Tuesday, December 14, 2021

Groundbreaking Win Against Palestinian Anti-Semitic Propaganda - Christine Douglass-Williams

 

by Christine Douglass-Williams

Played out at Canada's largest school board.

 


Antisemitism at the Toronto District School Board has led to a backlash that the Board undoubtedly did not expect. It was high time that the largest school Board in Canada, and the fourth largest in North America, faced accountability regarding its use of public funds to promote a pro-Palestinian agenda as part of its “equity” and “diversity” program. The Board’s actions go back to Operation Guardian of the Walls in May, and climaxed with the targeting of a Jewish school board trustee who was taken to the woodshed by the Board for pointing out a disturbing incident of antisemitism displayed by the TDSB’s equity advisor.

The backlash has been unprecedented, involving virtually every Jewish group and supporter of democracy in the Toronto area, and includes a rare statement by the Toronto Board of Rabbis. It ultimately resulted in a victory, in a groundbreaking, precedent-setting vote put to the TDSB Trustees to strike down an antisemitic motion. The battle was intense, and demonstrated what collective determination for the good could accomplish.

Enter Black Lives Matter, Pro-Palestinian Activist 

The complicated series of events that led to the storm began in late September, when author and activist Desmond Cole was hired by the Toronto District School Board to give a talk about anti-black racism. Cole veered off course to lecture teachers and administrators about “Palestine.” He claimed that “those troubled by the phrase ‘Free Palestine’ have a vested interest in the continued oppression of Palestinian people.”

He went on to interrupt and talk over superintendent Lorraine Linton and executive superintendent Shirley Chan, stating:

“If people interpret ‘Free Palestine’ as being violent, it is because they are benefitting from Palestinians being unfree…In the same way if you answer ‘Black Lives Matter’ with ‘All Lives Matter,’ you must have some investment in Black lives being undervalued.”

Cole does not accept the idea that one could advocate for black lives and all lives at the same time. Under Canada’s constitution, of course, all are equal.

Cole should also be questioned about the Islamic State’s genocide against black Christians in Africa, and the countless blacks who are being murdered by blacks in inner cities; this would reveal how much he really cares about black lives. Nor does he address the issue of blacks being held slaves in Mauritania, Sudan and Algeria by Arabs.

It doesn’t take a genius to recognize an agenda behind Black Lives Matter, and gaping holes in that organization’s stated concern for black lives. The group’s co-founder, Patrisse Cullors, has also made clear the group’s support for the Palestinian jihad; she has “called for the ‘end’ of Israel at a 2015 panel hosted a Harvard Law School. Anything white is deemed as  ‘the imperialist project.’”

Cole likewise ignores Palestinian history and Palestinian Charters that call for Israel’s obliteration. It is reprehensible that the TDSB would spend taxpayer money to subject staffers to Cole’s propagandist, discriminatory tirade. And this was the thanks the TDSP got in return: in a tweet, Cole “accused TDSB brass of directing Chan and Linton to derail his talk”:

The Board took at least some responsibility after the bad publicity and upheaval that ensued after Cole’s speech:

“Spokesperson Ryan Bird said it’s incumbent upon participants to interrupt and question speakers when content veers towards potentially problematic or inappropriate topics….‘it is clear that we should have done a better job in challenging any assertions that were hurtful or discriminatory’, he said.”

The BDS-supporting Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East subsequently launched a campaign of support for Cole, claiming that “Free Palestine” is about human rights, not hate.” This point was later addressed by the TDSB in a letter to a concerned citizen about the repeated incitement by pro-Palestinian groups to “free Palestine from the River to the Sea.”

Fast forward to the second week in November to a pro-Palestinian high school student classroom walkout and demonstration at Marc Garneau Collegiate Institute in Toronto. Over 200 students rallied to “Free Palestine”. The demonstration was organized in support of  Desmond Cole and Javier Davila (discussed further down). Students reportedly chanted “anti-Israel slogans” and carried signs with the slogan “From the River to the Sea, Palestine will be free.” In a letter forwarded to be by email, the TDSB attempted to address a complaint about a disturbing pattern of Antisemitism within its domain….

Re: Visitor [XXX]’s Inquiry from [Toronto District School Board] Regarding [General Comment / Question]
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 16:18:08 +0000
From:
GeneralInquiries <GeneralInquiries@tdsb.on.ca>
To: XXX

Hello XXX

Thank you for your email.

The Toronto District School Board is committed to developing students’ critical thinking skills so they can understand complex issues from many different perspectives. Conversations about Israeli-Palestinian relationships and geopolitical issues have arisen in classrooms, between staff, students, and in professional development sessions. As a board, we have been grappling with how to honour multiple lived experiences and identities (e.g. Palestinian and Israeli) in ways that do not further exclude or cause harm.

As educators, we understand that language and context matter. The phrases “Free Palestine” and “From the River to the Sea” have been in contention. These expressions mean different things to different people because of the diversity of lived experiences in the TDSB community and beyond. Some members of the Jewish community have experienced these phrases as antisemitic, calling for the eradication of Israel, and hateful. Some Palestinians use these phrases as a statement of their human and land rights as people.

Discussions about human rights are often complex and include an examination of competing rights….

Competing rights? No other country struggles to maintain its existence on a daily basis, as does Israel. In a working definition of antisemitism, evidently not considered by the TDSB, the International Holocaust Memorial Alliance states:

Manifestations might include the targeting of the state of Israel, conceived as a Jewish collectivity. However, criticism of Israel similar to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as antisemitic.

Palestinian Media Watch captures the full Palestinian agenda in Palestinian leaders’ own words. See HERE.

“From the River to the Sea” and the Influence of Javier Dávila, the TDSB’s Student Equity Program Advisor

Phrases such as “From the River to the Sea, Palestine will be free” originated in the Palestinian territories. The words explicitly refer to an imperative to obliterate Israel entirely, “from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea.” The phrase has a long history behind it. Fatah Commissioner and Central Committee member Tawfiq Tirawi declared:

Our Palestinian land is from the [Jordan] River to the [Mediterranean] Sea. I dare any Palestinian, any senior Palestinian official, or any Palestinian leader to reduce the Palestinian map to the West Bank and Gaza! He would not be able to walk one meter in the streets of our Palestinian cities among our people! … Arab brothers… Be with the Palestinian people, the people that lives on land that is all holy and that is all waqf land (i.e., land that is an inalienable religious endowment in Islamic law.)

The words “From the River to the Sea, Palestine will be free” do not mean “different things to different people.” They are an open incitement for Palestinians to destroy Israel. This quest manifests itself in, among other things, the Pay-for Slay program, which pays Palestinians to kill Jews, as well as in the launching of rockets against Israeli citizens and the celebration of martyrdom, which is actively promoted in Palestinian culture. PA TV also routinely indoctrinates and encourages Palestinian adults and children alike to murder Jews.

The pro-Palestinian agenda is supported by the Muslim Brotherhood, and its offshoots like Hamas. For the Muslim Brotherhood, “Jihad is the way.“ Many Islamic authorities state that it is the highest calling and duty for Muslims everywhere to take up the cause of jihad.

The Muslim Brotherhood vision has for quite some time spread on campuses throughout North America.

More followed at the TDSB: In mid-July, B’nai Brith Canada expressed outrage over “the apparent reinstatement without discipline of a Toronto school employee who sent materials to teachers justifying the murder of Israeli civilians.” B’nai Brith noted:

Javier Dávila, a Student Equity Program Advisor with the Toronto District School Board (TDSB), sent two emails to a list comprised of TDSB educators in May, as fighting between the Hamas terrorist group and Israel raged. The emails are filled with virulently anti-Israel teaching material, repeatedly describing Israelis as  “colonizers” in their indigenous homeland.

Dávila announced that he has been reinstated without discipline.

Some of the materials go even further. Dávila’s emails contain writings by Laila Khaled and Ghassan Kanafani, prominent members of the Popular Front for Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), another designated terrorist entity in Canada. One flyer promoted by Dávila, prepared by the “New England Committee to Defend Palestine,” even justifies Palestinian suicide bombings and accuses “Zionists” of plotting genocide against Palestinians.

Davila’s antisemitic messages resemble the propaganda that is routinely disseminated in the Palestinian territories. Yet in a sympathetic Washington Post article, Davila was presented as a hero of the oppressed who are suffering under “settler colonial violence’”.

TDSB Bans Former Yazidi Sex Slave and Nobel Prize Laureate and Censors Trustee for Raising an Antisemitism Problem

The TDSB even banned former Yazidi Islamic State sex slave survivor Nadia Murad, a Nobel laureate, to avoid appearing to be “Islamophobic.” The National Post stated:

From that pit of hell, she incredibly found the personal resources to escape, champion the cause of brutalized young women everywhere, and ascend to the heights of the world’s high honour, the Nobel Prize…. The equity department was concerned she would stoke Islamophobia!

Yes, that very same “equity” department in which Javier Dávila is a Student Equity Program Advisor.

In the latest incident, a TDSB Board Member Code of Conduct Complaint Investigation released a 50-page report after an investigation into Jewish school board Trustee Alexandra Lulka. The report stemmed from complaints launched against Lulka, who discovered in May that Javier Dávila had used “an opt-in email distribution list on gender-based violence to send out an information package for teachers about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.” Some of Dávila’s content has already been discussed above.

Lulka posted a statement on Twitter and Facebook:

“I was deeply disturbed to recently discover that virulently anti-Israel and even antisemitic materials were distributed to TDSB teachers through an opt-in list by a TDSB employee,” she wrote.

“I was outraged to discover that some of this material justifies suicide bombings and other forms of terrorism. This is reprehensible. These materials were provided by an employee from the TDSB equity department, the very department that should be countering antisemitism and violence, not fanning the flames.”

She said she would work “to ensure that none of these hateful materials ever see the inside of a TDSB classroom.”

Lulka demanded an investigation, but the investigation turned on her instead. Following the “formal complaints” for her post, the integrity commissioner “hired an independent human rights investigator to carry out a month-long probe.”

The integrity commissioner subsequently found that Lulka’s Twitter statement “fell within the TDSB definition of being discriminatory” because it might “perpetuate harmful anti-Muslim and anti-Palestinian tropes by tying generally pro-Palestinian discourse to antisemitism and violence.”

The Commissioner’s report thus recommended that the Board censure Lulka.

The investigator reasoned that “equating pro-Palestinian materials with support or justification for suicide bombings and terrorism similarly may perpetuate the dangerous and harmful stereotype which views Muslims, and particularly Palestinian Muslims, ‘as violent, aggressive, threatening, supportive of terrorism and engaged in a ‘clash of civilizations.’”

The investigator was hardly impartial. According to B’nai Brith, lawyer Morgan Sim, who has repeatedly referred to Jews as “white,” implying that supporting them is “white supremacist,” was the “independent investigator.” Canada’s largest Jewish lobby, the Center for Israel and Jewish Affairs (CIJA), tweeted a concerning screenshot of a telling statement from Morgan Sim:

 

For a better look at Sim’s Tweet:

The National Council of Canadian Muslims Lobby and the TDSB

Meanwhile, the National Council of Canadian Muslims (NCCM, formerly CAIR-CAN) openly encouraged a public lobbying of other trustees to censure Lulka, stating that the report’s findings “raise a number of serious concerns about anti-Palestinian racism and Islamophobia.”

Jihad Watch has covered the NCCM a great deal. See HERE.

The NCCM was a recipient of an undisclosed amount of Liberal government funding (that is, taxpayer money) to help implement Canada’s big mistake: anti-Islamophobia motion M-103, a prelude to wide-ranging censorship of anything offensive to Islam. The M-103 outcome included government plans to monitor citizens for compliance and training law enforcement to identify online and offline “hate.” The implementation of M-103 was enabled by a taxpayer-funded 23-million-dollar package. Another recipient along with the NCCM to assist the Liberal government’s implementation of its M-103 strategy was Islamic Relief Canada (IRFAN), which was outlawed by the previous Conservative government as a terrorist entity.

The NCCM also backed the Toronto District School Board’s definition of “Islamophobia” for Islamic Heritage Month in 2017. The definition labeled “fear, prejudice, hatred or dislike directed against Islam or Muslims, or towards Islamic politics or culture” as “Islamophobia.”

The National Council of Canadian Muslims also called on its supporters “and fellow Canadians to write to the leadership and trustees of the Toronto District School Board (TDSB) to thank them for supporting Islamic Heritage Month and for taking a principled stand against Islamophobia.”

But as B’nai Brith Canada noted:

The Guidebook was designed by TDSB project co-chairs Nazerah Shaikh and Haniya Sheikh, with support from the National Council of Canadian Muslims (NCCM). The TDSB definition, if enforced, could lead to punishment for students or teachers who display “dislike” toward the persecution of LGTBQ people in the Islamic Republic of Iran, harsh restrictions on women in Saudi Arabia, and Palestinian terrorism against Israelis, all of which are examples of “Islamic politics”.

After an outcry, the definition was scaled back to exclude reference to politics.

Still, most parents have no idea of what their children are being taught in schools; all too often, the content of that teaching is decided upon by special interest political lobbyists.

Stopping Antisemitism at TDSB

In the latest TDSB hoopla, even the usually silent Toronto Board of Rabbis weighed in:

We must take issue when unvetted information that is clearly antisemitic is distributed within the school system and a trustee is taken to task for bringing attention to this.

A Provincial Member of Parliament, Gila Martow, also launched a Working Group Against Jew Hatred, which included incidents at the TDSB and other troubling trends.

The fever-pitch levels of antisemitism being brought to school children, which increasingly look like lessons taken from the Palestinian Authority, are deeply disturbing, yet were inevitable given the history of Palestinian propaganda incursions on university campuses across the continent. Now this initiative is expanding. The showdown with the TDSB will make it tough for the Board to continue to justify its habitual antisemitic stance, which up to now it has disguised as “conversations” about “equity,” “creating safe spaces” and an interest in “Palestinian human rights,” while censoring discussion about the Palestinian jihad against Israel, a practice to which Trustee Lulka alluded.

During a TDSB Board meeting Wednesday evening, a few members  attempted to create a “safe space” for all students as they processed the issue through Western lenses. Some members genuinely expressed being torn, and not understanding the complex issue of the Middle East, but what was missing was a recognition of what the Palestinian agenda is really all about, or of the decades of attempts to delegitimize Israel and ultimately destroy it.

Finally, a motion was presented “that the Integrity Commissioner’s recommendation as presented in the report that Trustee Lulka breached rule 6.10 of the TDSB Code of Conduct, be rejected.” The TDSB vote after much deliberation, was 10-7 against the antisemitic move to censure Lulka.

Is the Board now prepared to stop open incitement of violence against the Jewish state and antisemitism in its schools? Or will it continue to try to censor speech that is offensive to pro-Palestinian sensibilities and some Muslim lobbies? This was a close win. Let’s hope that the TDSB has learned a lesson in this groundbreaking battle that managed to defeat the pro-Palestinian and NCCM agenda at the TDSB. For now, at least.

 

Christine Douglass-Williams 

Source: https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2021/12/groundbreaking-win-battle-against-palestinian-christine-douglass-williams/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Your government is lying to you about extreme weather events - Andrea Widburg

 

by Andrea Widburg

That Biden chose to politicize the catastrophic tornado in Kentucky was bad; what is worse is that he did so by lying.

I wrote on Saturday that Biden sympathized briefly, barely, with the people in Kentucky before blaming climate change for the tornadoes.  I said he was lying because serious weather events haven't escalated lately. They've remained stable over the decades or decreased in number and/or severity.

I was correct, but that point is so much better when you hear it from the horse's mouth: a real scientist who spends his life looking at; analyzing; and, obviously, understanding the data — and who has just released a video explaining the lies coming from the left when it comes to hurricanes and tornadoes.

Tony Heller is the proprietor of the very popular Real Climate Science website.  Heller knows that people have questions about him, so he put together a post a couple of years ago giving just some of his bona fides:

BS Geology, Arizona State University
Masters Electrical Engineering, Rice University
Boston University Geology
Northern Arizona University Computer Science
Colorado State University Computer Science
University of New Mexico Geochemistry

Lifelong environmentalist.
I testified at my first Congressional hearing in support of Wilderness in 1972.
I fought for the Clean Air and Water acts
Wilderness Ranger Cibola National Forest, New Mexico
Wilderness Ranger Santa Fe National Forest, New Mexico
Currently battling the City of Boulder, Colorado to stop development on the South Boulder Wetlands
Full time cyclist for all my local transportation, for the past 40 years

Teacher.
Science teacher, Athletic Director and Soccer Coach at Oak Creek Ranch School, Arizona
Math teacher at Phoenix Country Day School
Substitute teacher at Murphy School District, Phoenix Arizona
Computer instructor at Tomball College, Texas

Geologist.
Geothermal research at Los Alamos National Labs
Oil shale research at Los Alamos National Labs
Thermodynamic research of methane hydrates at Los Alamos National Labs
Volcano research at Los Alamos National Labs
Safety Analysis Report for the Permian Basin DOE nuclear waste disposal site
Volunteer curator Arizona Mineral Museum

Electrical Engineer
Compaq/SGI MIPS consortium design team
Power PC design team IBM/Apple/Motorola  (Used in  most game consoles over the last three decades, and PowerMacs)
Sandia Labs computer architect
Sandia Labs representative to Al Gore's Bankers Trust key escrow consortium
Cyrix Media GX microprocessor design team manager
Raycer Graphics OpenGL graphics processor verification lead
Design manager Hitachi/ST SH5 microprocessor
Verification lead MemoryLogix microprocessor
Founder, design lead Visual Media video effects/editing software
OpenGL driver development ATI
Itanium/i7 design team Intel  (very likely being used by you right now)
Sped up Helicos DNA sequencing algorithm by 50X
Sped up NCAR weather microphysics kernel by 500X
Ported NCAR's radiative transfer model to GPU
Ported NCAR's WRF weather model to Windows
Drone visualization and control software for the US military
Medical device control systems (under NDA)
Virtual reality visualization design (under NDA)
Radio control and visualization software (under NDA)

Suffice it to say that Heller knows a lot more than Biden or anyone in the Biden administration about climate phenomena.  Just as I did, Heller took umbrage at the fact that the Biden administration instantly politicized the tornadoes and their awful outcome and, worse, that it did so relying on lies and misinformation.  While Biden probably struggles now with which shoe goes on which foot, the people feeding him his lines know they're lying, but they lie anyway.

So, please, spend a few minutes watching Heller explain with perfect precision and clarity how leftists get away with claiming that our climate is more aggressive and dangerous than ever before when most of them know, or should know, that they are lying through their teeth:

One of the things you need to understand is that, in one way, leftists have the mental development of an infant.  If you've ever played peek-a-boo with a baby, the game works so well because, to a baby's undeveloped brain, when your face vanishes behind your hands, you have vanished.  (That kind of makes you wonder what babies think of living in a world in which everyone wears a mask.)  Out of sight, out of mind is the perfect reflection of a minimally developed mind.

The contrary is true, too: if babies or leftists see a lot of one thing, they believe that, because they see so much of that thing, then its existence in the world must be overwhelming.

So think of this: leftists show COVID deaths on TV but not vaccine deaths.  Leftists show endless footage of White suburban students crying after a school shooting but rush over footage of daily shootings in Black communities and barely mention defensive gun usages.  And, to get to the point here, leftists show every single tornado on TV, running the same footage endlessly, but fail to acknowledge that severe tornadoes are vastly diminished in scope and frequency.  I'm sure you can add your own example to the list.

What's important to know is that when it comes to leftists, no matter what they say, never trust, always verify.

Image: Chart of strong to violent tornadoes.  Newtube screen grab.

 

Andrea Widburg

Source:https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2021/12/your_government_is_lying_to_you_about_extreme_weather_events.html

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Former Minister: Biden does not answer Bennett's calls - Israel National News

 

by Israel National News

Former Finance Minister Yisrael Katz accuses Finance Minister Liberman of harming all of Israeli society, Bennett of failing on Iran.

 

PM Bennett and President Biden
PM Bennett and President Biden                                                                         Avi Ohayon/GPO

Former Minister of Finance Yisrael Katz (Likud) attacked the policies of Finance Minister Avigdor Liberman and claimed that he harms all sections of the public.

"Liberman's crudeness is expressed in his zero-sum policies. Cuts are being made to take money for other purposes. They are hurting the entire public and all walks of life. Now the haredim are not alone," Katz said in an interview with Kol Chai Radio.

Katz claimed that "Lieberman is a captive of the bureaucrats. They act as if it is their private money, without compassion, without mutual guarantee or comprehensive consideration. They must produce criteria. That's fine, but they fall below the criterion."

Katz added, "After all, people give money to the state all their lives and it collects it on their behalf, and they do not get it back. We left the state in an amazing situation and they took it and transferred billions to Abbas and therefore issued decrees on the public."

On the security issue of the Netanyahu family, Katz said, "Former Minister Dan Meridor of the Likud made the decision that the Netanyahu family will receive security. Bennett went to remove the decision to provide security for a year and instructed Minister Kahana to cut the decision by six months."

Referring to the Iranian threat, Katz said, "I do not officially confirm things. Israel's policy is to prevent weapons of mass destruction, also in cases of chemical weapons and if there were such things in Syria then it is in the interest of harming capabilities of this kind. The Syrians have already pledged not to develop such weapons."

"Bennett failed miserably on the Iranian issue, he talked about a different kind of friendship with Biden and the exchange of WhatsApp, and today the US president does not answer his calls. There are also gaps between him and Gantz. His opinions on health issues are also rejected," he said.

Contrary to the current government's announcements about Israel's lack of preparedness for an attack on Iran, Katz says, "I financed NIS 5 billion in coordination with Prime Minister Netanyahu and together with Gantz an addition to the defense budget of 2021. But now they say the Americans are not advancing of the Boeing planes we bought, which shows the state of that relationship. This is because the Prime Minister is a novice. He does not have the discretion to deal with the United States."

 

Israel National News

Source: https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/318647

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Transgender swimmer reportedly brags that winning races is 'so easy I thought I was cruising' - Monica Showalter

 

by Monica Showalter

If the report is true, then U Penn swimmer "Lia" Thomas is obviously laughing at them.

To hear the transgender lobby tell it, men with innate and unalterable XY chromosomes can nevertheless be turned into XX women through manipulating their hormones and sometimes body-altering surgery, so pay no attention to superior male bone structure, original male hormonal development, or other things that make men uniquely male instead of female.  All a person's sex is comes down to is hormones and a knife.

That's prompted pretty well the end of women's sports, now that male athletes have come into women's sports and taken the prizes, while university and sports officials enable it in the name of political correctness.

The biggest and most obvious example is that of University of Pennsylvania swimmer "Lia" Thomas, formerly men's swim champ Will Thomas, who cynically seems to recognize what kind of game is going on.

According to Breitbart News:

Transgender University of Pennsylvania swim team member Lia Thomas taunted natural-born female opponents saying that beating them was "so easy I was cruising," according to one swimming team member.

The claim came from a second female swimmer who recently spoke out to Outkick. The woman told the site that Thomas, who competed on the male swim team for three years before turning up as a transgender woman, joked about how easy it was to beat all the natural-born women at swim meets.

"That was so easy, I was cruising," the woman said that Thomas boasted after a recent win. Thomas also reportedly said, "At least I'm still No. 1 in the country," in front of teammates.

The U Penn swimmer also said that coaches and university flaks told the girls that they are "strongly advised" not to talk about Thomas outside the school.

Turns out beating girls is easy if you're male.  It's that way in normal society, and it's especially that way in the world of political correctness, where transgender athletes are recognized by their preference, not their natural biology.  The transgender lobby has been working overtime to promote the laughable fiction that male athletes just work harder than natural-born female athlete and the people complaining are simply less competitive slackers.

Thomas is now likely to win all the prizes and scholarships and other benefits of being a student athlete, while the actual females on the team get the crumbs at best and often nothing.  The females can try as hard as they like, but they won't be able to beat him, and it's pretty clear that he knows it and they know it.  In any other kind of contest, that's known as rigging.

Now Thomas is reportedly bragging about it.  Oh, how easy it is to beat those teenage girls.

As this Washington Examiner op-ed puts it:

So it should come as no surprise that the transgender student is smashing records left and right now that Thomas is competing against women, who literally cannot compete physically. In the 1,650-yard freestyle final, for example, Thomas beat the second-best swimmer, Penn's Anna Kalandadze, by 38 seconds. That's like putting a teenage girl up against a 250-pound linebacker and expecting her to hold a block: She wouldn't even have a chance.

Linebacker, meet teenage girl.  Sounds legit.

The op-ed warns that the only way out of this would be for the entire Penn team to boycott any match where the "differently endowed" Thomas is competing.  That would take courage, given that cancel culture on campus is strong and athletes could lose their scholarships and endorsement deals.  It's either be demonized forever or be eternal also-rans.  One hopes enough of them pick the former anyway, given that Thomas is literally laughing at them now.


Monica Showalter

Source: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2021/12/transgender_swimmer_reportedly_brags_that_winning_races_against_women_is_so_easy_i_thought_i_was_cruising_.html

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

The Whitewashing of Black Crime - Rick Fuentes

 

by Rick Fuentes

"News" through the leftist agenda filter, always

Selectively reporting or downright ignoring crime based upon race is a dangerous gambit in the hands of a partisan media with a political ax to grind.  The Associated Press Stylebook cautions journalists against identifying race in crime reporting once a suspect is found or apprehended; however, there is an escape clause that suggests that race can be injected into a story if a reporter believes it plays a part in a particular demonstration or criminal act.  That opens the door to gaslighting and editorializing upon the factual circumstances of an event for political purposes.

On January 6th, no sooner had the pepper spray fog lifted from Capitol Hill, leaving all to lick their wounds, than NPR had already leveled blame for the melee on majority-white Trump voters, Trump supporters, and an assortment of right-wing fringe groups.  Subsequent testimonial evidence of the involvement of Antifa decked out in full black bloc, along with credible reports of federal provocateurs acting as crowd agitators, none of whom have been arrested or handed House commission subpoenas, has drawn little interest from liberal commentators still exulting over the prolonged and isolated imprisonment of protesters charged with low-level crimes.

Similarly, media reporting in the immediate aftermath of the Kyle Rittenhouse shootings, to include Democrat celebrities and Joe Biden, immediately opened a false front by christening him a white supremacist.  Creating an inference that his shooting victims were black, neither Rosenbaum, Huber, nor Grosskreutz, were identified as white males with villainous histories.

Media tongues suddenly stopped wagging after a young black man drove his car into a Christmas parade in Waukesha, Wisconsin, killing six and injuring dozens.  Darrell Edward Brooks, a career criminal with a forty-four page vitae of lawbreaking, deliberately plowed his car through a marching group and onlookers in what many considered a blatant and premeditated act of domestic terror.  Brooks effectively made that case in his own social media postings, characterizing himself as a child abusing, Hitler-coddling anti-Semite and BLM acolyte with a predilection to run down elderly whites.

Suddenly faced with an incident at odds with the progressive race narrative and no white scapegoats in sight, CNN, MSNBC, and liberal newspaper outlets cashiered all arrest photographs of Brooks save one released by the police a day after the initial mugshot.  In the updated close-up, Brooks appears bug-eyed and washed-out, the melanin drained from his face as if the strong lighting of an arrest processing room were all that was needed to flesh out the white supremacist from the black xenophobe.

MSNBC fabulists Joe Scarborough, Rachel Maddow, Joy Reid, and Chris Hayes gave Waukesha an outright cold shoulder.  No link to the attack could be found on a scroll of their webpages still chock full of Machiavellian commentary on January 6 and the Rittenhouse verdict.  Maddow eventually aired a segment on Waukesha without so much as a reference to Brooks, choosing instead to cast blame upon a red SUV that “inexplicably sped into the parade route.”  Although Brooks  several times veered his car into the path of paradegoers, NBC News made a de minimis issue of his intent by labeling the attack an accident, while ABC came close to blaming cops by alleging Brooks was fleeing a pursuit.

Censoring criminal misdeeds in matters where a particular skin color is unsuitable to one’s needs or political purposes is emblematic of today’s legacy media.  MSNBC and CNN have chosen to shun awkward incidents of organized looting, an appellation promptly discarded in the belief that wordsmithing a crime might lessen a connotation to race.  Flash mobs of larcenous young adults, many concealed in ski masks, hoodies, and packing handguns, arrive en masse to empty boutique shops of their wares, pepper-spraying and assaulting employees, and at times engaging in gun battles with police while escaping in convoys weighted down with booty.  What began as a California phenomenon spurred on by the pro-thievery provisions of Proposition 47 has become hoodlum chic across the country.

The New York City Police compile data on crime and its characteristics as good as any major city department.  Their data shows that 63 percent of all homicides were committed by blacks against 65 percent of all murder victims in 2020.  In distant second at 26 percent were near identical rates of Hispanic-on-Hispanic victims and assailants. Citywide shootings and murder statistics for 2021 are tacking in the same direction, only worse.  These results are transposable to many Democrat-run major cities, all with a calamitous impact upon black residents and inner-city neighborhoods.

NYPD has sought the public’s help in identifying mob looters caught on security cameras.  Videos and photos unmistakably reveal inconvenient truths to those who ply their trade in racial obfuscations.  From San Francisco to Minneapolis and Chicago to New York City the choreography is the same, rampaging troupes of mostly young black males plundering in blue cities with do-nothing policies towards crime and mayoral diktats that prevent cops from interfering with or investigating retail theft.

The media’s willingness to play along with progressives in their effort to mask black-on-black crime reveals artful deception.  To date in 2021, in Chicago, over seven hundred people have been murdered by gun-toting assailants, an increase of more than fifty percent over the previous year.  The victims are disproportionately black at a rate of 8 to 1 against all other races and ethnicities combined, with most of the shootings occurring in majority-black neighborhoods and attributed to known street gangs and their affiliates.  In their 2020 annual crime report, the Chicago Police Department released information on the race and ethnicity of almost five hundred homicide victims but excluded that information for the more than two hundred known assailants, also a media practice more woke than informative in their day-to-day reporting of each individual shooting.

Black-on-black violence may be an irrefutable feature of city murder rates but should not be propagandized as an innate characteristic of race.  Motives behind urban bloodshed are socioeconomic and involve a culture of gun violence by criminal street gangs running a wholesale and retail drug trade supplied by foreign drug cartels.  The free flow of drugs across open borders feeds lucrative American drug markets.  Laissez faire approaches to enforcement in the face of political largesse towards violent felons has led to a dramatic uptick in gang recruitment and gunplay aimed at eliminating competition at the local level.  Internecine gang rivalries have given rise to a disturbing trend towards wild public shooting sprees rather than headshot street assassinations.  Multiple innocents are now caught between indiscriminate gang fusillades and their intended targets, causing murder rates to skyrocket.

Overlooking race in reporting crime data chills the development of solutions that would strengthen the safety and welfare of inner-city neighborhoods, allow police to focus their efforts upon serial shooters and other violent offenders, and recommend high bail or pre-trial detention for recidivist felons who pose a legitimate danger to the community.  Unfortunately, these remedies are of little interest within a liberal evangelism that has broad-brushed the word racist from a social pathology into a birth defect, putting a branding iron to more than three hundred million Americans born of a certain pallor and hammering home the message in grade schools, college campuses, the military, and corporate boardrooms.

Expect no mea culpa over the biased reporting of the Waukesha parade massacre, the Rittenhouse shootings, serial mob robberies, and racially-scrubbed city murder statistics, all necessary to advance the liberal canard on white fragility, supremacy, and systemic racism.  Unfortunately for the well-being of the black community, keeping a focus upon intrinsic white racism brings about an ignorance of the elemental constructs of black-on-black crime.

Image: PxHere

 

Rick Fuentes

Source: https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2021/12/the_whitewashing_of_black_crime.html

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Poverty, Economic Turmoil Shaking Erdoğan's Throne - Burak Bekdil

 

by Burak Bekdil

Erdoğan is heading fast to becoming the victim of his own miscalculations: a dramatically mismanaged economy and geostrategic challenges that went beyond Turkey's political and military might.

  • Erdoğan's biggest political rival ahead of the 2023 presidential elections seems to be -- poverty.

  • The first decade of Erdoğan's rule actually brought relative prosperity to Turks. Per capita GDP rose sharply from $3,688 in 2002 to $11,796 in 2012... Since 2013, however, reckless nepotism, increasing authoritarianism, corruption and economic mismanagement have boosted interest-rates, inflation and unemployment, bringing per capita GDP down to an estimated $7,500.

  • Nearly half of Turkish workers are minimum wage earners, meaning that millions of families must survive on $233 a month

  • Unfortunately, since early 2018, the lira has been on a downward slide due to constant geopolitical tensions with the West, widening current account deficits, shrinking foreign currency reserves and mounting public debt.

  • As the lira crashes to insane historic lows, local salaries are also severely devalued.

  • Erdoğan is heading fast to becoming the victim of his own miscalculations: a dramatically mismanaged economy and geostrategic challenges that went beyond Turkey's political and military might.

  • Perhaps these missteps will be the beginning of the end of Erdoğan's ugly populism -- his neo-Ottoman ambitions that have caused major damage to Turkey's economy as well as the country's international isolation.

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan's biggest political rival ahead of the 2023 presidential elections seems to be -- poverty. Nearly half of Turkish workers are minimum wage earners, meaning that millions of families must survive on $233 a month. In October, Turkey's official year-on-year inflation rate was 19.89%... the annualized inflation rate for that month was measured at 49.87%. (Photo by Adem Altan/AFP via Getty Images)

A punishing economic crisis in 2000-2001, the worst ever in modern Turkish history, pushed millions of Turks below the poverty line. In 2002, Turks went to the ballot box to punish a ruling coalition of mainstream parties and elected as prime minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. By a simple twist of fate, nearly two decades later, Erdoğan's biggest political rival ahead of the 2023 presidential elections seems to be -- poverty.

The first decade of Erdoğan's rule actually brought relative prosperity to Turks. Per capita GDP rose sharply from $3,688 in 2002 to $11,796 in 2012, boosting his popularity. Since 2013, however, reckless nepotism, increasing authoritarianism, corruption and economic mismanagement have boosted interest-rates, inflation and unemployment, bringing per capita GDP down to an estimated $7,500.

In October, Turkey's official year-on-year inflation rate was 19.89%. Awkwardly, an independent group of academics, ENAG, measured the annualized inflation rate for the month of October at 49.87%.

Nearly half of Turkish workers are minimum-wage earners, meaning that millions of families must survive on about $233 a month.

In mid-2017, when the Turkish lira traded at 3.5 to one U.S. dollar, Erdoğan advised Turks to sell their foreign currencies and invest in the national currency. Unfortunately, since early 2018, the lira has been on a downward slide due to constant geopolitical tensions with the West, widening current account deficits, shrinking foreign currency reserves and mounting public debt.

Erdoğan, who advocates aggressive interest rate cuts, has fired three central bank governors in roughly two years. Since September, he has pushed the central bank to make three interest rate cuts, the most recent in mid-November. He might have been hoping that lower interest rates would boost jobs, exports and growth -- a miracle blend of economic outlook that would bring him votes in 2023.

At the time of writing, the Turkish lira had crashed to a record low of 13.88 to the U.S. dollar -- well past what just a month earlier had been deemed a psychological barrier of 11 liras to the dollar. Within four and a half years, defying Erdoğan's advice to invest in Turkey's currency, the dollar's value against the lira skyrocketed from 3.5 to 13.88. Only this year, the lira has shed over 42% of its value against the dollar, making it the weakest global currency. On November 23, as markets were in turmoil, Apple halted sales of nearly all of its products in Turkey.

As the lira crashes to insane historic lows, local salaries are also severely devalued. Today, with his monthly salary, a Turkish minimum wage earner can afford 64 small cans of beer.

Turks say that household budgets and future plans are in turmoil. Businesses fare no better. At the end of August 2021, the private sector's foreign currency debt stock was at $174 billion. Since the beginning of the year, that debt stock, in lira terms, has risen by over 42%, potentially putting thousands of companies at risk of default.

Turks, including Erdoğan's once loyal supporters, are angry. On November 23, protests in Istanbul and the capital, Ankara, called for an end to the policies that have caused the economic slide, and that have led to an inflationary spiral and the crash of the lira this year. In parts of Istanbul, as protesters vented their fury against the Erdoğan government, police had to erect barriers.

Economic turmoil is an existential threat to Erdogan's grip on power. Research shows how much bread-and-butter issues matter to Turks, as probably to all voters. The pollster Optimar found that 63.8% of Turks think their biggest problem is the economy and unemployment. Optimar also found that only 27.8% of Turks think Erdoğan can resolve their pressing economic problems.

What can Erdoğan do? He does not seem to have too many options. He may stop challenging market forces and reverse his interest rate policy by raising rates, which then will come with another pre-election cost: an economic slowdown. He try to can tap into the vaults of rich friends such as Qatar for cash infusions and investment. That would at least be a temporary relief for an economy suffering fundamental imbalances.

Erdoğan is heading fast to becoming the victim of his own miscalculations: a dramatically mismanaged economy and geostrategic challenges that went beyond Turkey's political and military might.

Perhaps these missteps will be the beginning of the end of Erdoğan's ugly populism -- his neo-Ottoman ambitions that have caused major damage to Turkey's economy as well as the country's international isolation.

 

Burak Bekdil, one of Turkey's leading journalists, was recently fired from the country's most noted newspaper after 29 years, for writing in Gatestone what is taking place in Turkey. He is a Fellow at the Middle East Forum.

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/18008/turkey-poverty-economy

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Islam’s Crisis and Osama bin Laden - Andrew Harrod

 

by Andrew Harrod

A glimpse inside the ideological nature of jihadist threats.

 

 

In 1999, House Taskforce on Terrorism and Unconventional Warfare director Yossef Bodansky noted that “starting in the late 1970s, Islamist thinkers could see no way out of the crisis of Islam except for an all-out confrontation with the West.” His pre-9/11 book, Bin Laden: The Man Who Declared War on America, remains revealing and prophetic two decades later in explaining the wider context of Osama bin Laden’s jihad.

Bodansky introduced his book by defining the “term Islamist” that was then relatively obscure but has since become mainstream. Perhaps overoptimistically distinguishing this phenomenon from a historically inherently political Islam, he did not thereby

refer either to someone who might be labeled ‘Muslim’ because of inherited religious beliefs and culture or to aspects of Islam, such as Islamic belief or the Islamic state. The term Islamist denotes the overwhelming prevalence of the political aspect—particularly radicalism, extremism, and militancy—pursued and perpetrated under the banner of Islam as interpreted by the practitioners. While commonly used in professional literature, the term Islamist is not often used by American journalists and other writers, who prefer such terms as Islamic intellectual, Islamic fundamentalist, or Islamic militant. Such usage, however, blurs the distinction between the majority of Muslims, and a minority, comprising extremist terrorists.

“To comprehend Islamist terrorism, one must address its theological-ideological roots,” Bodansky analyzed based on his definition:

Radical militant Islamism—the driving force behind and the ideology justifying international terrorism—emerged from Islam’s conflict with Westernization and modernity. The antagonism between Islamic and Western civilizations has festered for several centuries.

Bodansky described a culture clash between Islamic sharia law and non-Muslims, which the modern world only accentuated:

This crisis reached its first boiling point in the mid-1970s, when the Muslim world, empowered by new petrodollar wealth, was exposed to Western civilization as never before through graduate studies in the West, leisure travel, and satellite TV, still in its infancy. The shock was immense. Leading Islamist intellectuals, who had experienced life in the United States as graduate students, concluded that the personal liberties and materialism they had experienced in the West constituted a mortal threat to traditional Islamic society, which is regimented and bound by strict codes of behavior.

Globalizing technologies only accelerated these confrontations, Bodansky observed:

Today this crisis is escalating because of the widening gap between the West and the Muslim world and the intensifying exposure of the Muslim world to Western civilization through electronic media—from satellite TV to the Internet. The Islamists consider this exposure an onslaught against their way of life, a constant and flagrant reminder of backward Islam’s failures in science and technology.

Simultaneously, “Islamists are convinced that this deviation of Western society (particularly American society, where the separation between church and state is so strongly enforced) from the Islamic divine order of authority is the root cause of its social malaise,” Bodansky wrote. Especially “Bin Laden hates the United States passionately and considers it his principal enemy. He accuses the United States—the locus of Westernization and modernity—of being the source of all crises and trouble afflicting the Muslim world.”

For jihadists such as bin Laden, a “fertile ground exists for anti-Western terrorism” in Muslim societies that can “compel governments to take notice,” Bodansky noted. The “onslaught of Westernization through the electronic media and the growing dependence on imported goods has created a backlash in the Muslim street that the Islamists incite and manipulate to create grassroots hostility.” Meanwhile in many Muslim countries “regimes face internal problems that are nearly impossible to reconcile and resolve,” he added. Therefore, “determined to placate their own citizenry and under growing pressure from the West, more and more regimes…found it expedient to sponsor international Islamist terrorism.”

Bin Laden and allies sought redemption in purging Western influence from Muslim countries. As Bodansky wrote, these jihadists “are convinced that it is only the West, as was so clearly demonstrated during the Gulf War, that saves and sustains subservient Muslim regimes while punishing those that stand up to the West.” Thus

it will be impossible to establish genuine Islamic governments and at once resolve all the problems presently afflicting the Muslim world. Islamist leaders may differ on the fine details of what constitutes a genuine Islamic state, but they all agree that the United States and Western civilization must first be evicted from their midst.

“Since a frontal assault is out of the question, the United States must be terrorized into withdrawing from the Muslim world,” Bodansky noted. Accordingly, “Islamist international terrorism will only escalate.” As he elaborated,

Bin Laden, his colleagues, and the states sponsoring them are all key components of the dominant megatrend in the Muslim world—the rise and spread of radical militant Islamism. They are all theologically motivated and driven, killing and dying in pursuit of an Islamist jihad against the rest of the world.

Appropriately, Bodansky placed bin Laden in a broader Islamic framework:

The story of Osama bin Laden is not just that of an impressive leader and an irreconcilable foe—it is also the story of the events he was part of and the overall dynamics and circumstances within which he strives. It is the story of dedicated zealots driven by hatred unacceptable and incomprehensible to a Westerner.

Bodansky’s book has remained a treasure trove of insights since he first wrote during an era before bin Laden became a household name. A highly important recurring theme in Bodansky’s writing is the ideological nature of jihadist threats, which Western material blandishments, such as development aid programs, cannot defuse, and in some ways might even make worse. Mining his writings on bin Laden’s life for better understanding of jihadism past and present will form the basis for a forthcoming series of articles.

 

Andrew Harrod

Source: https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2021/12/islams-crisis-and-osama-bin-laden-andrew-harrod/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Monday, December 13, 2021

The UN ignores Jewish history in Israel, archaeology proves it - Yochanan Visser

 

by Yochanan Visser

Archeological finds prove biased UN wrong on Jewish history in the land of Israel, from the Temple Mount to Magdala at the Sea of Galilee.

 

First Century synagogue in Magdala, Israel
First Century synagogue in Magdala, Israel                                      Israel Antiquities Authority

Last Wednesday the General Assembly of the United Nations (UNGA) once again denied Jewish history in the land of Israel by adopting a resolution that disavowed Jewish ties to the Temple Mount in Jerusalem.

In a resolution approved by a 129 to 11 majority, the UNGA used only the Muslim name of al-Haram al-Sharif for the Temple Mount and made it clear that the site is a Muslim holy place exclusively.

Although the United States and some European countries announced they opposed the omission of any Jewish connection to the Temple Mount most Western countries refrained from voting against the resolution.

The EU, for example, issued a statement reiterating “that whenever referring to the Temple Mount/al-Haram al-Sharif (in the Jerusalem resolution), both terms, i.e., Temple Mount and al-Haram al-Sharif should be used.”

Despite this statement, a fair number of EU members, among them Italy and France, approved the text of the new UNGA Jerusalem resolution by voting in favor of it.

That showed that most Western nations still prefer to appease the Palestinian leadership and some Arab countries over standing up for the truth about Jewish history in the land of Israel.

The Palestinian Authority was behind the adoption of the resolution that should make us begin laughing if it were not so deeply sad.

Jewish history is all over the land of Israel and all one has to do to discover this is to examine the results of the many archeological excavations that have been carried out since the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948.

In this respect, Israel should present the UN with the latest archeological find in Migdal, a village (moshav) located at the shore of the Sea of Galilee.

On Sunday, Mayor Nathaniel Alfassi of Migdal announced the latest sensational archeological find by the Israel Antiques Authority.

In a Facebook post, Alfassi wrote that an additional synagogue (!) had been unearthed during new excavations at the so-called Mango junction near Magdala, ancient Migdal that was destroyed by the Roman army during the last battle of the Great Jewish Revolt (67 AD).

The discovery was made before a construction company started to turn the dangerous junction at Highway 90 into a roundabout.

According to Alfassi, the new unearthed synagogue was located in the western quarter of Magdala at the foot of Mount Arbel.

The well-known history of Jewish life in Magdala gives irrefutable evidence of the existence of an independent Jewish Kingdom long before any Arabs were in the land at all and way before Palestinian Arabs and their cronies began to claim all of the land of Israel.

So, let’s take a brief look at that impressive history and the archeological evidence supporting what first-century Jewish Roman historian Flavius Josephus wrote in his epic works The Jewish War (75 CE) and Antiques of the Jews (94 CE).

The first historical work describes in detail the Jewish revolt against the Roman occupation while the second book deals with the Jewish view on the history of the world.

Magdala features prominently in Josephus’ description of the Great Jewish Revolt against the Romans.

The Jewish-Roman historian described in detail the siege the Romans laid on the city of 40.000 prior to the destruction of the ancient Jewish town.

Josephus wrote that the siege ended with the murder of the 40.000 Jewish residents of Magdala and that their bodies were dumped in the Sea of Galilee turning the water red for days.

Magdala was initially more important than Tiberias, one of the four holy Jewish cities in the land of Israel, and had a flourishing fishing industry.

The city also features prominently in the Christian gospels which said that Mary Magdalena one of the female Jewish followers of Jesus, was born and lived in the city while Jesus held lectures in Magdala.

After the destruction of Magdala, the area remained mainly fallow until the beginning of the 20th century when Russian Zionists began to purchase land that was later used to build the current Moshav Migdal on it.

According to a British census from 1922, only 51 people were living in the area of Migdal, but that number changed quickly after the establishment of the State of Israel, and today more than 2.000 Jews live in the villlage.

From 1971 on, changes started that eventually led to the discovery of the ruins of ancient Magdala or Migdal, which means 'tower'.

Part of the land on which Magdala once stood was sold to Christian organizations who wanted to establish a new pilgrimage site and later a hotel.

Another part of the land was later bought by the Arab businessman Saleh Dabah who built a small shopping center and a large supermarket there. There are also four restaurants in the commercial center and three hotels have been built nearby so far.

The Christian organizations first had to do fundraising before they could realize their plans, but in the meantime, they started excavations on a small scale that laid bare the ruins of a small Byzantine city.

It wasn't until 2006 that the real major excavations began prior to the construction of the spiritual center by the Magdala Organization.

These excavations are required by law in Israel and have to be done before the beginning of every new construction or infrastructure project.

The Israeli Antiquities Authority led the excavations, and soon sensational discoveries were made that showed that Magdala was a predominantly Jewish village until it was destroyed by the Romans during the last battle of the Great Jewish Revolt (67 AD).

The first evidence of this was the discovery of ritual baths (Mikva'ot) in the destroyed houses.

These ritual baths are found in every religious Jewish community to this day and enable religious Jews to maintain ritual purity.

Subsequent excavations in 2009 and 2013 showed other very unique finds, including the oldest synagogue in Galilee, and the so-called 'Migdal Stone'.

This big stone had an inscription from the menorah, the seven-armed candlestick that also stood in the Temple which hadn’t been destroyed yet when the synagogue in Magdala was opened.

It was the first inscription of a menorah found outside of Jerusalem.

The stone was found in the excavated synagogue and was probably the base of the 'bima', the table on which the Torah scrolls are placed before the weekly Torah portion is read

The Christian Magdala organization, which now manages the complex where the excavations were done, writes on its website about the disciples of Jesus and about the village where Mary Magdalene lived.

The organization now also recognizes that Jews lived in the village, however.

There had previously been criticism of the organization's guides for omitting any mention of indisputable evidence that Magdala was a Jewish village when touring the archaeological site with groups of tourists.

Now, for example, the Magdala organization writes that two rabbis of the Talmudic period lived in Magdala: Isaac of Magdala and Yudan of Magdala, who lived in the third and fourth century BCE respectively.

Another article on the website of the Magdala organization tells the story of Rabbi Shimon Ben Lakish who also lived in the third century and took refuge in Magdala after a conflict with Rabbi Yochanan.

Ben Lakish was consulted by the remaining Jews in the village about using the stones from the destroyed synagogue in order to build a new one.

The Talmud reported that Ben Lakish forbade the use of the stones because then any evidence that there was a synagogue in Magdala would disappear, according to the article.

Thanks to this advice from Rabbi Ben Lakish, the synagogue of Magdala can now be seen by visitors and hopefully, the other ancient synagogue will be open to the public soon, as became apparent on Sunday.

 

Yochanan Visser

Source: https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/318562

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Schumer, Who Accused Trump of Russian Collusion, is Getting Paid by Putin - Daniel Greenfield

 

by Daniel Greenfield

So is every top Democrat who accused President Trump of Russian collusion.

 


“A single, ominous question now hangs over the White House: What could possibly cause President Trump to put the interests of Russia over those of the United States?” Senator Schumer insinuated in 2018.

Why is Schumer putting Russia’s interests ahead of those of the United States by blocking Nord Stream 2 sanctions on Putin’s pet pipeline into Europe?

Schumer, along with a number of other top Democrats, is a beneficiary of campaign contributions from top Democrat fundraiser Vincent Roberti whose lobbying firm was paid over $8.5 million by Nord Stream 2 which is owned by Putin's state-run Gazprom energy monopoly.

Roberti, a former Dem politician, has maxed out his donations to Schumer and to Rep. Eric Swalwell, who may have been cheating on Fang Fang with Vladimir, and threw in a generous $171,000 to the DCCC, as part of the over $545,000 donated to the Democrat political machine.

The top Dem bundler is reportedly lobbying on “issues related to the U.S. position toward the Nord Stream 2 pipeline, including potential financial sanctions affecting the project.”

Suddenly, Schumer, who was accusing the GOP and Trump of being in bed with Putin, and demanding that they vote on sanctions, was refusing to hold a floor vote on Russia sanctions.

“Millions of Americans will continue to wonder if the only possible explanation for this dangerous behavior is the possibility that President Putin holds damaging information over President Trump,” Schumer had smeared back then. What damaging info does Putin have on Chuck?

President Trump, at the time, had urged that, “we should start an immediate investigation” into Schumer’s ties with Russia, and described him as a “total hypocrite”. That is an understatement.

Three years ago, Schumer was clamoring that putting off sanctions on Russia, “is an extreme dereliction of duty by President Trump, who seems more intent on undermining the rule of law of this country than standing up to Putin.” That describes Schumer in a nutshell.

But not just Schumer.

“With him, all roads lead to Putin,” Pelosi had ranted. “I don't know what the Russians have on the president, politically, personally, or financially.”

Roberti plowed $46,100 into Pelosi's Victory Fund. He also appears to have maxed out his contributions to the House Majority Leader and gave $5,000 to her PAC to the Future.

That’s not too shocking since Pelosi toasted Roberti and his wife at their wedding.

“Trump denial of Russian collusion rotten at core and doomed to unravel,” Senator Richard Blumenthal had tweeted. “Expect more serious convictions and indictments early in 2018 as the Special Counsel climbs the ladder of criminal culpability.”

The serious convictions and indictments, along with the criminal culpability, unraveled.

Meanwhile Roberti maxed out his donations to Blumenthal.

"Yet another reason to call for an independent prosecutor into the #TrumpRussia ties," Senator  Catherine Cortez Masto tweeted after having accused President Trump of endangering national security.

Roberti also maxed out his contributions to Masto.

Senator Patty Murray had called for "a special prosecutor to examine the Trump campaign's ties to Russia".

Murray, like Schumer and Mastro, got the maximum amount from the Nord Stream 2 lobbyist, along with Senator Maggie Hassan, who had also demanded a special prosecutor for Trump.

Senator Cory Booker alleged that President Trump had "betrayed" his role and that he was "weak and submissive" to Putin.

The New Jersey hack, who always has one hand out, got a cool grand from Roberti.

But the real lobbying effort to stop the Nord Stream 2 sanctions is coming out of the Biden White House with top associates of the notoriously corrupt politician pushing Senate Dems to let Putin have his pipeline. And that’s after Biden shut down the Keystone XL pipeline for America.

Biden falsely claimed that waiving sanctions on Putin's pipeline was in “U.S. national interests."

Roberti is a longtime Biden pal who boasts of having advised him on his 2008 presidential bid and reportedly flew him out to his hometown during the campaign.

Another Biden donor and lobbyist working for the foreign companies that partnered on Nord Stream 2 signed a check to Biden’s victory fund that Democrats refused to return until they were shamed into doing so by the New York Post.

“Where are the Republicans who know in their heart the president is giving away the store to Vladimir Putin?” Schumer had demanded.

Where are the Democrats who know Biden is giving away the store? Cashing their checks.

Secretary of State Blinken claimed that refusing to sanction Putin's pipeline would “rebuild relationships with our allies and partners in Europe.” Had a Trump administration cabinet member said something like that, we'd already be in the middle of three investigations, one by the FBI, another by the CIA, and a third by Rep. Adam Schiff's poolboy, but no one cares now.

After years in which Schumer could talk about nothing so much as Putin, he hardly has anything to say about the Russian ruler over the past year. That’s understandable considering that Biden joined Putin’s phony arms pact when President Trump wouldn’t do it, and refused to sanction Nord Stream 2. If Schumer has anything to say about Putin now, it’s, “Da, Comrade.”

There’s no more talk of special prosecutors and no suggestions that Putin is rigging elections. Not when a lobbyist for a Swiss company owned by the Putin regime is signing the checks.

There are no more of Schumer’s “ominous questions” when the answers are all too clear.

 

Daniel Greenfield is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center specializing in investigative reporting on the Left and Islamic terrorism.

Source: https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2021/12/schumer-who-accused-trump-russian-collusion-daniel-greenfield/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

The Arab Apartheid No One Talks About - Khaled Abu Toameh

 

by Khaled Abu Toameh

What is clear...is that the international community has long been ignoring the abuses and human rights violations by an Arab country against the Palestinians.

  • "Not all of the professions will be opened to Palestinians under the new decree...." — L'Orient Today, December 8, 2021.

  • Palestinian refugees in Lebanon "are socially marginalized, have very limited civil, social, political and economic rights, including restricted access to the Government of Lebanon's public health, educational and social services and face significant restrictions on their right to work and right to own property." — UNRWA, September 2020.

  • There are several reasons why the Lebanese do not want the Palestinians. One reason is that since the 1970s, the Palestinians have brought war and destruction to Lebanon and turned refugee camps into bases for terror groups.

  • "It is time to end this history of discrimination and systematic segregation... Qualified Palestinians should be allowed to practice their professions, especially in fields where they are most needed.... Very few Lebanese would share my view." — Sawssan Abou-Zahr, senior Lebanese journalist, Reliefweb, August 1, 2021.

  • What is clear...is that the international community has long been ignoring the abuses and human rights violations by an Arab country against the Palestinians.

  • The demonization of Israel by so many journalists, officials and so-called human-rights groups leaves little time to ask why a Palestinian in Lebanon is not permitted to practice medicine while a significant portion of the medical staff at Israeli hospitals consists of Arab doctors and nurses.

The international community has long been ignoring the abuses and human rights violations by Lebanon against the Palestinians. There are several reasons why the Lebanese do not want the Palestinians. One reason is that since the 1970s, the Palestinians have brought war and destruction to Lebanon and turned refugee camps into bases for terror groups. Pictured: Palestinians in Ain el-Hilweh, Lebanon's largest Palestinian refugee camp, protest on January 31, 2020. (Photo by Mahmoud Zayyat/AFP via Getty Images)

The issue of Arab apartheid and discrimination recently resurfaced after a Lebanese minister announced that his country decided to allow Palestinians to work in several sectors that were until now reserved just for Lebanese nationals.

The announcement by Mostafa Bayram, Lebanon's Minister of Labor, came as a surprise to many Palestinians who have been banned for the past four decades from working in many professions.

Palestinians are hoping that the decision would end decades of discrimination and marginalization by an Arab country -- Lebanon.

Some Lebanese, however, expressed fierce opposition to Bayram's decision to ease the labor restrictions imposed on the Palestinians. These Lebanese seem afraid that the Palestinians will either take their jobs or become full citizens of Lebanon.

On December 8, Bayram, who is affiliated with the Iranian-backed Hezbollah terrorist group, published a decree allowing Palestinians to work in trade-union-regulated professions.

The decree states that Palestinians born on Lebanese territory and officially registered with the Ministry of Interior may work in professions requiring union membership from which they had previously been barred.

These union-regulated jobs include professions such as medicine, law, and engineering, as well as public transport and tourism-related jobs.

This does not mean, however, that Lebanon has decided completely to end discriminatory measures against Palestinians.

"Not all of the professions will be opened to Palestinians under the new decree, as some require legal changes or changes to the unions' bylaws in order for non-Lebanese workers to be allowed into the field," according to L'Orient Today, which describes itself as an independent platform that aims to examine the failures of the Lebanese system.

"The history of Palestinian refugees' interactions with restrictive employment policies in Lebanon dates back to the period preceding the Lebanese Civil War," according to a study of Palestinian employment in Lebanon.

The study noted that the Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs proposed in 1964 to regulate the participation of foreigners in the Lebanese labor market. Consequently, the Palestinians were classified as foreigners and required to obtain a work permit.

In 1982, the Lebanese authorities further restricted the list of professions open to Palestinians. They were barred from working in 70 commercial and administrative professions.

The study also noted that the restrictions were lifted slightly in 1995, with the introduction of a new amendment to the ministerial decree. It exempted from these restrictions foreigners who were born in Lebanon, born to Lebanese mothers or married to Lebanese women.

According to the United Nations Relief and Work Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA):

"[Palestine refugees in Lebanon] are socially marginalized, have very limited civil, social, political and economic rights, including restricted access to the Government of Lebanon's public health, educational and social services and face significant restrictions on their right to work and right to own property."

UNRWA noted in addition that Palestinian refugees are still prohibited from practicing 39 professions, mainly due to a precondition that requires them to hold Lebanese nationality and obtain a work permit. The professions include the sectors of healthcare, law, transportation, engineering and tourism.

The latest decree by the Lebanese Minister of Labor was received with mixed feelings.

While some Palestinians and Lebanese welcomed it as a positive step towards ending the discrimination and apartheid, others said it was insufficient and did not provide clear mechanisms for enforcement. According to senior PLO official Ahmad Tamimi:

"The decree represents an important turning point in the lives of the Palestinian refugees in Lebanon, as it constitutes an end to their hardship and a significant development in changing their human conditions towards a decent life and a normal life."

Tamimi also said that the Lebanese decision "had a positive impact on the hearts of the Palestinians in general and the refugees in Lebanon in particular."

Critics, however, are less enthusiastic about the prospects of ending the system of apartheid and discrimination in Lebanon.

"Like everyone else, I am critical and wary of this decision," wrote a social media user called Islam-#GoldStrike.

"One of its very first and major flaws is that it is a decision made by the minister himself so it is tied to him being in this position, meaning it can be easily revoked by the next minister."

Some Lebanese seem especially worried that the Palestinians will take over the jobs of Lebanese citizens in a country where the rate of unemployment is estimated at more than 40%.

These Lebanese appear worried that the decision would pave the way for the permanent settlement of the Palestinians in Lebanon. There are several reasons why the Lebanese do not want the Palestinians.

One reason is that since the 1970s, the Palestinians have brought war and destruction to Lebanon and turned refugee camps into bases for terror groups.

The Lebanese are afraid that the continued presence of the Palestinians in Lebanon would have economic and demographic implications on Lebanon. They argue that Lebanon is facing an acute economic crisis and cannot afford to absorb non-Lebanese nationals, including the Palestinians, who are already living in harsh conditions in several refugee camps.

The Lebanese are also afraid of tawteen ("resettlement"). Some suspect that there are Arabs and other international parties, who would like to see Lebanon become a homeland for the Palestinians. That is why these Lebanese regard the Palestinians as "foreigners."

The Lebanese, in short, are saying that the Palestinians are not welcome to stay in Lebanon.

The heads of Lebanon's physicians' and pharmacists' unions, who opposed the easing of restrictions imposed on the Palestinians, expressed "shock" over the minister's decision.

They pointed out that the laws of their unions state that no doctor has the right to practice medicine on Lebanese territory until he or she is accepted as a member of the unions.

Lebanon's Kataeb Party, a Christian political party, warned that the decision to allow Palestinians to work in several sectors would have grave repercussions on the political and economic situation in Lebanon:

"Opening the door for refugees in Lebanon to practice dozens of professions is an assault on the right of the Lebanese, and a consolidation of their permanent presence in Lebanon while the Lebanese are emigrating... This step will contribute to reducing the salaries in the mentioned professions in line with the supply and demand market. It will also require institutions and employers to register [Palestinian] employees for social security, which will accumulate unbearable burdens that will lead to bankruptcy."

The Lebanese Party also warned that the decision has "hidden and malicious intentions," such as permanently settling Palestinians in Lebanon.

Despite these clear anti-Palestinian views by Arabs, there are nevertheless some Lebanese who are not afraid to express their shame over Lebanon's mistreatment of, and discriminatory measures against, the Palestinians.

"It is time to end this history of discrimination and systematic segregation," wrote senior Lebanese journalist Sawssan Abou-Zahr.

"Qualified Palestinians should be allowed to practice their professions, especially in fields where they are most needed. I dare to say it is time to grant Palestinians some kind of representation at municipalities at the very least. Very few Lebanese would share my view. Some might accuse me of treason; a large number would refuse considering this suggestion, either out of racism or fear that improving the living conditions of refugees is the equivalent of permanently settling them in the country."

It is not clear at this stage if the Hezbollah-affiliated minister's decision will indeed end Lebanon's long-standing apartheid policies and laws against Palestinians. What is clear, however, is that the international community has long been ignoring the abuses and human rights violations by an Arab country against the Palestinians.

Journalists covering the Middle East generally ignore the plight of the Palestinians in the Arab countries, including Lebanon. For them, Lebanon's actions and policies against the Palestinians is not newsworthy.

The demonization of Israel by so many journalists, officials and so-called human-rights groups leaves little time to ask why a Palestinian in Lebanon is not permitted to practice medicine while a significant portion of the medical staff at Israeli hospitals consists of Arab doctors and nurses.

Imagine the uproar that would have erupted at UN institutions or university campuses in the US or Canada had such measures been taken by Israel. Yet when an Arab country subjects Palestinians to deep-seated discrimination and violates their basic human rights, the only sound you can hear is a deadly silence.

  • Follow Khaled Abu Toameh on Twitter

 

Khaled Abu Toameh is an award-winning journalist based in Jerusalem.

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/18026/arab-apartheid

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter