by Isi Liebler
The demonic level of the incitement is reflected in the spontaneous street parties and public celebrations that erupt whenever an innocent civilian has been murdered.
Like most Israelis, I
am proud that we remain one of the most democratic countries in the
world, despite being surrounded by a sea of barbarism and facing
continuous threats to our existence by hostile neighbors.
But the nation today is
facing a serious threat, not from external adversaries but from
elements of Arab-Israeli society that have been incited by their kinsmen
in the Palestinian Authority and Hamas to engage in frenzied attacks
against their Jewish neighbors. The levels of incitement and calls to
become martyrs “for Allah” have reached such a feverish pitch that in
addition to rock throwing, impressionable Arab-Israeli youngsters are
now engaged in indiscriminate stabbings and acts of mayhem against Jews.
Significantly, the
ongoing attacks are not restricted to communities over the Green Line
and have occurred in Jerusalem, Jaffa, Petach Tikva, Afula, Kiryat Gat
and Raanana. PA anti-Israeli incitement makes no distinction between
Israelis living behind or beyond the Green Line.
The demonic level of
the incitement is reflected in the spontaneous street parties and public
celebrations that erupt whenever an innocent civilian has been
murdered. Pictures of murdered Israelis are shared on social media and
proud parents of “shaheeds” bless their children for their martyrdom
initiatives on official PA-sponsored TV.
A key source of this
vicious hysteria emanates from our “peace partner,” Mahmoud Abbas, who
denies that a Jewish Temple ever existed in Jerusalem and accuses
Israelis of “contaminating” and “defiling” Al-Aqsa mosque with their
“filthy feet” as well as plotting to demolish it. Abbas has refused to
condemn the attacks, his military factions claim credit for the murders,
and the PA media boasts stabbings and murders as heroic acts and a
prelude to eliminating Jewish sovereignty in the region. In fact, Abbas
himself publicly sanctified the murderers, stating, “We bless you. We
welcome every drop of blood spilled in Jerusalem. This is pure blood,
clean blood, blood on its way to Allah. With the help of Allah every
shaheed will be in heaven and every wounded will get his reward.”
After the stabbing of
the 13 year old boy in Pisgat Zeev, the official PA spokesman accused
Israelis of executing his assailant - who was hailed as a hero. In a
deliberate and successful attempt to incite further terrorism, pictures
were posted on PA sponsored media comparing the terrorist to Muhammad Al
Dura, the young boy falsely claimed to have been shot by Israeli
forces, images of which laid the groundwork for the second intifada.
However, speaking with a
forked tongue, Abbas persists in telling the Western media that he
seeks peace. Despite threats to the contrary, he has not disbanded the
PA security forces – knowing that were he to do so and were the IDF to
withdraw, Hamas would immediately take over the region.
With the eruption of
this wave of violence and the death of innocent Israeli civilians, the
response – or lack thereof - from world leaders is deplorable. The U.S.,
claiming to be an ally of Israel, was especially disappointing as
President Barack Obama arranged that Secretary of State John Kerry and
U.N. Ambassador Samantha Power absent themselves when Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu addressed the U.N. General Assembly – a calculated
insult to Israel. Secretary of State John Kerry declined to apportion
blame but attributed Palestinian “frustration” to Israel’s ongoing
settlement construction and the White House spokesman expressed
condemnation of violence directed against “Israeli and Palestinian
civilians,” disgustingly implying a moral equivalence between terrorists
and innocent Israeli victims.
UN Secretary General
Ban Ki Moon had the chutzpa of calling on Israel to review the
“excessive force” he alleged it was employing against terrorists.
Likewise, the Quartet "called upon all parties to exercise restraint,
refrain from provocative actions and rhetoric, and preserve unchanged
the status quo at the holy sites in both word and practice.” The British
foreign secretary called for an end to the occupation. His French
counterpart announced his intention to pursue a resolution at the next
meeting of the U.N. Security Council demanding a freeze on all
“settlement” construction, including in Jerusalem and the settlement
blocs that even Abbas had initially conceded Israel would retain. All of
this obviously encourages the Palestinians to intensify terrorism.
These attacks do not constitute an existential threat to Israel and we have overcome far greater threats of terrorism.
But now we face a
dangerous new phenomenon with the emergence of extremist Arab-Israeli
elements supporting enemies of the state. In the past, hostile
Arab-Israeli proclamations and demonstrations were basically ignored.
But that has now changed with the violence and killings by crazed
Arab-Israelis aspiring to become martyrs and it has raised profoundly
greater tensions within society which can no longer be dismissed.
In light of this, the
government and Zionist parties in opposition must temporarily set aside
conventional political differences and achieve a consensus on measures
required to stem the new threat of mushrooming Arab-Israeli terrorism.
In this context,
restrictions and compromises relating to unfettered freedom of speech
and activity will be required to prevent incitement and enable Israeli
citizens to live in security.
To achieve this
rationally and to minimize the inevitable hysterical attacks from the
international community and anti-Israeli agencies such as the United
Nations, a broad consensus of the Knesset must be achieved to
demonstrate that this reflects a national determination to live in
security and cannot be construed as a right-wing scheme.
Ideally, this should be
achieved with a national unity government. But if political leaders
refuse to act in the national interest, the government would be well
advised to consider creating a subcommittee comprising representatives
from across the Zionist political spectrum to consensually determine
security policies. There is no doubt that the vast majority of Israelis
would welcome such a situation.
This must include
legislation banning incitement, with harsh penalties for any Israelis
who endorse or engage in such acts. The major Arab centers in East
Jerusalem and Arab towns in the Galil such as Umm al-Fahm have virtually
been ignored by law enforcement authorities, who in many cases were
instructed not to enter these areas. This has encouraged the festering
of anti-Israeli agitation and terror. Now is the time for authorities to
take action in these areas – including lockdowns, if necessary - to
ensure that Israeli law is enforced and that incitement against the
state or Jewish citizens is proscribed.
Steps must be taken to
curb the incitement and hysteria fanned by elements of the Arab-Israeli
political party, the Joint Arab List. The behavior of some, endorsing
the disgusting calls by Abbas to save Al-Aqsa from defilement by Jewish
infidels or the calls by MK Hanin Zoabi for Arab masses to engage in a
new intifada, unquestionably amount to treason.
Arab-Israeli
organizations that engage in agitation, such as the extremist Northern
Branch of the Islamic Movement, should have been proscribed a long time
ago. Demonstrations that either incite or employ placards or flags
supporting Israel’s enemies should be outlawed.
Further drastic steps
must be implemented to deter “martyrs.” Destroying the family homes of
perpetrators is only one step. Under specified circumstances, national
insurance and other state privileges should be suspended or canceled.
Arab-Israelis who find this unacceptable and identify with seeking our
destruction can freely relocate themselves to Palestinian-populated
areas over the Green Line. This, of course, would be in conformity with a
commitment to separation and the ultimate creation of a demilitarized
peaceful Palestinian state.
This may appear
draconian to the international community, which fails to comprehend the
fanatical Islamic culture of death and hatred perpetuated by the PA and
Hamas. But the vast majority of the Jewish Israeli public would endorse
such measures, which would enable them to live peacefully within Israel
without facing attacks from inflamed Arab-Israelis brainwashed into
killing machines by extremist mullahs and pathological anti-Semites.
There is little doubt
that any Western democracy facing similar threats from an extremist
minority in its own society would take similar action. Indeed, both the
British and Australian governments are now considering legislation to
withdraw citizenship from those convicted of engaging in terrorism.
Besides, even after enacting such restrictions, Israel would still
remain one of the most buoyant democracies in the world.
Of course, it would be
incumbent on us to assure peace-loving Arabs in our midst that they are
entitled to all the privileges and rights of any Israeli citizens and we
should be making greater efforts to elevate their socio-economic
status. The reality is that even hostile Arab-Israelis have no desire to
relocate or live under the corrupt and despotic PA administration.
Nothing illustrates this more than polls in east Jerusalem showing that
the majority of Arabs are opposed to a division of the city.
We are at a crossroads.
We should now do what is necessary even if it is, to some, politically
incorrect, and stop ignoring the obvious. The vast majority of Israelis
say enough is enough. If we must curtail unlimited freedom of expression
and irritate our global bleeding hearts to save Israeli lives — so be
it.
Isi Liebler may be contacted at ileibler@leibler.com
Source: http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Candidly-Speaking-The-time-has-come-to-consider-drastic-action-424965
Copyright - Original materials copyright (c) by the authors.
No comments:
Post a Comment