Tuesday, June 17, 2025

‘Israel Will Go, It Must Not Survive, and It Will Not’ - Robert Spencer

 

by Robert Spencer

Israel is right to see Iran as an existential threat.

 

 

[Want even more content from FPM? Sign up for FPM+ to unlock exclusive series, virtual town-halls with our authors, and more—now for just $3.99/month. Click here to sign up.]

“The real divide,” Tucker Carlson declared Friday, “isn’t between people who support Israel and people who support Iran or the Palestinians. The real divide is between those who casually encourage violence, and those who seek to prevent it — between warmongers and peacemakers. Who are the warmongers? They would include anyone who’s calling Donald Trump today to demand air strikes and other direct US military involvement in a war with Iran. On that list: Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, Rupert Murdoch, Ike Perlmutter and Miriam Adelson. At some point they will all have to answer for this, but you should know their names now.”

Well, not exactly, as Levin, for one, has sharply disputed Carlson’s claim, but the idea that Israel is carrying out unprovoked warmongering assault against an innocent Islamic Republic of Iran isn’t limited to Carlson alone. Candace Owens, who shares with Carlson the mantle of being the highest-profile newly minted post-Oct. 7 antisemite, put it a bit more crudely than Carlson did: “Get ready, white American men! It’s time for you to go die for Israel again. If you don’t want to die for Israel then you are an antisemite. Sign up to die in Iran for Netanyahu today, or just admit you hate Jews. Trust the science.”

No Americans, white or otherwise, have died for Israel, unless one considers all the wars that the U.S. has waged since 9/11, or perhaps in Candace’s mind since 1941, as being for Israel or the Jews. In reality, however, as Israel (not actually America at all) has struck Iran over the last few days, it was not acting out of an unprovoked “warmongering” impulse. There has been much discussion of whether Iran was really developing a nuclear bomb, and how close it was to doing so, but quite aside from the question of nukes, for many years the Islamic Republic has made no secret of its determination to destroy Israel.

As far back as Nov. 2012, a huge billboard on Tehran’s Niayesh highway depicted a missile with the legend, “Destination Tel Aviv.” It attracted little attention from the Iranians who drove by it. Over the previous three decades of living in the Islamic Republic, they had become accustomed to a steady barrage of bellicose anti-Israel rhetoric. From the moment the Iranian mullahs took power, they had been outspoken about their hostility to Israel. The Ayatollah Khomeini dubbed Israel “the Little Satan” and once declared, “this regime occupying Jerusalem must vanish from the page of time.”

The Islamic Republic has been determined from its inception to make sure that happened. It set out to make good on its aggressive rhetoric in the early 1980s by creating Hizballah as a permanent force set against the Jewish state. During the 2006 Israeli-Hizballah conflict, Iranian forces directly aided Hizballah, and two members of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps were killed fighting alongside Hizballah in Lebanon.  Hundreds of Iranian soldiers aided Hizballah in firing missiles into Israel.

Iran’s proxy war against Israel didn’t begin after Oct. 7. As far back as March 2009, Iran was shipping weapons to Gaza through Sudan—until Israeli forces carried out airstrikes against the shipments. Two years later, Israeli commandos boarded a cargo ship flying the Liberian flag. On it they found, in containers that were labeled as carrying cotton and lentils, mortar shells and Chinese-made anti-ship missiles bound for Hamas. Instruction manuals were written in Farsi. The cargo had been loaded in the Syrian port of Latakia; then the ship had made its way to Turkey before attempting to pass by Israeli defenses and get its cargo to Hamas.

On July 18, 2012, a caller to Bulgaria’s tourist office warned that a group of Israeli tourists who were just arriving would be “welcomed by two bombs.” When the tourists duly arrived at Bulgaria’s Burgas International Airport, they boarded a bus to their hotel—and seven people were killed and over thirty more wounded when a bomb tore through that bus.

Benjamin Netanyahu immediately pointed to the mullahs and accused them of carrying out terror attacks against Israelis all over the globe: “All signs point towards Iran. Over the last few months we have seen Iran’s attempts to attack Israelis in Thailand, India, Georgia, Kenya, Cyprus and other countries. Exactly 18 years to the day after the horrendous attack on the Jewish Community Center in Argentina, deadly Iranian terrorism continues to strike at innocent people. This is a global Iranian terror onslaught and Israel will react firmly to it.”

Nearly thirteen years later, that Iranian terror onslaught continues, and Israel is finally taking decisive action to end it once and for all. The Jewish state deserves the gratitude of the free world.


Robert Spencer

Source: https://www.frontpagemag.com/israel-will-go-it-must-not-survive-and-it-will-not/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Israel’s Warning to Iran: Stop Hitting Civilians or We Will Strike Your Infrastructure - Hugh Fitzgerald

 

by Hugh Fitzgerald

The Mullahs are cornered.

 

 

[Want even more content from FPM? Sign up for FPM+ to unlock exclusive series, virtual town-halls with our authors, and more—now for just $3.99/month. Click here to sign up.]

Israel has issued a warning to the Islamic Republic of Iran regarding its preference for civilian targets. More on this can be found here: “Israel’s message to Iran: Target population centers, IDF will strike infrastructure,” by Amichai Stein, Jerusalem Post, June 14, 2025:

Israel conveyed a message in the last 24 hours to Iran that it would strike strategic infrastructure across the country if the Islamic Republic targets civilian population centers in Israel, sources with knowledge told The Jerusalem Post on Saturday.

Senior Israeli officials held discussions with top Trump administration officials, expressing interest in US participation in a strike on nuclear facilities.

“We hope this will ultimately come to pass,” an Israeli source told the Post.

Some 204 people have already been wounded by Iranian attacks, and three killed in Iran’s attacks on Israel launched on Friday evening, Magen David Adom said.

Missiles struck in Tel Aviv, Ramat Gan, and Rishon Lezion….

Israel has made it clear. If Iran continues to strike civilians, as with the ballistic missiles it has launched not on military targets, but on civilian streets and buildings in Tel Aviv, Jerusalem, Ramat Gan and Rishon Lezion, then Israel will no longer limit its own strikes to military targets, as it has done so far, but will hit civilian infrastructure in Iran. This means roads, bridges, electricity plants, water filtration and desalination plants, transportation hubs including airports, and train stations. With all of its aerial defenses destroyed, Iran no longer has any way to prevent Israel’s fighter jets from striking at will.

The Iranians have seen on television the rubble-strewn streets, and the bomb-blasted buildings, of Gaza. Do they want Tehran, Isfahan, and Tabriz to look like that? Or will the Supreme Leader and his remaining civilian and military advisers come to their senses, and spare the people of Iran even more misery?


Hugh Fitzgerald

Source: https://www.frontpagemag.com/israels-warning-to-iran-stop-hitting-civilians-or-we-will-strike-your-infrastructure/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

FBI gives Congress intel on alleged Chinese plot to create fake mail-in ballots in 2020 - John Solomon

 

by John Solomon

Newly declassified intelligence report partially corroborated but was recalled before it could be fully investigated, officials say.

 

FBI Director Kash Patel on Monday evening turned over to Congress an intelligence report raising concerns that China had mass-produced fake U.S. driver's licenses to carry out a scheme to hijack the 2020 election with fake mail-in ballots for Democrat Joe Biden.

The newly declassified intelligence reports from August 2020 weren’t corroborated or fully investigated and instead were recalled from intelligence agencies at about the time that then-FBI Director Chris Wray testified there were no known plots of foreign interference ahead of the 2020 election in which Biden defeated Donald Trump, officials told Just the News.

The new documents were turned over to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, who had first raised concerns to the bureau that the intelligence hadn’t been fully vetted, and instead was just dismissed even though there was evidence of the fake licenses.  

"Thanks to the oversight work and partnership of Chairman Grassley, the FBI continues to provide unprecedented transparency at the people's Bureau,” Patel told Just the News in a statement. “To that end, we have located documents Chairman Grassley requested, which detail alarming allegations related to the 2020 U.S. election.

“Specifically, these include allegations of plans from the CCP to manufacture fake driver's licenses and ship them into the United States for the purpose of facilitating fraudulent mail-in ballots – allegations which, while substantiated, were abruptly recalled and never disclosed to the public,” Patel also said. 

“In accordance with Chairman Grassley's request for documents, I have immediately declassified the material and turned the document over to the Chairman for further review."

Officials who have seen the documents told Just the News the FBI had a relatively new confidential source who provided information in summer 2020 that the Chinese government was manufacturing and exporting fake U.S. driver's licenses as part of a plot to create voter identities for Chinese residents living in the United States so they could vote with fake mail-in ballots.

The intelligence source claimed the plot was specifically designed to benefit Biden, officials said.

They also said the intelligence report was recalled within a few weeks and the allegations never fully investigated, on the grounds that the source needed to be re-interviewed.

But, in fact, another agency, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, had intercepted nearly 20,000 fake licenses around the time the intelligence came in a possible corroboration of the report, officials said. 


John Solomon

Source: https://justthenews.com/accountability/political-ethics/fbi-gives-congress-intel-alleged-chinese-plot-create-fake-mail

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Trump breaks from Gabbard on Iran nuke program - Sarah Roderick-Fitch

 

by Sarah Roderick-Fitch

President Donald Trump appears to break from his intelligence director on earlier claims that Iran wasn’t producing military weapons.

 

(The Center Square) -

President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning appeared to break from his intelligence director on earlier claims that Iran wasn’t producing military weapons.

U.S. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said in March, while speaking before a Senate intelligence briefing, that Iran wasn’t building a nuclear weapon.

However, as Trump was briefing reporters on Air Force One, returning home from the G7 summit in Canada, he said Iran was close to getting a nuclear weapon, contradicting Gabbard’s earlier claims.

“I don’t care what she said. They were very close to getting a nuke,” Trump told reporters.

In March, Gabbard said the intelligence community was assessing the nuclear situation in Iran.

“Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has not authorized the nuclear weapons program he suspended in 2003,” Gabbard said.

Trump told reporters he was headed directly back to the White House and into its Situation Room to deal with the ongoing conflict between Israel and Iran, after the two countries entered a fifth day of fighting.

The White House has denied reports of trying to negotiate a ceasefire between Israel and Iran, while also quashing reports that the U.S. was entering the fight.

 

Sarah Roderick-Fitch

Source: https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/trump-breaks-gabbard-iran-nuke-program

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

PMW in JPost: Norway is on the wrong side of history - Mette Johanne Follestad

 

by Mette Johanne Follestad

Regrettably, I should not be surprised that Norway has turned its back on Israel's just war. For years, my country's support for those waging terror against Israel has been official policy.

 

After months of criticizing Israel's counterattack against Hamas, key Western democracies have finally acknowledged the existential threats Israel faces and have lined up in defense of Israel's war to destroy Iran's nuclear weapons program. Except for Norway.

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz affirmed Israel's "right to defend its existence." French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot was equally clear: "We reaffirm Israel's right to defend itself."

Britain went even further when Industry Minister Sarah Jones stated that the UK "did not rule out British involvement in defending Israel if Iran fired ballistic missiles."

US President Donald Trump was the most supportive: "I think it's been excellent. We gave them [Iran] a chance and they didn't take it... They got hit about as hard as you're going to get hit. And there's more to come. A lot more."

In contrast, the world's dictatorships lined up to condemn Israel. Qatar accused Israel of violating Iran's sovereignty. Iraq claimed it broke international law. Oman called it a dangerous escalation. Turkey labeled the strikes a provocation. Russia, China, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and the United Arab Emirates all joined the chorus of condemnation.

And siding with the terror regimes and authoritarian states was my country, Norway.

Why Norway sides with authoritarian regimes against Israel

PRIME MINISTER Jonas Gahr Store chose to condemn Israel. "This is a very serious development," he said. "Norway condemns the escalation of the war situation around Iran." Foreign Minister Espen Barth Eide echoed the criticism: "The situation in the Middle East is now a good deal worse than it was until last night."

Barth Eide even claimed Israel was isolated: "The US and Trump have explicitly called and asked Netanyahu not to attack… There is no support, as far as I can tell, anywhere." In truth, Israel has strong backing from fellow democracies, just not from Norway.

Regrettably, I should not be surprised that Norway has turned its back on Israel's just war. For years, my country's support for those waging terror against Israel has been official policy.

Recently, the Norwegian foreign minister visited Israel for the first time since Hamas's October 7, 2023, atrocities. His press release was filled with fundamental errors, chief among them his sanitizing of the Palestinian Authority, which Norway funds with my tax kroners.

Barth Eide said: "I hope Israel sees that they have a partner for peace in Palestine… The Palestinian Authority renounced the use of violence over 30 years ago." That claim is laughable, as the PA has never renounced violence to its own people in Arabic.

PA officials have repeatedly praised the October 7 massacre. Senior leader Jibril Rajoub called it a day "full of epics and acts of heroism," while Abbas adviser Mahmoud al-Habbash called it "legitimate resistance" five times in one interview.

Abbas himself recently vowed yet again that if the PA had just one penny left, it would go to imprisoned terrorists and the families of "martyrs." He explained they deserved it because these murderers are "more precious than all of us."

THERE WAS a time when Norway rejected the PA's terror support. When Palestinian Media Watch revealed that Norway had funded a girls' community center that was named after terrorist Dalal Mughrabi, who led the 1978 massacre of 37 civilians, including 12 children, then-foreign minister Borge Brende responded with moral clarity:

"The glorification of terrorist attacks is completely unacceptable… We will not allow Norwegian aid to be used for such purposes… We have asked for the funds to be repaid." (Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs)

That principled response is now absent. The PA has named six schools after that same Mughrabi, five after Abu Jihad (responsible for 125 murders), five more after Salah Khalaf (mastermind of the 1972 Munich Olympic massacre), and even one after Nazi ally and war criminal Amin al-Husseini. Yet Norway is silent today while its aid money funds a PA education system that presents these terrorists as role models for kids.

Barth Eide's hailing Yasser Arafat's 1993 lie about "renouncing violence" is as tragic as Neville Chamberlain's hailing Hitler's 1938 lies as "peace in our time." A diplomat who does not recognize the PA's systemic support for terrorism has no place in Middle East diplomacy.

Equally offensive in Barth Eide's press release was his use of Holocaust remembrance: "Antisemitism is completely unacceptable… We have been members of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance [IHRA] since 2003. I take the work against antisemitism very seriously."

"Holocaust remembrance" is a meaningless slogan if Barth Eide does not condemn Mahmoud Abbas for claiming that Hitler fought the Jews because he believed "the Jews caused ruin." "Holocaust remembrance" is a meaningless slogan if Barth Eide won't denounce the PA for praising the atrocities of October 2023 or for continuing to call for genocide today.

Over the past year, senior PA religious figures have broadcast calls for the extermination of Jews seven times on official PA TV, including just this past week:

"Allah, strike the thieving Jews. Allah, count them one by one. Kill them one by one. Do not leave even one."

Hitler never said it more clearly.

If Barth Eide believes Holocaust remembrance means condemning the genocide of the past while ignoring calls for genocide in the present, then maybe it's time Norway canceled its IHRA membership.

Building on the delusion that the PA is a "partner for peace," Norway has taken the dangerous step of recognizing the terror-supporting PA as a state and is encouraging others to do the same.

As a proud but troubled Norwegian, I call on my country to base its foreign policy on reality, rather than self-deception. Norway must declare full support for Israel's just war against Iran and withdraw its recognition of a terror-supporting PA state until genuine reforms are implemented by the PA.

If Norway fails to take these essential and principled steps, it will remain on the wrong side of history.

The writer is the European representative of Palestinian Media Watch.

Source: https://www.jpost.com/opinion/article-857949 


Mette Johanne Follestad

Source: https://palwatch.org/page/37193

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Will Trump Really Agree to Some Fake 'Deal' That Allows Iran to Keep Fordow, Secret Sites, and Force the Great Iranian People to Suffer Under a Terrorist Regime? - Khaled Abu Toameh

 

by Khaled Abu Toameh

The US urgently needs to spearhead not another porous, fake "nuclear deal" but real security, stability and freedom -- not only for millions of Muslims, Christians and Jews, but also for the great people of Iran who have been forced to suffer under vicious psychopathic despots long enough.

 

  • If US President Donald J. Trump wants actual long-term peace in the Middle East, like it or not, there is no alternative other than allowing the departure of Iran's theocratic terrorist dictators and liberating the Iranian people – just as, after World War II, the US liberated Germany and Japan to enable the election of Chancellor Konrad Adenauer in Germany and the highly successful democracy in Japan.

  • More negotiations are just the usual stalling tactic of the Iranian regime. Interminably negotiating some "deal" -- which, based on their track record, Iran will cheat on, no matter how vigilant its guardians are -- just allows Iran's regime a 24-karat opportunity to resupply, regroup and terrorize the region again.

  • The last thing Trump needs is "help" from Russian President Vladimir Putin.

  • The US urgently needs to spearhead not another porous, fake "nuclear deal" but real security, stability and freedom -- not only for millions of Muslims, Christians and Jews, but also for the great people of Iran who have been forced to suffer under vicious psychopathic despots long enough.

  • For real peace, Trump needs to be the Churchill of our time. Let Israel finish the job. It is for us.

For real peace, President Donald Trump needs to be the Churchill of our time. Let Israel finish the job. It is for us. Pictured: Trump bids farewell to Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House, after a meeting on April 7, 2025 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)

The Israel-Iran war erupted as Palestinians were marking the 18th anniversary of the Hamas coup against the Palestinian Authority (PA) in the Gaza Strip.

On June 14, 2007, the Iran-backed terror group staged a violent coup that lasted for a few days and resulted in the death of hundreds of PA loyalists, some of whom were lynched in public squares, while others were thrown from the top floors of high-rise buildings. Human Rights Watch reported on June 12, 2007:

"In internal Palestinian fighting over the last three days, both [the PA's ruling] Fatah faction and Hamas military forces have summarily executed captives, killed people not involved in hostilities, and engaged in gun battles with one another inside and near Palestinian hospitals...

"On Sunday, Hamas military forces captured 28-year-old Muhammad Swairki, a cook for President Mahmoud Abbas's Presidential Guard, and executed him by throwing him to his death, with his hands and legs tied, from a 15-story apartment building in Gaza City. Later that night, Fatah military forces shot and captured Muhammad al-Ra'fati, a Hamas supporter and mosque preacher, and threw him from a Gaza City high-rise apartment building."

The Hamas takeover of the Gaza Strip could not have taken place without Iran's financial and military support for the terror group. Former PA General Intelligence Chief Tawfik Tirawi has accused Iran of playing a "big role" in Hamas's seizure of the Gaza Strip. Dozens of Hamas members, Tirawi said, had received military training in Iran. He also accused Hamas of smuggling weapons into the Gaza Strip to fight the PA.

Prominent Palestinian human rights activist Bassem Eid noted that Hamas was able to defeat the security forces of the PA in the Gaza Strip partly as a result of training and weapons provided from Iran.

"It looks like through the operation of Hamas, I can see the Iranian weapons there. I am quite sure [of the Iranian connection]. And this is why Hamas becomes more violent than any other Palestinian political movement."

According to a 2020 US State Department report, Iran provides about $100 million annually to Palestinian terror groups, including Hamas. As of 2023, according to an Israeli security source, Iran had significantly increased its funding for Hamas to $350 million a year.

The late Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh told the Qatari-owned Al-Jazeera TV network in 2022 that his group had received $70 million in military aid from Iran, adding:

"We have rockets that are locally manufactured, but the long-range rockets came from abroad, from Iran, Syria and others through Egypt."

Earlier, Haniyeh had thanked the Iranian regime for "supporting and funding the [Palestinian] resistance financially, militarily, and technically."

In 2020, senior Hamas official Mahmoud Zahar revealed that Iran gave him $22 million in cash. In an interview with Iran's Arabic-language television network al-Alam, Zahar said he outlined some of the financial problems Hamas faced during a meeting with Iran's slain Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps commander Qassem Soleimani during a visit to Tehran in 2006.

"The following day, I found $22 million in bags at the airport" as a Hamas delegation was about to leave Tehran," Zahar said. "We had agreed on a higher amount, but we were only nine people, and we could not carry any more cash due to baggage allowance."

Iran's financial and military support for Hamas enabled the terror group to build a vast network of tunnels and manufacture weapons in the Gaza Strip. Thanks to this support, Hamas was able to build an army consisting of tens of thousands of fighters and turn the Gaza Strip into a large base for jihad (holy war) against Israel.

Were it not for Iran's financial and military backing, Hamas would not have been able to launch its October 7, 2023 invasion of Israel. On that day, Hamas terrorists and thousands of "ordinary" Palestinians murdered more than 1,200 Israelis and foreign nationals and wounded thousands.

Unsurprisingly, Iran was quick to praise the massacres. Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei hailed the October 7 invasion as "logical and legal." Iran's foreign ministry described the massacre as "a turning point in the history of the legitimate struggle of the Palestinian people against the Zionist regime."

The Iranian regime chose to support Hamas and its other terror proxies – Hezbollah, Palestinian Islamic Jihad and the Houthis – to advance its goal of destroying the "Zionist entity." Iran's mullahs bear full responsibility for the death of thousands of Palestinians in the Gaza Strip. They are also responsible for the death of the "two-state solution," because their support for the 2007 Hamas coup led to the creation of two separate rival Palestinian entities in the Gaza Strip and West Bank. The Iranian regime was always prepared to support any Palestinian or Arab who carried the banner of jihad against Israel.

The Iranian regime has brought nothing but death and destruction on the Palestinians and many Arabs in Lebanon, Syria, Iraq and Yemen. Its support for terror proxies and militias has triggered civil war and bloodshed throughout the Middle East. These attacks include the deaths of more than 1,000 Americans (such as here, here and here).

Iran and its proxies, such as the Houthis, have repeatedly launched rockets and missiles not only at US assets in the Middle East, but also at its oil rich-Sunni neighbors, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.

Many Arabs and Iranians will not shed a tear if Iran's mullahs are removed from power.

If US President Donald J. Trump wants actual long-term peace in the Middle East, like it or not, there is no alternative other than allowing the departure of Iran's theocratic terrorist dictators and liberating the Iranian people – just as, after World War II, the US liberated Germany and Japan to enable the election of Chancellor Konrad Adenauer in Germany and the highly successful democracy in Japan.

As pointed out in Politico, hardly a "right wing" news outlet, "Iran's Target Isn't Just Israel. It's Us."

More negotiations are just the usual stalling tactic of the Iranian regime. Interminably negotiating some "deal" -- which, based on their track record (such as here and here), Iran will cheat on, no matter how vigilant its guardians are -- just allows Iran's regime a 24-karat opportunity to resupply, regroup and terrorize the region again.

Trump would be wise to let Israel "finish what they started" in Iran and do what is good for Israel, the Free World and the West.

The last thing Trump needs is "help" from Russian President Vladimir Putin.

The US and the rest of the international community should fully support Israel in its war against Iran's bloodthirsty regime. Not only is it brutal to its neighbors and Israel, but to its own people as well.

In 2024, Iran repressed, imprisoned, tortured and executed a large number of its own citizens.

The US urgently needs to spearhead not another porous, fake "nuclear deal" but real security, stability and freedom -- not only for millions of Muslims, Christians and Jews, but also for the great people of Iran who have been forced to suffer under vicious psychopathic despots long enough.

For real peace, Trump needs to be the Churchill of our time. Let Israel finish the job. It is for us.


Khaled Abu Toameh is an award-winning journalist based in Jerusalem.

Source: https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21688/trump-iran

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

The evolving mystery of whether Israel destroyed Natanz centrifuges: IDF, Grossi trade reversals - Yonah Jeremy Bob

 

by Yonah Jeremy Bob

The IDF had said twice that the underground site beneath Natanz was also destroyed by a military strike.

 

 A satellite image shows the Natanz nuclear facility after airstrike in Iran, June 16, 2025
A satellite image shows the Natanz nuclear facility after airstrike in Iran, June 16, 2025
(photo credit: MAXAR TECHNOLOGIES/HANDOUT VIA REUTERS)

 

A top IDF official on Tuesday acknowledged for the first time that while Israel has destroyed Natanz's above-ground nuclear facilities, the military is unsure whether it succeeded in destroying Iran's uranium-enriching centrifuge fleet at the Natanz underground facility.

This past Friday, the IDF had said that it had succeeded in striking and destroying both the above-ground and specifically also the underground Natanz nuclear sites, including the crucial centrifuge fleet.

However, satellite footage analyzed by the Institute for Science and International Security had already cast doubt on the claims of destroying the Natanz underground facility, while confirming the above-ground destruction. 

Then on Monday, IAEA Director-General Rafael Grossi told the IAEA Board of Governors that Israel had failed to destroy Iran's uranium-enriching centrifuge fleet at the underground facility at Natanz.

He also acknowledged that the IDF had succeeded in destroying the above-ground Natanz nuclear sites, damaging the electrical grid that runs the underground centrifuges, and causing contamination of the underground facility.

IAEA board and chief Rafael Grossi hold exceptional meeting about Israel's strikes on Iran, June 16, 2025 (credit: REUTERS/ELISABETH MANDL)
IAEA board and chief Rafael Grossi hold exceptional meeting about Israel's strikes on Iran, June 16, 2025 (credit: REUTERS/ELISABETH MANDL)
Responding on Monday, multiple IDF senior sources initially said that they believed Grossi was wrong.

However, on Tuesday, an even more senior IDF official said that they were not sure what the status of the underground facility was.

An IDF official also played down the centrifuges issue (though they provide the all-important uranium for a potential bomb), noting that Israel had destroyed dozens of nuclear weapons group sites and laboratories, which were the most critical element for ever having a chance to move enriched uranium to being used for an actual nuclear weapon.

Grossi and the IAEA then made a third revision of their position even later on Tuesday, saying on X: "Based on continued analysis of high-resolution satellite imagery collected after Friday's attacks, the IAEA has identified additional elements that indicate direct impacts on the underground enrichment halls at Natanz."

In a dizzying range of changing positions, this leaves the IDF on record as having moved from being sure that the centrifuges were destroyed to being uncertain. Meanwhile, the IAEA has moved from denying that the centrifuges were destroyed to saying that they were not directly hit by IDF missiles but may have been damaged indirectly by electrical outages, to saying that IDF missiles likely hit them. 

IAEA head: IDF failed to destroy key Iranian nuclear sites

Grossi on Monday had told the Board, "There has been no additional damage at the Natanz Fuel Enrichment Plant site since the Friday attack, which destroyed the above-ground part of the Pilot Fuel Enrichment Plant, one of the plants at which Iran was producing uranium enriched up to 60% U-235."

Next, he stated, "Electricity infrastructure at the facility, which included an electrical sub-station, a main electric power supply building, and emergency power supply and back-up generators, was also destroyed."

"There has been no indication of a physical attack on the underground cascade hall containing part of the Pilot Fuel Enrichment Plant and the main Fuel Enrichment Plant. However, the loss of power to the cascade hall may have damaged the centrifuges there," he reported.

Moreover, he said, "The level of radioactivity outside the Natanz site has remained unchanged and at normal levels, indicating no external radiological impact to the population or the environment from this event."

In addition, Grossi said, "Within the Natanz facility, there is both radiological and chemical contamination. Considering the type of nuclear material at this facility, it is possible that Uranium isotopes contained in Uranium Hexafluoride, Uranyl Fluoride and Hydrogen Fluoride are dispersed inside the facility."

Also, the IAEA chief explained that, "The radiation, primarily consisting of alpha particles, poses a significant danger if Uranium is inhaled or ingested. However, this risk can be effectively managed with appropriate protective measures, such as using respiratory protection devices while inside the affected facilities. The main concern inside the facility is the chemical toxicity of the Uranium Hexafluoride and the Fluoride compounds generated at the contact with water."

After his initial statement that the IDF failed to kinetically strike the underground centrifuges, Grossi later told the BBC: "Our assessment is that with this sudden loss of external power, in great probability the centrifuges have been severely damaged if not destroyed altogether."

Moving on from Natanz, Grossi stated that, "No damage has been seen at the site of the Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant or at the Khondab heavy water reactor, which is under construction. Bushehr nuclear power plant has not been targeted nor affected by the recent attacks, and neither has the Tehran Research Reactor."

Next, he noted, "At the [Isfahan] nuclear site, four buildings were damaged in Friday’s attack: the central chemical laboratory, a uranium conversion plant, the Tehran reactor fuel manufacturing plant, and the UF4 to EU metal processing facility, which was under construction. As in Natanz, off-site radiation levels remain unchanged."

When contacted on Monday, Grossi's staff did not provide comment as to whether their information about the underground facility at Natazn was based on their staff on the ground seeing it up close, long-distance machinery and readings, or relying on Iranian reports.


Yonah Jeremy Bob

Source: https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/iran-news/article-858042

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Trump blocked Biden-era plan to remove Snake River dams, and he may have prevented an eco-disaster - Kevin Killough

 

by Kevin Killough

If the experiences of those in northern California living along the Klamath River are any indication, Trump is right that a dam-removal project on the Snake River would cause serious and lasting impacts.

 

President Donald Trump issued a memorandum last week blocking an effort that was underway during the Biden-Harris administration to remove four hydroelectric dams in the Snake River. 

Trump’s memorandum revokes a directive from the previous administration, which Trump described as an effort by “radical environmentalism” to raise the “equitable treatment for fish” above that of human flourishing. 

“The negative impacts from these reckless acts, if completed, would be devastating for the region, and there would be no viable approach to replace the low-cost, baseload energy supplied,” Trump stated in the memo. 

If the experiences of those in northern California living along the Klamath River are any indication, Trump is right that a dam-removal project on the Snake River would cause serious and lasting impacts. 

Bad outcomes of dam removal in the past

Last year, four dams near the Klamath River near the Oregon-California border were removed, and people living in communities along the river tell Just the News that the sediment that flooded the river has turned the Klamath into a muddy waterway. While proponents of dam removal say it helps salmon populations, the Klamath River dam removal has decimated fish populations, ruined fishing tourism, and may impact agriculture. 

The worst part, they say, is that all the problems were known long before the removals were carried out. Opponents of the project fought for years to stop it, but the environmentalists who supported the project had more resources and ultimately succeeded in getting what they wanted. 

“We’re a rural community, and we had to have bake sales and auctions to raise money to fight this. And we just didn’t have the funding to be able to fight people coming from all over the globe, essentially, to make this happen,” Richard Marshall, a resident of Fort Jones, California, told Just the News. 

Years in the making

In 2010, a group of federal and state agencies, Tribal governments, counties and environmental organizations signed the Klamath Hydroelectric Settlement Agreement, which laid out a process to remove the four dams. The goal was to restore natural fish production and establish water and power supplies in support of agriculture and communities. 

The agreement formed the Klamath River Renewal Corporation (KRRC), a nonprofit organization that oversaw the dams’ removal. In 2018, KRRC submitted a 2,300 page document called the “Definite Plan for the Lower Klamath Project” to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). 

By that point, people living in Siskiyou County, California, through which the river runs, began to object to the plan. Lawyers for the county government wrote to then-FERC Chairman Kevin McIntyre and Secretary Kimberly Bose to explain that the county had on multiple occasions expressed concerns about “the potential impacts of dam removal on imperiled species, water quality, and other health of the Klamath River ecosystem, as well as the socioeconomic impacts on the local community.” The “Definite Plan,” the lawyers told FERC, failed to address any of these concerns. 

Among the issues the lawyers raised was their doubt that KRRC is “financially, legally, and technically qualified to effectuate dam removal.” The project, according to the county’s letter, lacked adequate environmental review, underestimates costs and fails to manage risks. The “Definite Plan” does not address risks to salmon and other aquatic species, animals living around the river, roads, cultural resources and water supplies. 

In 2022, 79% of Siskiyou County residents voted against the project, but in May of 2023, the Siskiyou County Board of Supervisors voted to go forward with the dam removal. Along with the state and federal approvals, KRRC was given the green light. 

The dam removal began in September 2023 and finished up in October 2024. Just the News reached out to KRRC for their response to the criticisms about the dam-removal outcomes and did not receive a response. 

‘Never really about fish’ 

Marshall, the resident of Fort Jones, said that various environmental groups and the state, including Gov. Gavin Newsom, heavily promoted the project, which overwhelmed the opposition in Siskiyou County. 

“They claimed it was to save the fish, but the fact of the matter is, it was never really about fish. It was just about removing the dams,” Marshall said.

He explained that the salmon have three-year cycles. So they go out to the ocean, and return every three years to spawn. The dam removal comes as the salmon would be heading out to the ocean, he said, but the sediment that flooded the waters killed them off. 

Al Kutzkey, owner of Kutzkey Guide Service, said he’s been a fishing guide on the river for three generations. His grandfather, he told Just the News, was the first fishing guide on the Klamath. Following the dam removal, he said, the business has been destroyed, and he’s selling real estate. 

“My business is gone. It's dead. It's dead, it's gone. I can't fish at all. Water's been so muddy since they pulled the dams out that it's not fishable at all. I don't know if there's even trout left in there,” Kutzkey said, adding that the business in previous years provided 90% of his annual income. He said other fishing guides on the river are likewise seeing their businesses destroyed. 

The impacts from the sediment could ripple out across the entire ecosystem. This time of year, Kutzkey said, you can usually see salmon flies, which can be as big as a humming bird, crawling on the banks and trees. 

“The trout love them,” Kutzkey said. As they grow, they shed their husks, and Kutzkey said you can usually see thousands of these left behind all along the river. He’s seen only a few husks this year. He hasn’t seen the flies either. 

“This time of year is when it should be the prime. They should be up in hundreds and thousands of them everywhere. And I'm not seeing any,” he said. 

These insects are a main food source for fish and other insects, so if that food source isn’t there, Kutzkey said, it could indicate problems throughout the river ecosystem. While proponents promised a healthier river, Krutzkey said the only ones who have benefited so far from the project are the contractors and the rafting guides. With the dams removed, the rafters can go a lot further down the river. 

Not backing down

Despite all the problems, environmental groups reportedly are not reconsidering whether dam removal is a good idea. Theodora Johnson is a rancher and freelance journalist in Siskiyou County. She’s been writing about the Klamath dam removal project for a decade. 

In an article on the Substack publication “American Unwon,” which includes photos of dead fish and wildlife along the Klamath, Johnson called it the “largest, most devastating dam removal experiment in modern history, for both wildlife and residents.” She explains that there’s now talk about removing the last two dams on the river, which would force hundreds of farmers in the Upper Klamath out of business.

“Our region now faces physical and political threats because of dam removal. If not headed off, these threats will destroy our agrarian economy and culture,” Johnson wrote. 

Jeff Reynolds, senior editor for Restoration News, told Just the News that it’s unlikely any negative impacts on outdoor recreation, agriculture — or even the fish species they’re allegedly trying to protect — will get environmentalists to reconsider the wisdom of dam removal. 

“They're going to do what they always do. They're going to push out the propaganda that it's been an unmitigated success, and that anybody that believes otherwise is pushing fake news and fake science,” Reynolds said. 

While Trump has put the brakes on the Snake River dam removal proposal, future administrations looking to present their green credentials may likely do their utmost to revive it.  


Kevin Killough

Source: https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/energy/trump-blocked-biden-era-plan-remove-snake-river-dams-and-he-may-have

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Monday, June 16, 2025

Why I Support Israel‘s Recent Actions in Iran - Cynical Publius

 

by Cynical Publius

Israel’s precision strikes on Iran aren’t endless war—they’re a rare case of strategic force serving global security without costing American lives or treasure.

 

As a veteran who frequently rails against what I call “useless, endless wars,” I feel a duty to explain my seemingly contradictory position of supporting Israel’s recent kinetic actions in Iran.

First, by “useless, endless wars,” I am specifically referring to the expenditure of American blood and/or treasure in a war that ultimately does not serve the national security interests of the USA.

Examples:

  • Squandering American lives in a futile and unwinnable effort to transform a medieval society of deranged, violent warlords and opium growers (who also practice actual slavery and bacha bāzī—be sure you are willing to click on that last link, it’s disturbing—and who have an utter disregard for human life) into a liberal democracy is a “useless, endless war.”
  • Invading Iraq with zero rational plans to install a new government, and then dragging out a guerilla conflict for seventeen years under the inept leadership of generals trained to fight the Soviet Union in the Fulda Gap, and then cutting and running when it was finally possible for strategic, pro-USA objectives to be achieved, is a “useless, endless war.”
  • Sending billions of American taxpayer dollars to the steppes of Ukraine in an effort to interject NATO into a war between two corrupt oligarchies (in a conflict that has literally spanned thousands of years, on and off), while never promoting a single, meaningful strategic national security objective of the USA, while simultaneously increasing the chances of a humanity-destroying, global, thermonuclear war is a “useless, endless war.”

So, how are Israel’s actions in blowing up Iran’s nuclear and command/control capabilities any different?

I’ll explain:

1. There are no American boots on the ground in Iran, nor are there likely to be. America’s only direct involvement in the conflict is to assist the Israelis with purely defensive, land– and sea-based missile/drone defense units and ships, in or near Israel.

2. America has been engaged in low-intensity military conflict with the Iranian regime continuously since 1979. Many Americans are too young to recall the Iran Hostage Crisis, but the wounds there run deep, and the conflict it engendered has never fully abated.

3. Iran has killed many American troops, and by that I mean many American troops. I vividly remember sitting in Iraq as the media assured us that Iran was not supplying Iraqi insurgents, while I was staring at cases of RPGs and 82mm mortar rounds we had just captured from Iraqi insurgents, all with Iranian Army markings on the wooden cases.

4. Iran literally has a national holiday called “Death to America Day.”

5. Iran has been working feverishly for years to produce nuclear weapons and has been absolutely unwilling to enter into any international agreement that would fully prevent it from gaining such capability. Specifically, they have been unwilling to accept an inspection regime that would fully prevent them from achieving nuclear capability.

6. Iran’s leadership has specifically and repeatedly pledged to use nuclear weapons on Israel. A nuclear war between Iran and Israel is in no one’s interest. Moreover, given Iran’s desire for “Death to America,” it is not unreasonable to assume that our nation would also be the target of an eventual nuclear attack, killing many millions of American citizens.

7. There is no “realpolitik” here. The Iranian mullahs cannot be reasoned with from a position of rational self-interest, as could even the Soviet Union in its heyday. Instead, the Iranian government is solely motivated by a vision of Shia Islam forcibly dominating the world. Moreover, they believe that the “Twelfth Imam” will someday come to usher in the end times. An apocalyptic religious death cult is not a group you want possessing nuclear weapons, plain and simple.

8. Israel’s attacks have been limited to military and nuclear targets. Unlike the unguided missiles randomly launched at civilians in Israel by Iran, Hamas, and Hezbollah, Israel is not launching terror attacks against the civilian population in Iran.

9. There is a non-zero chance that Israel’s actions will result in an internal overthrow of the mullahs by peace-loving Persians, ending the threat this nation has represented to world peace since 1979, and helping Iran rejoin the family of nations.

In summary, Israel is putting its own blood and treasure on the line in a military effort that clearly and unequivocally serves the USA’s national interests.

Iran’s government (not its people) is a crazed long-term foe that is centered on apocalyptic religious zealotry and seeks capabilities that could literally end civilization.

Israel is doing the USA, the world, and civilized peoples everywhere a huge favor by eliminating that risk, and it is bearing the cost almost exclusively by itself. Israel is putting its civilian population at risk as a worldwide public service, truly. (Don’t believe me? Witness the Tel Aviv civilian apartment complex, wrecked a few days ago by unguided Iranian ballistic missiles.)

I salute Israel’s actions, and I do so as a patriotic American veteran who hates war. Eradicating Iran’s nuclear capability and military command and control infrastructure is for the benefit of Israel, of course. But it is also to the great benefit of the USA and all of humanity. It’s not a “useless, endless war.”

If you are someone who despises Israel for whatever reason, I urge you to consider this conflict objectively and realize what a great service Israel is doing for the USA.

Thank you, Israel.

***


Cynical Publius is the nom de plume of a retired U.S. Army colonel and veteran of Iraq and Afghanistan, who is now a practicing corporate law attorney. You can follow Cynical Publius on X at @CynicalPublius.

Source: https://amgreatness.com/2025/06/16/why-i-support-israels-recent-actions-in-iran/

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter

Redefining shock and awe: Lessons from Israel's opening strikes on Iran - opinion - John Spencer

 

by John Spencer

Israel didn’t just strike Iran. It disarmed, disoriented, and destabilized a much larger adversary before the war had even begun in earnest.

 

Israeli Air Force fighter jets seen ahead of Operation Rising Lion in Iran, June 13, 2025
Israeli Air Force fighter jets seen ahead of Operation Rising Lion in Iran, June 13, 2025
(photo credit: IDF SPOKESPERSON'S UNIT)

Imagine if Operation Overlord in World War II began with the elimination of Field Marshal Wilhelm Keitel, Chief of the German High Command; Heinrich Himmler, head of the SS; Field Marshal Erwin Rommel; numerous other senior generals; and the destruction of all of Germany’s air defenses, before a single Allied soldier landed on the beaches of Normandy. That’s not an exaggerated hypothetical. It’s a near-parallel to what Israel just did to Iran.

Israel’s war against Iran is still ongoing. But what has already unfolded will be studied for decades.

Israel's current military operation against Iran is officially called Operation Rising Lion, launched on June 13, 2025, with a sweeping and precise preemptive strike. The operation was not just historic. It was transformational. It redefined what shock and awe can look like in the 21st century.

This was not merely a strike. It was a campaign—a layered, synchronized demonstration of modern operational art, built on deep intelligence, strategic deception, and the innovative fusion of old and new tools of war. Here's what it teaches us.

Israeli Air Force fighter pilots embark to attack Iranian nuclear targets, June 15, 2025 (credit: IDF SPOKESPERSON'S UNIT)
Israeli Air Force fighter pilots embark to attack Iranian nuclear targets, June 15, 2025 (credit: IDF SPOKESPERSON'S UNIT)

Surprise as a core element of operational art

Israel’s campaign against Iran is a textbook case in modern operational art. It wasn’t just an airstrike. It was a synchronized, multi-domain offensive that combined cyber, human intelligence, electronic warfare, airpower, special operations, and psychological operations.

Israel achieved a surprise at the highest level. It launched a campaign that disrupted Iranian defenses before the first fighter jet even crossed the border. This is not warfare of the past. This is what large-scale, intelligence-driven combat looks like in 2025. The decisive moment in war often arrives long before the first bomb drops.

Deep intelligence penetration and human terrain dominance

Perhaps the most stunning revelation is the depth to which Mossad and Israeli intelligence had penetrated Iran’s inner military and nuclear circles. They not only knew where nuclear scientists and Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) commanders were located. They manipulated meeting schedules and lured multiple top generals into the same underground facility to be eliminated simultaneously.

Confirmed kills include Chief of Staff Maj. Gen. Mohammad Hossein Bagheri, IRGC Commander Maj. Gen. Hossein Salami, Khatam al-Anbia HQ Commander Maj. Gen. Gholam Ali Rashid, IRGC Aerospace Force Commander Maj. Gen. Amir Ali Hajizadeh, and nine nuclear scientists.

These were not replaceable figures. Many had served for decades and had no peer backups. Their loss was not just symbolic. It decapitated Iran’s ability to coordinate large-scale retaliation.

Additionally, Quds Force Commander Esmail Qaani was struck, along with over 20 senior commanders targeted and eliminated in the first night alone. This wasn’t just a blow. It was a beheading of Iran’s strategic brain trust.

Combined use of low-cost tech and high-end platforms

For months, Mossad smuggled hundreds of quadcopter drones into Iran. Smuggled piece by piece, hidden in suitcases, trucks, and shipping containers. These were assembled by trained teams inside the country and positioned near high-value targets: air defense sites, radar arrays, and mobile missile launcher zones.

This is a new model of saturation attack. Low-cost drones blind and disrupt. Then advanced platforms like F-35s and bunker busters follow in to strike deeply buried and hardened targets.

Ukraine pioneered this approach against Russian air bases. Israel just scaled it up strategically.

The drones blinded radar and communications, clearing corridors for strike aircraft

Teams targeted mobile missile launchers, knowing Iran had more missiles than launch vehicles. Israel attacked the bottleneck

Dozens of radar sites, launchers, and coordination hubs were destroyed before Iran could respond

This is how Israel achieved aerial freedom of action. Not by dominating all airspace, but by tactically disabling the systems that mattered most.

Air supremacy without traditional air superiority

Israel deployed approximately 200 aircraft during the first night of the operation. They operated for over two hours in Iranian airspace, including directly over Tehran. That is unprecedented in modern warfare.

How was this possible? Air defenses were blinded, radar jammers and cyber tools disrupted early warning systems, electronic warfare severed command coordination.

Israel created a temporary operational corridor. It neutralized Iran’s ability to track or respond without needing to control every piece of sky.

Crippling retaliation before it happened

Iran did respond, but the result fell far short of expectations. Why?

Israel had already targeted and neutralized the trucks, radars, and commanders who would have organized a more coordinated and lethal retaliation. The Iranian immediate response was not only limited. It was late, confused, and largely ineffective.

Israel’s opening strikes were not just about degrading Iran’s nuclear infrastructure. They were a deliberate campaign to suppress retaliation by eliminating missile trucks, communication networks, and key leadership before they could act. This wasn’t just precision warfare. It was a new model of deterrence.

Psychological and strategic effects

The impact was not only kinetic. It was psychological.

As former Mossad official Sima Shine said: “No one in Iran’s high command can be sure they are not known to Israeli intelligence or next on the list.”

That kind of uncertainty is debilitating. It generates fear and hesitation inside enemy leadership circles. It shifts the focus from offense to self-preservation. Israel seized the strategic initiative in every dimension—military, psychological, and political.

 IDF Chief-of-Staff Eyal Zamir speaks to Air Force personnel amid Israeli strikes on Iran, June 14, 2025 (credit: IDF SPOKESPERSON'S UNIT)
IDF Chief-of-Staff Eyal Zamir speaks to Air Force personnel amid Israeli strikes on Iran, June 14, 2025 (credit: IDF SPOKESPERSON'S UNIT)

What the US military should learn

Operation Rising Lion is more than a regional operation. It is a global case study in modern warfare. Key lessons for the US and other advanced militaries include:

Strategic success depends on integration, not scale. Decapitation of enemy leadership is not just possible, but now operationally viable. Commercial drone swarms are part of the opening act, not an afterthought. Suppressing the ability to retaliate can be more valuable than destroying offensive assets.

This is a shift in how deterrence and defense must be understood.

This is the future of war. It is multi-domain. It is preemptive. It is asymmetric. It is built on intelligence and designed for initiative.

Israel didn’t just strike Iran. It disarmed, disoriented, and destabilized a much larger adversary before the war had even begun in earnest.

Operation Rising Lion is a warning to adversaries and a blueprint for allies. With deep intelligence, strategic patience, and operational convergence, even the most fortified enemy can be cracked open.

The challenge for others is not to admire it from afar, but to understand it, internalize it, and adapt before the next war demands it.


John Spencer is the executive director of the Urban Warfare Institute. He is the coauthor of Understanding Urban Warfare. Learn more at www.johnspenceronline.com You can also follow him on 'X' at: @SpencerGuard. Substack: https://substack.com/@spencerguard

 

Source: https://www.jpost.com/opinion/article-857928

Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter