source: https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/article-825069

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

New report IDs groups in US allegedly promoting pro-Iranian propaganda, one met with Kamala Harris - Paul Bond

 

by Paul Bond

Report by George Washington University researchers includes Vice President Kamala Harris interacting, perhaps unknowingly, with one alleged operative

 

 Imam Mohammad Ali Elahi

A dramatic new report from researchers at George Washington University identifies a dozen organizations, some operating in the U.S. under tax-exempt status, whose purpose is to promote pro-Iranian propaganda, and includes photos of Vice President Kamala Harris happily interacting with one alleged operative: Imam Mohammad Ali Elahi.

The photos were taken in 2021 at Elahi’s Islamic House of Wisdom in Michigan at an event Democrat Gov. Gretchen Whitmer also attended and was for the purpose of advancing the COVID-19 vaccinations.

But the Oct. 9 report, "Propaganda, Procurement and Lethal Operations: Iran's Activities Inside America," describes Elahi as a radical who has likened Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to “Hitler” carrying out a "holocaust" against the Palestinians and who has referred to the Israeli military as a “terrorist cult.”

Elahi, who once served as head of the Iranian Navy’s political-ideological office, has cast doubts on Al-Qaeda’s role in the 9/11 terror attacks and was friendly with Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, who was instrumental in the hostage crisis of 1979 in which 53 Americans were held captive for 444 days.

“What arguably constitutes the most problematic aspect of Imam Elahi's persona is his explicit and continuous support for Hezbollah,” says the report.

While some will no doubt interpret the association of Harris, now the Democratic presidential nominee, with Elahi as undercutting her oft-stated support of Israel in its ongoing war with Hamas, the report is non-partisan, one of its authors, Lara Burns, told Just the News.

Burns said she does not know how much information Harris had when the photos of her smiling next to Elahi were taken three years ago.

“These are just examples of attempts to gain credibility and influence by rubbing shoulders with people of prominence,” she said.

Elahi and others in the report “operate under the cloak of organizations that represent a segment of the population, but they don’t disclose their true agenda, which is to spread Iranian-regime rhetoric for the purpose of radicalizing and recruiting,” Burns also said.

Burns added that one step toward solving the problem would be to rethink the charitable status of the groups operating stateside.

“The whole benefit is that you are contributing to the public good, and if an organization is driving the agenda of a sponsor of terrorism like Iran, that’s not for the public good,” she said. “There should be extra scrutiny on their tax-exempt status.”

While Harris did not respond to a request for comment from Just the News, she was recently asked on CBS News' 60 Minutes to name the nation that is America’s greatest adversary, and she answered it was Iran. And on Wednesday she was on Fox News to explain her answer.

“Critics say that you either relaxed or failed to enforce sanctions on Iran, allowing all of this money to flow into Iran, like, billions in oil profits,” host Bret Baier said during a combative interview in which the two frequently spoke over each other.

Harris responded: “Let’s go back to Donald Trump … who pulled out of the deal that would have actually put Iran in check,” referring to him as president ending of a nuclear deal struck by preceding President Barack Obama in favor of beefing up sanctions.

The report was made public just prior to Netanyahu announcing Thursday that Israeli military forces killed Yahya Sinwar, the Hamas leader who masterminded the Oct. 7, 2023, attack that killed about 1,200 civilians.

“Evil suffered a heavy blow,” Netanyahu said. “This is the beginning of the day after Hamas, and this is an opportunity for you, the residents of Gaza, to finally break free from its tyranny.”

On Thursday, Harris also addressed the nation about the killing of Sinwar.

“Justice has been served, and the United States, Israel and the entire world are better off as a result,” she said. “He had American blood on his hands. Today, I can only hope that the families of the victims of Hamas feel a sense and measure of  relief.”

While GWU report is not focused on Hamas, it notes that Iran provides about $100 million annually to Hamas and other terrorist groups, while Elahi and organizations tied to him funnel money from the U.S. to Iran.

The 126-page report includes 498 citations, and photos of Obama and former Secretary of State John Kerry hobnobbing with Imam Hassan Qazwini in 2008 and 2014, respectively.

Qazwini leads the tax-exempt Islamic Institute of America and is described in the report as “one of the most influential Shia figures in the U.S.” He has also met with presidents Bill Clinton and George W. Bush and former Vice President Al Gore, among others.

Qazwini has said the riot at the Capitol building on Jan. 6, 2021, was a punishment from God because then-President Trump oversaw the operation that killed Qasem Soleimani, whom the U.S. had identified as one of the world’s top terrorists.

Qazwini is also known for his antisemitic rhetoric, according to the report, claiming that Israel is behind ISIS and that its citizens are “the enemies of Islam” and promising that Jerusalem “will be a Muslim city.”

Another prolific organization for spreading Iranian propaganda is the Alavi Foundation, a prime benefactor of Elahi that has reportedly donated $1.9 million to American colleges like Harvard University, Columbia University, the University of California at Berkeley and others that saw their share of anti-Israel protests since Hezbollah terrorists' attacked the nation on Oct. 7, 2023.

The report notes that in 2008 the Department of Justice argued that Alavi “secretly served as a front for the Iranian government and as a gateway for millions of dollars to be funneled to Iran in clear violation of U.S. sanction laws,” setting off a legal battle that is ongoing today.

The New York Post earlier reported that Elahi is a regular donor to Democrats through ActBlue, a platform also used by Thomas Matthews Crooks, the 20-year-old would-be assassin who shot President Donald Trump in the ear at a Pennsylvania rally in July.

While Burns said she and the other authors of the report found no evidence of an Iranian connection to either of the two attempted assassinations of Trump, the report notes that the U.S. is “aware of multiple plots against U.S. officials,” including John Bolton, Trump’s former security adviser.

The “desire to avenge Soleimani’s death led to a set of lethal plots against former Trump Administration officials,” the report states.

The report also notes that Hezbollah is the oldest, most established of Iran’s proxies and it has long operated in the U.S. George Washington University’s Program on Extremism has identified 142 U.S.-based individuals who have been prosecuted for Hezbollah activities since 2000.

“The possibility that Iran and its proxies could mobilize known and trusted assets based in the U.S. rather than hired guns to carry out some kind of violent action in the future is a concrete one,” according to the report.

Among others who have mingled with Elahi are Sen. Gary Peters, Rep. Debbie Dingell and the late Congressman John Conyers, all Democrats from Michigan, a state that is well represented in the report, as it is home to Elahi’s House of Wisdom and several other pro-Iranian entities.

House of Wisdom has operated from Dearborn, Michigan, as a federally tax-exempt organization since 1996, and it regularly praises Khomeini and Iranian-style democracy that is insinuates should be copied worldwide.

Elahi is also the only identifiable American member of Ahl Al-Bayt World Assembly, a group founded in 1994 by Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei that operates in 90 countries.

The report notes that ABWA is barred from operating directly in the U.S. due to sanctions, though it reportedly organizes trips for American academics hoping to meet regime leaders at its headquarters in the holy city of Qom, Iran.

The report calls ABWA “one of the main tools for spreading the Iranian regime’s version of Shia Islam and supporting its agenda.”

Just the News reached out not only to the Harris campaign, but Dingell, Peters, Elahi and Qazwini, as well, and it will update this story should any of them respond.

 
Paul Bond

Source: https://justthenews.com/government/iran

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Columbia bans Israeli professor for criticizing university’s policy on antisemitism - Don J. Pierre

 

by Don J. Pierre

Davidai criticized Columbia’s administration for permitting pro-Hamas demonstrations celebrating October 7th.

 

Columbia bans Israeli professor for criticizing university’s policy on antisemitism

Columbia University has “temporarily” banished its most distinguished pro-Israel Jewish professor — Shai Davidai — from campus property, a severe disciplinary sanction which prevents him from attending university functions and accessing his office.

Speaking to The Algemeiner on Wednesday morning, Davidai denounced the action as retaliation for his much publicized advocacy of Jewish civil rights, unabashed support for Zionism, and condemnations of student and faculty calls for continued acts of terrorism against Israel and other Western countries. He has, he noted, been targeted by the university before. Last semester, it launched an investigation of his conduct following spurious accusations that his denouncing terrorism amounted to anti-Muslim bigotry.

Now, the university has allegedly found cause to discipline Davidai under a microscope, punishing him for an exchange of words which took place during dueling demonstrations marking the one-year anniversary of Hamas’s Oct. 7 massacre across southern Israel. According to Davidai’s own social media account, as swarms of pro-Hamas students bellowed slogans demanding violence against Israelis, the Columbia professor filmed himself reproaching the university’s chief operating officer, Cas Holloway, for permitting anti-Israel activists to hold a celebration of the terror attack — in which Hamas-led Palestinian terrorists murdered Jewish children, sexually assaulted Jewish women and men, and kidnapped over 200 hostages during their rampage.

Footage of the encounter shows Davidai approaching Holloway and requesting that he explain the pro-Hamas demonstration’s concurrence with a Jewish-student led vigil, a circumstance that many people on campus felt was an injustice and desecration of Jewish life. Davidai then vowed to walk with Holloway until he received a sufficient response to his concerns, a not unusual behavior on Ivy League campuses, where administrative buildings have been illegally occupied and presidential offices stormed by anti-Israel demonstrators over the past year. Earlier in the day, Davidai himself was stalked by pro-Hamas activists and briefly jousted with two public safety officers about whether his freedom of movement had been violated.

“Cas, what do you have to say?” Davidai said to Holloway, with whom he crossed paths incidentally. “How could you allow this to happen on Oct. 7? … You have to do your job, and I will not let you rest until they let us rest.”

During the meeting, Davidai initiated a conversation between Holloway and an Israeli student who, like Davidai, pleaded for answers.

Holloway apologized to the student, to which Davidai responded, “Don’t say sorry if you let this happen. This is your responsibility. This is not being sorry … I’m filing a complaint with you right now, Cas. You’re the COO … You know it’s unsanctioned; you know they violated every time, place, and manner. They are hiding their faces.”

Holloway then proceeded to terminate the conversation, prompting Davidai to say, “I’m walking with you. Where are we going, Cas? Because Jewish and Israeli students don’t get to go, so where are we going? I’m walking with you. I’m not obstructing you.”

During Wednesday’s interview with the Algemeiner, Davidai defended his approach as a genuine expression of grief and concern for the welfare of Jewish students.

“People are free to see exactly the videos and see, you know, what did or did not happen and judge for themselves,” he said. “That is why I call this a clear act or retaliation. My lawyers got on a phone call with them on Oct. 7 [of this year] and were told that the university is going to suspend my ability to be on campus. On that day, the university found that the most important thing is to remove me from campus. I am, to the best of my knowledge, the only professor who has been removed from campus since Oct. 7 [2023].”

Davidai went on to point to faculty conduct which has been covered by The Algemeiner, including Columbia professor Joseph Massad publishing in Electronic Intifada an essay cheering Hamas’s atrocities as “awesome” and describing men who paraglided into a music festival to kill young people as “the air force of the Palestinian resistance.”

Davidai continued, “The only person who was removed from campus is the one that exposed the chief operating officer’s antisemitic problem. And I say this, you know, I don’t know if he is or isn’t an antisemite. I do know that he’s awfully comfortable with antisemitism and that he has an antisemitism problem.”

According to Columbia University, the campus ban, which does not affect Davidai’s compensation or employment status, was prompted by “threats of intimidation, harassment, or other threatening behavior.”

Samantha Slater, a university spokesperson, continued: “Columbia has consistently and continually respected Assistant Professor Davidai’s right to free speech and to express his views. His freedom of speech has not been limited and is not being limited now. Columbia, however, does not tolerate threats of intimidation, harassment, or other threatening behavior by its employees. Because Assistant Professor Davidai repeatedly harassed and intimidated university employees in violation of university policy, we have temporarily limited his access to campus while he undertakes appropriate training on our policies governing the behavior of our employees.”

This latest clash between Davidai and Columbia University comes during what has been widely described as an unprecedented “crisis” at the school which, since Oct. 7, 2023, has undermined its credibility with the public and drawn the scrutiny of federal lawmakers.

In April, an anti-Zionist group occupied Hamilton Hall, forcing then-university president Minouche Shafik to call on the New York City Police Department (NYPD) for help, a decision she hesitated to make and which led to over 108 arrests. However, according to documents shared in August by the US House Committee on Education and the Workforce, 18 of the 22 students slapped with disciplinary charges for their role in the incident remain in “good standing” despite the university’s earlier pledge to expel them. Another 31 of 35 who were suspended for illegally occupying the campus with a “Gaza Solidarity Encampment” remain in good standing too.

In August, Shafik resigned as president of the university, and just two months prior, in June, its legal counsel reached an out of court settlement with a student who accused administrators of neglecting their obligation to foster a safe learning environment during the final weeks of last spring semester. While stopping short of admitting guilt, the settlement virtually conceded to the plaintiff her argument that the campus was unsafe for Jewish students, agreeing to provide her and others “Safe Passage Liaisons” tasked with protecting them from racist abuse and violence.

Amid this cluster of scandals and conflagrations, Davidai has allegedly received a lion’s share of the university’s attention. Last semester, it launched an investigation of his conduct, which he called a persecution that “reveals the depths of its hostility towards its Jewish community.” He has since retained counsel to guard his rights and prevent being bulldozed by one of the wealthiest and powerful universities in the world. Despite his troubles, however, he told The Algemeiner on Wednesday that Columbia is redeemable.

“I do this because I love teaching and I love research. And because I truly believe that Columbia can become better,” he said. “For me, Cas Holloway is ruining Colombia’s reputation. He is the anathema of everything that’s right about Columbia, its educational practice, research, and openness to everyone. And I don’t know if he’s a good person or a bad person, but his inaction, his indifference shows that he’s OK with ruining everything that higher education should be standing for.”


Don J. Pierre

Source: https://worldisraelnews.com/columbia-bans-israeli-professor-for-criticizing-universitys-policy-on-antisemitism/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Tim Walz vs. the Constitution: A Fight Over State Interests - Stephen Soukup

 

by Stephen Soukup

Tim Walz and other progressives backing the National Popular Vote Compact prioritize centralizing power over protecting state interests.

 

 

Tim Walz is, of course, the Democratic Party’s vice presidential nominee. He is also the governor of Minnesota, the 22nd-largest state in the union (by population). As of the last census, Minnesota has roughly 1/7th of the population of California, the most populous state. Indeed, if you took the five largest states and then added Minnesota, it would account for less than 5% of the total population. In the grand scheme of things, Minnesota is pretty insignificant, at least in terms of population.

Given this, it might seem a little batty (to say the least) for Walz to be running around the country declaring his opposition to the Electoral College. And it might seem even battier that Walz would have signed into law Minnesota’s participation in the National Popular Vote Compact, an agreement between 17 blue and deep purple states and the District of Columbia to allocate their electoral votes based on the national popular vote (but not until states with a combined total of 270 or more electoral votes have signed on, naturally).

Why would anyone do such a thing? Why would anyone advocate for and then participate in the de facto disenfranchisement of the citizens of his state? And it’s not just Walz and his fellow Minnesota leftists. Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Maine, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and DC are all signatories and all have fewer electoral votes—and thus smaller, more easily ignored populations—than Minnesota. Why would the elected representatives of those polities do that to their constituents? Why would anyone deliberately say to the two major parties, “Hey! We don’t matter! Please forget about us!”

The answer to this question is not especially complicated. It can be summarized in just one word: Progressivism.

For starters, all of the signatories (and a majority of their constituents) are unshakably convinced of the righteousness of their ideology. They believe not only that they are “on the right side of history,” but that they will always be. It never even crosses their minds that political winds might someday shift and blow majority opinion in a different direction. They are utterly incapable of imagining a situation in which they might be in the political minority and, therefore, dependent on the mercies guaranteed by the Electoral College and the rest of the Constitution’s republican features. Since its inception, this type of unflinching sanctimoniousness has been one of the chief defining characteristics of Progressivism.

More importantly, as good Progressives, the elected representatives of the signatory states care neither for the Constitution nor even for the very idea of “states.” In their eyes, the Constitution is an impediment to “good governance,” while the states are arbitrary creations that serve no purpose other than to obstruct the power of the national government and, by extension, to empower “outside-of-the-mainstream” cranks and reactionaries.

The Progressive movement has long loathed the nation’s founding documents, finding their reliance on federalism and the separation of powers to be inconvenient obstacles in their efforts to fix the world and rule the nation as only they know how. Teddy Roosevelt, the nation’s first Progressive president, was interminably frustrated by the Constitution, considering it an outdated document meant for another time, another place, and frankly, another people. In Roosevelt’s eyes, the nation had changed over the course of a century-plus, but the Founders’ arrogance kept the government from changing along with it. Woodrow Wilson, the second Progressive president and a godfather of the movement, also loathed the Constitution and sought to skirt its restraints as often as possible. Likewise, Herbert Croly—a Progressive intellectual giant and a guru of sorts to both presidents—found the Constitution cumbersome and overly restrictive. He actively encouraged its “reform” or complete abandonment.

The 16th and 17th Amendments to the Constitution—both of which permanently (and negatively) altered the nature of the federal government—were the work of the Progressives, as was the near-simultaneous creation of the Federal Reserve, the nation’s nominally “private” central bank. In the span of roughly a decade, the Progressives thoroughly undermined the Framers’ vision and set the stage for a perpetual war by the left against the Constitution. When Vox.com’s Ian Millhiser declares that “the Constitution is actually quite bad,” for example, he is merely echoing more than a century of Progressive orthodoxy.

The largest part of this war on the Constitution and its safeguards has been the left’s enduring effort to place greater and greater power and authority in the hands of the centralized national government. Nearly seven decades ago, Russell Kirk, the driving intellectual force behind the rebirth of American Conservatism, noted that the overarching trend in human-social relations is toward greater centralization and away from “community.” This trend, he continued, had accelerated dramatically since the Enlightenment and, at least, in the United States, since the launch of the Progressive Movement, which marked the start of the nation’s “modern era.” “All history, and especially modern history,” Kirk wrote, “is in some sense the account of the decline of community and the ruin consequent upon that loss.” He continued:

In the process, the triumph of the modern state has been the most powerful factor. “The single most decisive influence upon Western social organization has been the rise and development of the centralized territorial state.” There is every reason to regard the state in history as, to use a phrase that Gierke applied to Rousseau’s doctrine of the General Will, “a process of permanent revolution.” Hostile toward every institution which acts as a check upon its power, the nation-state has been engaged, ever since the decline of the medieval order, in stripping away one by one the functions and prerogatives of true community—aristocracy, church, guild, family, and local association. What the state seeks is a tableland upon which a multitude of individuals, solitary though herded together, labor anonymously for the state’s maintenance.

The Progressives—then and now—have always aligned themselves with the interests of the centralized, national government (what Kirk terms “the state”). Consequently, they have always joined in the national government’s hostility to and aggressive repudiation of “every institution which acts as a check on its power.” Kirk notes that the list of these repudiated institutions includes the church, the family, and “local association.” It also includes all civic, athletic, business, and social organizations, including all alternative sources of democratic power, including state governments. There is a reason, after all, that the left has spent the last century demonizing those who believe in “state’s rights,” despite the fact that those rights existed long before they were used to justify secession from the Union and are, in fact, enshrined in the Bill of Rights. Of course, the left has also spent the last century demonizing anyone who expresses support for an originalist interpretation of the Ninth and Tenth Amendments for the very same reason.

Why does Tim Walz not care that the Electoral College was designed specifically to protect the interests of states like the one he governs? Why do none of the elected officials from the other states that have signed the National Popular Vote Compact care about their own states’ interests?

Because they don’t believe that states should have interests. They hate the idea that other states are able, to some extent, to reject the dictates of the ideology they know in their hearts is ideal. They hate that the Constitution establishes that state governments should serve as a counterbalance to the national government. They desperately want their states—and all the others as well—to serve “a tableland upon which a multitude of individuals, solitary though herded together, labor anonymously for the” maintenance and growth of the national government.

Tim Walz thinks states’ interests just get in the way. So, to hell with them—and the Constitution.


Stephen Soukup

Source: https://amgreatness.com/2024/10/19/tim-walz-vs-the-constitution-a-fight-over-state-interests/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Thursday, October 17, 2024

IDF: Hamas terror chief Yahya Sinwar is dead - Charles Byebelezer, Amelie Botbol

 

by Charles Byebelezer, Amelie Botbol

The architect of the Oct. 7, 2023, massacre was one of three terrorists killed following a random encounter with Israeli forces.

 

Yahya Sinwar, leader of the Hamas terrorist group, at a rally in Beit Lahia, the northern Gaza Strip, on May 30, 2021. Photo by Atia Mohammed/Flash90.
Yahya Sinwar, leader of the Hamas terrorist group, at a rally in Beit Lahia, the northern Gaza Strip, on May 30, 2021. Photo by Atia Mohammed/Flash90.

Israel Defense Forces soldiers killed Hamas terror master Yahya Sinwar in a firefight in the southern Gaza city of Rafah, the military confirmed in a press release on Thursday night.

Sinwar “was eliminated after hiding for the past year behind the civilian population of Gaza, both above and below ground in Hamas tunnels in the Gaza Strip,” the IDF and Shin Bet (Israel Security Agency) stated.

According to the announcement, increased military operations in southern Gaza in recent weeks “restricted Yahya Sinwar’s operational movement as he was pursued by the forces and led to his elimination.

“After completing the process of identifying the body, it can be confirmed that Yahya Sinwar was eliminated,” the statement to the press concluded.

 

The Israel Police positively identified the corpse of Sinwar, who was killed on Wednesday. The Hamas leader was reportedly identified by his teeth.

Netanyahu was set to address the nation at 8:30 p.m. local time.

Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar holds the son of an Al-Qassam Brigades terrorist who was killed in recent fighting with Israel, during a rally in Gaza City, May 24, 2021. Photo by Mahmud Hams/AFP via Getty Images.

The Israel Defense Forces said earlier Thursday that it was investigating whether Sinwar was one of three terrorists killed by Israeli soldiers in the Palestinian enclave.

According to initial reports, the Hamas leader was killed by tank fire called in by IDF soldiers who had identified armed terrorists in a building.

When the soldiers subsequently searched the premises, they discovered that one of the bodies bore a striking resemblance to Sinwar.

“We will reach every terrorist and eliminate them,” Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant tweeted on Thursday.

“You will pursue your enemies, and they will fall before you by the sword,” added Gallant, quoting Leviticus 26:7.

The X post included pictures of former Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah, who was assassinated in an IDF strike in Beirut last month, and former Hamas “military”/Al-Qassam Brigades chief Mohammed Deif, who was killed in an Israeli strike in southern Gaza’s Khan Yunis in July.

Later on Thursday, IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Herzi Halevi and Shin Bet (Israel Security Agency) head Ronen Bar held a situation assessment.

Shin Bet head Ronen Bar (left) and IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Herzi Halevi hold a situation assessment, Oct. 17, 2024. Credit: Israel Defense Forces.

The military said on Thursday that while no hostages were found in the building where the three terrorists were killed, “forces continue to operate with the necessary caution in the area.”

Netanyahu instructed the IDF to inform hostage families that there was no indication any hostages were hurt during the battle.

Efrat Machikawa, the niece of captive Gadi Moses, told JNS on Thursday, “I hope all Israelis including the government will remain modest and humble. While this is a military achievement, the most important thing remains saving lives, and by that I mean returning the hostages.”

While the Hamas leader’s elimination is “very important, I remain extremely concerned about [the hostages’] fate. They are in my head and my heart every second since Oct. 7. They are the only ones I think about,” Machikawa added.

Opposition leader Yair Lapid called on the Netanyahu government to “take advantage of the opportunity for a decisive move regarding the hostages.

“Strive for a comprehensive deal and offer monetary rewards and safe passage to anyone who brings captives to our forces,” he tweeted.

Qatari officials involved in indirect negotiations between Israel and Hamas have told family members of hostages that Sinwar had surrounded himself with captives.

Channel 12 reported that Sinwar had been hiding with the six hostages who were executed and then recovered by the IDF on Aug. 31. The hostages were identified as Hersh Goldberg-Polin, 23, Eden Yerushalmi, 24, Almog Sarusi, 25, Alexander Lobanov, 32, Carmel Gat, 40, and Master Sgt. Ori Danino, 25.

Hamas still holds 101 hostages, including 97 of the 251 taken during the Palestinian terror group’s massacre of some 1,200 people in the northwestern Negev just over a year ago.

“We need to thank the IDF if Sinwar is indeed dead. It also means that there is a lot of anxiety regarding the fate of the 101 hostages,” Ruby Chen, the father of captive Itay Chen, told JNS on Thursday. “Now is the time to leverage this military action for a deal to get them out.

“We received an update from IDF sources confirming that there were no hostages in the vicinity with regards to the incident,” he continued. “My message is that now is the time to get a deal done and put an end to all of this.”

Yahya Sinwar
Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar in a terror tunnel underneath the southern Gaza Strip city of Khan Yunis, Oct. 10, 2023. Credit: IDF.

Earlier this month, Sinwar reportedly renewed contacts with mediators in Qatar to find out the chances that he could receive immunity in any ceasefire-for-hostages-and-terrorists-release deal.

Similarly, in August, Ynet reported that Sinwar wanted protection against the possibility of an Israeli assassination. “Sinwar insists on guarantees for his safety and life” a senior Egyptian official said.

Two threats from Qatar led to Sinwar’s emergence from a long silence, according to Channel 12.

Sinwar was convicted on multiple murder counts by an Israeli court and sentenced to five life sentences, which he was supposed to serve until his death. However, in October 2011, he was released from prison—having served 22 years—as part of the Gilad Shalit prisoner exchange.

Following his release, Sinwar gained power and popularity within Hamas, becoming its Gaza leader in 2017 by defeating Ismail Haniyeh in a vote.

In August, Sinwar was chosen to lead Hamas’s so-called political bureau, replacing Haniyeh, who was assassinated in Tehran on July 31.


Charles Byebelezer, Amelie Botbol

Source: https://www.jns.org/idf-probing-if-hamas-terror-chief-sinwar-killed-in-gaza/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

The Biden-Harris Administration's Misguided Policy On The Palestinians - Bassam Tawil

 

by Bassam Tawil

What is most disturbing about Harris's advocacy for the establishment of an Iranian-controlled Palestinian state is that it is seen by many Palestinians as a reward for the October 7 atrocities.... So, when Harris talks about the need to establish a Palestinian state, she is sending a message to Hamas and other Palestinians that terrorism against Israel pays....

 

  • On a number of occasions over the past few months, US Vice President and Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris has declared her support for the creation of a Palestinian state next to Israel. Last month, Harris said: "We must have a two-state solution where we can rebuild Gaza where the Palestinians have security, self-determination and the dignity they so rightly deserve."

  • Harris's repeated talk about the need to establish a Palestinian state in the aftermath of the October 7 atrocities against Israelis is the best gift the Iran-backed Hamas terrorist group could have wished for.

  • Harris seems to ignore that a majority of Palestinians continue to support Hamas and the October 7 atrocities.... Two-thirds of the Palestinians [in a poll conducted by Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research (PSR) in June] said that the October 7 massacres were "correct."

  • What is most disturbing about Harris's advocacy for the establishment of an Iranian-controlled Palestinian state is that it is seen by many Palestinians as a reward for the October 7 atrocities.... So, when Harris talks about the need to establish a Palestinian state, she is sending a message to Hamas and other Palestinians that terrorism against Israel pays....

  • If Harris really cared about the Palestinians, she should be calling on Hamas to surrender; and calling on the Palestinian Authority (PA) stop glorifying terrorists and paying their families monthly salaries, dismantle all terror groups operating in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, stop poisoning the hearts and minds of their people, and recognize Israel's right to exist. Unfortunately, she has done none of the above.

  • Moreover, the assumption that the PA can be "revitalized" and play a role in a post-war Gaza shows that Harris and the Biden administration are unfortunately clueless.... The poll also found that if presidential elections were held today, Hamas arch-terrorist Yahya Sinwar would receive 41% of the votes, while Abbas would get only 13%. A majority of 84% of the Palestinians want Abbas to resign.

  • Abbas is also well aware that the talk about "revitalizing" the corrupt PA is nothing but a farce. The PA was established more than 30 years ago and its leaders, first Yasser Arafat and now Abbas, have never shown any serious intention to combat rampant corruption, anarchy and lawlessness in areas under their control.

  • Abbas and the Egyptians appear to have renewed their talks with Hamas because they sense that the Biden-Harris administration is not interested in ending the terror group's rule over the Gaza Strip.

  • If Biden and Harris really wanted to see Hamas removed from power and the Israeli hostages released, all they need to do, is issue an ultimatum to the ruler of Qatar, who funds and hosts the terror group's leadership, that the US will withdraw its air base from the Gulf state and impose sanctions on the emirate if the issue is not resolved immediately.

  • If the Biden-Harris administration really wanted to get rid of Hamas, they would be calling out Abbas and the Egyptians for negotiating with a terror group about ways of incorporating it in a new administration in the Gaza Strip.

  • Talk about creating a Palestinian state emboldens terrorists everywhere and assures the world that the US is on their side.

Vice President Kamala Harris's repeated talk about the need to establish a Palestinian state in the aftermath of the October 7 atrocities against Israelis is the best gift the Iran-backed Hamas terrorist group could have wished for. Pictured: Harris and President Joe Biden on in New York City, September 11, 2024. (Photo by Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images)

On a number of occasions over the past few months, US Vice President and Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris has declared her support for the creation of a Palestinian state next to Israel. Last month, Harris said: "We must have a two-state solution where we can rebuild Gaza where the Palestinians have security, self-determination and the dignity they so rightly deserve."

In July, she was quoted as saying that the two-state solution is the "only path" forward for Israel and the Palestinians. Less than two months after the October 7, 2023, Hamas-led attack on Israel, which resulted in the murder of 1,200 Israelis, including many of them being raped, tortured and burned alive, Harris, after meeting with a number of Arab leaders in the United Arab Emirates, talked about the need to "revitalize the Palestinian Authority" headed by Mahmoud Abbas and the need to "see a unified Gaza and West Bank under the Palestinian Authority." She added: "A two-state solution remains the best path, we believe, toward a durable peace. The President (Joe Biden) and I are committed to that goal."

Harris's repeated talk about the need to establish a Palestinian state in the aftermath of the October 7 atrocities against Israelis is the best gift the Iran-backed Hamas terrorist group could have wished for. Harris is basically saying that, if elected, she will pursue the Biden administration's policy of appeasing Iran and its terror proxies by helping them establish a Palestinian terror state that would undoubtedly be controlled by Hamas murderers and rapists.

If such a state is created in the West Bank, Gaza Strip or east Jerusalem, it will be used as a base from which to launch more October 7-style massacres and eliminate Israel.

Harris seems to ignore that a majority of Palestinians continue to support Hamas and the October 7 atrocities. A poll published by the Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research (PSR) in June found that overall support for Hamas among the Palestinians stood at 40%, a six-point increase from a previous survey conducted three months earlier. According to the poll, only some 20% support the ruling Fatah faction headed by Abbas. In addition, the poll showed that more than half of the Palestinians, support the "armed struggle" (terrorism) against Israel. Two-thirds of the Palestinians said that the October 7 massacres were "correct."

What is most disturbing about Harris's advocacy for the establishment of an Iranian-controlled Palestinian state is that it is seen by many Palestinians as a reward for the October 7 atrocities. When asked by the PSR pollsters why they believe the Hamas-led attack was "correct," 82% of the Palestinians said it was because the massacres "revived international attention to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and could lead to increased recognition of Palestinian statehood."

So, when Harris talks about the need to establish a Palestinian state, she is sending a message to Hamas and other Palestinians that terrorism against Israel pays and brings them closer to achieving their goal of creating a terror state that would facilitate their goal of murdering more Jews and destroying Israel. She has, in fact, revived the hopes of Palestinian terrorists that they are closer than ever to fulfill their dream of replacing Israel with a jihadi-genocidal state armed and funded by Qatar and the mullahs in Iran.

If Harris wants the Palestinians to live in security and dignity, she should be urging them to revolt against the Hamas murders and rapists who, on October 7, 2023, launched the biggest massacre of Jews since the Holocaust. If Harris really cared about the Palestinians, she should be calling on Hamas to surrender; and calling on the Palestinian Authority (PA) stop glorifying terrorists and paying their families monthly salaries, dismantle all terror groups operating in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, stop poisoning the hearts and minds of their people, and recognize Israel's right to exist. Unfortunately, she has done none of the above.

The absence of a firm and tough US policy towards Hamas and terrorism has led many Palestinians, including the PA's Abbas, to believe that it is fine to seek unity with Iran's Palestinian terror proxies. Moreover, the assumption that the PA can be "revitalized" and play a role in a post-war Gaza shows that Harris and the Biden administration are unfortunately clueless. As several PSR polls have shown, more than 80% of the Palestinians have no faith in Abbas and the PA. The latest poll, published in September, showed that a majority of 57% of the Palestinians believe that when the war ends, Hamas will continue to rule the Gaza Strip. The poll also found that if presidential elections were held today, Hamas arch-terrorist Yahya Sinwar would receive 41% of the votes, while Abbas would get only 13%. A majority of 84% of the Palestinians want Abbas to resign.

Unlike Harris, Abbas is well aware that a vast majority of the Palestinians prefer Hamas over him and his PA. That is why he has so far refused to condemn the Hamas-led October 7 atrocities. Abbas is also well aware that the talk about "revitalizing" the corrupt PA is nothing but a farce. The PA was established more than 30 years ago and its leaders, first Yasser Arafat and now Abbas, have never shown any serious intention to combat rampant corruption, anarchy and lawlessness in areas under their control.

If Biden and Harris want to see a "revitalized" PA, the first thing they need to do is ask Abbas, whose term in office expired in 2009, to step down. If they want to see a "revitalized" PA, they should be asking the Palestinian security forces in the West Bank immediately to crack down on hundreds of Iran-backed militiamen who have formed terror groups to murder Jews. Biden and Harris are misguided if they think that Abbas would ever be able to return to the Gaza Strip, from where he and his PA were expelled by Hamas during a brutal and bloody coup in 2007.

Abbas does not even have the courage to publicly call on Hamas to relinquish control over the Gaza Strip. Instead, he is busy these days trying to forge an alliance with Hamas. According to reports in the Arab media, Abbas loyalists and Hamas leaders, who recently met in the Egyptian capital of Cairo, agreed to "form a joint committee to manage the Gaza Strip." The committee, the reports said, consists of 10-15 "professional members" who are not affiliated with any Palestinian faction. If true, the reports demonstrate that Abbas continues to view Hamas, whose charter calls for the elimination of Israel through jihad, as a legitimate partner. Worse, it shows that Egypt, a key US ally in the Middle East, also sees Hamas as a legitimate player in the Palestinian arena.

Future meetings between Fatah and Hamas in Cairo will be based on four pillars, "in light of Egypt's commitment to the Palestinian cause as a matter of national security," according to Egyptian academic and political analyst Dr. Tarek Fahmy. "According to my understanding, these pillars include Cairo completing its efforts to achieve Palestinian reconciliation," he said.

Ibrahim Al-Madhoun, a Palestinian political analyst close to Hamas, said that the Fatah-Hamas meetings are being held under Egyptian sponsorship to discuss ways of forming a new Palestinian unity government. Al-Madhoun believes that "the Egyptian sponsorship will facilitate the course of the talks in that meeting and will make everyone work with open hearts to reach agreements."

Abbas and the Egyptians appear to have renewed their talks with Hamas because they sense that the Biden-Harris administration is not interested in ending the terror group's rule over the Gaza Strip. If Biden and Harris really wanted to see Hamas removed from power and the Israeli hostages released, all they need to do, is issue an ultimatum to the ruler of Qatar, who funds and hosts the terror group's leadership, that the US will withdraw its air base from the Gulf state and impose sanctions on the emirate if the issue is not resolved immediately.

If the Biden-Harris administration really wanted to get rid of Hamas, they would be calling out Abbas and the Egyptians for negotiating with a terror group about ways of incorporating it in a new administration in the Gaza Strip.

Talk about creating a Palestinian state emboldens terrorists everywhere and assures the world that the US is on their side.


Bassam Tawil is a Muslim Arab based in the Middle East. His work is made possible through the generous donation of a couple of donors who wished to remain anonymous. Gatestone is most grateful.

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21012/biden-harris-palestinian-policy

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Who is Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar - the terror leader killed in Gaza? - Jerusalem Post Staff

 

by Jerusalem Post Staff

Under Sinwar's leadership, Hamas has strengthened its alliances with Iran and Hezbollah, leveraging these relationships to enhance its military capabilities.

        Update: The IDF has officially confirmed that Yahiya Sinwar was eliminated today

 

Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar attends a rally marking the anniversary of Land Day, in Gaza City, March 30, 2022. (photo credit: ATTIA MUHAMMED/FLASH90)
Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar attends a rally marking the anniversary of Land Day, in Gaza City, March 30, 2022.
(photo credit: ATTIA MUHAMMED/FLASH90)

Yahya (Ibrahim Hassan) Sinwar was announced as the new head of Hamas's political bureau following the assassination of Ismail Haniyeh in Tehran - but his reign over the terror group may have only been short lived as the IDF announced on October 17 that he may have been eliminated.

He was born on October 29, 1962, in the Khan Yunis refugee camp in Gaza. His family was displaced from Ashkelon during the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, a factor that profoundly influenced his militant activities and ideological commitments. 

Sinwar pursued his education at the Islamic University of Gaza, earning a degree in Arabic studies. His early life in the refugee camp instilled a solid determination to resist Israeli occupation, shaping his future role in Hamas.

How did Yahya Sinwar rise to prominence within Hamas?

Sinwar co-founded Majd, Hamas's security apparatus, in the late 1980s, focusing on identifying and eliminating Palestinians suspected of collaborating with Israel.

His terrorist activities led to his arrest in 1988 for orchestrating the abduction and killing of two Israeli soldiers. 

 Yahya Sinwar Gaza Strip chief of the Palestinian Islamist Hamas movement, waves to Palestinians during a rally to mark the annual al-Quds Day (Jerusalem Day), in Gaza, April 14, 2023. (credit: REUTERS/IBRAHEEM ABU MUSTAFA)Enlrage image
Yahya Sinwar Gaza Strip chief of the Palestinian Islamist Hamas movement, waves to Palestinians during a rally to mark the annual al-Quds Day (Jerusalem Day), in Gaza, April 14, 2023. (credit: REUTERS/IBRAHEEM ABU MUSTAFA)

Sinwar was sentenced to four life terms but was released in 2011 in a prisoner exchange deal for Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit. 

During his 22 years in Israeli prisons, Sinwar became known for his steadfastness and leadership among inmates, earning a reputation as a critical figure within Hamas.

What are Yahya Sinwar's key leadership roles and achievements?

In 2017, Sinwar was elected as the leader of Hamas in Gaza, succeeding Ismail Haniyeh. His leadership marked a shift towards a more militant stance, emphasizing military build-up and closer ties with regional powers like Iran and Hezbollah. 

Sinwar's strategic vision involved enhancing Hamas's military capabilities and preparing for large-scale conflicts with Israel. 

He is widely regarded as the mastermind behind the October 7, 2023, massacre against Israel, which resulted in over 1,200 deaths and the abduction of around 240 hostages.

How did Yahya Sinwar influence the October 7, 2023, attacks?

Sinwar orchestrated the October 7, 2023, attacks, the deadliest in Israeli history. The attacks significantly escalated the Israel-Hamas conflict, positioning Sinwar as a primary target for Israeli retaliation. 

His ability to evade capture by utilizing a complex network of tunnels in Gaza has heightened his notoriety and influence within Hamas. 

Sinwar's strategic use of hostages as negotiation leverage further underscores his hardline approach.

What is Yahya Sinwar's leadership philosophy and vision?

Sinwar's leadership is characterized by a hardline approach, prioritizing military resistance over political negotiations. 

He views his role as pivotal in the broader jihad against Israel, often dismissing political solutions that do not align with his vision of Palestinian resistance. 

Sinwar's disdain for political figures like his predecessor Haniyeh, whom he viewed as less committed to the militant cause, reflects his uncompromising stance. 

His strategic vision involves leveraging alliances with regional powers and enhancing Hamas's military capabilities to challenge Israeli forces.

How has Yahya Sinwar strengthened Hamas's regional alliances?

Under Sinwar's leadership, Hamas has strengthened its alliances with Iran and Hezbollah, leveraging these relationships to enhance its military capabilities.

The May 2021 Gaza conflict was a significant turning point for Sinwar, as he perceived it as a demonstration of Hamas's ability to mobilize multiple fronts against Israel. 

This perception has encouraged him to pursue larger-scale operations, believing such actions could significantly alter the regional power dynamics.

What challenges does Yahya Sinwar face as the new head of Hamas's political bureau?

Following the assassination of Haniyeh in Tehran, Sinwar's position within Hamas was further solidified. 

As the new head of Hamas's political bureau, he faces the dual challenge of maintaining internal cohesion within the organization and addressing intensified Israeli military operations targeting Hamas leadership. 

Despite these challenges, Sinwar remains formidable, continuing to shape Hamas's strategies and actions in the ongoing war.

 
Jerusalem Post Staff

Source: https://www.jpost.com/israel-hamas-war/article-813628

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter