by Richard C. Crandall
Examining Islamic teachings raises questions about their compatibility with America’s constitutional freedoms.
Elected Muslim politicians have been using the word Inshallah, which means “if God wills.” Although the phrase sounds harmless, what these politicians are saying is that they want everyone to live under Islamic domination, which is the will of the Islamic god.
Recently, both the Muslim congresswoman from Minnesota and the newly elected Muslim senator from Michigan used the word Inshallah. It is important to define Inshallah, since as the number of Muslim politicians at the local, state, and national levels grows, we will hear it more often. The word means “God willing” or “if God wills.” At first glance, this seems innocent enough—just another innocuous religious phrase. But perhaps we should ask, “What is the will of the Islamic god?”
Muhammad revealed the will of the Islamic god when he told his followers, “Allah has ordered me to fight against the people till they testify that none has the right to be worshiped but Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah.” Muhammad repeated the Islamic god’s will many times in slightly different forms. For example, “Jihad is to continue until all testify that none has the right to be worshipped but Allah, and that Muhammad is his Messenger.” In addition to Muhammad’s statements, the Koran contains similar verses detailing the Islamic god’s will. These verses instruct Muslims to fight non-Muslims until there is no disbelief, all worship is for the Islamic god, and it is acknowledged that Muhammad is his Messenger.
Now we know that the will of the Islamic god and of Muslim politicians is for everyone to live under Islamic domination, where the Islamic faith and law prevail. Under Islamic domination, individuals surrender and live in submission to the Islamic god. Although many believe that the word Islam means peace, it actually means surrender or submission. Those who have surrendered or submitted to the Islamic god are called Muslims, whom the Islamic god refers to as his slaves and whom he created to worship him.
How would the will of the Islamic god affect our constitutional rights?
The Declaration of Independence states, “All men are created equal.” In contemporary usage, “men” refers to both males and females. According to Muhammad, men excel over women; thus, Islam considers females to be beneath males, not equal to them. Additionally, Islam does not consider all males to be equal. Under Islam, Muslim males are superior to non-Muslim males.
The will of the Islamic god also has consequences for the Bill of Rights and the Constitution’s amendments.
The First Amendment addresses religion in two ways: the “Establishment” Clause and the “Free Exercise” Clause. The Establishment Clause prohibits a state-mandated religion. Under Islamic domination, Islam becomes the state-mandated religion. Muslims who leave Islam to exercise freedom of religion are apostates who deserve to be killed.
The First Amendment also protects freedom of speech. In Islam, severe penalties are imposed on those who exercise this freedom. Harsh punishments are prescribed for speech that offends the Islamic god or Muhammad. This is because apostasy includes more than leaving Islam. An apostate is also someone who speaks in a way that implies disbelief in Islam, reviles the Islamic god, denies the existence of the Islamic god, is sarcastic about the Islamic god, denies any part of the Koran, reviles Islam, is sarcastic about sharia, or denies that all should follow Islam. Those who criticize Islam are to be killed, maimed, or crucified. Muhammad personally ordered that people be killed for what they said, sang, or wrote about him or Islam.
The Second Amendment protects the right to bear arms. In Islam, it is illegal for non-Muslims to bear arms.
There are also problems with the Eighth Amendment, which prohibits cruel and unusual punishment, unless we consider amputation, crucifixion, flogging, stoning, and torture “usual” forms of punishment. The right hand is amputated for theft. The hand is then hung around the thief’s neck. For a second offense, the left foot is amputated. For the third offense, the left hand is amputated. For the fourth offense, the right foot is amputated. A fifth offense results in either death or imprisonment.
There is also the problem of the Thirteenth Amendment’s prohibition of slavery. Muhammad owned, traded, and raped slaves, and pious Muslims, if they want to go to paradise, are obligated to follow Muhammad’s behavior. Women who are captured become slaves, or “what the right hand possesses,” and can be legally raped by their owners. Since adultery is illegal in Islam, if the Muslim rapist is married, and his rape victim is also married, is the rapist guilty of adultery? Conveniently, within Islam, when married women are captured and become slaves, their marriages are annulled, which means the Muslim is a rapist, which is legal, but not an adulterer, which is illegal.
One example of Muhammad’s behavior toward slaves occurred when one of his followers captured “one of the prettiest girls in Arabia.” After seeing the girl, Muhammad told his followers to give her to him because she fascinated him. Muhammad’s follower didn’t want to give him the girl because he hadn’t had the opportunity to “disrobe” her. However, it was difficult to refuse the Prophet Muhammad’s request, so the man gave the girl to Muhammad, who later traded her for some Muslim prisoners. Muhammad did not obtain the girl to save her from rape, release her from slavery, or return her to her family. Instead, she was simply something for Muhammad to use sexually and commercially.
There is also a verse that approves the marriage of “pious, fit, and capable” slaves. Slaves were an important source of labor in Islam. Captives provided the largest share of slaves, but another source was the children of slaves.
The Fourteenth Amendment guarantees citizens equal protection under the law. Under Islamic rule, all non-Muslims must pay a tax so that they “feel themselves subdued.” They must live in designated areas of a city, generally the least desirable. Their homes must be inferior to those of Muslims, and their entrance doors must be low, so they must bend before entering. A non-Muslim male who marries or has sex with a Muslim woman is executed. Non-Muslims cannot carry weapons or ride horses or camels. They may ride donkeys outside a city, but sometimes they must ride backward. When approaching a Muslim, they must dismount the donkey and bow until the Muslim passes. Non-Muslims may pass Muslims only from the left, their unclean side. There are often clothing regulations distinguishing non-Muslims from Muslims. These restrictions are severe, causing non-Muslims to live in constant fear and under humiliating, oppressive conditions with few legal rights.
The Nineteenth Amendment gave women the right to vote. Since Muhammad said women are deficient in intelligence and compared them to nothing more than donkeys and dogs, it is doubtful that they will be given the right to vote.
The Twenty-first Amendment allows the manufacture, purchase, and consumption of alcohol. Alcohol is forbidden in Islam.
Before taking office, all members of Congress must take an oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies. The oath ends with “so help me God.” Muslims do not support the Constitution. Rather than defending it, they are the enemy attempting to destroy it. It would be a form of apostasy or disbelief for a Muslim to support and defend laws that conflict with sharia, such as those in the Constitution.
For an oath to be valid for Muslims, it must be made in the name of the Islamic god. Thus, saying “so help me God” rather than “so help me Allah” renders the oath invalid. Also, a Muslim can invalidate an oath by saying, mumbling, or thinking Inshallah.
Those who are to administer the oath of office to Muslims should refuse to do so because they are not taking it in good faith.
Image created using AI.
Richard C. Crandall taught at the university level for 50 years, during which he watched the once-proud discipline of sociology descend into a cesspool of liberal lies, indoctrination, and propaganda. Consequently, he is now in a recovery program for sociologists, which, unlike programs with a defined number of steps, is a never-ending walk of shame. Fortunately, the program includes wine. In addition to several articles, the author has written books on gerontology, running, Inuit art, and Islam. He is currently completing a book titled Islam: The Evil Among Us.
Source: https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2026/11/inshallah-coming-soon-to-a-community-near-you/
No comments:
Post a Comment