by Thomas Lifson
Thus, we have the spectacle of Harvard librarians rating political websites and warning away students and faculty, lest their minds become confused by viewpoints that might disturb the liberal mindset.
As someone who spent almost two decades at Harvard, first as a student and then as a member of the faculty, I am ashamed at how far an institution that proclaims “Truth” (“Veritas” in Latin) as its motto has fallen away from that mission. The Harvard University library system is now in the business of rating political publications and warning away students from polluting their minds with dissident information that might raise uncomfortable questions in Liberalville. Can’t have the youngsters questioning the orthodoxy of the Left!
Thus, we have the spectacle of Harvard librarians rating political websites and warning away students and faculty, lest their minds become confused by viewpoints that might disturb the liberal mindset. (For instance, remembering that when Bill Clinton fired all the US Attorneys, it was a normal “replacement,” but when Donald Trump did the same thing, it was an outrageous “ousting” of dedicated crime-fighters. Harvard undergraduates, too young to remember the Clinton firing, must be protected from viewpoints that might confuse them.)
This graphic published by the librarians ought to be a matter of shame for the university:
I am sorry, but this is dangerous nonsense. I was very grateful for the help that the staffs of several Harvard libraries (there are dozens of libraries at Harvard) gave me in my years there. They knew what their collections contained, and how to get ahold of even the most obscure items. But they always knew that they were in a service role, not in the role of determining what sources I should rely on. That was my job!
How about, when in doubt, read what they have to say, read others, and make up your mind? That was what I always did.
Consider this: the Harvard librarians do not trust students to make up their own minds. Instead, they find certain viewpoints dangerous, and want to make sure that youngsters are warned away from viewpoints dissenting from liberal orthodoxy.
In actuality, it is the job of librarians to collect, organize, and store source materials for students and scholars to use in their work. It is the job of scholars and students (not librarians) to evaluate those sources, and appropriately draw on them in their research and writing. At the mammoth Harvard University Library system, they seem to have forgotten this role distinction. In the age of Trump, the dangers of exposing bright young minds to information incompatible with the worldview of leftists is so great that the librarians took it upon themselves to warn away students before those viewpoints ever reach their eyes.
One of the websites the Harvard Librarians ban as “biased” is American Thinker. We have plenty of company on the right, much less on the Left. Doug Ross has collected the ratings for us and a number of our colleagues:
Missing from any hints of bias are the New York Times, NBC News, and pretty much everyone in the MSM.
This graphic published by the librarians ought to be a matter of shame for the university:
“When in doubt, ask a librarian”…because librarians are sophisticated consumers of political news, and because they have exhaustively researched each of the hundreds of websites they “rate”?
I am sorry, but this is dangerous nonsense. I was very grateful for the help that the staffs of several Harvard libraries (there are dozens of libraries at Harvard) gave me in my years there. They knew what their collections contained, and how to get ahold of even the most obscure items. But they always knew that they were in a service role, not in the role of determining what sources I should rely on. That was my job!
How about, when in doubt, read what they have to say, read others, and make up your mind? That was what I always did.
Consider this: the Harvard librarians do not trust students to make up their own minds. Instead, they find certain viewpoints dangerous, and want to make sure that youngsters are warned away from viewpoints dissenting from liberal orthodoxy.
In actuality, it is the job of librarians to collect, organize, and store source materials for students and scholars to use in their work. It is the job of scholars and students (not librarians) to evaluate those sources, and appropriately draw on them in their research and writing. At the mammoth Harvard University Library system, they seem to have forgotten this role distinction. In the age of Trump, the dangers of exposing bright young minds to information incompatible with the worldview of leftists is so great that the librarians took it upon themselves to warn away students before those viewpoints ever reach their eyes.
One of the websites the Harvard Librarians ban as “biased” is American Thinker. We have plenty of company on the right, much less on the Left. Doug Ross has collected the ratings for us and a number of our colleagues:
| Site | Harvard Labels | Real Description | ||
| americanthinker.com | bias | Political news and opinion liberals hate | ||
| AmmoLand.com | bias | Firearm news liberals hate | ||
| barenakedislam.com | hate | News about Isamic terror that liberals hate | ||
| breitbart.com | political | unreliable | bias | Political news and opinion liberals hate |
| canadafreepress.com | conspiracy | bias | Political news and opinion liberals hate | |
| centerforsecuritypolicy.org | bias | conspiracy | News about Isamic terror that liberals hate | |
| citizensunited.org | bias | Pro-free speech group that liberals hate | ||
| city-journal.org | political | Urban news that liberals hate | ||
| CNSNews.com | unreliable | bias | Political news and opinion liberals hate | |
| commentarymagazine.com | political | Political opinions that liberals hate | ||
| conservativereview.com | political | Pro-Constitution articles that liberals hate | ||
| counterjihad.com | bias | News about Isamic terror that liberals hate | ||
| dailycaller.com | political | clickbait | unreliable | Political news and opinion liberals hate |
| dailysignal.com | bias | Pro-Constitution articles that liberals hate | ||
| drudgereport.com | political | bias | Political news and opinion liberals hate | |
| familysecuritymatters.org | conspiracy | bias | News about Isamic terror that liberals hate | |
| FreeBeacon.com | bias | Political news and opinion liberals hate | ||
| freedomworks.org | political | Pro-Constitution articles that liberals hate | ||
| frontpagemag.com | bias | hate | News about Isamic terror that liberals hate | |
| gatesofvienna.net | hate | conspiracy | News about Isamic terror that liberals hate | |
| heartland.org | bias | Pro-business group that liberals hate | ||
| heritage.org | unknown | Pro-Constitution articles that liberals hate | ||
| jihadwatch.org | unknown | News about Isamic terror that liberals hate | ||
| judicialwatch.org | unknown | Pro-Constitution articles that liberals hate | ||
| lifenews.com | bias | clickbait | Pro-Life articles that liberals hate | |
| lifezette.com | clickbait | Pro-Life articles that liberals hate | ||
| nationalreview.com | unknown | Political news and opinion liberals hate | ||
| pamelageller.com | conspiracy | fake | bias | News about Isamic terror that liberals hate |
| PeakProsperity.com | unknown | Economic facts that liberals despise | ||
| pjmedia.com | unknown | Political news and opinion liberals hate | ||
| powerlineblog.com | unknown | Political news and opinion liberals hate | ||
| rightwingnews.com | bias | unreliable | Political news and opinion liberals hate | |
| ShadowStats.com | unknown | Economic facts that liberals despise | ||
| SteveQuayle.com | unknown | Political news and opinion liberals hate | ||
| theamericanmirror.com | unknown | Political news and opinion liberals hate | ||
| TheBurningPlatform.com | unknown | Economic facts that liberals despise | ||
| theconservativetreehouse.com | unknown | Political news and opinion liberals hate | ||
| theduran.com | unreliable | Political news and opinion liberals hate | ||
| thegatewaypundit.com | bias | conspiracy | unreliable | Political news and opinion liberals hate |
| theintercept.com | unknown | Political news and opinion liberals hate | ||
| therightscoop.com | fake | clickbait | Videos of news shows that liberals hate | |
| truepundit.com | bias | clickbait | Political news and opinion liberals hate | |
| twitchy.com | clickbait | rumor | Tweets that liberals hate | |
| unz.com | unknown | Politically incorrect articles that liberals hate | ||
| weaselzippers.us | unreliable | bias | Political news and opinion liberals hate | |
| weeklystandard.com | political | bias | Political news and opinion liberals hate | |
| westernjournalism.com | bias | clickbait | Political news and opinion liberals hate | |
| wikileaks.org | unknown | Government documents that liberals hate | ||
| wnd.com | bias | clickbait | unreliable | Political news and opinion liberals hate |
| zerohedge.com | conspiracy | Political news and opinion liberals hate | ||
Missing from any hints of bias are the New York Times, NBC News, and pretty much everyone in the MSM.
Thomas Lifson
Source: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2017/03/harvard_going_orwell_protecting_students_from_conservative_websites.html
Follow Middle East and Terrorism on Twitter
Copyright - Original materials copyright (c) by the authors.
No comments:
Post a Comment